| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
TULSA
SEATTLE |
|
|
143.5
| 86
Final
59 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | TULSA | +200 | | 602 | SEATTLE | -250 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(675-289 since 1997.) (70%, +149.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(632-276 since 1997.) (69.6%, +135.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(131-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +61.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(114-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(274-100 since 1997.) (73.3%, +83.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(256-92 since 1997.) (73.6%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(208-76 since 1997.) (73.2%, +77.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(162-46 since 1997.) (77.9%, +73.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(313-188 since 1997.) (62.5%, +73.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, with a losing record.
(218-72 since 1997.) (75.2%, +71.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(159-50 since 1997.) (76.1%, +67.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(143-42 since 1997.) (77.3%, +64.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(166-70 since 1997.) (70.3%, +63.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(176-60 since 1997.) (74.6%, +62 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(184-79 since 1997.) (70%, +59.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(148-53 since 1997.) (73.6%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(112-28 since 1997.) (80%, +58.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(161-53 since 1997.) (75.2%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(106-23 since 1997.) (82.2%, +56 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(85-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(143-54 since 1997.) (72.6%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(96-22 since 1997.) (81.4%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(90-18 since 1997.) (83.3%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(105-35 since 1997.) (75%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(98-28 since 1997.) (77.8%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(43-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(103-38 since 1997.) (73%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(108-47 since 1997.) (69.7%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(121-64 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(68-16 since 1997.) (81%, +40 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(60-13 since 1997.) (82.2%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(62-16 since 1997.) (79.5%, +36.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a home loss against a division rival.
(85-60 since 1997.) (58.6%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(75-34 since 1997.) (68.8%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(67-19 since 1997.) (77.9%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(56-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(34-4 since 1997.) (89.5%, +27.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(35-10 since 1997.) (77.8%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(51-19 since 1997.) (72.9%, +22.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off 2 consecutive home losses by 10 points or more.
(35-14 since 1997.) (71.4%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(74-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss against a division rival.
(34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off 2 consecutive home losses by 10 points or more, in May, June, or July games.
(27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(25-7 since 1997.) (78.1%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(49-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(43-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog.
(46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog.
(53-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset win as an underdog.
(45-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off an upset win as an underdog.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +25.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off an upset win as an underdog.
(31-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off an upset win as an underdog.
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off an upset win as an underdog.
(38-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(256-113 since 1997.) (69.4%, +77.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(233-238 since 1997.) (49.5%, +77.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(134-108 since 1997.) (55.4%, +61.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(144-50 since 1997.) (74.2%, +57.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(43-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(72-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +45.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | 72 | | 25-65 | 38.4% | 7-22 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 76.4% | 40 | 10 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 79 | | 29-64 | 45.1% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 45 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 703 times, while TULSA won 279 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 1-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 77.0, OPPONENT 87.4 | TULSA is 2-19 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 72.7, OPPONENT 87.1 | TULSA is 4-40 against the money line (-30.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 75.5, OPPONENT 88.9 | TULSA is 7-40 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 75.8, OPPONENT 87.4 | TULSA is 1-7 against the money line (-6.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 81.0, OPPONENT 89.6 | SEATTLE is 8-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.6, OPPONENT 77.5 | SEATTLE is 70-27 against the money line (+38.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.6, OPPONENT 71.1 | SEATTLE is 12-1 against the money line (+14.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 66.3 | SEATTLE is 34-10 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 68.2 | SEATTLE is 59-34 against the money line (+36.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 72.0 | SEATTLE is 13-7 against the money line (+15.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.5 | SEATTLE is 51-36 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 71.4 | SEATTLE is 6-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 73.8 | SEATTLE is 12-9 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.7 | SEATTLE is 4-0 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 65.8 | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.0, OPPONENT 70.7 | SEATTLE is 10-4 against the money line (+14.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 78.6 | SEATTLE is 11-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.6, OPPONENT 71.6 | SEATTLE is 14-0 against the money line (+21.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 86.5, OPPONENT 73.8 | SEATTLE is 15-13 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 72.7 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 62-23 against the money line (+30.6 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 18-6 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 21-11 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-5 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-14 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 56-22 against the money line (+22.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 23-8 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 48-21 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 87-38 against the money line (+29.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 36-32 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 24-1 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 66.2 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 71-32 against the money line (+23.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 17-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 14-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.6, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 50-14 against the money line (+29.0 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 127-87 against the money line (+29.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 56-29 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 82-43 against the money line (+26.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 65.9 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 11-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 21-7 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 34-12 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 49-18 against the money line (+22.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 2-11 against the money line (-13.6 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 64.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
TULSA is 7-35 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 74.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-22 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 71.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 182-67 against the money line (+41.5 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.9, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 147-45 against the money line (+46.5 Units) as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 28-11 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 21-7 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 27-11 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 171-148 against the money line (+22.4 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-7 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 49-32 against the money line (+30.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 21-6 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 15-3 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 35-9 against the money line (+22.3 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in home games after 4 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 6-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 10-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 83-40 against the money line (+23.3 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 10-5 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 66.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 6-0 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 84-30 against the money line (+33.3 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 88-33 against the money line (+24.8 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-13 | -6.2 | 8-8 | 10-6 | 77.3 | 37.3 | 38.7% | 40.3 | 84.5 | 41.9 | 48.2% | 45.5 | | Road Games | 1-8 | -2.5 | 4-5 | 5-4 | 71.3 | 35.1 | 36.2% | 39.9 | 82.4 | 40.8 | 48.1% | 45.6 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 0-5 | 4-1 | 70.4 | 34.6 | 35.4% | 40.0 | 86.4 | 45.4 | 50.0% | 45.8 | | Division Games | 2-6 | -0.5 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 79.6 | 37.2 | 41.9% | 38.7 | 82.9 | 41.7 | 48.6% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.3 | 37.3 | 27-69 | 38.7% | 7-22 | 33.4% | 17-21 | 79.2% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.6 | 38 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.3 | 35.1 | 24-67 | 36.2% | 6-21 | 28.0% | 17-21 | 81.3% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.5 | 41.9 | 32-66 | 48.2% | 5-14 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 76.3% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.7 | 39.8 | 29-67 | 44.0% | 4-13 | 33.2% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.4 | 40.8 | 32-66 | 48.1% | 4-13 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 76.3% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 16 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-8 | +4 | 7-6 | 4-10 | 69.9 | 33.0 | 41.6% | 37.9 | 73.6 | 36.6 | 43.7% | 39.9 | | Home Games | 3-2 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 72.8 | 34.6 | 42.9% | 38.2 | 71.4 | 35.8 | 44.7% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 0-5 | 64.2 | 27.2 | 40.0% | 39.0 | 64.8 | 33.6 | 36.5% | 39.8 | | Division Games | 2-3 | +1.5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 72.6 | 34.8 | 42.9% | 36.4 | 83.8 | 40.6 | 51.0% | 38.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 33.0 | 25-61 | 41.6% | 5-17 | 30.9% | 14-17 | 81.4% | 38 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.7 | 38.8 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.8 | 34.6 | 27-62 | 42.9% | 4-17 | 24.7% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 38 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.6 | 36.6 | 27-62 | 43.7% | 4-13 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.3 | 38.5 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 77.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.4 | 35.8 | 28-62 | 44.7% | 3-11 | 28.3% | 13-16 | 79.0% | 39 | 9 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 72.8, SEATTLE 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 67-58 | W | +250 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 10 | | 6/8/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-76 | L | | 27-67 | 40.3% | 35 | 21 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 20 | | 6/14/2013 | MINNESOTA | 74-83 | L | +400 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 37 | 5 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 53 | 13 | | 6/16/2013 | PHOENIX | 103-108 | L | +200 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 42 | 10 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | | 6/20/2013 | CHICAGO | 83-74 | W | +200 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 9 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 51 | 15 | | 6/22/2013 | SEATTLE | 92-70 | W | -200 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 14 | | 6/23/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-88 | L | | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 11 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 41 | 13 | | 6/28/2013 | @ INDIANA | 69-80 | L | +135 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/30/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 61-84 | L | +145 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | | 7/2/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-88 | L | +180 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | | 7/11/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 78-94 | L | +280 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | | 7/13/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75-86 | L | +350 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 36 | 15 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 43 | 15 | | 7/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | TULSA | 58-67 | L | -330 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 10 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 42 | 13 | | 6/14/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 59-68 | L | +325 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 41 | 18 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 46 | 14 | | 6/16/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-66 | W | +300 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 42 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 10 | | 6/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 96-86 | W | -165 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 12 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 36 | 15 | | 6/21/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 91-86 | W | +200 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 34 | 10 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 32 | 9 | | 6/22/2013 | @ TULSA | 70-92 | L | +170 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 14 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | | 6/28/2013 | NEW YORK | 62-67 | L | -175 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 36 | 7 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 52 | 21 | | 6/30/2013 | @ INDIANA | 63-71 | L | +175 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 28 | 17 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 20 | | 7/2/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 69-60 | W | +280 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 47 | 12 | | 7/6/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 59-62 | L | +200 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 41 | 23 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 39 | 17 | | 7/9/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 57-66 | L | +220 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 45 | 17 | | 7/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 73-65 | W | +155 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 45 | 15 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 31 | 10 | | 7/17/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| TULSA is 13-16 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 7-2 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| TULSA is 6-6 (+4.9 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 1-2 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/22/2013 | SEATTLE | 70 | 147 | Over | 30 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 12 | 14 | | | TULSA | 92 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 41 | 10 | 9 | 6/7/2013 | TULSA | 67 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 42 | 7 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 58 | -7.5 | Under | 29 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 0-17 | 0.0% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 34 | 8 | 10 | 9/8/2012 | SEATTLE | 89 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-55 | 58.2% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 7 | 15 | | | TULSA | 66 | 153.5 | Over | 31 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 34 | 10 | 10 | 9/6/2012 | TULSA | 74 | 148 | Over | 40 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 13-33 | 39.4% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 37 | 11 | 14 | | | SEATTLE | 101 | -10 | SU ATS | 53 | 37-62 | 59.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 40 | 5 | 13 | 6/15/2012 | SEATTLE | 86 | 144 | SU ATS | 53 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 12-27 | 44.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 40 | 7 | 16 | | | TULSA | 73 | -1.5 | Over | 43 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 28 | 8 | 10 | 6/1/2012 | TULSA | 58 | 145 | Under | 35 | 17-60 | 28.3% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 46 | 14 | 15 | | | SEATTLE | 76 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 44 | 7 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 20-29 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 70.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brian is 120-76 against the money line (+40.4 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 91-22 against the money line (+40.5 Units) as a favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 73-12 against the money line (+44.4 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 29-7 against the money line (+17.7 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 23-3 against the money line (+17.4 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 78-17 against the money line (+51.0 Units) in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 46-9 against the money line (+30.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 66.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 72-15 against the money line (+47.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 31-15 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 74-42 against the money line (+38.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 31-16 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 78-43 against the money line (+32.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 45-26 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 24-12 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 13-5 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 43-26 against the money line (+18.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 80-49 against the money line (+28.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 69-40 against the money line (+34.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 24-8 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 65-46 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-2 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 6*) | Brian is 30-21 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 21-7 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 6-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 26-12 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 45-30 against the money line (+14.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 29-17 against the money line (+11.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 33-19 against the money line (+13.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 12-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 37-19 against the money line (+17.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 14-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 14-1 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 6*) | Brian is 48-29 against the money line (+12.9 Units) off a home win as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 45-34 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 14-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 8-1 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.4, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 56-37 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 64-36 against the money line (+27.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 73-44 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 63-27 against the money line (+23.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 41-25 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 65-45 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 44-21 against the money line (+16.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-31 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 46-24 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 70-36 against the money line (+34.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 11-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 66.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 16-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 63-40 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 96-63 against the money line (+31.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 40-22 against the money line (+19.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 58-38 against the money line (+23.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 56-36 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 88-60 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 44-11 against the money line (+26.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 33-12 against the money line (+13.5 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 16-3 against the money line (+13.5 Units) vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 64-41 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 95-60 against the money line (+29.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 43-21 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 64-30 against the money line (+27.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 61-38 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 87-56 against the money line (+26.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 29-9 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 62-44 against the money line (+17.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 28-15 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 173 times, while the road underdog won straight up 68 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 22 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [C] 05/25/2013 - Ann Wauters out for season ( Personal ) | | [F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Hamstring ) | | [G] 05/25/2013 - Sue Bird out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 11:05:12 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|