| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK
First Half Results
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
75.5
| 34
Final
37 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | NEW YORK | 74.5 | | 654 | LOS ANGELES | -4.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(84-46 since 1997.) (64.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (NEW YORK) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(99-55 since 1997.) (64.3%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in July games.
(436-307 since 1997.) (58.7%, +98.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in May, June, or July games.
(935-733 since 1997.) (56.1%, +128.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 3 or more days rest, in July games.
(116-71 since 1997.) (62%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(119-73 since 1997.) (62%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(102-57 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(102-57 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(102-57 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(427-291 since 1997.) (59.5%, +106.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(317-204 since 1997.) (60.8%, +92.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(227-148 since 1997.) (60.5%, +64.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(126-73 since 1997.) (63.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(495-369 since 1997.) (57.3%, +89.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(64-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +24.4 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(175-108 since 1997.) (61.8%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(120-72 since 1997.) (62.5%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(218-144 since 1997.) (60.2%, +59.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - bad 3 point shooting team - making 3 or less 3 point shots/game, in July games.
(36-13 since 1997.) (73.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(156-100 since 1997.) (60.9%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games.
(127-73 since 1997.) (63.5%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games.
(211-140 since 1997.) (60.1%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(385-279 since 1997.) (58%, +78.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in July games.
(436-307 since 1997.) (58.7%, +98.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in May, June, or July games.
(935-733 since 1997.) (56.1%, +128.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - playing with 3 or more days rest, in May, June, or July games.
(214-150 since 1997.) (58.8%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(588-432 since 1997.) (57.6%, +112.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(119-73 since 1997.) (62%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(102-57 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(102-57 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(102-57 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(120-76 since 1997.) (61.2%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(427-291 since 1997.) (59.5%, +106.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(317-204 since 1997.) (60.8%, +92.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after scoring 75 points or more.
(138-84 since 1997.) (62.2%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(366-256 since 1997.) (58.8%, +84.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(443-328 since 1997.) (57.5%, +82.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(92-50 since 1997.) (64.8%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points against opponent off a home loss.
(24-5 since 1997.) (82.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(131-79 since 1997.) (62.4%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog.
(124-79 since 1997.) (61.1%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - off an upset win as an underdog.
(223-153 since 1997.) (59.3%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival.
(458-331 since 1997.) (58%, +93.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(273-199 since 1997.) (57.8%, +54.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(294-207 since 1997.) (58.7%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(175-115 since 1997.) (60.3%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(133-87 since 1997.) (60.5%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(157-102 since 1997.) (60.6%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(89-53 since 1997.) (62.7%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(728-513 since 1997.) (58.7%, +163.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(186-118 since 1997.) (61.2%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(765-536 since 1997.) (58.8%, +175.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(237-144 since 1997.) (62.2%, +78.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(491-345 since 1997.) (58.7%, +111.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| NEW YORK | 70 | | 35 | | 28-65 | 42.7% | 4-11 | 33.7% | 11-15 | 75.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | | 39 | | 31-69 | 44.3% | 3-8 | 32.0% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 43 | 10 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK covered the first half line 516 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 484 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 536 games went under first half total, while 464 games went over first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 66-97 against the 1rst half line (-40.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.4, OPPONENT 40.6 | NEW YORK is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.6, OPPONENT 39.5 | LOS ANGELES is 21-10 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.3, OPPONENT 36.8 | LOS ANGELES is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 35.6 | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.8, OPPONENT 34.1 | LOS ANGELES is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.5, OPPONENT 35.0 | LOS ANGELES is 22-12 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 37.1 |
|
NEW YORK is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 37.5, OPPONENT 41.7 | NEW YORK is 27-11 OVER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 37.4, OPPONENT 44.1 | NEW YORK is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 37.0, OPPONENT 41.7 | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.6, OPPONENT 39.2 |
|
NEW YORK is 133-61 UNDER (+65.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 33.5 | NEW YORK is 104-43 UNDER (+56.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.7, OPPONENT 34.6 | NEW YORK is 94-36 UNDER (+54.4 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.5, OPPONENT 32.5 | NEW YORK is 113-66 UNDER (+40.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 34.1 | NEW YORK is 86-47 UNDER (+34.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 33.4 | NEW YORK is 202-117 UNDER (+73.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 33.7 | NEW YORK is 85-46 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.5, OPPONENT 34.0 | NEW YORK is 72-44 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.2, OPPONENT 33.6 | NEW YORK is 86-45 UNDER (+36.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 33.4 | NEW YORK is 224-114 UNDER (+98.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 33.6 | LOS ANGELES is 94-57 UNDER (+31.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.3 | LOS ANGELES is 73-41 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 33.2 | LOS ANGELES is 181-141 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.7 |
|
| | | | |
|
NEW YORK is 39-23 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.2, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 59-90 against the 1rst half line (-40.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.6, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 28-42 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.2, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 37.5, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-16 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-25 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-14 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.6, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-7 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 161-86 UNDER (+66.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 86-59 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 62-38 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 35-15 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 3 or less 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.5, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 57-31 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 84-53 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 78-54 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 109-81 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 177-118 UNDER (+47.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 86-60 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 133-85 UNDER (+39.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 153-83 UNDER (+61.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.6, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 222-113 UNDER (+97.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 212-125 UNDER (+74.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 317-173 UNDER (+126.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 77-45 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.5, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 99-67 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 163-100 UNDER (+53.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 101-71 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 153-108 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 71-43 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 101-63 UNDER (+31.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 107-76 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 187-148 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-48 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 53-26 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 67-42 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 114-72 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 15-26 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.2, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 79-111 against the 1rst half line (-43.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.4, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-11 against the 1rst half line (-11.1 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 8-26 against the 1rst half line (-20.6 Units) off a close home win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-35 against the 1rst half line (-21.5 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 46-68 against the 1rst half line (-28.8 Units) after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 4-18 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.5, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 23-37 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.0, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 134-171 against the 1rst half line (-54.1 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 56-85 against the 1rst half line (-37.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 3-19 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 3-15 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 48-75 against the 1rst half line (-34.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 24-54 against the 1rst half line (-35.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 14-41 against the 1rst half line (-31.1 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 47-18 against the 1rst half line (+27.2 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 52-26 against the 1rst half line (+23.4 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 88-59 against the 1rst half line (+23.1 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-28 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-14 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 16-4 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.6, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 38.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 398-221 UNDER (+154.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 190-125 UNDER (+52.5 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 157-99 UNDER (+48.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 194-113 UNDER (+69.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 103-72 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 120-65 UNDER (+48.5 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 255-138 UNDER (+103.2 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 32-16 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.0, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 152-78 UNDER (+66.2 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 248-130 UNDER (+105.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 151-110 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 144-77 UNDER (+59.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 152-78 UNDER (+66.2 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 211-123 UNDER (+75.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 119-60 UNDER (+53.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 71-34 UNDER (+33.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 127-71 UNDER (+48.9 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 118-69 UNDER (+42.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 135-55 UNDER (+74.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.4, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 68-43 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 185-113 UNDER (+60.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 87-59 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 69-34 UNDER (+31.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.9, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 131-84 UNDER (+38.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 87-34 UNDER (+49.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.0, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 72-44 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 132-59 UNDER (+67.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a close home win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 132-56 UNDER (+70.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.3, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 120-81 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 35-17 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 72-41 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 130-78 UNDER (+44.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 100-63 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 64-34 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 40-22 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 191-107 UNDER (+73.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 86-50 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 212-95 UNDER (+107.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 206-102 UNDER (+93.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.9, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 76-43 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 49-27 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 116-85 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 159-120 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 107-76 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 227-183 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 107-76 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 175-135 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-13 | -5.8 | 7-13 | 8-13 | 73.2 | 37.2 | 43.0% | 42.7 | 75.6 | 40.1 | 41.9% | 41.7 | | Road Games | 1-8 | -6.6 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 71.3 | 34.1 | 42.0% | 42.2 | 77.4 | 39.2 | 41.6% | 43.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 40.2 | 44.8% | 45.8 | 75.4 | 41.4 | 43.3% | 36.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.2 | 37.2 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 4-11 | 33.9% | 13-18 | 75.3% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.8 | 38.7 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 15-20 | 77.6% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.3 | 34.1 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 4-10 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 74.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.6 | 40.1 | 28-67 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 38.7 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.4 | 39.2 | 29-69 | 41.6% | 5-15 | 31.6% | 15-19 | 81.5% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-12 | -11.9 | 10-12 | 10-11 | 79.0 | 40.9 | 45.7% | 39.9 | 78.2 | 38.6 | 45.1% | 39.7 | | Home Games | 3-7 | -11.6 | 3-7 | 4-6 | 76.9 | 39.1 | 46.0% | 38.5 | 78.4 | 38.4 | 46.8% | 38.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 78.2 | 39.6 | 44.4% | 38.4 | 71.6 | 39.8 | 44.2% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.0 | 40.9 | 31-68 | 45.7% | 3-8 | 32.8% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 40 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.6 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 5-14 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.9 | 39.1 | 30-66 | 46.0% | 3-9 | 33.0% | 13-17 | 79.9% | 38 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 38.6 | 29-65 | 45.1% | 5-14 | 34.7% | 14-18 | 81.4% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.4 | 38.4 | 30-64 | 46.8% | 5-14 | 37.5% | 13-18 | 75.3% | 39 | 8 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 70.3, LOS ANGELES 71 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/13/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 75-83 | 26-46 | -3 | L | 74.5 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 43 | 10 | | 6/15/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-76 | 37-38 | -0.5 | L | 73.5 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 43 | 14 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 46 | 9 | | 6/18/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 100-105 | 38-35 | 1 | W | 73 | P | 36-75 | 48.0% | 45 | 17 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 10 | | 6/20/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 64-85 | 35-49 | 5 | L | 76.5 | O | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | | 6/22/2014 | ATLANTA | 85-78 | 38-40 | 2.5 | W | 75 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | | 6/27/2014 | CHICAGO | 69-73 | 37-50 | 1 | L | 76.5 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 26 | 15 | | 6/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 67-65 | 34-31 | -1.5 | W | 74 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 49 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | TULSA | 90-74 | 46-35 | -1.5 | W | 77.5 | O | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | | 7/6/2014 | MINNESOTA | 87-80 | 48-48 | 2 | W | 75.5 | O | 37-71 | 52.1% | 41 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 38 | 11 | | 7/9/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 66-80 | 29-42 | 2 | L | 75 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 42 | 15 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 36 | 10 | | 7/11/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 54-68 | 33-42 | 2 | L | 76.5 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 41 | 16 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 37 | 10 | | 7/16/2014 | ATLANTA | 77-75 | 45-40 | 3 | W | 76 | O | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | | 7/23/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/13/2014 | @ TULSA | 67-69 | 39-43 | -2 | L | 77 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 47 | 13 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 42 | 6 | | 6/14/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-101 | 44-49 | -1.5 | L | 76 | O | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 19 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 29 | 11 | | 6/17/2014 | MINNESOTA | 77-94 | 42-53 | 1 | L | 78 | O | 31-70 | 44.3% | 35 | 12 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 35 | 13 | | 6/19/2014 | TULSA | 87-77 | 46-36 | -3.5 | W | 77.5 | O | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 69-72 | 38-40 | -3.5 | L | 78.5 | U | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | | 6/24/2014 | SEATTLE | 65-57 | 32-26 | -3.5 | W | 73 | U | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | | 6/28/2014 | @ TULSA | 92-89 | 47-32 | 0.5 | W | 79 | P | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | CHICAGO | 83-90 | 44-41 | -3.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 11 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 45 | 21 | | 7/3/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 70-56 | 40-22 | -1 | W | 73 | U | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | | 7/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 89-94 | 47-45 | 1 | W | 79.5 | O | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | | 7/8/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-83 | 42-48 | 2 | L | 80.5 | O | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | | 7/11/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 68-54 | 42-33 | -2 | W | 76.5 | U | 30-63 | 47.6% | 37 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 41 | 16 | | 7/13/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 90-64 | 44-38 | -2 | W | 76 | O | 32-62 | 51.6% | 43 | 12 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 39 | 11 | | 7/15/2014 | @ INDIANA | 86-78 | 36-46 | -1.5 | L | 74 | O | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | | 7/17/2014 | WASHINGTON | 75-79 | 34-34 | -4 | L | 76 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | | 7/23/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 21-17 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 24 of 38 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 5-0 versus the first half line when playing against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 10-8 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 9 of 18 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/11/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | -4 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 37 | 5 | 10 | | | NEW YORK | 54 | 156 | Under | 33 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 8/10/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 42 | 8 | 15 | | | NEW YORK | 67 | 153 | Under | 30 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 41 | 9 | 12 | 7/4/2013 | NEW YORK | 89 | 157 | ATS | 37 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 34 | 15 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 97 | -13 | SU Over | 60 | 40-62 | 64.5% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 29 | 4 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Bill is 30-14 against the 1rst half line (+14.6 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 36.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 27-12 against the 1rst half line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 37.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Bill is 15-26 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.8, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 1-11 against the 1rst half line (-11.1 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) off a home win as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 4-18 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.5, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 3-19 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Bill is 3-15 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 5-20 against the 1rst half line (-17.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.6, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Bill is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.6, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Bill is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 34.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 69-47 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 34.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 24-10 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 32.0, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 83-59 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 34.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 85 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 77 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 12 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 9 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 27 games went under the first half total, while 24 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 8 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 11 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 8 games went over the first half total, while 8 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/16/2014 - Kamiko Williams out for season ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 4:26:20 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|