| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
TULSA
First Half Results
SEATTLE |
|
|
71
| 45
Final
26 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
 - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(103-56 since 1997.) (64.8%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home loss.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(35-12 since 1997.) (74.5%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(87-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(50-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(45-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(44-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(62-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(101-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(96-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(34-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +23 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(54-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in July games.
(263-155 since 1997.) (62.9%, +92.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win.
(253-141 since 1997.) (64.2%, +97.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win, in May, June, or July games.
(160-94 since 1997.) (63%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(59-21 since 1997.) (73.8%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(208-130 since 1997.) (61.5%, +65 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(117-68 since 1997.) (63.2%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(289-190 since 1997.) (60.3%, +80 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(281-171 since 1997.) (62.2%, +92.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(165-96 since 1997.) (63.2%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(130-77 since 1997.) (62.8%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(75-34 since 1997.) (68.8%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after playing a home game.
(379-232 since 1997.) (62%, +123.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(158-89 since 1997.) (64%, +60.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(99-53 since 1997.) (65.1%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(404-255 since 1997.) (61.3%, +123.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(407-250 since 1997.) (61.9%, +132 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(268-162 since 1997.) (62.3%, +89.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(90-49 since 1997.) (64.7%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games.
(532-349 since 1997.) (60.4%, +148.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - playing with 2 days rest.
(179-117 since 1997.) (60.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents.
(489-319 since 1997.) (60.5%, +138.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, off a home win.
(142-85 since 1997.) (62.6%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(111-66 since 1997.) (62.7%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(415-267 since 1997.) (60.9%, +121.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(213-136 since 1997.) (61%, +63.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(247-166 since 1997.) (59.8%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(287-171 since 1997.) (62.7%, +98.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(94-42 since 1997.) (69.1%, +47.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record.
(258-167 since 1997.) (60.7%, +74.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record, in July games.
(104-56 since 1997.) (65%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(112-62 since 1997.) (64.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(67-31 since 1997.) (68.4%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(419-228 since 1997.) (64.8%, +168.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(164-94 since 1997.) (63.6%, +60.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(64-27 since 1997.) (70.3%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog.
(60-26 since 1997.) (69.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(123-55 since 1997.) (69.1%, +62.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss against a division rival.
(38-13 since 1997.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss against a division rival.
(95-53 since 1997.) (64.2%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(266-145 since 1997.) (64.7%, +106.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(112-61 since 1997.) (64.7%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a home win.
(75-35 since 1997.) (68.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a loss against a division rival.
(70-33 since 1997.) (68%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points.
(84-38 since 1997.) (68.9%, +42.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(227-124 since 1997.) (64.7%, +90.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(104-57 since 1997.) (64.6%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(41-13 since 1997.) (75.9%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home win.
(68-30 since 1997.) (69.4%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(290-155 since 1997.) (65.2%, +119.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(131-68 since 1997.) (65.8%, +56.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(47-19 since 1997.) (71.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog.
(44-17 since 1997.) (72.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(78-39 since 1997.) (66.7%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(233-117 since 1997.) (66.6%, +104.3 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(99-50 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(32-8 since 1997.) (80%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a home win.
(75-32 since 1997.) (70.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(325-176 since 1997.) (64.9%, +131.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(130-73 since 1997.) (64%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(89-43 since 1997.) (67.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(187-100 since 1997.) (65.2%, +77 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in July games.
(401-276 since 1997.) (59.2%, +97.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(661-494 since 1997.) (57.2%, +117.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games.
(863-659 since 1997.) (56.7%, +138.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents.
(821-620 since 1997.) (57%, +139 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(102-55 since 1997.) (65%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(151-90 since 1997.) (62.7%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - with a losing record.
(458-335 since 1997.) (57.8%, +89.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - with a losing record, on Wednesday nights.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(190-121 since 1997.) (61.1%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(691-475 since 1997.) (59.3%, +168.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(297-199 since 1997.) (59.9%, +78.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(110-60 since 1997.) (64.7%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(192-119 since 1997.) (61.7%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(502-361 since 1997.) (58.2%, +104.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(227-154 since 1997.) (59.6%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(364-251 since 1997.) (59.2%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(83-44 since 1997.) (65.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(58-24 since 1997.) (70.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(484-326 since 1997.) (59.8%, +125.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, playing with 2 days rest.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(237-155 since 1997.) (60.5%, +66.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(86-46 since 1997.) (65.2%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(376-246 since 1997.) (60.5%, +105.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(183-105 since 1997.) (63.5%, +67.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(58-22 since 1997.) (72.5%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(544-365 since 1997.) (59.8%, +142.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(239-158 since 1997.) (60.2%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(304-206 since 1997.) (59.6%, +77.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(72-37 since 1997.) (66.1%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - in July games.
(263-155 since 1997.) (62.9%, +92.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(292-200 since 1997.) (59.3%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(283-190 since 1997.) (59.8%, +74 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after scoring 75 points or more.
(324-207 since 1997.) (61%, +96.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(384-255 since 1997.) (60.1%, +103.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(214-143 since 1997.) (59.9%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(209-137 since 1997.) (60.4%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(125-74 since 1997.) (62.8%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(287-183 since 1997.) (61.1%, +85.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(166-104 since 1997.) (61.5%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(379-267 since 1997.) (58.7%, +85.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(280-173 since 1997.) (61.8%, +89.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(166-102 since 1997.) (61.9%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(402-240 since 1997.) (62.6%, +138 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(170-75 since 1997.) (69.4%, +87.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(255-145 since 1997.) (63.8%, +95.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(249-149 since 1997.) (62.6%, +85.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(368-251 since 1997.) (59.5%, +91.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(130-74 since 1997.) (63.7%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(210-134 since 1997.) (61%, +62.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after playing a home game.
(395-252 since 1997.) (61.1%, +117.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after playing 2 consecutive home games.
(196-124 since 1997.) (61.2%, +59.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(379-270 since 1997.) (58.4%, +82 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - in May, June, or July games.
(532-349 since 1997.) (60.4%, +148.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - playing with 3 or more days rest.
(142-85 since 1997.) (62.6%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - playing with 3 or more days rest, in May, June, or July games.
(108-54 since 1997.) (66.7%, +48.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(489-319 since 1997.) (60.5%, +138.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(344-227 since 1997.) (60.2%, +94.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(230-150 since 1997.) (60.5%, +65 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after a division game.
(452-303 since 1997.) (59.9%, +118.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(296-189 since 1997.) (61%, +88.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(139-85 since 1997.) (62.1%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in May, June, or July games.
(109-63 since 1997.) (63.4%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(293-202 since 1997.) (59.2%, +70.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(194-118 since 1997.) (62.2%, +64.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(348-236 since 1997.) (59.6%, +88.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(401-276 since 1997.) (59.2%, +97.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(703-510 since 1997.) (58%, +142 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(271-158 since 1997.) (63.2%, +97.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(447-306 since 1997.) (59.4%, +110.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in May, June, or July games.
(863-659 since 1997.) (56.7%, +138.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(821-620 since 1997.) (57%, +139 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | 72 | | 36 | | 25-65 | 38.4% | 7-22 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 76.4% | 40 | 10 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 79 | | 40 | Over | 29-64 | 45.1% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 45 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE covered the first half line 488 times, while TULSA covered the first half line 468 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 638 games went over first half total, while 325 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 21-36 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 45.4 | SEATTLE is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.5, OPPONENT 29.5 | SEATTLE is 58-34 against the 1rst half line (+20.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 31.6 | SEATTLE is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 31.9 | SEATTLE is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 35.1 | SEATTLE is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 33.5 | SEATTLE is 16-4 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 33.8 | SEATTLE is 12-2 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.5, OPPONENT 37.3 | SEATTLE is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.4, OPPONENT 32.9 | SEATTLE is 14-0 against the 1rst half line (+14.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 42.7, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.7, OPPONENT 33.2 |
|
TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.5, OPPONENT 44.2 | TULSA is 25-12 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 45.3 | TULSA is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 44.6 | TULSA is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.1, OPPONENT 46.4 | TULSA is 23-10 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 44.5 | SEATTLE is 91-59 OVER (+26.1 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 38.3 | SEATTLE is 101-57 OVER (+38.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 41.2, OPPONENT 35.6 |
|
SEATTLE is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 30.7, OPPONENT 32.9 | SEATTLE is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.8, OPPONENT 34.3 | SEATTLE is 142-91 UNDER (+41.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 33.7 | SEATTLE is 59-37 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 | SEATTLE is 32-15 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 34.7 | SEATTLE is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 30.9 | SEATTLE is 63-31 UNDER (+28.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 32.3 | SEATTLE is 163-93 UNDER (+60.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 33.9 |
|
| | | | |
|
TULSA is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.8, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 40.1, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 12-2 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-8 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 27-15 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-4 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.2, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 27-15 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.2, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
TULSA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 34-16 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 120-73 UNDER (+39.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 139-106 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 80-54 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 111-78 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 41-21 UNDER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 142-107 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 112-73 UNDER (+31.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 144-106 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 220-147 UNDER (+58.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 71-35 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 131-85 UNDER (+37.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 68-36 UNDER (+28.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 130-99 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 33-19 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 54-31 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 77-43 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 16-31 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.3, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 10-24 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.1, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.9, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-19 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 1-11 against the 1rst half line (-11.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 10-24 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.1, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.8, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 35.5, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 21-42 against the 1rst half line (-25.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.7, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.1, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 16-31 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.5, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.1, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.7, OPPONENT 45.6 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 33.5, OPPONENT 47.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-22 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.6, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.3, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.0, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.0, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 27-13 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.4, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-2 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 29.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 27-13 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.9, OPPONENT 31.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.3, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 40.1, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.7, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 43.9, OPPONENT 48.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 32.9, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 54-32 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 30.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 134-102 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 184-123 UNDER (+48.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 100-66 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 79-52 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 143-95 UNDER (+38.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 136-101 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 42-24 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 87-60 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 105-64 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 65-29 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 42-20 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 70-40 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.4, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 41-24 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 30.2, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 28-12 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 30.3, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 133-95 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 146-81 UNDER (+56.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-13 | -6.2 | 8-8 | 10-6 | 77.3 | 37.3 | 38.7% | 40.3 | 84.5 | 41.9 | 48.2% | 45.5 | | Road Games | 1-8 | -2.5 | 4-5 | 5-4 | 71.3 | 35.1 | 36.2% | 39.9 | 82.4 | 40.8 | 48.1% | 45.6 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 0-5 | 4-1 | 70.4 | 34.6 | 35.4% | 40.0 | 86.4 | 45.4 | 50.0% | 45.8 | | Division Games | 2-6 | -0.5 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 79.6 | 37.2 | 41.9% | 38.7 | 82.9 | 41.7 | 48.6% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.3 | 37.3 | 27-69 | 38.7% | 7-22 | 33.4% | 17-21 | 79.2% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.6 | 38 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.3 | 35.1 | 24-67 | 36.2% | 6-21 | 28.0% | 17-21 | 81.3% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.5 | 41.9 | 32-66 | 48.2% | 5-14 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 76.3% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.7 | 39.8 | 29-67 | 44.0% | 4-13 | 33.2% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.4 | 40.8 | 32-66 | 48.1% | 4-13 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 76.3% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 16 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-8 | +4 | 7-6 | 4-10 | 69.9 | 33.0 | 41.6% | 37.9 | 73.6 | 36.6 | 43.7% | 39.9 | | Home Games | 3-2 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 72.8 | 34.6 | 42.9% | 38.2 | 71.4 | 35.8 | 44.7% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 0-5 | 64.2 | 27.2 | 40.0% | 39.0 | 64.8 | 33.6 | 36.5% | 39.8 | | Division Games | 2-3 | +1.5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 72.6 | 34.8 | 42.9% | 36.4 | 83.8 | 40.6 | 51.0% | 38.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 33.0 | 25-61 | 41.6% | 5-17 | 30.9% | 14-17 | 81.4% | 38 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.7 | 38.8 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.8 | 34.6 | 27-62 | 42.9% | 4-17 | 24.7% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 38 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.6 | 36.6 | 27-62 | 43.7% | 4-13 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.3 | 38.5 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 77.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.4 | 35.8 | 28-62 | 44.7% | 3-11 | 28.3% | 13-16 | 79.0% | 39 | 9 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 72.8, SEATTLE 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 67-58 | 34-29 | 4 | W | 73 | U | 23-54 | 42.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 10 | | 6/8/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-76 | 30-38 | 10 | W | 83 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 35 | 21 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 20 | | 6/14/2013 | MINNESOTA | 74-83 | 35-39 | 6 | W | 80 | U | 27-71 | 38.0% | 37 | 5 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 53 | 13 | | 6/16/2013 | PHOENIX | 103-108 | 46-48 | 3 | W | 83.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 42 | 10 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | | 6/20/2013 | CHICAGO | 83-74 | 41-39 | 3 | W | 79 | O | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 9 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 51 | 15 | | 6/22/2013 | SEATTLE | 92-70 | 41-30 | -2.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 31-62 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 14 | | 6/23/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-88 | 40-49 | 8.5 | L | 80 | O | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 11 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 41 | 13 | | 6/28/2013 | @ INDIANA | 69-80 | 33-39 | 1.5 | L | 70 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/30/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 61-84 | 34-44 | 2 | L | 79 | U | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | | 7/2/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-88 | 34-43 | 3 | L | 74 | O | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | | 7/11/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 78-94 | 35-50 | 4.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | | 7/13/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75-86 | 37-51 | 5.5 | L | 78.5 | O | 26-67 | 38.8% | 36 | 15 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 43 | 15 | | 7/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | TULSA | 58-67 | 29-34 | -4 | L | 73 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 10 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 42 | 13 | | 6/14/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 59-68 | 35-38 | 5 | W | 73 | P | 21-62 | 33.9% | 41 | 18 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 46 | 14 | | 6/16/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-66 | 40-33 | 5 | W | 71.5 | O | 32-64 | 50.0% | 42 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 10 | | 6/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 96-86 | 47-40 | -2 | W | 69 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 12 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 36 | 15 | | 6/21/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 91-86 | 39-37 | 3 | W | 71 | O | 31-59 | 52.5% | 34 | 10 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 32 | 9 | | 6/22/2013 | @ TULSA | 70-92 | 30-41 | 2.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 14 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | | 6/28/2013 | NEW YORK | 62-67 | 30-30 | -2 | L | 71 | U | 23-68 | 33.8% | 36 | 7 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 52 | 21 | | 6/30/2013 | @ INDIANA | 63-71 | 30-29 | 2.5 | W | 68.5 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 28 | 17 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 20 | | 7/2/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 69-60 | 34-31 | 4.5 | W | 74 | U | 23-63 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 47 | 12 | | 7/6/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 59-62 | 21-35 | 3 | L | 71.5 | U | 20-54 | 37.0% | 41 | 23 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 39 | 17 | | 7/9/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 57-66 | 19-36 | 3.5 | L | 70 | U | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 45 | 17 | | 7/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 73-65 | 32-37 | 2 | L | 70 | U | 28-54 | 51.9% | 45 | 15 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 31 | 10 | | 7/17/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| TULSA is 17-16 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997 | | 17 of 32 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 6-5 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| TULSA is 9-7 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997 | | 9 of 15 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/22/2013 | SEATTLE | 70 | 147 | Over | 30 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 12 | 14 | | | TULSA | 92 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 41 | 10 | 9 | 6/7/2013 | TULSA | 67 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 42 | 7 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 58 | -7.5 | Under | 29 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 0-17 | 0.0% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 34 | 8 | 10 | 9/8/2012 | SEATTLE | 89 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-55 | 58.2% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 7 | 15 | | | TULSA | 66 | 153.5 | Over | 31 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 34 | 10 | 10 | 9/6/2012 | TULSA | 74 | 148 | Over | 40 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 13-33 | 39.4% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 37 | 11 | 14 | | | SEATTLE | 101 | -10 | SU ATS | 53 | 37-62 | 59.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 40 | 5 | 13 | 6/15/2012 | SEATTLE | 86 | 144 | SU ATS | 53 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 12-27 | 44.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 40 | 7 | 16 | | | TULSA | 73 | -1.5 | Over | 43 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 28 | 8 | 10 | 6/1/2012 | TULSA | 58 | 145 | Under | 35 | 17-60 | 28.3% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 46 | 14 | 15 | | | SEATTLE | 76 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 44 | 7 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) on Wednesday as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Gary is 7-19 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Gary is 1-11 against the 1rst half line (-11.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Gary is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 5-19 against the 1rst half line (-15.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Gary is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Gary is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 35.6, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 36.0, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-37 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-11 against the 1rst half line (+12.9 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.2, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-40 against the 1rst half line (+15.0 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 38-17 against the 1rst half line (+19.3 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.8, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 55-35 against the 1rst half line (+16.5 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 38-25 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 37-26 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 61-47 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 33-21 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 31-17 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.5, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.3, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 27-11 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.4, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.5, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 39-26 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 63-47 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 41-23 against the 1rst half line (+15.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 55-34 against the 1rst half line (+17.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 40-28 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 62-42 against the 1rst half line (+15.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 34-22 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 88-71 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 38-24 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-37 against the 1rst half line (+18.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 53-39 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 84-65 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 30-17 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 34-22 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 85-70 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 33-21 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 46-28 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 20-6 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 30-13 against the 1rst half line (+15.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Gary is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.7, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Gary is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 43.9, OPPONENT 48.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Gary is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 34-23 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 41.0, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Gary is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 34.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 119-80 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 69-48 UNDER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-37 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 41-20 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.9, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 56-43 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 45-26 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.6, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 53-37 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 60-30 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 70-46 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-54 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 48-26 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 42-27 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 77-54 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 93-62 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 101-69 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 61-27 UNDER (+31.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.2, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 44-25 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.7, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 46-28 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 27-11 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 81-47 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 57-33 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 41-18 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 31.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 64-42 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 48-31 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 39-19 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.6, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 54-41 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 60-42 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-49 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.7, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 58-37 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 90-58 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-39 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 61-45 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 21-6 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.3, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 29.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 61-45 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 95-66 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 55-40 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 93-52 UNDER (+35.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 90-60 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 36-23 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 93-65 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Gary 36.3, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 33-18 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 57-43 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 85-58 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 62-42 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 39-22 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 127 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 110 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 17 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 13 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 70 games went under the first half total, while 45 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went under the first half total, while 4 games went over the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 15 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 12 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 15 games went over the first half total, while 13 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [C] 05/25/2013 - Ann Wauters out for season ( Personal ) | | [F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Hamstring ) | | [G] 05/25/2013 - Sue Bird out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/30/2024 11:24:42 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|