| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
153.5
| 66
Final
64 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | NEW YORK | +280 | | 654 | LOS ANGELES | -360 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(49-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win as an underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(104-47 since 1997.) (68.9%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(103-29 since 1997.) (78%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(171-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +74.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(87-43 since 1997.) (66.9%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite against opponent off a close home win by 3 points or less.
(39-13 since 1997.) (75%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(77-49 since 1997.) (61.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +15.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +12.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home loss, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(38-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a close home win by 3 points or less.
(28-11 since 1997.) (71.8%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(26-4 since 1997.) (86.7%, +20.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(27-7 since 1997.) (79.4%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +18.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(94-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(115-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(115-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(115-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(36-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a win against a division rival.
(22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +13.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season.
(224-189 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in non-conference games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(49-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(468-508 since 1997.) (48%, +99.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(266-272 since 1997.) (49.4%, +95.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(283-198 since 1997.) (58.8%, +76.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(141-126 since 1997.) (52.8%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(129-91 since 1997.) (58.6%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(89-93 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.9%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(53-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +35.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in non-conference games, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival.
(69-39 since 1997.) (63.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(54-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(28-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +16 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(69-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +23 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +19 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival, in July games.
(38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off a home win against a division rival, in July games.
(23-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +14.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| NEW YORK | 70 | | 28-65 | 42.7% | 4-11 | 33.7% | 11-15 | 75.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | | 31-69 | 44.3% | 3-8 | 32.0% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 43 | 10 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 718 times, while NEW YORK won 260 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 20-17 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 0-4 against the money line (-8.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 82.0 | LOS ANGELES is 3-4 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 75.7 | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 84.0 | LOS ANGELES is 13-14 against the money line (-20.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 78.3 |
|
NEW YORK is 61-86 against the money line (-34.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.5, OPPONENT 71.2 | NEW YORK is 4-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 78.3 | NEW YORK is 23-53 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 79.8 | NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.9 | NEW YORK is 2-8 against the money line (-6.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 77.2 | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.4, OPPONENT 77.1 | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 68.5 | LOS ANGELES is 93-41 against the money line (+33.8 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 71.5 | LOS ANGELES is 108-56 against the money line (+34.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 70.6 | LOS ANGELES is 71-29 against the money line (+26.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 198-56 against the money line (+116.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 77.7 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-6 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-12 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-10 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-15 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-12 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-27.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-11 against the money line (-23.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 2-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 13-30 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-21 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-27 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 2-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 10-29 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-21 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 107-92 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.8, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 102-88 against the money line (+29.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 115-104 against the money line (+34.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.4, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 106-96 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 86-76 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-9 against the money line (-23.5 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in home games in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-25.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-18 against the money line (-20.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-12 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-13 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-86 against the money line (-49.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-12 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-15 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-12 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-10 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-11 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 2-22 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 3-9 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-29 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 5-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 66.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 61.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 64.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 2-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 65.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 3-12 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-17 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 4-18 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 66.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 4-14 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 31-47 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 19-35 against the money line (-24.7 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 92-53 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-22 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-13 | -5.8 | 7-13 | 8-13 | 73.2 | 37.2 | 43.0% | 42.7 | 75.6 | 40.1 | 41.9% | 41.7 | | Road Games | 1-8 | -6.6 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 71.3 | 34.1 | 42.0% | 42.2 | 77.4 | 39.2 | 41.6% | 43.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 40.2 | 44.8% | 45.8 | 75.4 | 41.4 | 43.3% | 36.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.2 | 37.2 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 4-11 | 33.9% | 13-18 | 75.3% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.8 | 38.7 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 15-20 | 77.6% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.3 | 34.1 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 4-10 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 74.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.6 | 40.1 | 28-67 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 38.7 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.4 | 39.2 | 29-69 | 41.6% | 5-15 | 31.6% | 15-19 | 81.5% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-12 | -11.9 | 10-12 | 10-11 | 79.0 | 40.9 | 45.7% | 39.9 | 78.2 | 38.6 | 45.1% | 39.7 | | Home Games | 3-7 | -11.6 | 3-7 | 4-6 | 76.9 | 39.1 | 46.0% | 38.5 | 78.4 | 38.4 | 46.8% | 38.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 78.2 | 39.6 | 44.4% | 38.4 | 71.6 | 39.8 | 44.2% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.0 | 40.9 | 31-68 | 45.7% | 3-8 | 32.8% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 40 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.6 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 5-14 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.9 | 39.1 | 30-66 | 46.0% | 3-9 | 33.0% | 13-17 | 79.9% | 38 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 38.6 | 29-65 | 45.1% | 5-14 | 34.7% | 14-18 | 81.4% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.4 | 38.4 | 30-64 | 46.8% | 5-14 | 37.5% | 13-18 | 75.3% | 39 | 8 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 70.3, LOS ANGELES 71 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/13/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 75-83 | L | -250 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 43 | 10 | | 6/15/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-76 | L | -115 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 43 | 14 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 46 | 9 | | 6/18/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 100-105 | L | +105 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 45 | 17 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 10 | | 6/20/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 64-85 | L | +325 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | | 6/22/2014 | ATLANTA | 85-78 | W | +170 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | | 6/27/2014 | CHICAGO | 69-73 | L | +100 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 26 | 15 | | 6/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 67-65 | W | -155 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 49 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | TULSA | 90-74 | W | -140 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | | 7/6/2014 | MINNESOTA | 87-80 | W | +155 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 41 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 38 | 11 | | 7/9/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 66-80 | L | +155 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 42 | 15 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 36 | 10 | | 7/11/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 54-68 | L | +155 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 41 | 16 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 37 | 10 | | 7/16/2014 | ATLANTA | 77-75 | W | +180 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | | 7/23/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/13/2014 | @ TULSA | 67-69 | L | -175 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 47 | 13 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 42 | 6 | | 6/14/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-101 | L | -140 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 19 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 29 | 11 | | 6/17/2014 | MINNESOTA | 77-94 | L | +100 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 35 | 12 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 35 | 13 | | 6/19/2014 | TULSA | 87-77 | W | -270 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 69-72 | L | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | | 6/24/2014 | SEATTLE | 65-57 | W | -300 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | | 6/28/2014 | @ TULSA | 92-89 | W | -105 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | CHICAGO | 83-90 | L | -270 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 11 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 45 | 21 | | 7/3/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 70-56 | W | -125 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | | 7/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 89-94 | L | +105 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | | 7/8/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-83 | L | +155 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | | 7/11/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 68-54 | W | -175 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 37 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 41 | 16 | | 7/13/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 90-64 | W | -175 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 43 | 12 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 39 | 11 | | 7/15/2014 | @ INDIANA | 86-78 | W | -140 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | | 7/17/2014 | WASHINGTON | 75-79 | L | -330 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | | 7/23/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 18-19 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 4-1 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 7-10 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/11/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | -4 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 37 | 5 | 10 | | | NEW YORK | 54 | 156 | Under | 33 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 8/10/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 42 | 8 | 15 | | | NEW YORK | 67 | 153 | Under | 30 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 41 | 9 | 12 | 7/4/2013 | NEW YORK | 89 | 157 | ATS | 37 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 34 | 15 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 97 | -13 | SU Over | 60 | 40-62 | 64.5% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 29 | 4 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Bill is 73-47 against the money line (+27.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 74.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 38-26 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 76.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 18-12 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 89-59 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 71.0, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 49-32 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 70.6, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Bill is 12-29 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 5-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 66.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 36-38 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 1-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 61.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 1-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 64.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 2-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 65.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 3-12 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 5-17 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 4-18 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 66.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 4-14 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 8-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 13-30 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 3-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 70.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 4-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 12-27 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 4-16 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 8-21 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 117 times, while the road underdog won straight up 51 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/16/2014 - Kamiko Williams out for season ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 12:58:10 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|