| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX
SEATTLE |
|
|
151.5
| 89
Final
71 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | PHOENIX | -300 | | 608 | SEATTLE | +220 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset loss as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +13.6 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(23-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.5%, +20.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG).
(28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(43-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(62-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season.
(223-188 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG).
(47-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +21.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(467-505 since 1997.) (48%, +102.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(265-269 since 1997.) (49.6%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(184-55 since 1997.) (77%, +88.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(161-35 since 1997.) (82.1%, +78.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(243-93 since 1997.) (72.3%, +76.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(246-228 since 1997.) (51.9%, +76 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(232-82 since 1997.) (73.9%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(237-93 since 1997.) (71.8%, +71.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(232-95 since 1997.) (70.9%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(152-125 since 1997.) (54.9%, +66.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(161-51 since 1997.) (75.9%, +64.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(117-30 since 1997.) (79.6%, +64.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(82-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +62.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(175-57 since 1997.) (75.4%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(205-81 since 1997.) (71.7%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(103-18 since 1997.) (85.1%, +59.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(127-44 since 1997.) (74.3%, +59.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in May, June, or July games.
(121-39 since 1997.) (75.6%, +58.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(131-32 since 1997.) (80.4%, +58.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(223-100 since 1997.) (69%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(174-64 since 1997.) (73.1%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(151-51 since 1997.) (74.8%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(62-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(118-35 since 1997.) (77.1%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(44-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(122-49 since 1997.) (71.3%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(125-51 since 1997.) (71%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(74-56 since 1997.) (56.9%, +49.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(82-19 since 1997.) (81.2%, +49.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(142-56 since 1997.) (71.7%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(119-47 since 1997.) (71.7%, +47.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(127-47 since 1997.) (73%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(40-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +32 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(76-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(54-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.4%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(123-48 since 1997.) (71.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(88-35 since 1997.) (71.5%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(95-29 since 1997.) (76.6%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(88-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.4%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(112-36 since 1997.) (75.7%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss, on Tuesday nights.
(150-104 since 1997.) (59.1%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - with a losing record, in July games.
(82-21 since 1997.) (79.6%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(105-33 since 1997.) (76.1%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(43-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(102-35 since 1997.) (74.5%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(41-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +35.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(90-31 since 1997.) (74.4%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(50-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(107-52 since 1997.) (67.3%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(88-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(142-103 since 1997.) (58%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 80 points or more.
(92-25 since 1997.) (78.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(150-95 since 1997.) (61.2%, +38.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(48-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(36-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(68-16 since 1997.) (81%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(112-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(70-17 since 1997.) (80.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(65-15 since 1997.) (81.2%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(51-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in July games.
(64-19 since 1997.) (77.1%, +35.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(65-15 since 1997.) (81.2%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(61-16 since 1997.) (79.2%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 55% of their free throws or worse.
(53-16 since 1997.) (76.8%, +35 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(65-15 since 1997.) (81.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(79-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(33-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.2%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(52-10 since 1997.) (83.9%, +33.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(79-47 since 1997.) (62.7%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in July games.
(64-16 since 1997.) (80%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(99-56 since 1997.) (63.9%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(68-44 since 1997.) (60.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(72-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +49.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +18.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(50-30 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(50-21 since 1997.) (70.4%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(41-6 since 1997.) (87.2%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(52-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +36.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(67-18 since 1997.) (78.8%, +29.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(55-20 since 1997.) (73.3%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(43-13 since 1997.) (76.8%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 8 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(33-3 since 1997.) (91.7%, +28.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +27.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(69-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(31-15 since 1997.) (67.4%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 55% of their free throws or worse.
(56-30 since 1997.) (65.1%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(49-20 since 1997.) (71%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(28-4 since 1997.) (87.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(31-5 since 1997.) (86.1%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(27-11 since 1997.) (71.1%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(53-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(74-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +48.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(52-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +22.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Tuesday nights.
(28-5 since 1997.) (84.8%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(29-5 since 1997.) (85.3%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(24-2 since 1997.) (92.3%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 55% of their free throws or worse.
(28-11 since 1997.) (71.8%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(25-10 since 1997.) (71.4%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(42-21 since 1997.) (66.7%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(34-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(68-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in May, June, or July games.
(35-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(50-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(62-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +17.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 55% of their free throws or worse.
(35-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| PHOENIX | 77 | | 30-63 | 46.9% | 5-15 | 31.4% | 13-16 | 83.3% | 41 | 8 | 12 | | SEATTLE | 71 | | 27-63 | 42.1% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 12-16 | 78.5% | 38 | 8 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, PHOENIX won the game straight up 666 times, while SEATTLE won 306 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 73.2 | PHOENIX is 110-76 against the money line (+36.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 77.5 | PHOENIX is 12-1 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | PHOENIX is 4-0 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 75.3 | PHOENIX is 137-102 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 80.4 | PHOENIX is 19-8 against the money line (+15.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 79.9 | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.8, OPPONENT 68.3 | PHOENIX is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.1, OPPONENT 79.6 | SEATTLE is 2-15 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.0, OPPONENT 77.6 | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 75.9 |
|
PHOENIX is 43-83 against the money line (-49.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 72.5, OPPONENT 76.3 | PHOENIX is 5-6 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 74.5, OPPONENT 73.0 | SEATTLE is 61-60 against the money line (+18.8 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 71.6 | SEATTLE is 19-17 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 72.5 | SEATTLE is 54-18 against the money line (+28.8 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 67.3 | SEATTLE is 12-5 against the money line (+15.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.9, OPPONENT 80.2 |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 68-30 against the money line (+21.9 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 50-18 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 10-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 76.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 20-8 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 21-12 against the money line (+8.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 14-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 14-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 49-15 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 23-7 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 76.8, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 8-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 16-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 64-23 against the money line (+27.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-7 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 20-11 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 9-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 74.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 16-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 9-16 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 73.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 8-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 71.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 77-48 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 96-80 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 143-126 against the money line (+23.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 84-57 against the money line (+24.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-6 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-4 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 64-31 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 23-25 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-12 against the money line (+12.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-17 against the money line (+17.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 10-5 against the money line (+16.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 95-47 against the money line (+27.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 23-24 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 88-69 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 94-70 against the money line (+24.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-24 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 83-43 against the money line (+24.6 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 39-19 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-18 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.5, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-5 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-18 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 19-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 19-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 19-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 92.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 11-6 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 15-6 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 9-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 12-3 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 10-5 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 16-7 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 16-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 87.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 15-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 13-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 15-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 14-5 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 11-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 102-70 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 88.9, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 10-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 11-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 11-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 11-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 9-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 16-2 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 3-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 64.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 65.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 5-10 against the money line (-17.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=49% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.1, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 22-32 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 25-34 against the money line (-24.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 46-54 against the money line (-29.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 13-26 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 23-37 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 75.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 26-32 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-25 against the money line (+18.0 Units) as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 174-85 against the money line (+44.2 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 120-47 against the money line (+44.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 181-165 against the money line (+23.3 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 111-59 against the money line (+28.8 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-14 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-20 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 132-110 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 57-24 against the money line (+26.6 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 15-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.1, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.5, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.0, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 69-33 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-11 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 66.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 91-67 against the money line (+30.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 100-84 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-12 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.1, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 58-50 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-14 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.8, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 9-3 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 6*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 18-3 | +9.2 | 15-6 | 10-11 | 85.6 | 41.2 | 49.3% | 39.3 | 75.5 | 36.4 | 41.9% | 40.1 | | Road Games | 8-2 | +4.7 | 6-4 | 4-6 | 82.6 | 36.4 | 46.2% | 40.8 | 78.4 | 38.3 | 41.2% | 42.6 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 86.2 | 43.4 | 49.1% | 39.8 | 69.6 | 30.8 | 42.7% | 39.2 | | Division Games | 12-2 | +5.9 | 10-4 | 7-7 | 85.0 | 41.5 | 50.2% | 38.6 | 75.0 | 35.7 | 41.0% | 40.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.6 | 41.2 | 31-63 | 49.3% | 6-15 | 38.1% | 18-21 | 82.7% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.1 | 39.1 | 30-65 | 45.1% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.6 | 36.4 | 29-63 | 46.2% | 5-14 | 35.0% | 20-24 | 81.3% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.5 | 36.4 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 5-16 | 31.4% | 12-16 | 78.3% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.5 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.4 | 38.3 | 29-70 | 41.2% | 6-15 | 36.1% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-15 | -2.4 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 70.2 | 33.4 | 43.2% | 35.8 | 75.0 | 36.2 | 45.5% | 39.3 | | Home Games | 5-4 | +1.9 | 3-6 | 5-3 | 71.9 | 33.7 | 43.3% | 37.2 | 75.0 | 38.3 | 45.5% | 40.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.9 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 69.8 | 34.0 | 44.4% | 34.4 | 76.2 | 38.0 | 46.8% | 40.2 | | Division Games | 5-10 | -1.7 | 6-9 | 6-8 | 69.4 | 32.1 | 43.4% | 35.6 | 74.4 | 37.2 | 45.5% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.2 | 33.4 | 26-59 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 34.8% | 13-16 | 79.1% | 36 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.3 | 39 | 29-67 | 44.0% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.9 | 33.7 | 26-61 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 13-18 | 75.3% | 37 | 7 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.0 | 36.2 | 29-64 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 31.3% | 13-16 | 80.8% | 39 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.5 | 39.5 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 5-14 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.0 | 38.3 | 29-65 | 45.5% | 4-13 | 34.5% | 12-15 | 76.6% | 40 | 8 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 70.9, SEATTLE 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/12/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-96 | L | -270 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 38 | 7 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 38 | 12 | | 6/15/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 80-72 | W | +180 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 42 | 10 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 10 | | 6/18/2014 | MINNESOTA | 92-79 | W | -200 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 44 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 28 | 6 | | 6/20/2014 | TULSA | 91-80 | W | -750 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 35 | 8 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 5 | | 6/27/2014 | @ INDIANA | 81-76 | W | -220 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 30 | 7 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 46 | 17 | | 6/29/2014 | @ TULSA | 80-77 | W | -200 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | | 7/2/2014 | CHICAGO | 87-69 | W | -500 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 51 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 38 | 7 | | 7/6/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-89 | W | -125 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | | 7/9/2014 | SEATTLE | 78-58 | W | -550 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | | 7/11/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 72-66 | W | -220 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 54 | 17 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 36 | 12 | | 7/13/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 90-61 | W | -400 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 39 | 13 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 38 | 16 | | 7/15/2014 | WASHINGTON | 90-78 | W | -600 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 12 | | 7/17/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 101-85 | W | -750 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 37 | 8 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 15 | | 7/22/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/13/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 79-72 | W | +200 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 32 | 16 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 12 | | 6/15/2014 | @ TULSA | 79-85 | L | +210 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 11 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 8 | | 6/19/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-87 | L | -155 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 6 | | 6/22/2014 | WASHINGTON | 89-86 | W | -165 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | | 6/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-65 | L | +220 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | | 6/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | W | +210 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | | 6/29/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 69-74 | L | +325 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | | 7/3/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 56-70 | L | +105 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | | 7/5/2014 | CHICAGO | 80-73 | W | -140 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 29 | 5 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 10 | | 7/9/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 58-78 | L | +375 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | | 7/11/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 88-67 | W | +175 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 11 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 25 | 11 | | 7/13/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 60-77 | L | +280 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 32 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 51 | 16 | | 7/15/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 63-86 | L | -165 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 32 | 8 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 9 | | 7/22/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 39-22 (+23.9 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 8-3 (+13.5 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 22-7 (+13.4 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 4-0 (+7.5 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/9/2014 | SEATTLE | 58 | 152.5 | Under | 20 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 1-12 | 8.3% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 43 | 9 | 20 | | | PHOENIX | 78 | -10 | SU ATS | 37 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 30 | 4 | 6 | 6/3/2014 | SEATTLE | 72 | 146.5 | Over | 34 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 34 | 9 | 14 | | | PHOENIX | 87 | -11 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 37 | 6 | 11 | 5/17/2014 | SEATTLE | 64 | 152 | Under | 30 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 39 | 10 | 11 | | | PHOENIX | 81 | -10 | SU ATS | 46 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 33 | 5 | 15 | 8/23/2013 | SEATTLE | 81 | 150 | SU ATS | 44 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 25-29 | 86.2% | 37 | 8 | 13 | | | PHOENIX | 73 | -9 | Over | 34 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 33 | 4 | 16 | 8/6/2013 | SEATTLE | 80 | 155 | SU ATS | 31 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 48 | 13 | 11 | | | PHOENIX | 65 | -10 | Under | 30 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 37 | 7 | 15 | 8/1/2013 | PHOENIX | 79 | -4.5 | Over | 44 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 40 | 5 | 10 | | | SEATTLE | 88 | 150 | SU ATS | 41 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 11-26 | 42.3% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 43 | 6 | 11 | 6/2/2013 | PHOENIX | 72 | -10 | Under | 38 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 34 | 7 | 12 | | | SEATTLE | 75 | 160.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 42 | 8 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Sandy is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 16-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 87.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 15-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 15-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 13-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 9-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 82.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 11-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 16-2 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 9-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 86.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 13-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 84.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 10-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 10-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 83.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 5-18 against the money line (-15.1 Units) revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 64.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 10-19 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 5-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brian is 140-101 against the money line (+48.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 89-28 against the money line (+50.4 Units) in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.9, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 80-26 against the money line (+44.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 27-7 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 34-21 against the money line (+22.0 Units) in July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 84-59 against the money line (+39.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 16-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games on Tuesday as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 35-25 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 92-62 against the money line (+40.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 50-33 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 47-34 against the money line (+23.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 92-63 against the money line (+38.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 17-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 71.5, OPPONENT 65.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 13-7 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-41 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 28-10 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 41-32 against the money line (+20.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 33-14 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 26-14 against the money line (+30.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 6*) | Brian is 33-14 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 29-13 against the money line (+27.2 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 9-4 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 54-44 against the money line (+17.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 24-12 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 15-11 against the money line (+8.9 Units) revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 39-31 against the money line (+13.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 12-11 against the money line (+12.1 Units) triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 34-13 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 53-31 against the money line (+32.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 55-38 against the money line (+26.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 19-12 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 31-24 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 24-25 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.6, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 75-47 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 55-39 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 65-48 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 66-47 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 27-21 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 57-41 against the money line (+28.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 25-12 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 50-55 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 23-14 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 9-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 48-35 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 75-57 against the money line (+29.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 20-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 54-29 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 80-43 against the money line (+39.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 55-47 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 29-26 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 41-34 against the money line (+30.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 15-15 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 7-4 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 77-55 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 114-82 against the money line (+42.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 51-34 against the money line (+31.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 73-51 against the money line (+40.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 19-12 against the money line (+14.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 31-17 against the money line (+29.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 70-51 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 106-78 against the money line (+39.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 33-23 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 47-33 against the money line (+25.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 32-32 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 14-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 77-56 against the money line (+22.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 112-79 against the money line (+40.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 21-12 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 10-6 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.8, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-51 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 100-73 against the money line (+37.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 52-42 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 75-59 against the money line (+30.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 30-21 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 42-31 against the money line (+31.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 07/15/2014 - Shekinna Stricklen "?" Tuesday vs. Phoenix Mercury ( Head ) | | [F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 12:21:45 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|