| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA MINNESOTA |
|
| 163.5 | 108 Final 112 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | ATLANTA | +175 | 606 | MINNESOTA | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (297-119 since 1997.) (71.4%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (49-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (46-6 since 1997.) (88.5%, +35.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (170-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +73.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (72-39 since 1997.) (64.9%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +27.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (54-23 since 1997.) (70.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +27 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +27 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +27 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals. (41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (43-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.4%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals. (30-10 since 1997.) (75%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (114-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (114-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (114-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a win against a division rival. (39-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in non-conference games, playing with 3 or more days rest. (48-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season. (135-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (467-505 since 1997.) (48%, +102.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (265-269 since 1997.) (49.6%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (140-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (231-237 since 1997.) (49.4%, +81.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (138-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (91-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.2%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (152-125 since 1997.) (54.9%, +66.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (141-123 since 1997.) (53.4%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road loss, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (53-60 since 1997.) (46.9%, +50.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (105-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.7%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more. (144-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, on Tuesday nights. (92-69 since 1997.) (57.1%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games. (88-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.4%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after playing 2 consecutive home games, playing with 3 or more days rest. (99-90 since 1997.) (52.4%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (91-62 since 1997.) (59.5%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (91-62 since 1997.) (59.5%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (91-62 since 1997.) (59.5%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (88-55 since 1997.) (61.5%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (88-55 since 1997.) (61.5%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (88-55 since 1997.) (61.5%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (45-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (79-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (83-34 since 1997.) (70.9%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (66-22 since 1997.) (75%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (66-22 since 1997.) (75%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (66-22 since 1997.) (75%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (46-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (26-14 since 1997.) (65%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (35-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +32.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (23-11 since 1997.) (67.6%, +25.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (45-26 since 1997.) (63.4%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (37-20 since 1997.) (64.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (33-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (24-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (20-8 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (20-8 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (20-8 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (47-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (57-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (29-11 since 1997.) (72.5%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games. (34-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 74 | | 29-69 | 41.5% | 4-14 | 30.8% | 12-17 | 71.2% | 42 | 11 | 15 | MINNESOTA | 84 | | 32-66 | 47.7% | 4-11 | 34.3% | 17-21 | 80.4% | 44 | 9 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 761 times, while ATLANTA won 216 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 72.5 | MINNESOTA is 53-72 against the money line (-42.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 82-90 against the money line (-37.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 73.7 | MINNESOTA is 141-158 against the money line (-50.6 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 78.1 | ATLANTA is 14-16 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.7 | ATLANTA is 6-14 against the money line (-18.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 82.4 | ATLANTA is 7-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7 | ATLANTA is 18-26 against the money line (-20.3 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 81.6 | ATLANTA is 14-16 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 9-19 against the money line (-24.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 84.5 | ATLANTA is 2-14 against the money line (-20.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 87.6 | ATLANTA is 44-53 against the money line (-26.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.8 | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.3 | ATLANTA is 19-37 against the money line (-21.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 77.0 | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.8, OPPONENT 77.5 | MINNESOTA is 17-1 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 70.3 | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 71.8 | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 77.4 | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 71.2 | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 75.3 | MINNESOTA is 21-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 73.1 | MINNESOTA is 18-0 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 74.4 | MINNESOTA is 13-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.9, OPPONENT 77.4 | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.3, OPPONENT 81.4 | MINNESOTA is 12-0 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.8, OPPONENT 79.9 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 35-54 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-25 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 26-37 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-19 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-16 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 68.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 15-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-16 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 18-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-15 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-14 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-8.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 18-4 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 30-9 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 25-5 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 36-11 against the money line (+19.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-5 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 32-11 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 14-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 24-9 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 54-41 against the money line (-31.6 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 160-172 against the money line (-59.0 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 54-41 against the money line (-31.6 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 107-117 against the money line (-43.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 72-80 against the money line (-34.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 11-19 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-19 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-16 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 68.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-13 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 24-36 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 68.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 69.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 4-7 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-16 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-17 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-16 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 43-12 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 41-7 against the money line (+20.7 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-1 against the money line (+19.8 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 22-1 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 22-1 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 17-1 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-9 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 22-6 against the money line (+12.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 49-18 against the money line (+23.1 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-6 against the money line (+11.7 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 25-6 against the money line (+13.7 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-6 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 17-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) off 2 consecutive wins by 10 points or more against division rivals since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 3 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 28-8 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-8 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 37-10 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 23-5 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-1 against the money line (+21.4 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 19-3 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 15-6 | +0.8 | 11-10 | 12-9 | 81.7 | 41.8 | 43.9% | 46.7 | 76.1 | 38.4 | 41.8% | 43.1 | Road Games | 5-4 | -2.2 | 3-6 | 5-4 | 79.7 | 42.1 | 42.6% | 44.3 | 78.9 | 39.8 | 43.5% | 43.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 83.6 | 43.2 | 43.5% | 48.0 | 74.8 | 39.2 | 40.0% | 47.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.7 | 41.8 | 31-70 | 43.9% | 4-14 | 30.4% | 16-22 | 71.4% | 47 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 10 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.6 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 16-20 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.7 | 42.1 | 30-69 | 42.6% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 72.1% | 44 | 12 | 18 | 19 | 11 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 38.4 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 74.6% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.9 | 39.8 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 7-17 | 39.5% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 18 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-6 | +5.3 | 11-12 | 15-8 | 82.7 | 41.9 | 47.7% | 41.2 | 78.0 | 40.9 | 43.2% | 39.1 | Home Games | 10-1 | +6.8 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 83.0 | 38.8 | 47.6% | 42.2 | 75.5 | 38.8 | 41.4% | 39.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 84.8 | 45.0 | 49.7% | 41.2 | 77.2 | 41.2 | 40.6% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.7 | 41.9 | 32-66 | 47.7% | 4-12 | 32.8% | 16-20 | 80.7% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.9 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.6% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.0 | 38.8 | 31-66 | 47.6% | 4-11 | 36.1% | 16-20 | 83.3% | 42 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 40.9 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 39 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 77.1 | 38 | 29-65 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.5 | 38.8 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 13-17 | 76.2% | 39 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69.6, MINNESOTA 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/13/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-82 | W | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 46 | 15 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 6/15/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-67 | W | -175 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 52 | 17 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 19 | 6/18/2014 | WASHINGTON | 83-73 | W | -330 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 14 | 6/20/2014 | NEW YORK | 85-64 | W | -450 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | 6/22/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 78-85 | L | -200 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | 6/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-79 | W | -155 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | 6/29/2014 | @ INDIANA | 76-68 | W | -155 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | 7/1/2014 | INDIANA | 70-77 | L | -330 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | 7/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 86-73 | W | -400 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | 7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 83-71 | W | -450 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | 7/12/2014 | @ INDIANA | 93-74 | W | -120 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 81-79 | W | -300 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | L | -220 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/13/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 82-85 | L | +100 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 46 | 15 | 6/15/2014 | PHOENIX | 72-80 | L | -220 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 10 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 42 | 10 | 6/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-77 | W | -120 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 35 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 35 | 12 | 6/18/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 79-92 | L | +170 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 28 | 6 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 44 | 13 | 6/20/2014 | WASHINGTON | 75-65 | W | -360 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 10 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 39 | 9 | 6/22/2014 | INDIANA | 83-77 | W | -500 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 34 | 19 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 37 | 16 | 6/27/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 71-81 | L | -270 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | SEATTLE | 74-69 | W | -450 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 7/3/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 91-84 | W | -360 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 12 | 7/6/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 80-87 | L | -175 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 38 | 11 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/8/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 83-72 | W | -175 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | 7/10/2014 | @ TULSA | 91-85 | W | -155 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | 7/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 77-60 | W | -360 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 51 | 16 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 32 | 12 | 7/16/2014 | TULSA | 93-82 | W | -400 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | 7/22/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
MINNESOTA is 14-5 (+4.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 6-2 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 8-2 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 4-0 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/13/2014 | MINNESOTA | 82 | 163 | Over | 33 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 42 | 9 | 12 | | ATLANTA | 85 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 46 | 14 | 15 | 10/10/2013 | MINNESOTA | 86 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 26-31 | 83.9% | 39 | 5 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 77 | 152.5 | Over | 37 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 38 | 8 | 16 | 10/8/2013 | ATLANTA | 63 | 153.5 | Under | 36 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 31 | 4 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -11 | SU ATS | 51 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 0-1 | 0.0% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 53 | 8 | 20 | 10/6/2013 | ATLANTA | 59 | 157 | Under | 25 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 0-15 | 0.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 45 | 16 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 54 | 13 | 15 | 8/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75 | -2.5 | Over | 41 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 43 | 15 | 19 | | ATLANTA | 88 | 158 | SU ATS | 52 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 40 | 9 | 13 | 7/9/2013 | ATLANTA | 72 | 158 | Over | 39 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 46 | 16 | 18 | | MINNESOTA | 94 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 47 | 7 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 214-107 against the money line (+42.3 Units) in all games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 96-67 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 146-64 against the money line (+47.8 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.2, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 101-49 against the money line (+29.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 79-35 against the money line (+27.6 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 49-20 against the money line (+20.7 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 96-35 against the money line (+47.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 63-14 against the money line (+34.7 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 43-22 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 72.6, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 28-5 against the money line (+25.4 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 81.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 6*) | Michael is 46-22 against the money line (+21.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-2 against the money line (+12.1 Units) off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 17-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 9-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) off a close road loss of 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 79.1, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 8-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games after a close loss by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 26-13 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 165-65 against the money line (+43.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 59-29 against the money line (+23.1 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 51-22 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.1, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 41-17 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 85-26 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.3, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 65-22 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 51-31 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 91-57 against the money line (+21.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 41-23 against the money line (+18.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 33-17 against the money line (+16.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 29-13 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 86-51 against the money line (+23.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 87-43 against the money line (+21.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 113-60 against the money line (+30.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 165-85 against the money line (+30.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.9, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 58-28 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 29-15 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.8, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 39-23 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 48-19 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 111-52 against the money line (+26.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 56-13 against the money line (+22.1 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 60-16 against the money line (+24.9 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 60-16 against the money line (+24.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 23-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 49-22 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 36-12 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 67-33 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 54-15 against the money line (+28.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 43-11 against the money line (+24.5 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 34-7 against the money line (+23.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Cheryl is 38-8 against the money line (+26.2 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Cheryl is 18-3 against the money line (+12.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 51-22 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 26-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 34-13 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 47-17 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 43-13 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 19-2 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 36-22 against the money line (+13.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-19 against the money line (+10.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 28-12 against the money line (+16.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 36-9 against the money line (+17.9 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-3 against the money line (+21.4 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 30-9 against the money line (+14.1 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 32-8 against the money line (+15.4 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 50-16 against the money line (+21.0 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 33-16 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 49-17 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 83-39 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 68-29 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 64-27 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 86-31 against the money line (+29.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 67-24 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 57-16 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 49-11 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 55-21 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 58-25 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 66-28 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 80-31 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 60-21 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 45-13 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 34-8 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 33-16 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 47-29 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 57-26 against the money line (+18.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 77-40 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 67-27 against the money line (+23.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 89-42 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 61-25 against the money line (+24.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 79-40 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 69-41 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-21 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 53-32 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 26-11 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 205 times, while the road underdog won straight up 95 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/3/2024 8:40:06 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|