| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
TULSA SAN ANTONIO |
|
| 151.5 | 65 Final 69 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | TULSA | +100 | 604 | SAN ANTONIO | -120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in August or September games. (304-115 since 1997.) (72.6%, +91.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (225-77 since 1997.) (74.5%, +87.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (264-97 since 1997.) (73.1%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (228-81 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (221-76 since 1997.) (74.4%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss, in August or September games. (209-76 since 1997.) (73.3%, +71.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (188-65 since 1997.) (74.3%, +65.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (170-62 since 1997.) (73.3%, +60 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (124-80 since 1997.) (60.8%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, in August or September games. (123-41 since 1997.) (75%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games. (119-40 since 1997.) (74.8%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, in August or September games. (104-33 since 1997.) (75.9%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games. (100-33 since 1997.) (75.2%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in August or September games. (101-33 since 1997.) (75.4%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (97-52 since 1997.) (65.1%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (80-26 since 1997.) (75.5%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (83-29 since 1997.) (74.1%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (78-49 since 1997.) (61.4%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games. (34-21 since 1997.) (61.8%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (37-20 since 1997.) (64.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (42-15 since 1997.) (73.7%, +21.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Sunday games. (33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (24-4 since 1997.) (85.7%, +19.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games. (20-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home win, with a losing record. (65-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (260-120 since 1997.) (68.4%, +69 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (123-48 since 1997.) (71.9%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (146-55 since 1997.) (72.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (103-76 since 1997.) (57.5%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (86-29 since 1997.) (74.8%, +42.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (82-45 since 1997.) (64.6%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (53-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (71-40 since 1997.) (64%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (51-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (60-34 since 1997.) (63.8%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (36-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.3%, +28.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (83-50 since 1997.) (62.4%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (37-22 since 1997.) (62.7%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (28-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, -3.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (44-22 since 1997.) (66.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (154-91 since 1997.) (62.9%, +26.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (86-39 since 1997.) (68.8%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (46-18 since 1997.) (71.9%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (23-10 since 1997.) (69.7%, +25.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (118-70 since 1997.) (62.8%, +23.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (32-15 since 1997.) (68.1%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (34-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (40-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (30-14 since 1997.) (68.2%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, on Sunday games. (22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +11.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA | 78 | | 28-67 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 45 | 11 | 15 | SAN ANTONIO | 76 | | 30-70 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 11-16 | 72.3% | 44 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA won the game straight up 542 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 436 times. Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 6-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.6 | TULSA is 7-7 against the money line (+15.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 70.2, OPPONENT 74.5 | TULSA is 13-10 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 85.9, OPPONENT 84.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 45-43 against the money line (-30.7 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 28-67 against the money line (-58.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 77.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 26-49 against the money line (-24.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 38-61 against the money line (-31.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.0, OPPONENT 75.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 29-49 against the money line (-31.6 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.8, OPPONENT 75.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 9-22 against the money line (-16.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.0, OPPONENT 85.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 82-108 against the money line (-51.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 75.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 32-37 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.1, OPPONENT 80.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-11 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 73-112 against the money line (-51.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 74.5 |
|
TULSA is 2-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was TULSA 76.1, OPPONENT 85.5 | TULSA is 3-9 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was TULSA 76.5, OPPONENT 83.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 12-7 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.2, OPPONENT 78.8 |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 6-4 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 80.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-75 against the money line (-40.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-42 against the money line (-23.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-93 against the money line (-41.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 97-124 against the money line (-48.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 59-52 against the money line (-43.1 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-6 against the money line (-10.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-7 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 85-116 against the money line (-43.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 129-168 against the money line (-54.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-19 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 51-43 against the money line (-40.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 27-25 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 67-78 against the money line (-32.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 96-114 against the money line (-45.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 30-31 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 9-12 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 74.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 163-213 against the money line (-67.2 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 73-52 against the money line (-40.8 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 96-91 against the money line (-47.1 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 74-67 against the money line (-43.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-21 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 94-137 against the money line (-57.0 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 75-117 against the money line (-53.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 86-122 against the money line (-56.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after a game - shooting 35% or lower, allowing 50% or higher since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 66.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 48-72 against the money line (-37.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 39-66 against the money line (-44.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-6 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in home games off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-18 against the money line (-14.2 Units) off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 79-111 against the money line (-47.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 47-57 against the money line (-29.0 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-10 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 75-105 against the money line (-45.5 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 83-120 against the money line (-43.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 1-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 74.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.7, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-14 | -0.5 | 12-9 | 12-9 | 77.8 | 37.6 | 40.3% | 41.3 | 80.6 | 39.5 | 45.7% | 44.2 | Road Games | 2-8 | -0.7 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 72.8 | 36.1 | 37.9% | 39.5 | 80.1 | 39.3 | 47.0% | 44.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.7 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 79.2 | 38.4 | 46.0% | 44.4 | 68.0 | 31.6 | 37.8% | 40.0 | Division Games | 4-6 | +4.1 | 8-2 | 7-3 | 81.9 | 38.5 | 44.2% | 38.8 | 81.1 | 39.1 | 47.1% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.8 | 37.6 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 17-21 | 78.6% | 41 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.7 | 37.3 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 5-14 | 31.6% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.8 | 36.1 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 6-20 | 30.2% | 17-21 | 81.2% | 39 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.6 | 39.5 | 30-66 | 45.7% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-20 | 76.2% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 4-14 | 31.9% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.1 | 39.3 | 30-65 | 47.0% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 14-19 | 76.3% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 16 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-13 | 0 | 8-11 | 6-13 | 71.6 | 35.3 | 39.3% | 40.7 | 79.9 | 38.7 | 46.2% | 44.9 | Home Games | 4-5 | +0.4 | 4-5 | 2-7 | 73.3 | 36.3 | 40.8% | 42.0 | 75.0 | 38.4 | 42.1% | 44.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 64.6 | 33.2 | 36.9% | 45.0 | 72.6 | 36.6 | 42.3% | 45.6 | Division Games | 2-7 | +1 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 72.7 | 34.8 | 40.2% | 38.8 | 85.3 | 39.8 | 50.1% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.6 | 35.3 | 28-70 | 39.3% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 11-15 | 72.3% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 37.9 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-15 | 31.7% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.3 | 36.3 | 28-68 | 40.8% | 5-16 | 31.7% | 13-18 | 73.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.9 | 38.7 | 31-66 | 46.2% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 15-18 | 82.1% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.9 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 15-20 | 78.4% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.0 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 4-15 | 26.5% | 15-19 | 82.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 72, SAN ANTONIO 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/28/2013 | @ INDIANA | 69-80 | L | +135 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 13 | 6/30/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 61-84 | L | +145 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | 7/2/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-88 | L | +180 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | 7/11/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 78-94 | L | +280 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | 7/13/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75-86 | L | +350 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 36 | 15 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 43 | 15 | 7/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 86-59 | W | +180 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 36 | 17 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 32 | 19 | 7/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 64-58 | W | +100 | 25-75 | 33.3% | 66 | 24 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 15 | 7/21/2013 | ATLANTA | 90-63 | W | +175 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 8 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 47 | 8 | 7/25/2013 | INDIANA | 60-71 | L | -165 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 34 | 19 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 18 | 8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 96-89 | W | +280 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | 8/4/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/25/2013 | PHOENIX | 77-83 | L | +180 | 30-83 | 36.1% | 41 | 7 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 56 | 12 | 6/30/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 67-93 | L | +550 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 32 | 21 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 45 | 18 | 7/6/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 66-93 | L | +550 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 15 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 43 | 12 | 7/10/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 88-80 | W | +350 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 35 | 12 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 35 | 17 | 7/12/2013 | WASHINGTON | 73-83 | L | -165 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 33 | 7 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 51 | 16 | 7/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 84-86 | L | +250 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 46 | 14 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 7 | 7/16/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-86 | L | +220 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 16 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 48 | 10 | 7/19/2013 | MINNESOTA | 71-87 | L | +375 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 44 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 40 | 12 | 7/20/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 60-52 | W | -115 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 16 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 11 | 7/25/2013 | NEW YORK | 65-53 | W | -140 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 52 | 13 | 16-60 | 26.7% | 48 | 16 | 8/2/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-85 | L | | 25-73 | 34.2% | 39 | 13 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 46 | 11 | 8/4/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/17/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
TULSA is 19-18 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
TULSA is 11-7 (+10.8 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 1-0 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/16/2012 | TULSA | 80 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 41 | 7 | 18 | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | -13.5 | Under | 44 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 37 | 9 | 15 | 9/12/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 78 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 42 | 8 | 14 | | TULSA | 67 | 162 | Under | 27 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 38 | 9 | 13 | 8/25/2012 | TULSA | 71 | 158.5 | Over | 38 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 3-4 | 75.0% | 29 | 6 | 14 | | SAN ANTONIO | 91 | -16 | SU ATS | 50 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 48 | 16 | 9 | 8/17/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 89 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 42 | 8 | 16 | | TULSA | 79 | 163.5 | Over | 46 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 34 | 6 | 15 | 5/19/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 88 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 47 | 12 | 24 | | TULSA | 79 | 150.5 | Over | 42 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 36 | 12 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Gary is 6-4 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 80.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 128-143 against the money line (-33.4 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 78-48 against the money line (-27.0 Units) as a favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 57-37 against the money line (-29.3 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 73-62 against the money line (-30.7 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 64-53 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-59 against the money line (-40.1 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 75-87 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 60-75 against the money line (-27.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 68-79 against the money line (-33.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-50 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 35-44 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 61-78 against the money line (-31.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-52 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-37 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 23-30 against the money line (-25.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 60-68 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 60-76 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 25-20 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-61 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 75-79 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 31-25 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 63-63 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 93-93 against the money line (-34.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 35-46 against the money line (-22.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 53-70 against the money line (-37.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 66-78 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 101-112 against the money line (-33.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-12 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 85-76 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 49-46 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 56-61 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 82-87 against the money line (-31.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 24-25 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Gary is 1-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 74.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 21-6 against the money line (+13.0 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 36-32 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 28 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 22 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 4 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 08/02/2013 - Delisha Milton-Jones "?" Sunday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Knee ) | [G] 07/08/2013 - Becky Hammon out for season ( Knee ) | [F] 05/23/2013 - Sophia Young out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/11/2024 10:51:43 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|