WNBA TULSA Matchup 20140731

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : Money Line Matchup

Thursday 7/31/2014

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

ATLANTA

TULSA

-3

-155

+135

165

85
Final
75

ATLANTA (16 - 9) at TULSA (10 - 17)

Thursday, 7/31/2014 8:05 PM

Board		Money Line
605	ATLANTA	-165
606	TULSA	+145

	Current Money Line FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

BETTING TRENDS

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)	(0%)	OVER	(0%)
(Money)	(0%)	UNDER	(0%)

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring TULSA against the money line

There are 14 situations with a total rating of 32 stars.

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(110-62 since 1997.) (64%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(78-41 since 1997.) (65.5%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(174-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +75.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(51-19 since 1997.) (72.9%, +34.3 units. Rating = 4*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(73-39 since 1997.) (65.2%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +30.6 units. Rating = 4*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(58-30 since 1997.) (65.9%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(21-11 since 1997.) (65.6%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +14.7 units. Rating = 0*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(118-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(118-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(118-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring ATLANTA against the money line

There are 51 situations with a total rating of 105 stars.

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(475-520 since 1997.) (47.7%, +98.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(273-284 since 1997.) (49%, +93.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(240-95 since 1997.) (71.6%, +71.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(236-97 since 1997.) (70.9%, +69 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(156-132 since 1997.) (54.2%, +63.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(178-64 since 1997.) (73.6%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(146-132 since 1997.) (52.5%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(131-46 since 1997.) (74%, +60.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(227-102 since 1997.) (69%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(155-52 since 1997.) (74.9%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(140-47 since 1997.) (74.9%, +54 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(48-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(86-20 since 1997.) (81.1%, +51.7 units. Rating = 4*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(128-52 since 1997.) (71.1%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(126-51 since 1997.) (71.2%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(127-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(144-57 since 1997.) (71.6%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(104-26 since 1997.) (80%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(79-21 since 1997.) (79%, +47.8 units. Rating = 4*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(80-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +36 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(121-49 since 1997.) (71.2%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(90-22 since 1997.) (80.4%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - with a losing record, in July games.
(86-22 since 1997.) (79.6%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(104-36 since 1997.) (74.3%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(95-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.2%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(146-106 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(74-18 since 1997.) (80.4%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(69-16 since 1997.) (81.2%, +38 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(69-16 since 1997.) (81.2%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(37-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(68-16 since 1997.) (81%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in July games.
(67-16 since 1997.) (80.7%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(86-39 since 1997.) (68.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(80-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(46-7 since 1997.) (86.8%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(66-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(59-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +34.6 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a win against a division rival, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +12.2 units. Rating = 0*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a bad team (25% to 40%) after 15 or more games.
(45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(56-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +25.2 units. Rating = 0*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(60-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(40-22 since 1997.) (64.5%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(37-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +22 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a win against a division rival, in July games.
(42-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(25-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, in July games.
(26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(68-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(36-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +16.1 units. Rating = 0*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(31-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(137-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection		Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
ATLANTA	82		31-69	45.3%	4-14	30.6%	15-21	72.8%	44	12	15
TULSA	84		30-70	43.3%	6-18	33.6%	18-23	78.5%	44	13	14

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.

In 1000 simulated games, TULSA won the game straight up 560 times, while ATLANTA won 410 times.
Edge against the money line=TULSA

Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

ATLANTA is 35-18 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4

ATLANTA is 14-2 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.9, OPPONENT 78.0

TULSA is 10-30 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 80.2, OPPONENT 84.7

TULSA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.9

TULSA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 75.1, OPPONENT 78.8

TULSA is 2-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 75.3, OPPONENT 81.6

TULSA is 8-29 against the money line (-20.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 82.8, OPPONENT 88.5

TULSA is 10-22 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.1, OPPONENT 82.6

TULSA is 9-25 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4

TULSA is 10-26 against the money line (-14.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 84.0, OPPONENT 87.8

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring TULSA to win against the money line

ATLANTA is 31-28 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 76.9

ATLANTA is 7-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7

ATLANTA is 15-18 against the money line (-24.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.4

ATLANTA is 10-21 against the money line (-28.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 85.0

ATLANTA is 2-15 against the money line (-21.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 89.1

ATLANTA is 45-54 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.7

ATLANTA is 5-12 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 85.0

ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 83.4

ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 84.2

ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1

ATLANTA is 8-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.1, OPPONENT 79.0

TULSA is 8-3 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 86.0, OPPONENT 80.3

TULSA is 23-20 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 87.2, OPPONENT 85.2

TULSA is 13-8 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 92.3, OPPONENT 85.0

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

TULSA is 7-16 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*)

TULSA is 8-18 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)

TULSA is 8-17 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring TULSA to win against the money line

There are 25 trends with a total rating of 50 stars.

ATLANTA is 20-17 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 10-12 against the money line (-16.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 16-22 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*)

ATLANTA is 28-26 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-14.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 5-12 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 16-21 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 28-26 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 9-19 against the money line (-26.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 6*)

ATLANTA is 18-22 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 10-17 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 17-19 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 12-25 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 19-32 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 25-23 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 17-19 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 3*)

ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 3-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*)

TULSA is 12-10 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

There are 8 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.

TULSA is 6-19 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games in July games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*)

TULSA is 24-71 against the money line (-39.6 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 77.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*)

TULSA is 11-23 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*)

TULSA is 8-19 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 77.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*)

TULSA is 10-24 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*)

TULSA is 7-25 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 77.9, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*)

TULSA is 6-15 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 82.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*)

TULSA is 8-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring TULSA to win against the money line

There are 21 trends with a total rating of 36 stars.

ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) as a road favorite of -165 to -250 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 11-21 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*)

ATLANTA is 11-21 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*)

ATLANTA is 7-18 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.8, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 5-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 22-36 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.8, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 9-13 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 1-4 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 20-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 10-11 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 11-12 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 14-19 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

ATLANTA - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	16-9	-5.2	12-12	14-11	82.2	41.4	43.8%	46.0	77.9	39.3	42.6%	43.4
Road Games	5-6	-4.8	4-7	6-5	81.1	42.3	42.4%	44.2	81.7	40.8	44.3%	44.7
Last 5 Games	1-4	-8.2	1-3	2-3	82.8	39.8	43.0%	41.2	85.0	44.0	45.6%	46.4

ATLANTA Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	82.2	41.4	31-71	43.8%	4-15	29.1%	16-21	72.7%	46	12	20	19	10	15	5
vs opponents surrendering	77.5	38.1	29-66	43.6%	5-14	32.6%	15-20	77.9%	42	10	17	18	8	13	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	81.1	42.3	31-72	42.4%	5-17	31.4%	15-20	73.1%	44	12	19	19	11	16	5
Stats Against (All Games)	77.9	39.3	29-67	42.6%	5-14	36.8%	15-20	75.6%	43	10	19	21	9	17	3
vs opponents averaging	76	37.7	28-66	43.1%	5-14	33.2%	15-19	78.3%	41	10	16	19	8	14	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	81.7	40.8	30-67	44.3%	7-16	41.4%	15-20	76.9%	45	9	18	19	8	18	4

TULSA - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	10-17	-5.8	16-10	19-8	82.5	38.8	43.3%	43.1	83.9	42.6	47.0%	39.8
Home Games	7-7	-0.2	8-6	8-6	81.7	39.9	42.3%	43.0	79.9	42.0	46.7%	38.4
Last 5 Games	3-2	+1	4-0	3-2	84.8	35.4	43.9%	43.4	82.0	41.6	46.4%	38.8

TULSA Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	82.5	38.8	30-69	43.3%	6-18	31.5%	17-22	77.4%	43	12	16	20	7	12	3
vs opponents surrendering	77.4	38.1	29-66	44.0%	5-14	32.6%	14-18	78.6%	41	9	17	18	8	13	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	81.7	39.9	28-67	42.3%	5-18	29.3%	20-24	80.7%	43	11	16	20	7	11	3
Stats Against (All Games)	83.9	42.6	31-65	47.0%	4-12	36.4%	18-22	80.9%	40	9	17	21	7	12	5
vs opponents averaging	77.9	38.7	29-65	44.7%	5-14	34.6%	15-18	79.7%	40	9	18	18	8	13	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	79.9	42.0	29-63	46.7%	4-11	35.1%	17-21	80.4%	38	9	17	21	6	12	4

Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70, TULSA 71

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

ATLANTA - Season Results Against the Money Line
					Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Money	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/22/2014	@ NEW YORK	78-85	L	-200	27-74	36.5%	56	15	31-66	47.0%	40	16
6/26/2014	@ SAN ANTONIO	81-79	W	-155	32-71	45.1%	46	13	27-64	42.2%	37	16
6/29/2014	@ INDIANA	76-68	W	-155	31-63	49.2%	37	15	24-63	38.1%	43	18
7/1/2014	INDIANA	70-77	L	-330	25-68	36.8%	57	15	23-66	34.8%	44	11
7/5/2014	WASHINGTON	86-73	W	-400	35-76	46.1%	48	8	29-65	44.6%	44	15
7/8/2014	CONNECTICUT	83-71	W	-450	33-66	50.0%	52	20	29-74	39.2%	41	20
7/12/2014	@ INDIANA	93-74	W	-120	33-70	47.1%	43	9	23-61	37.7%	44	13
7/13/2014	CHICAGO	81-79	W	-300	29-82	35.4%	60	18	28-74	37.8%	55	21
7/16/2014	@ NEW YORK	75-77	L	-220	28-69	40.6%	37	14	31-76	40.8%	53	18
7/22/2014	@ MINNESOTA	108-112	L	+175	42-93	45.2%	45	14	42-86	48.8%	58	21
7/25/2014	CHICAGO	75-79	L	-450	29-67	43.3%	33	20	28-52	53.8%	34	24
7/27/2014	@ WASHINGTON	67-77	L	-155	28-75	37.3%	42	15	27-59	45.8%	44	15
7/29/2014	CONNECTICUT	89-80	W	-450	34-70	48.6%	49	14	32-78	41.0%	43	12
7/31/2014	@ TULSA
8/3/2014	NEW YORK
8/5/2014	@ PHOENIX
8/7/2014	@ SEATTLE
8/8/2014	@ LOS ANGELES
8/10/2014	@ CHICAGO
8/13/2014	PHOENIX
8/15/2014	TULSA

TULSA - Season Results Against the Money Line
					Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Money	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/22/2014	@ CHICAGO	105-99	W	+120	37-74	50.0%	43	17	39-77	50.6%	42	14
6/25/2014	@ INDIANA	107-102	W	+170	39-78	50.0%	46	14	34-74	45.9%	45	12
6/28/2014	LOS ANGELES	89-92	L	-115	31-74	41.9%	47	16	36-76	47.4%	46	11
6/29/2014	PHOENIX	77-80	L	+170	24-77	31.2%	50	12	25-51	49.0%	33	13
7/1/2014	@ NEW YORK	74-90	L	+120	28-70	40.0%	34	9	36-68	52.9%	52	14
7/3/2014	@ CONNECTICUT	96-83	W	+155	35-73	47.9%	52	12	31-71	43.7%	38	12
7/5/2014	CONNECTICUT	76-78	L	-165	27-67	40.3%	42	11	30-68	44.1%	43	14
7/8/2014	INDIANA	76-78	L	-115	25-59	42.4%	41	15	28-63	44.4%	36	11
7/10/2014	MINNESOTA	85-91	L	+135	31-72	43.1%	36	10	33-60	55.0%	40	12
7/12/2014	WASHINGTON	74-91	L	-165	28-71	39.4%	42	10	34-70	48.6%	48	13
7/16/2014	@ MINNESOTA	82-93	L	+300	27-66	40.9%	44	16	34-70	48.6%	39	8
7/17/2014	SAN ANTONIO	95-90	W	-115	30-60	50.0%	43	10	33-64	51.6%	29	12
7/22/2014	@ SAN ANTONIO	93-95	L	+145	37-71	52.1%	31	8	38-70	54.3%	41	9
7/25/2014	@ WASHINGTON	77-82	L	+175	30-84	35.7%	52	11	25-64	39.1%	52	14
7/27/2014	CHICAGO	79-69	W	-125	24-63	38.1%	50	12	28-72	38.9%	42	12
7/29/2014	SEATTLE	80-74	W	-210	26-57	45.6%	41	14	29-60	48.3%	30	14
7/31/2014	ATLANTA
8/2/2014	MINNESOTA
8/5/2014	@ LOS ANGELES
8/8/2014	SAN ANTONIO
8/10/2014	@ SEATTLE
8/15/2014	@ ATLANTA
8/16/2014	@ MINNESOTA

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

TULSA is 7-8 (+4.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

TULSA is 2-2 (+5.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons

All games played at TULSA since 1997

ATLANTA is 4-3 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997

Games played at TULSA over the last 3 seasons.

TULSA is 1-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
7/21/2013	ATLANTA	63	-5	Under	35	24-72	33.3%	0-17	0.0%	15-23	65.2%	47	14	8
	TULSA	90	158.5	SU ATS	44	33-63	52.4%	3-14	21.4%	21-26	80.8%	44	8	8
5/25/2013	TULSA	81	156.5	Over	44	24-64	37.5%	5-16	31.2%	28-30	93.3%	37	9	22
	ATLANTA	98	-8.5	SU ATS	48	38-72	52.8%	3-9	33.3%	19-24	79.2%	44	12	15

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

There are 30 trends with a total rating of 33 stars.

Michael is 215-110 against the money line (+36.2 Units) in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 181-58 against the money line (+41.7 Units) as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 71-28 against the money line (+23.2 Units) as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.1, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 147-66 against the money line (+46.3 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 102-50 against the money line (+29.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.7, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 79-36 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.6, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 97-38 against the money line (+41.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Michael is 43-20 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 100-42 against the money line (+26.6 Units) off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 166-67 against the money line (+42.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 59-30 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.0, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 51-23 against the money line (+23.1 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 73.6, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 148-64 against the money line (+34.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.8, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 15-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 70.1, OPPONENT 62.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Michael is 114-63 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 27-6 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 18-12 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 73.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Fred is 15-25 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 79.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Fred is 0-5 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 71.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Fred is 17-28 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Fred is 8-19 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 75.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Fred is 12-20 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Fred is 15-24 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 78.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*)

Fred is 24-33 against the money line (-27.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 79.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Fred is 5-11 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 78.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Fred is 9-16 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 80.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Fred is 10-21 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Fred is 18-32 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 78.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Fred is 3-13 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.7, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Fred is 8-22 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring TULSA to win against the money line

There are 7 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.

Michael is 1-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 71.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Fred is 25-10 against the money line (+19.2 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 77.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*)

Fred is 11-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Fred is 14-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 82.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Fred is 18-5 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in home games after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 82.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Fred is 21-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 81.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Fred is 32-18 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 77.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening Money Line: Home=+135 (Road=-155), Closing Money Line: Home=+145 (Road=-165)

Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 80 times, while the home underdog won straight up 37 times. No Edge.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

ATLANTA

No significant injuries.

TULSA

No significant injuries.

Last Updated: 5/5/2024 11:13:43 AM EST.