| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
First Half Results
TULSA |
|
|
81.5
| 43
Final
39 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | |
|
 - Road favorites vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(51-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(119-62 since 1997.) (65.7%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(91-47 since 1997.) (65.9%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(53-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(98-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(74-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(60-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +36.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(45-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(105-63 since 1997.) (62.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(121-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(62-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(447-315 since 1997.) (58.7%, +100.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in May, June, or July games.
(946-741 since 1997.) (56.1%, +130.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a division game.
(935-727 since 1997.) (56.3%, +135.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(389-295 since 1997.) (56.9%, +64.5 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(273-199 since 1997.) (57.8%, +54.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(58-32 since 1997.) (64.4%, +22.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(501-371 since 1997.) (57.5%, +92.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(180-110 since 1997.) (62.1%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(125-74 since 1997.) (62.8%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a win against a division rival, on Thursday nights.
(82-43 since 1997.) (65.6%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a home win, on Thursday nights.
(64-31 since 1997.) (67.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(109-68 since 1997.) (61.6%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(116-74 since 1997.) (61.1%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a win by 6 points or less.
(250-169 since 1997.) (59.7%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(161-104 since 1997.) (60.8%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(733-562 since 1997.) (56.6%, +114.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(388-271 since 1997.) (58.9%, +89.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(248-167 since 1997.) (59.8%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(31-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in July games.
(447-315 since 1997.) (58.7%, +100.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in May, June, or July games.
(946-741 since 1997.) (56.1%, +130.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season.
(126-75 since 1997.) (62.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(56-27 since 1997.) (67.5%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(681-487 since 1997.) (58.3%, +145.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(219-119 since 1997.) (64.8%, +88.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(384-250 since 1997.) (60.6%, +109 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(458-330 since 1997.) (58.1%, +95 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(154-91 since 1997.) (62.9%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(161-93 since 1997.) (63.4%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(282-195 since 1997.) (59.1%, +67.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in July games.
(97-57 since 1997.) (63%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in May, June, or July games.
(171-114 since 1997.) (60%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(109-62 since 1997.) (63.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(187-125 since 1997.) (59.9%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(151-96 since 1997.) (61.1%, +45.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - off a win against a division rival.
(464-332 since 1997.) (58.3%, +98.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - off a win against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(279-200 since 1997.) (58.2%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(270-184 since 1997.) (59.5%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(750-552 since 1997.) (57.6%, +142.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(287-171 since 1997.) (62.7%, +98.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(475-328 since 1997.) (59.2%, +114.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(436-319 since 1997.) (57.7%, +85.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(152-78 since 1997.) (66.1%, +66.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(264-176 since 1997.) (60%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(87-45 since 1997.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games.
(129-68 since 1997.) (65.5%, +54.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(213-147 since 1997.) (59.2%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(773-539 since 1997.) (58.9%, +180.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(245-147 since 1997.) (62.5%, +83.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(499-348 since 1997.) (58.9%, +116.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, on Thursday nights.
(123-77 since 1997.) (61.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(116-73 since 1997.) (61.4%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(449-299 since 1997.) (60%, +120.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(293-193 since 1997.) (60.3%, +80.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(186-127 since 1997.) (59.4%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(203-128 since 1997.) (61.3%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 82 | | 42 | | 31-69 | 45.3% | 4-14 | 30.6% | 15-21 | 72.8% | 44 | 12 | 15 | | TULSA | 84 | | 43 | | 30-70 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 18-23 | 78.5% | 44 | 13 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 615 times, while ATLANTA covered the first half line 351 times.
Edge against first half line=TULSA | In 1000 simulated games, 598 games went over first half total, while 358 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.3, OPPONENT 43.2 | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 43.7 | TULSA is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 44.0 | TULSA is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 45.9 | TULSA is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 43.6 | TULSA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 44.1 | TULSA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.9, OPPONENT 45.5 |
|
ATLANTA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.6, OPPONENT 40.9 | ATLANTA is 15-30 against the 1rst half line (-18.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.1, OPPONENT 42.6 | ATLANTA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in road games when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.8, OPPONENT 44.7 | ATLANTA is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.9, OPPONENT 40.3 |
|
ATLANTA is 97-55 OVER (+36.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.8, OPPONENT 42.5 | ATLANTA is 72-31 OVER (+37.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 44.0 | ATLANTA is 106-57 OVER (+43.3 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.2, OPPONENT 41.3 | ATLANTA is 94-44 OVER (+45.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.2, OPPONENT 40.7 | TULSA is 71-40 OVER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 45.0 | TULSA is 70-33 OVER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 44.2 | TULSA is 50-20 OVER (+28.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 41.5, OPPONENT 43.8 | TULSA is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 43.7, OPPONENT 43.0 |
|
| | | | |
|
ATLANTA is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 7-15 against the 1rst half line (-9.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 5-16 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.3, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.2, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.5, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.5, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 33-21 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.3, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.9, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.7, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 16-4 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.5, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.4, OPPONENT 46.2 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 23-10 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 18-33 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 4-17 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 36.3, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-15 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in July games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) as a home underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 43.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 39-26 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.0, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.0, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.7, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 19-6 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.4, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-2 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 48.8 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.6, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 16-9 | -5.2 | 12-12 | 14-11 | 82.2 | 41.4 | 43.8% | 46.0 | 77.9 | 39.3 | 42.6% | 43.4 | | Road Games | 5-6 | -4.8 | 4-7 | 6-5 | 81.1 | 42.3 | 42.4% | 44.2 | 81.7 | 40.8 | 44.3% | 44.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -8.2 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 82.8 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 41.2 | 85.0 | 44.0 | 45.6% | 46.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.2 | 41.4 | 31-71 | 43.8% | 4-15 | 29.1% | 16-21 | 72.7% | 46 | 12 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.5 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 15-20 | 77.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.1 | 42.3 | 31-72 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 15-20 | 73.1% | 44 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 11 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.9 | 39.3 | 29-67 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 36.8% | 15-20 | 75.6% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.7 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 7-16 | 41.4% | 15-20 | 76.9% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 18 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-17 | -5.8 | 16-10 | 19-8 | 82.5 | 38.8 | 43.3% | 43.1 | 83.9 | 42.6 | 47.0% | 39.8 | | Home Games | 7-7 | -0.2 | 8-6 | 8-6 | 81.7 | 39.9 | 42.3% | 43.0 | 79.9 | 42.0 | 46.7% | 38.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-0 | 3-2 | 84.8 | 35.4 | 43.9% | 43.4 | 82.0 | 41.6 | 46.4% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.5 | 38.8 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 17-22 | 77.4% | 43 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.7 | 39.9 | 28-67 | 42.3% | 5-18 | 29.3% | 20-24 | 80.7% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.9 | 42.6 | 31-65 | 47.0% | 4-12 | 36.4% | 18-22 | 80.9% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.9 | 38.7 | 29-65 | 44.7% | 5-14 | 34.6% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.9 | 42.0 | 29-63 | 46.7% | 4-11 | 35.1% | 17-21 | 80.4% | 38 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70, TULSA 71 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/22/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 78-85 | 40-38 | -2.5 | L | 75 | O | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | | 6/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-79 | 45-42 | -1.5 | W | 80.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | | 6/29/2014 | @ INDIANA | 76-68 | 40-37 | -1.5 | W | 77 | P | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | | 7/1/2014 | INDIANA | 70-77 | 34-40 | -4 | L | 75.5 | U | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | | 7/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 86-73 | 40-40 | -5 | L | 76 | O | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | | 7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 83-71 | 39-31 | -5 | W | 79 | U | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | | 7/12/2014 | @ INDIANA | 93-74 | 55-34 | -1 | W | 75.5 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 81-79 | 42-46 | -3.5 | L | 78.5 | O | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | 40-45 | -3 | L | 76 | O | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 108-112 | 48-52 | 2.5 | L | 81 | O | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 75-79 | 29-43 | -5 | L | 79 | U | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-77 | 38-39 | -1.5 | L | 77.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-80 | 44-41 | -5 | L | 77 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 49 | 14 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 43 | 12 | | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 105-99 | 38-48 | 1.5 | L | 79 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 42 | 14 | | 6/25/2014 | @ INDIANA | 107-102 | 36-51 | 2.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | | 6/28/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 89-92 | 32-47 | -0.5 | L | 79 | P | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 77-80 | 37-31 | 2.5 | W | 81.5 | U | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | | 7/1/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 74-90 | 35-46 | 1.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | | 7/3/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-83 | 43-40 | 2 | W | 79 | O | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | | 7/5/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 76-78 | 35-37 | -2 | L | 81.5 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | | 7/8/2014 | INDIANA | 76-78 | 34-41 | -0.5 | L | 76 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | | 7/10/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-91 | 49-55 | 1.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | | 7/12/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74-91 | 42-55 | -2 | L | 76.5 | O | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | | 7/16/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 82-93 | 39-40 | 5 | W | 82.5 | U | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | | 7/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 95-90 | 38-45 | -0.5 | L | 79 | O | 30-60 | 50.0% | 43 | 10 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 29 | 12 | | 7/22/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 93-95 | 34-37 | 2 | L | 80.5 | U | 37-71 | 52.1% | 31 | 8 | 38-70 | 54.3% | 41 | 9 | | 7/25/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 77-82 | 37-49 | 2.5 | L | 80 | O | 30-84 | 35.7% | 52 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 52 | 14 | | 7/27/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-69 | 33-41 | -1 | L | 80.5 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 50 | 12 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 12 | | 7/29/2014 | SEATTLE | 80-74 | 35-36 | -2.5 | L | 75 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 30 | 14 | | 7/31/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 10-6 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 12 of 16 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 2-1 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| ATLANTA is 7-1 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 6 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/21/2013 | ATLANTA | 63 | -5 | Under | 35 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 0-17 | 0.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 47 | 14 | 8 | | | TULSA | 90 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 44 | 8 | 8 | 5/25/2013 | TULSA | 81 | 156.5 | Over | 44 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 28-30 | 93.3% | 37 | 9 | 22 | | | ATLANTA | 98 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 44 | 12 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in July games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-17 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 36.3, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-15 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-16 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Michael is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 32.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 40-60 against the 1rst half line (-26.0 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 33.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.2, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.5, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in home games off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 41.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.7, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.7, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 37-20 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 10-0 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 31.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 27-11 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 29-14 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 34-17 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 32.5, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 15-3 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 31.7, OPPONENT 28.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 12-1 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 29.0, OPPONENT 27.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 59 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 58 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 11 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 7 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 10 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 4 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 7:14:26 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|