| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
INDIANA
First Half Results
SEATTLE |
|
|
70.5
| 28
Final
31 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | INDIANA | -1.5 | | 608 | SEATTLE | 69.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(78-40 since 1997.) (66.1%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(39-12 since 1997.) (76.5%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
 - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record.
(288-189 since 1997.) (60.4%, +80.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record, in July games.
(112-60 since 1997.) (65.1%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record, in May, June, or July games.
(175-111 since 1997.) (61.2%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(193-122 since 1997.) (61.3%, +58.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Thursday nights.
(35-11 since 1997.) (76.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(135-80 since 1997.) (62.8%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(83-43 since 1997.) (65.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(435-241 since 1997.) (64.3%, +169.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(176-101 since 1997.) (63.5%, +64.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(121-69 since 1997.) (63.7%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(84-46 since 1997.) (64.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in July games.
(275-160 since 1997.) (63.2%, +99 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games.
(563-365 since 1997.) (60.7%, +161.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - on Thursday nights.
(131-71 since 1997.) (64.9%, +52.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game.
(552-345 since 1997.) (61.5%, +172.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(217-128 since 1997.) (62.9%, +76.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(373-239 since 1997.) (60.9%, +110.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, on Thursday nights.
(53-22 since 1997.) (70.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(112-61 since 1997.) (64.7%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(58-26 since 1997.) (69%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(110-67 since 1997.) (62.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(217-139 since 1997.) (61%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(175-106 since 1997.) (62.3%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(157-100 since 1997.) (61.1%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games.
(322-213 since 1997.) (60.2%, +87.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, after a division game.
(201-123 since 1997.) (62%, +65.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(380-248 since 1997.) (60.5%, +107.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(57-26 since 1997.) (68.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(155-93 since 1997.) (62.5%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(112-63 since 1997.) (64%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(156-86 since 1997.) (64.5%, +61.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(275-153 since 1997.) (64.3%, +106.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(118-64 since 1997.) (64.8%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(88-46 since 1997.) (65.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss against a division rival.
(101-59 since 1997.) (63.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss against a division rival.
(72-38 since 1997.) (65.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss.
(101-51 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(305-167 since 1997.) (64.6%, +121.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(143-75 since 1997.) (65.6%, +60.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(113-61 since 1997.) (64.9%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(70-33 since 1997.) (68%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(118-67 since 1997.) (63.8%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(87-45 since 1997.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(120-62 since 1997.) (65.9%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(338-186 since 1997.) (64.5%, +133.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(140-79 since 1997.) (63.9%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(128-72 since 1997.) (64%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(99-52 since 1997.) (65.6%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(137-69 since 1997.) (66.5%, +61.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in July games.
(447-315 since 1997.) (58.7%, +100.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games.
(946-741 since 1997.) (56.1%, +130.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a division game.
(935-727 since 1997.) (56.3%, +135.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(364-255 since 1997.) (58.8%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(239-159 since 1997.) (60.1%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(32-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.2%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(745-532 since 1997.) (58.3%, +159.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(333-232 since 1997.) (58.9%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(106-61 since 1997.) (63.5%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(549-408 since 1997.) (57.4%, +100.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(257-179 since 1997.) (58.9%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(535-378 since 1997.) (58.6%, +119.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(272-186 since 1997.) (59.4%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(123-79 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(100-57 since 1997.) (63.7%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(589-412 since 1997.) (58.8%, +135.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(269-184 since 1997.) (59.4%, +66.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(229-155 since 1997.) (59.6%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival.
(268-173 since 1997.) (60.8%, +77.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a road loss against a division rival.
(185-110 since 1997.) (62.7%, +64 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a road loss against a division rival, in July games.
(56-21 since 1997.) (72.7%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a road loss against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(113-67 since 1997.) (62.8%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a road loss.
(254-166 since 1997.) (60.5%, +71.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a road loss, in July games.
(78-37 since 1997.) (67.8%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(342-226 since 1997.) (60.2%, +93.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(137-80 since 1997.) (63.1%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(65-28 since 1997.) (69.9%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(394-283 since 1997.) (58.2%, +82.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in July games.
(144-87 since 1997.) (62.3%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(230-155 since 1997.) (59.7%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(228-145 since 1997.) (61.1%, +68.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(130-75 since 1997.) (63.4%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(311-206 since 1997.) (60.2%, +84.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(179-111 since 1997.) (61.7%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(315-198 since 1997.) (61.4%, +97.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(185-107 since 1997.) (63.4%, +67.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(66-31 since 1997.) (68%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, in July games.
(51-24 since 1997.) (68%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(85-49 since 1997.) (63.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - averaging 37 or less rebounds/game on the season.
(62-21 since 1997.) (74.7%, +38.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - averaging 37 or less rebounds/game on the season, in July games.
(29-6 since 1997.) (82.9%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - averaging 37 or less rebounds/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(126-75 since 1997.) (62.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season, in July games.
(52-24 since 1997.) (68.4%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(54-23 since 1997.) (70.1%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(86-41 since 1997.) (67.7%, +40.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after playing a road game.
(414-279 since 1997.) (59.7%, +107.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(392-264 since 1997.) (59.8%, +101.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(205-127 since 1997.) (61.7%, +65.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(184-119 since 1997.) (60.7%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(107-61 since 1997.) (63.7%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(54-24 since 1997.) (69.2%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(396-268 since 1997.) (59.6%, +101.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games.
(129-71 since 1997.) (64.5%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses.
(199-129 since 1997.) (60.7%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - off a road loss against a division rival, in July games.
(87-45 since 1997.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - off a road loss, in July games.
(128-69 since 1997.) (65%, +52.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(161-104 since 1997.) (60.8%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - averaging 37 or less rebounds/game on the season.
(75-30 since 1997.) (71.4%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - averaging 37 or less rebounds/game on the season, in July games.
(33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - averaging 37 or less rebounds/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games.
(217-145 since 1997.) (59.9%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - in July games.
(275-160 since 1997.) (63.2%, +99 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - in May, June, or July games.
(563-365 since 1997.) (60.7%, +161.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - on Thursday nights.
(131-71 since 1997.) (64.9%, +52.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after a non-conference game.
(355-212 since 1997.) (62.6%, +121.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(321-225 since 1997.) (58.8%, +73.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(210-138 since 1997.) (60.3%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(213-139 since 1997.) (60.5%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(157-100 since 1997.) (61.1%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(94-51 since 1997.) (64.8%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - in non-conference games.
(322-213 since 1997.) (60.2%, +87.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, after a non-conference game.
(210-125 since 1997.) (62.7%, +72.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(369-255 since 1997.) (59.1%, +88.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(246-165 since 1997.) (59.9%, +64.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(296-181 since 1997.) (62.1%, +96.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - in July games.
(447-315 since 1997.) (58.7%, +100.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - in May, June, or July games.
(946-741 since 1997.) (56.1%, +130.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after a non-conference game.
(597-429 since 1997.) (58.2%, +125.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(98-54 since 1997.) (64.5%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(67-32 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(306-204 since 1997.) (60%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(406-285 since 1997.) (58.8%, +92.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in July games.
(131-82 since 1997.) (61.5%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(229-155 since 1997.) (59.6%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(305-206 since 1997.) (59.7%, +78.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(177-114 since 1997.) (60.8%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(415-298 since 1997.) (58.2%, +87.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(411-249 since 1997.) (62.3%, +137.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(172-76 since 1997.) (69.4%, +88.4 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(261-147 since 1997.) (64%, +99.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, on Thursday nights.
(66-30 since 1997.) (68.8%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(258-158 since 1997.) (62%, +84.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(391-267 since 1997.) (59.4%, +97.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(137-77 since 1997.) (64%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(226-140 since 1997.) (61.7%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Thursday nights.
(76-30 since 1997.) (71.7%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after playing a road game.
(394-263 since 1997.) (60%, +104.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after playing 3 consecutive road games.
(73-39 since 1997.) (65.2%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(189-101 since 1997.) (65.2%, +77.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(71-30 since 1997.) (70.3%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(117-58 since 1997.) (66.9%, +53.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(70-30 since 1997.) (70%, +37 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(146-78 since 1997.) (65.2%, +60.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(60-24 since 1997.) (71.4%, +33.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(94-45 since 1997.) (67.6%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(55-27 since 1997.) (67.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(109-53 since 1997.) (67.3%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(65-27 since 1997.) (70.7%, +35.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(438-247 since 1997.) (63.9%, +166.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(168-108 since 1997.) (60.9%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (INDIANA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(213-132 since 1997.) (61.7%, +67.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(750-552 since 1997.) (57.6%, +142.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(287-171 since 1997.) (62.7%, +98.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(475-328 since 1997.) (59.2%, +114.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after playing a road game.
(663-521 since 1997.) (56%, +89.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after playing 3 consecutive road games.
(121-76 since 1997.) (61.4%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(299-210 since 1997.) (58.7%, +68 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(108-61 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(180-118 since 1997.) (60.4%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(137-90 since 1997.) (60.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(161-104 since 1997.) (60.8%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(93-55 since 1997.) (62.8%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(735-516 since 1997.) (58.8%, +167.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(133-74 since 1997.) (64.3%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (INDIANA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(366-262 since 1997.) (58.3%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| INDIANA | 73 | | 37 | | 27-63 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 14-19 | 75.7% | 41 | 10 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 73 | | 37 | Over | 26-60 | 44.0% | 6-17 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 39 | 8 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE covered the first half line 596 times, while INDIANA covered the first half line 404 times.
Edge against first half line=SEATTLE | In 1000 simulated games, 658 games went over first half total, while 342 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.6, OPPONENT 33.6 | INDIANA is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 41.5, OPPONENT 37.9 |
|
SEATTLE is 26-10 against the 1rst half line (+15.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.2 |
|
INDIANA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.5, OPPONENT 38.4 | SEATTLE is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 37.7 |
|
INDIANA is 96-60 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 33.2 | INDIANA is 46-26 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.3, OPPONENT 34.7 | INDIANA is 71-47 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 34.1 | INDIANA is 57-37 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.7, OPPONENT 35.5 | INDIANA is 85-60 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.9 | INDIANA is 70-47 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.5, OPPONENT 33.9 | INDIANA is 172-130 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.7, OPPONENT 34.0 | INDIANA is 36-19 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.2, OPPONENT 34.9 | INDIANA is 161-121 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 34.1 | INDIANA is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.9, OPPONENT 34.8 | SEATTLE is 133-80 UNDER (+45.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 88-54 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.3 | SEATTLE is 104-45 UNDER (+54.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 33.7 | SEATTLE is 79-45 UNDER (+29.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 34.7 | SEATTLE is 105-64 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 34.5 | SEATTLE is 164-99 UNDER (+55.1 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 123-91 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.9 | SEATTLE is 102-57 UNDER (+39.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 33.1 | SEATTLE is 183-102 UNDER (+70.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 33.9 |
|
| | | | |
|
INDIANA is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.2, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 119-89 against the 1rst half line (+21.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 33-15 against the 1rst half line (+16.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 21-7 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 82-48 against the 1rst half line (+29.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 31-17 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 166-131 against the 1rst half line (+21.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 236-191 against the 1rst half line (+25.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 36.0, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 36.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-12 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 28-10 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 31.6, OPPONENT 30.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 37-17 against the 1rst half line (+18.3 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 31.2, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 41-16 against the 1rst half line (+23.4 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 37.2, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 46-28 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 31-16 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 133-91 UNDER (+32.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 43-24 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.5, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.6, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 122-88 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 120-89 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 47-26 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 62-38 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 176-129 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 166-131 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 244-183 UNDER (+42.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 68-42 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.0, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 31.6, OPPONENT 30.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 35-18 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 31.2, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.2, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 67-44 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.5, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 152-116 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 121-86 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 165-124 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 162-120 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 242-164 UNDER (+61.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 69-40 UNDER (+25.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 154-101 UNDER (+42.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 62-45 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 37.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 35.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 90-65 against the 1rst half line (+18.5 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.1, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 69-43 against the 1rst half line (+21.7 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 136-103 against the 1rst half line (+22.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was INDIANA 38.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 30-17 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.5, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 94-57 against the 1rst half line (+31.3 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.3, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 130-97 against the 1rst half line (+23.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 144-111 against the 1rst half line (+21.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 65-43 against the 1rst half line (+17.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.5, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 39.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 69-41 against the 1rst half line (+23.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 36-14 against the 1rst half line (+20.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 30.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 65-44 against the 1rst half line (+16.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 40.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 38.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 307-231 UNDER (+52.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 33.0, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 163-105 UNDER (+47.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 31-18 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 98-56 UNDER (+36.4 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.1, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 35.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 50-22 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 37-21 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 119-71 UNDER (+40.9 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 111-73 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 50-29 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 144-96 UNDER (+38.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 85-60 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 33.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 119-71 UNDER (+40.9 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 92-66 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 123-80 UNDER (+35.0 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.6, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 38-20 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 108-77 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 36.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 33.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 137-91 UNDER (+36.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 119-76 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 31.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 30-12 UNDER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 32.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 152-109 UNDER (+32.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 76-48 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 34.7, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 137-105 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 35.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 37-24 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 28-17 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 147-112 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 28-15 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 46-28 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 160-107 UNDER (+42.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 155-112 UNDER (+31.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.0, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 64-42 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-7 UNDER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-4 UNDER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 23-9 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 34-17 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 26-8 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 12-14 | +0.1 | 15-11 | 14-12 | 75.1 | 36.7 | 42.1% | 40.1 | 76.5 | 36.1 | 43.9% | 41.6 | | Road Games | 7-6 | +5.6 | 9-4 | 8-5 | 73.5 | 36.2 | 41.3% | 40.3 | 75.0 | 35.1 | 43.0% | 42.3 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 73.0 | 36.6 | 45.0% | 38.8 | 71.0 | 33.8 | 41.3% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.1 | 36.7 | 27-63 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 34.9% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.4 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.5 | 36.2 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 4-14 | 30.8% | 17-22 | 75.8% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 23 | 9 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.5 | 36.1 | 27-62 | 43.9% | 4-13 | 30.3% | 18-23 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.3 | 38.9 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.0 | 35.1 | 26-61 | 43.0% | 3-12 | 22.9% | 19-25 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-19 | -7.1 | 9-18 | 15-12 | 70.7 | 34.0 | 43.3% | 35.9 | 76.0 | 36.7 | 45.8% | 39.3 | | Home Games | 5-7 | -1.8 | 3-9 | 7-4 | 72.2 | 34.8 | 43.1% | 37.5 | 77.1 | 39.2 | 46.2% | 39.9 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6.4 | 0-5 | 4-1 | 71.4 | 36.2 | 43.3% | 35.4 | 83.2 | 39.8 | 48.7% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.7 | 34.0 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 13-16 | 79.3% | 36 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.2 | 38.9 | 29-67 | 44.0% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.2 | 34.8 | 27-62 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 13-16 | 76.6% | 37 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 36.7 | 29-64 | 45.8% | 4-12 | 32.3% | 14-17 | 81.2% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.6 | 39.6 | 30-67 | 44.9% | 5-13 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.1 | 39.2 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 5-12 | 36.7% | 13-16 | 78.8% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 69.7, SEATTLE 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-83 | 41-35 | 5.5 | W | 74.5 | O | 26-70 | 37.1% | 37 | 16 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 34 | 19 | | 6/25/2014 | TULSA | 102-107 | 51-36 | -2.5 | W | 74.5 | O | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | | 6/27/2014 | PHOENIX | 76-81 | 42-33 | 3 | W | 78.5 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 46 | 17 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 30 | 7 | | 6/29/2014 | ATLANTA | 68-76 | 37-40 | 1.5 | L | 77 | P | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | | 7/1/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 77-70 | 40-34 | 4 | W | 75.5 | U | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | | 7/2/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-77 | 42-29 | 2 | W | 71 | P | 31-59 | 52.5% | 38 | 17 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 37 | 14 | | 7/5/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 70-71 | 34-38 | -2 | L | 74.5 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 14 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | | 7/8/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-76 | 41-34 | 0.5 | W | 76 | U | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | | 7/10/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 72-68 | 21-30 | -3 | L | 73.5 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 14 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 36 | 12 | | 7/12/2014 | ATLANTA | 74-93 | 34-55 | 1 | L | 75.5 | O | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | | 7/15/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 78-86 | 46-36 | 1.5 | W | 74 | O | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 82-64 | 45-31 | -2.5 | W | 74.5 | O | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | | 7/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 57-60 | 20-29 | -2 | L | 74 | U | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | | 7/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 75-68 | 41-38 | 1 | W | 73.5 | O | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 11 | | 7/28/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-77 | 31-35 | 2.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 15 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 16 | | 7/31/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/22/2014 | WASHINGTON | 89-86 | 45-41 | -2 | W | 69.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | | 6/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-65 | 26-32 | 3.5 | L | 73 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | | 6/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | 33-26 | 3.5 | W | 73 | U | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | | 6/29/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 69-74 | 32-42 | 5 | L | 72.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | | 7/3/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 56-70 | 22-40 | 1 | L | 73 | U | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | | 7/5/2014 | CHICAGO | 80-73 | 45-45 | -1.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 29 | 5 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 10 | | 7/9/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 58-78 | 20-37 | 6 | L | 75 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | | 7/11/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 88-67 | 47-35 | 2.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 11 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 25 | 11 | | 7/13/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 60-77 | 28-34 | 4.5 | L | 73 | U | 23-68 | 33.8% | 32 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 51 | 16 | | 7/15/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 63-86 | 30-39 | -2 | L | 70 | U | 27-66 | 40.9% | 32 | 8 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 9 | | 7/22/2014 | PHOENIX | 71-89 | 36-47 | 3.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 20 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 27 | 10 | | 7/24/2014 | NEW YORK | 80-84 | 45-41 | -2 | W | 70.5 | O | 32-78 | 41.0% | 38 | 7 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 53 | 16 | | 7/26/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 69-77 | 34-37 | 2.5 | L | 73 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 39 | 13 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 10 | | 7/29/2014 | @ TULSA | 74-80 | 36-35 | 2.5 | W | 75 | U | 29-60 | 48.3% | 30 | 14 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 14 | | 7/31/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 15-11 versus the first half line when playing against INDIANA since 1997 | | 17 of 27 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 9-3 versus the first half line when playing against INDIANA since 1997 | | 9 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 1-0 versus the first half line when playing against INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/11/2014 | SEATTLE | 68 | 138.5 | Over | 36 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 30 | 4 | 13 | | | INDIANA | 76 | -7 | SU ATS | 30 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 8/17/2013 | INDIANA | 70 | 133 | Over | 39 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 23-31 | 74.2% | 43 | 10 | 5 | | | SEATTLE | 77 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 28 | 7 | 11 | 6/30/2013 | SEATTLE | 63 | 139 | Under | 30 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 28 | 4 | 17 | | | INDIANA | 71 | -5 | SU ATS | 29 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 18-18 | 100.0% | 37 | 12 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Lin is 142-117 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 88-70 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 39-22 against the 1rst half line (+14.8 Units) in July games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 84-61 against the 1rst half line (+16.9 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 25-14 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) on Thursday as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 35-23 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 83-64 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 88-62 against the 1rst half line (+19.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 72-51 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 24-13 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 40-25 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) off a road loss as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 65-52 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 73-57 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 53-40 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 67-39 against the 1rst half line (+24.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 56-42 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 85-52 against the 1rst half line (+27.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 46-22 against the 1rst half line (+21.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 63-35 against the 1rst half line (+24.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 55-27 against the 1rst half line (+25.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 79-40 against the 1rst half line (+35.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 49-32 against the 1rst half line (+13.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 69-48 against the 1rst half line (+16.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 76-57 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 82-62 against the 1rst half line (+13.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 116-90 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 31-20 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 43-29 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 34-19 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 46-27 against the 1rst half line (+16.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 41.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 26-11 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 40.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 82-68 against the 1rst half line (+7.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 112-91 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 45-33 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 38.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.2, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brian is 69-54 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 45-29 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 63-49 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games on Thursday as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 78-60 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 31-18 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-36 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 55-38 against the 1rst half line (+13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 20-6 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 61-40 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 50-34 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 77-57 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 47-35 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 72-50 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 109-91 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 69-56 against the 1rst half line (+7.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 104-85 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 106-90 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 52-39 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Lin is 35-24 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 39.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Lin is 71-58 UNDER (+7.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 36.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 44-31 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 35.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 69-53 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 36.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 80-65 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 50-38 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 71-58 UNDER (+7.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 33-19 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 34.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lin 30.5, OPPONENT 30.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 37-25 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 37.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 33.2, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 147-100 UNDER (+37.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 71-46 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 69-53 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 55-33 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 64-46 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 68-34 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 89-57 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 25-9 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 56-31 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 86-67 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 62-44 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 94-66 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 80-62 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-8 UNDER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 56-31 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 74-32 UNDER (+38.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 31.6, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 59-43 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-40 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 38-21 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.1, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 48-24 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 61-29 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 62-35 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 38-20 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 68-44 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 36-22 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-33 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 78-42 UNDER (+31.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 72-44 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 64-36 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 26-15 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 73-44 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 60-35 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-16 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 74-59 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 49-36 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 71-53 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 79-59 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 118-83 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 71-56 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 112-77 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 34-15 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-24 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 78-61 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 116-81 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 71-54 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 104-71 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 63 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 56 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 6 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 5 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 4 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 9 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 4 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 8 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 2:26:39 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|