| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT WASHINGTON |
|
| 148.5 | 75 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | CONNECTICUT | +175 | 652 | WASHINGTON | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (132-32 since 1997.) (80.5%, +59.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (50-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (49-17 since 1997.) (74.2%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (49-17 since 1997.) (74.2%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (49-17 since 1997.) (74.2%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (65-28 since 1997.) (69.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (35-5 since 1997.) (87.5%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more. (24-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +21.1 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (468-508 since 1997.) (48%, +99.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (266-272 since 1997.) (49.4%, +95.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (222-178 since 1997.) (55.5%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (53-61 since 1997.) (46.5%, +49.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games. (89-93 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.9%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents. (124-103 since 1997.) (54.6%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (108-63 since 1997.) (63.2%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (106-60 since 1997.) (63.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (113-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (84-38 since 1997.) (68.9%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (35-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (90-51 since 1997.) (63.8%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (59-33 since 1997.) (64.1%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (62-26 since 1997.) (70.5%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games. (53-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +35.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (54-29 since 1997.) (65.1%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (60-31 since 1997.) (65.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%). (43-18 since 1997.) (70.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%) after 15 or more games. (40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games. (54-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (22-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +15 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (37-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 72 | | 28-70 | 40.2% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 12-15 | 74.8% | 43 | 12 | 13 | WASHINGTON | 77 | | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 28.3% | 14-17 | 81.9% | 45 | 11 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 620 times, while CONNECTICUT won 348 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 21-14 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 73.6 | CONNECTICUT is 47-17 against the money line (+31.3 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 71.0 | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 74.6 | CONNECTICUT is 63-37 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 71.3 | WASHINGTON is 81-141 against the money line (-50.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 78.4 | WASHINGTON is 68-99 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 20-64 against the money line (-52.1 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.0, OPPONENT 74.9 | WASHINGTON is 41-50 against the money line (-26.0 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 77.1 | WASHINGTON is 114-184 against the money line (-70.6 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 4-17 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 75.2 | WASHINGTON is 58-98 against the money line (-39.3 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 40-52 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 83.4 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-31 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 78.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 8-22 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-17 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | WASHINGTON is 11-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 72.5 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 110-132 against the money line (-49.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 56-74 against the money line (-38.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-57 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-42 against the money line (-26.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 69-136 against the money line (-68.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 111-188 against the money line (-65.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 82-138 against the money line (-62.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 128-191 against the money line (-63.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 107-185 against the money line (-83.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 170-267 against the money line (-94.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 58-94 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 53-99 against the money line (-43.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-33 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-28 against the money line (-15.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-22 against the money line (-20.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-28 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-41 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 44-27 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-11 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 103-73 against the money line (+24.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 76-53 against the money line (+22.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 222-346 against the money line (-110.7 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-69 against the money line (-41.6 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-151 against the money line (-63.0 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 41-60 against the money line (-36.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 67-110 against the money line (-49.9 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 155-233 against the money line (-71.3 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-42 against the money line (-31.1 Units) on Wednesday since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 142-220 against the money line (-81.7 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 94-156 against the money line (-61.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 97-171 against the money line (-80.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 33-54 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 41-65 against the money line (-30.2 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 25-44 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 78-153 against the money line (-71.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-102 against the money line (-56.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 91-171 against the money line (-75.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-91 against the money line (-53.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 28-32 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 126-227 against the money line (-86.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 105-167 against the money line (-61.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 94-125 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 20-36 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-25 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-15 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-22 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-16 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-16 against the money line (-10.8 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-20 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-10 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 10-14 | -1.4 | 13-11 | 11-13 | 76.0 | 36.5 | 41.8% | 43.5 | 78.0 | 36.2 | 45.1% | 41.0 | Road Games | 3-9 | -3.1 | 6-6 | 6-6 | 75.1 | 35.7 | 42.3% | 43.1 | 79.5 | 35.9 | 45.5% | 42.3 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 35.4 | 43.0% | 42.0 | 81.8 | 37.0 | 48.6% | 39.2 | Division Games | 6-9 | -2 | 8-7 | 6-9 | 73.5 | 34.9 | 40.1% | 43.9 | 75.2 | 35.5 | 44.4% | 42.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.0 | 36.5 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 75.2% | 44 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.7 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 33.5% | 15-20 | 78.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.1 | 35.7 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 33.9% | 12-16 | 72.5% | 43 | 12 | 13 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 36.2 | 29-64 | 45.1% | 4-12 | 31.4% | 16-21 | 77.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.4 | 38.3 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.5 | 35.9 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 32.4% | 16-21 | 75.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-13 | -1.7 | 11-12 | 9-14 | 74.0 | 36.2 | 42.8% | 43.0 | 75.1 | 36.8 | 41.8% | 41.5 | Home Games | 4-7 | -5.6 | 4-7 | 3-8 | 71.5 | 33.6 | 40.5% | 45.2 | 73.6 | 34.3 | 41.4% | 41.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 78.6 | 40.6 | 45.2% | 41.4 | 78.0 | 40.2 | 43.1% | 41.0 | Division Games | 6-6 | -0.8 | 6-6 | 4-8 | 71.3 | 36.1 | 41.6% | 44.0 | 71.2 | 35.8 | 40.2% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.0 | 36.2 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 5-17 | 29.3% | 13-16 | 81.9% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.5 | 33.6 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 4-17 | 25.5% | 13-16 | 82.2% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 36.8 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 5-14 | 33.9% | 14-19 | 74.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 44.2% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 15-20 | 77.6% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.6 | 34.3 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 14-19 | 73.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70, WASHINGTON 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/13/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 83-75 | W | +200 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 43 | 10 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 10 | 6/15/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-72 | W | -105 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 46 | 9 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 43 | 14 | 6/17/2014 | INDIANA | 89-67 | W | -165 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 21 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 37 | 21 | 6/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-69 | W | -120 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 55 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 12 | 6/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-69 | L | +135 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 14 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 65-67 | L | +135 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 49 | 16 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 7/1/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-74 | L | -165 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 19 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 15 | 7/3/2014 | TULSA | 83-96 | L | -175 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 7/5/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-76 | W | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 7/8/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 71-83 | L | +325 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 7/10/2014 | @ INDIANA | 68-72 | L | +180 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 36 | 12 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 14 | 7/13/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 64-90 | L | +155 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 39 | 11 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 43 | 12 | 7/15/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 86-63 | W | +145 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 9 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 32 | 8 | 7/17/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 85-101 | L | +500 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 15 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 37 | 8 | 7/23/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-68 | W | -300 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 44 | 13 | 6/15/2014 | ATLANTA | 67-75 | L | +155 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 19 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 52 | 17 | 6/18/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 73-83 | L | +250 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 14 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | 6/20/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 65-75 | L | +280 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 39 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 10 | 6/22/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 86-89 | L | +145 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | 6/24/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-70 | W | +200 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 9 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 37 | 8 | 6/27/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 69-63 | W | -155 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 13 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 14 | 6/29/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 65-73 | L | -140 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 12 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 7 | 7/2/2014 | INDIANA | 77-80 | L | -175 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 37 | 14 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 38 | 17 | 7/5/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 73-86 | L | +300 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | 7/9/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 72-65 | W | +145 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 41 | 12 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 50 | 15 | 7/12/2014 | @ TULSA | 91-74 | W | +145 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | 7/15/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 78-90 | L | +400 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | 7/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 79-75 | W | +250 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | 7/23/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 40-23 (+12.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 5-5 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 16-15 (-2.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 3-3 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/27/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 63 | 149.5 | Under | 33 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 36 | 9 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 69 | -3 | SU ATS | 31 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 48 | 16 | 13 | 6/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 49 | 9 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 66 | 149 | Under | 30 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 38 | 12 | 9 | 9/13/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 56 | 148 | Under | 27 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 36 | 5 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 82 | -10 | SU ATS | 42 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 49 | 14 | 16 | 9/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | 70 | -5.5 | Under | 34 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 21-22 | 95.5% | 42 | 13 | 18 | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 147.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 34 | 5 | 18 | 8/11/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 63 | 149.5 | Under | 23 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 41 | 9 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 74 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 45 | 9 | 14 | 6/7/2013 | WASHINGTON | 66 | 151 | SU ATS | 29 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 42 | 6 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 62 | -6.5 | Under | 30 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 53 | 14 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 78-64 against the money line (+20.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 4-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Anne is 20-36 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 14-25 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-15 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 36-49 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 9-16 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 6-22 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Anne is 7-16 against the money line (-10.8 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 1-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 68.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 4-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-20 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 10-33 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 70.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 23-62 against the money line (-34.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 70.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-34 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 9-20 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 75.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 35-46 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 75.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 4-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 78.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 7-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 77.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 4-19 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 19-26 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 157-111 against the money line (+23.5 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 11-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 88-65 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 45-26 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 24-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 53-18 against the money line (+27.4 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 78.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 95-70 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 14-10 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 9-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 7-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 28-18 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 104-62 against the money line (+24.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 73.9, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 145-93 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 74.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 229 times, while the road underdog won straight up 91 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/22/2014 - Allison Hightower "?" Wednesday vs. Wash Mystics ( Knee ) | [G] 06/25/2014 - Danielle McCray out 6-8 weeks ( Thumb ) | |
[G] 07/23/2014 - Tierra Ruffin-Pratt "?" Wednesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Ankle ) | [G] 07/22/2014 - Kara Lawson "?" Wednesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Back ) | [F] 07/22/2014 - Jelena Milovanovic "?" Wednesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/6/2024 12:19:25 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|