| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
First Half Results
MINNESOTA |
|
|
81
| 48
Final
52 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | ATLANTA | 80.5 | | 606 | MINNESOTA | -2.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(117-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 12 or more of their last 15 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(98-55 since 1997.) (64.1%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(39-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(31-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(33-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.5%, +24.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(27-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.1%, +22.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.5%, +19.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(54-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(25-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +20.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-4 since 1997.) (85.2%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(126-67 since 1997.) (65.3%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(99-52 since 1997.) (65.6%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(47-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(142-88 since 1997.) (61.7%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(50-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(90-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(67-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(53-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.6%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(50-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a win by 10 points or more.
(62-29 since 1997.) (68.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(85-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(63-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(41-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(46-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(33-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite.
(52-23 since 1997.) (69.3%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(90-48 since 1997.) (65.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(49-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(41-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(72-27 since 1997.) (72.7%, +42.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(52-20 since 1997.) (72.2%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(71-34 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(73-35 since 1997.) (67.6%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(64-32 since 1997.) (66.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(54-25 since 1997.) (68.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(57-28 since 1997.) (67.1%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(84-45 since 1997.) (65.1%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(47-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(116-60 since 1997.) (65.9%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(50-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(180-117 since 1997.) (60.6%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(43-14 since 1997.) (75.4%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Tuesday nights.
(36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 90 points or more.
(116-66 since 1997.) (63.7%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(62-27 since 1997.) (69.7%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Tuesday nights.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(88-45 since 1997.) (66.2%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(51-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(94-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(70-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +37 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(56-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.7%, +35.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(42-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +26.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(47-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(33-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(117-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(66-35 since 1997.) (65.3%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(59-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(84-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(47-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, on Tuesday nights.
(160-101 since 1997.) (61.3%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(89-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(74-36 since 1997.) (67.3%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-18 since 1997.) (71%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(30-10 since 1997.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(27-5 since 1997.) (84.4%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(44-17 since 1997.) (72.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(99-54 since 1997.) (64.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(128-73 since 1997.) (63.7%, +47.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(60-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(108-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(112-54 since 1997.) (67.5%, +52.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(86-38 since 1997.) (69.4%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(85-44 since 1997.) (65.9%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(354-255 since 1997.) (58.1%, +73.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(107-53 since 1997.) (66.9%, +48.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(176-106 since 1997.) (62.4%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in July games.
(77-36 since 1997.) (68.1%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(78-37 since 1997.) (67.8%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(123-68 since 1997.) (64.4%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(189-121 since 1997.) (61%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in July games.
(63-26 since 1997.) (70.8%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in May, June, or July games.
(96-52 since 1997.) (64.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(139-86 since 1997.) (61.8%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(45-16 since 1997.) (73.8%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(46-17 since 1997.) (73%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(23-5 since 1997.) (82.1%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(740-528 since 1997.) (58.4%, +159.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(82-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season.
(280-199 since 1997.) (58.5%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(203-121 since 1997.) (62.7%, +69.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(159-86 since 1997.) (64.9%, +64.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(115-62 since 1997.) (65%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(121-46 since 1997.) (72.5%, +70.4 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(86-31 since 1997.) (73.5%, +51.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win against a division rival.
(126-80 since 1997.) (61.2%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(218-136 since 1997.) (61.6%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(202-133 since 1997.) (60.3%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(545-405 since 1997.) (57.4%, +99.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(69-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(122-64 since 1997.) (65.6%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(90-46 since 1997.) (66.2%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(90-36 since 1997.) (71.4%, +50.4 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(66-25 since 1997.) (72.5%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win against a division rival.
(159-101 since 1997.) (61.2%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(530-374 since 1997.) (58.6%, +118.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(162-103 since 1997.) (61.1%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(120-68 since 1997.) (63.8%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(93-37 since 1997.) (71.5%, +52.3 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(72-31 since 1997.) (69.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(153-94 since 1997.) (61.9%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(585-409 since 1997.) (58.9%, +135.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(152-89 since 1997.) (63.1%, +54.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(164-96 since 1997.) (63.1%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(126-73 since 1997.) (63.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(94-38 since 1997.) (71.2%, +52.2 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(65-27 since 1997.) (70.7%, +35.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(129-80 since 1997.) (61.7%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(114-73 since 1997.) (61%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(108-63 since 1997.) (63.2%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(77-41 since 1997.) (65.3%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(60-29 since 1997.) (67.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(728-558 since 1997.) (56.6%, +114.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(127-78 since 1997.) (62%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(385-268 since 1997.) (59%, +90.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(245-164 since 1997.) (59.9%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(96-52 since 1997.) (64.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(153-96 since 1997.) (61.4%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(113-67 since 1997.) (62.8%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(77-42 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(61-27 since 1997.) (69.3%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(231-154 since 1997.) (60%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(145-94 since 1997.) (60.7%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(108-60 since 1997.) (64.3%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(81-44 since 1997.) (64.8%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(75-40 since 1997.) (65.2%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in July games.
(434-305 since 1997.) (58.7%, +98.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in May, June, or July games.
(933-731 since 1997.) (56.1%, +128.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - playing with 3 or more days rest, in May, June, or July games.
(212-148 since 1997.) (58.9%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(587-431 since 1997.) (57.7%, +112.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(242-165 since 1997.) (59.5%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(443-327 since 1997.) (57.5%, +83.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(92-49 since 1997.) (65.2%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season.
(381-276 since 1997.) (58%, +77.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(328-224 since 1997.) (59.4%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(301-204 since 1997.) (59.6%, +76.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(210-142 since 1997.) (59.7%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(165-111 since 1997.) (59.8%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(254-169 since 1997.) (60%, +68.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(56-29 since 1997.) (65.9%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(245-159 since 1997.) (60.6%, +70.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(174-114 since 1997.) (60.4%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(126-81 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(679-484 since 1997.) (58.4%, +146.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(217-116 since 1997.) (65.2%, +89.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(382-247 since 1997.) (60.7%, +110.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(456-327 since 1997.) (58.2%, +96.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(152-88 since 1997.) (63.3%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(159-90 since 1997.) (63.9%, +60 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in July games.
(434-305 since 1997.) (58.7%, +98.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in May, June, or July games.
(933-731 since 1997.) (56.1%, +128.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - playing with 3 or more days rest, in July games.
(114-69 since 1997.) (62.3%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a division game.
(930-722 since 1997.) (56.3%, +135.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(388-292 since 1997.) (57.1%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(273-197 since 1997.) (58.1%, +56.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(58-31 since 1997.) (65.2%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(99-50 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(116-70 since 1997.) (62.4%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(77-42 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(442-314 since 1997.) (58.5%, +96.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(106-60 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(210-135 since 1997.) (60.9%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(214-136 since 1997.) (61.1%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(150-89 since 1997.) (62.8%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(133-66 since 1997.) (66.8%, +60.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(100-45 since 1997.) (69%, +50.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(236-159 since 1997.) (59.7%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(56-26 since 1997.) (68.3%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning record on the season.
(212-143 since 1997.) (59.7%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(150-89 since 1997.) (62.8%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(119-62 since 1997.) (65.7%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(89-48 since 1997.) (65%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(75-28 since 1997.) (72.8%, +44.2 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(59-23 since 1997.) (72%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(331-231 since 1997.) (58.9%, +76.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(304-216 since 1997.) (58.5%, +66.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(178-110 since 1997.) (61.8%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(175-113 since 1997.) (60.8%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(130-78 since 1997.) (62.5%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(363-260 since 1997.) (58.3%, +77 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(108-53 since 1997.) (67.1%, +49.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(185-111 since 1997.) (62.5%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in July games.
(76-36 since 1997.) (67.9%, +36.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(80-36 since 1997.) (69%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(108-61 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(186-124 since 1997.) (60%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(746-547 since 1997.) (57.7%, +144.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(283-166 since 1997.) (63%, +100.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(471-323 since 1997.) (59.3%, +115.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(434-316 since 1997.) (57.9%, +86.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(150-75 since 1997.) (66.7%, +67.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(262-173 since 1997.) (60.2%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games.
(127-66 since 1997.) (65.8%, +54.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(211-145 since 1997.) (59.3%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after playing a road game.
(660-514 since 1997.) (56.2%, +94.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 74 | | 38 | | 29-69 | 41.5% | 4-14 | 30.8% | 12-17 | 71.2% | 42 | 11 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 84 | | 43 | | 32-66 | 47.7% | 4-11 | 34.3% | 17-21 | 80.4% | 44 | 9 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA covered the first half line 598 times, while ATLANTA covered the first half line 402 times.
Edge against first half line=MINNESOTA | In 1000 simulated games, 525 games went under first half total, while 475 games went over first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 54-77 against the 1rst half line (-30.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.5 |
|
ATLANTA is 15-27 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.1, OPPONENT 42.4 | ATLANTA is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in road games when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.3, OPPONENT 44.3 | MINNESOTA is 126-92 against the 1rst half line (+24.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.4, OPPONENT 38.6 | MINNESOTA is 23-12 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.9, OPPONENT 37.1 |
|
ATLANTA is 95-54 OVER (+35.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.8, OPPONENT 42.5 | ATLANTA is 71-31 OVER (+36.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 43.9 | ATLANTA is 104-56 OVER (+42.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.2, OPPONENT 41.3 | MINNESOTA is 39-23 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.8, OPPONENT 38.7 |
|
MINNESOTA is 79-48 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 | MINNESOTA is 105-73 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.8 | MINNESOTA is 72-41 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 | MINNESOTA is 161-116 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.0, OPPONENT 35.4 | MINNESOTA is 178-128 UNDER (+37.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.6 | MINNESOTA is 118-83 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.0 | MINNESOTA is 45-24 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 33.8 | MINNESOTA is 106-68 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.7 | MINNESOTA is 167-113 UNDER (+42.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.2 |
|
| | | | |
|
ATLANTA is 28-13 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 110-148 against the 1rst half line (-52.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 43-69 against the 1rst half line (-32.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 30-66 against the 1rst half line (-42.6 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.5, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.6, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 31-18 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 31-19 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.2, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 161-98 UNDER (+53.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 97-54 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 75-38 UNDER (+33.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 50-22 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 59-36 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 84-60 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.2, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 174-119 UNDER (+43.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 257-175 UNDER (+64.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-19 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 61-24 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 86-45 UNDER (+36.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 28-48 against the 1rst half line (-24.8 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 55-82 against the 1rst half line (-35.2 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 33-52 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-25 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 55-80 against the 1rst half line (-33.0 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 73-102 against the 1rst half line (-39.2 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-38 against the 1rst half line (-19.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 47-71 against the 1rst half line (-31.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 113-158 against the 1rst half line (-60.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-39 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 116-157 against the 1rst half line (-56.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-41 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 33-22 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) in home games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 37-24 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.7, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 47-27 OVER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.7, OPPONENT 47.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.9, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.4, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.4, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 56-39 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.7, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-10 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.5, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 34-19 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 312-227 UNDER (+62.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 124-86 UNDER (+29.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 69-42 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 161-110 UNDER (+40.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-32 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 202-158 UNDER (+28.2 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 196-137 UNDER (+45.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 130-83 UNDER (+38.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 87-55 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 84-56 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 152-113 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 116-72 UNDER (+36.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 158-102 UNDER (+45.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 86-50 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 149-106 UNDER (+32.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 98-70 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 95-57 UNDER (+32.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 66-42 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 105-64 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 131-100 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 55-36 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.9, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a combined score of 175 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 160-118 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 120-90 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 83-44 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 43-19 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 163-106 UNDER (+46.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 93-55 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-30 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 15-6 | +0.8 | 11-10 | 12-9 | 81.7 | 41.8 | 43.9% | 46.7 | 76.1 | 38.4 | 41.8% | 43.1 | | Road Games | 5-4 | -2.2 | 3-6 | 5-4 | 79.7 | 42.1 | 42.6% | 44.3 | 78.9 | 39.8 | 43.5% | 43.3 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 83.6 | 43.2 | 43.5% | 48.0 | 74.8 | 39.2 | 40.0% | 47.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.7 | 41.8 | 31-70 | 43.9% | 4-14 | 30.4% | 16-22 | 71.4% | 47 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 10 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.6 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 16-20 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.7 | 42.1 | 30-69 | 42.6% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 72.1% | 44 | 12 | 18 | 19 | 11 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 38.4 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 74.6% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.9 | 39.8 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 7-17 | 39.5% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 18 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 17-6 | +5.3 | 11-12 | 15-8 | 82.7 | 41.9 | 47.7% | 41.2 | 78.0 | 40.9 | 43.2% | 39.1 | | Home Games | 10-1 | +6.8 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 83.0 | 38.8 | 47.6% | 42.2 | 75.5 | 38.8 | 41.4% | 39.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 84.8 | 45.0 | 49.7% | 41.2 | 77.2 | 41.2 | 40.6% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.7 | 41.9 | 32-66 | 47.7% | 4-12 | 32.8% | 16-20 | 80.7% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.9 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.6% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.0 | 38.8 | 31-66 | 47.6% | 4-11 | 36.1% | 16-20 | 83.3% | 42 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 40.9 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 39 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.1 | 38 | 29-65 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.5 | 38.8 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 13-17 | 76.2% | 39 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69.6, MINNESOTA 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/13/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-82 | 50-33 | -1 | W | 80.5 | O | 30-71 | 42.3% | 46 | 15 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | | 6/15/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-67 | 40-32 | -2 | W | 76 | U | 26-68 | 38.2% | 52 | 17 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 19 | | 6/18/2014 | WASHINGTON | 83-73 | 34-39 | -4 | L | 75.5 | U | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 14 | | 6/20/2014 | NEW YORK | 85-64 | 49-35 | -5 | W | 76.5 | O | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | | 6/22/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 78-85 | 40-38 | -2.5 | L | 75 | O | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | | 6/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-79 | 45-42 | -1.5 | W | 80.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | | 6/29/2014 | @ INDIANA | 76-68 | 40-37 | -1.5 | W | 77 | P | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | | 7/1/2014 | INDIANA | 70-77 | 34-40 | -4 | L | 75.5 | U | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | | 7/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 86-73 | 40-40 | -5 | L | 76 | O | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | | 7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 83-71 | 39-31 | -5 | W | 79 | U | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | | 7/12/2014 | @ INDIANA | 93-74 | 55-34 | -1 | W | 75.5 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 44 | 13 | | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 81-79 | 42-46 | -3.5 | L | 78.5 | O | 29-82 | 35.4% | 60 | 18 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 55 | 21 | | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | 40-45 | -3 | L | 76 | O | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/13/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 82-85 | 33-50 | 1 | L | 80.5 | O | 28-67 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 46 | 15 | | 6/15/2014 | PHOENIX | 72-80 | 31-50 | -3 | L | 81.5 | U | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 10 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 42 | 10 | | 6/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-77 | 53-42 | -1 | W | 78 | O | 37-58 | 63.8% | 35 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 35 | 12 | | 6/18/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 79-92 | 42-52 | 2.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 28 | 6 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 44 | 13 | | 6/20/2014 | WASHINGTON | 75-65 | 43-34 | -4.5 | W | 75.5 | O | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 10 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 39 | 9 | | 6/22/2014 | INDIANA | 83-77 | 35-41 | -5.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 31-54 | 57.4% | 34 | 19 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 37 | 16 | | 6/27/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 71-81 | 26-33 | -3.5 | L | 73 | U | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/29/2014 | SEATTLE | 74-69 | 42-32 | -5 | W | 72.5 | O | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | | 7/3/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 91-84 | 41-35 | -4.5 | W | 77 | U | 28-63 | 44.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 12 | | 7/6/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 80-87 | 48-48 | -2 | L | 75.5 | O | 31-70 | 44.3% | 38 | 11 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 41 | 13 | | 7/8/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 83-72 | 48-42 | -2 | W | 80.5 | O | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | | 7/10/2014 | @ TULSA | 91-85 | 55-49 | -1.5 | W | 81.5 | O | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | | 7/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 77-60 | 34-28 | -4.5 | W | 73 | U | 31-65 | 47.7% | 51 | 16 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 32 | 12 | | 7/16/2014 | TULSA | 93-82 | 40-39 | -5 | L | 82.5 | U | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | | 7/22/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 11-8 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA since 1997 | | 10 of 19 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 5-3 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 5-5 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA since 1997 | | 5 of 10 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/13/2014 | MINNESOTA | 82 | 163 | Over | 33 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 42 | 9 | 12 | | | ATLANTA | 85 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 46 | 14 | 15 | 10/10/2013 | MINNESOTA | 86 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 26-31 | 83.9% | 39 | 5 | 13 | | | ATLANTA | 77 | 152.5 | Over | 37 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 38 | 8 | 16 | 10/8/2013 | ATLANTA | 63 | 153.5 | Under | 36 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 31 | 4 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -11 | SU ATS | 51 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 0-1 | 0.0% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 53 | 8 | 20 | 10/6/2013 | ATLANTA | 59 | 157 | Under | 25 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 0-15 | 0.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 45 | 16 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 54 | 13 | 15 | 8/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75 | -2.5 | Over | 41 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 43 | 15 | 19 | | | ATLANTA | 88 | 158 | SU ATS | 52 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 40 | 9 | 13 | 7/9/2013 | ATLANTA | 72 | 158 | Over | 39 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 46 | 16 | 18 | | | MINNESOTA | 94 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 47 | 7 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 13-28 against the 1rst half line (-17.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 26-40 against the 1rst half line (-18.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 33-45 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-35 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 33-45 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 8-24 against the 1rst half line (-18.4 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 28-40 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 48-63 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 42-61 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-48 against the 1rst half line (-23.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 24-35 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) in home games after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 10-29 against the 1rst half line (-21.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 7-20 against the 1rst half line (-15.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 6-20 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 13-28 against the 1rst half line (-17.8 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Michael is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) in road games after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 32.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-31 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 32.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.9, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 56-42 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 36-22 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 27-14 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 24-13 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.9, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 96-83 OVER (+4.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 75-61 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 56-42 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 41-25 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 41-25 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 31-19 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 50-34 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.9, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 55-35 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 33.6, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 28-13 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 53-32 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 87-59 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 49-31 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 33.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 26-8 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 32.1, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 33-13 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 33.3, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-13 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 37-26 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 30-17 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 27-16 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 156 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 141 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 10 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 7 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 9 games went under the first half total, while 7 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 4 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 9 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 5 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 8 games went under the first half total, while 6 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 1:40:23 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|