| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
First Half Results
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
80.5
| 34
Final
37 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | ATLANTA | 79 | | 604 | LOS ANGELES | -6.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.2%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +18.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.5%, +19.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(87-48 since 1997.) (64.4%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(36-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(73-36 since 1997.) (67%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, playing with 2 days rest.
(30-10 since 1997.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(86-43 since 1997.) (66.7%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(49-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(37-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(24-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off 2 or more consecutive road losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(23-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(151-95 since 1997.) (61.4%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(48-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(120-68 since 1997.) (63.8%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(63-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(87-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(101-56 since 1997.) (64.3%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(50-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +23.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(142-83 since 1997.) (63.1%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(66-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(33-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +25.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(29-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(53-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(102-56 since 1997.) (64.6%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(32-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(74-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(54-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in July games.
(401-276 since 1997.) (59.2%, +97.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival.
(433-316 since 1997.) (57.8%, +85.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(81-45 since 1997.) (64.3%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(168-105 since 1997.) (61.5%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(82-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(94-53 since 1997.) (63.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(201-123 since 1997.) (62%, +65.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(69-33 since 1997.) (67.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(105-54 since 1997.) (66%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(661-494 since 1997.) (57.2%, +117.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(226-153 since 1997.) (59.6%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(120-68 since 1997.) (63.8%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(358-229 since 1997.) (61%, +106.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(227-141 since 1997.) (61.7%, +71.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(255-175 since 1997.) (59.3%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(144-86 since 1997.) (62.6%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(118-70 since 1997.) (62.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(73-36 since 1997.) (67%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(211-132 since 1997.) (61.5%, +65.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(49-20 since 1997.) (71%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in May, June, or July games.
(863-659 since 1997.) (56.7%, +138.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game.
(843-632 since 1997.) (57.2%, +147.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(324-229 since 1997.) (58.6%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(579-426 since 1997.) (57.6%, +110.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(389-246 since 1997.) (61.3%, +118.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(407-280 since 1997.) (59.2%, +99 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(199-126 since 1997.) (61.2%, +60.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(197-119 since 1997.) (62.3%, +66.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(127-59 since 1997.) (68.3%, +62.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(306-208 since 1997.) (59.5%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(281-194 since 1997.) (59.2%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(167-103 since 1997.) (61.9%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(161-98 since 1997.) (62.2%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(107-49 since 1997.) (68.6%, +53.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(120-71 since 1997.) (62.8%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(82-40 since 1997.) (67.2%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(337-236 since 1997.) (58.8%, +77.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(102-50 since 1997.) (67.1%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(169-99 since 1997.) (63.1%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(113-63 since 1997.) (64.2%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(182-111 since 1997.) (62.1%, +59.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in July games.
(60-25 since 1997.) (70.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record, in May, June, or July games.
(93-48 since 1997.) (66%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in July games.
(401-276 since 1997.) (59.2%, +97.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(331-234 since 1997.) (58.6%, +73.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good pressure defensive team - forcing >=17 turnovers/game.
(228-147 since 1997.) (60.8%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good pressure defensive team - forcing >=17 turnovers/game, in July games.
(100-41 since 1997.) (70.9%, +54.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good pressure defensive team - forcing >=17 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(156-93 since 1997.) (62.7%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(402-282 since 1997.) (58.8%, +91.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(144-67 since 1997.) (68.2%, +70.3 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(247-156 since 1997.) (61.3%, +75.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(180-108 since 1997.) (62.5%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in July games.
(65-25 since 1997.) (72.2%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(130-72 since 1997.) (64.4%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games.
(121-60 since 1997.) (66.9%, +55 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(199-129 since 1997.) (60.7%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in May, June, or July games.
(863-659 since 1997.) (56.7%, +138.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a non-conference game.
(544-386 since 1997.) (58.5%, +119.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(389-246 since 1997.) (61.3%, +118.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(225-147 since 1997.) (60.5%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(407-290 since 1997.) (58.4%, +88 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season.
(355-249 since 1997.) (58.8%, +81.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(301-198 since 1997.) (60.3%, +83.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(279-181 since 1997.) (60.7%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(233-149 since 1997.) (61%, +69.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(225-139 since 1997.) (61.8%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(631-432 since 1997.) (59.4%, +155.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(207-106 since 1997.) (66.1%, +90.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(357-224 since 1997.) (61.4%, +110.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(346-241 since 1997.) (58.9%, +80.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(103-50 since 1997.) (67.3%, +48 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(178-104 since 1997.) (63.1%, +63.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 75 | | 38 | | 30-69 | 43.8% | 4-13 | 27.4% | 11-15 | 75.9% | 40 | 12 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | | 42 | | 32-65 | 49.4% | 4-12 | 33.6% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 41 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA covered the first half line 603 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 397 times.
Edge against first half line=ATLANTA | In 1000 simulated games, 514 games went over first half total, while 458 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.1, OPPONENT 36.3 | ATLANTA is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 37.5 | ATLANTA is 12-2 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.3, OPPONENT 37.1 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 24-12 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.8 | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.7, OPPONENT 34.5 | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.5, OPPONENT 36.8 | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.7, OPPONENT 34.8 | LOS ANGELES is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.8, OPPONENT 37.7 | LOS ANGELES is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.7, OPPONENT 36.9 | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.5, OPPONENT 37.3 | LOS ANGELES is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 48.8, OPPONENT 33.8 | LOS ANGELES is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.9, OPPONENT 37.6 |
|
ATLANTA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 42.9 | ATLANTA is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 43.0 | ATLANTA is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.8, OPPONENT 40.8 | ATLANTA is 18-4 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 42.3, OPPONENT 41.2 | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.0, OPPONENT 38.4 | LOS ANGELES is 37-16 OVER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.1, OPPONENT 40.4 | LOS ANGELES is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.8, OPPONENT 38.0 | LOS ANGELES is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.9, OPPONENT 36.9 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 71-45 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 33.2 | LOS ANGELES is 167-131 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 34.5 | LOS ANGELES is 177-138 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.7 |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | |  | | LOS ANGELES | -3 | |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 79-55 against the 1rst half line (+18.5 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-13 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-9 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.8, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-23 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) in home games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 56-35 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 138-104 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 65-44 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-43 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) after 3 straight blowout wins by 12 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 31.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 34-18 against the 1rst half line (+14.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-5 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 48-24 against the 1rst half line (+21.6 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-4 against the 1rst half line (+13.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in home games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.3, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 48.2, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-11 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-8 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-11 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.0, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 203-163 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 78-53 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-18 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 104-75 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 92-55 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-34 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 82-56 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-13 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive road wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 145-111 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-69 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 50-31 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 208-167 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 97-70 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 75-44 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-18 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 155-114 UNDER (+29.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-3 | +5.5 | 8-4 | 7-6 | 78.8 | 41.8 | 44.3% | 42.7 | 71.7 | 37.5 | 41.2% | 42.8 | | Road Games | 3-3 | -1.5 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 73.5 | 39.8 | 40.4% | 41.5 | 76.7 | 38.3 | 44.7% | 45.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 78.4 | 40.0 | 45.6% | 40.0 | 73.8 | 37.2 | 44.4% | 41.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.8 | 41.8 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 4-14 | 31.5% | 14-19 | 74.5% | 43 | 11 | 17 | 16 | 12 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.2 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.5 | 39.8 | 28-70 | 40.4% | 3-14 | 25.0% | 13-16 | 78.8% | 41 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 11 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.7 | 37.5 | 27-66 | 41.2% | 4-12 | 31.4% | 13-17 | 78.4% | 43 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.5 | 36.7 | 28-67 | 41.6% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 77.9% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.7 | 38.3 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 3-11 | 32.8% | 13-17 | 74.8% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-4 | -1.5 | 7-7 | 5-9 | 85.8 | 45.6 | 49.5% | 41.8 | 75.1 | 37.2 | 41.2% | 41.6 | | Home Games | 8-0 | +6 | 5-3 | 2-6 | 89.2 | 47.7 | 52.7% | 41.9 | 66.9 | 33.1 | 38.9% | 38.5 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 93.6 | 50.4 | 54.2% | 41.6 | 75.0 | 35.4 | 40.5% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.8 | 45.6 | 33-67 | 49.5% | 4-11 | 35.4% | 16-20 | 76.0% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.7 | 39.6 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 89.2 | 47.7 | 34-65 | 52.7% | 4-11 | 40.4% | 16-21 | 80.0% | 42 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 37.2 | 28-69 | 41.2% | 4-14 | 27.8% | 14-19 | 77.2% | 42 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.1 | 38.6 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.9 | 33.1 | 26-67 | 38.9% | 3-13 | 25.2% | 11-16 | 70.9% | 38 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69.7, LOS ANGELES 69.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/7/2013 | NEW YORK | 75-56 | 44-33 | -6.5 | W | 75.5 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 53 | 13 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 40 | 19 | | 6/9/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 67-76 | 33-32 | -3 | L | 73.5 | U | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 18 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 49 | 15 | | 6/14/2013 | SEATTLE | 68-59 | 38-35 | -5 | L | 73 | P | 28-67 | 41.8% | 46 | 14 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 41 | 18 | | 6/16/2013 | CHICAGO | 88-74 | 51-47 | -3 | W | 76 | O | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 8 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 49 | 17 | | 6/23/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-77 | 45-37 | -2.5 | W | 73.5 | O | 30-74 | 40.5% | 39 | 14 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 56 | 18 | | 6/25/2013 | INDIANA | 76-60 | 36-30 | -7.5 | L | 70 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 32 | 15 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 48 | 23 | | 6/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 86-75 | 39-28 | -5.5 | W | 77 | U | 34-67 | 50.7% | 46 | 16 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 15 | | 6/30/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-67 | 49-40 | -7 | W | 75.5 | O | 36-64 | 56.2% | 45 | 18 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 32 | 21 | | 7/9/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-94 | 39-56 | 3 | L | 78 | O | 29-77 | 37.7% | 46 | 18 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 47 | 10 | | 7/14/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 65-73 | 37-32 | -2 | W | 70 | U | 27-69 | 39.1% | 31 | 10 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 45 | 15 | | 7/17/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/8/2013 | TULSA | 76-69 | 38-30 | -10 | L | 83 | U | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 20 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 35 | 21 | | 6/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 81-97 | 50-48 | -1.5 | W | 86 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 47 | 10 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 14 | | 6/15/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 84-48 | 35-28 | -5 | W | 78 | U | 36-61 | 59.0% | 34 | 15 | 16-53 | 30.2% | 37 | 22 | | 6/21/2013 | MINNESOTA | 87-59 | 50-24 | -2 | W | 81.5 | U | 35-73 | 47.9% | 55 | 14 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 39 | 16 | | 6/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | 79-69 | 47-37 | -7.5 | W | 79 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 37 | 11 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 19 | | 6/28/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-88 | 30-44 | 3.5 | L | 81 | U | 24-65 | 36.9% | 31 | 14 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 52 | 14 | | 6/29/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-94 | 41-47 | 2 | L | 79.5 | O | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 13 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 55 | 7 | | 7/2/2013 | MINNESOTA | 96-66 | 60-39 | -1.5 | W | 81.5 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 8 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 43 | 13 | | 7/4/2013 | NEW YORK | 97-89 | 60-37 | -7.5 | W | 77.5 | O | 40-62 | 64.5% | 29 | 15 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/6/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-66 | 39-29 | -7 | W | 79 | U | 36-66 | 54.5% | 43 | 12 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 15 | | 7/11/2013 | @ TULSA | 94-78 | 50-35 | -4.5 | W | 80.5 | O | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | | 7/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 88-76 | 43-37 | -2 | W | 87 | U | 34-67 | 50.7% | 53 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 35 | 14 | | 7/17/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 7-3 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA since 1997 | | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 4-1 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA since 1997 | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/8/2012 | ATLANTA | 63 | 163 | Under | 36 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 44 | 12 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 48 | 13 | 17 | 6/15/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 59 | 161.5 | Under | 28 | 22-77 | 28.6% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 52 | 16 | 18 | | | ATLANTA | 92 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 56 | 11 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 37.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Carol is 34-18 against the 1rst half line (+14.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 30-9 against the 1rst half line (+20.1 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 20-6 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 21-6 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 21-6 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 17-5 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 18-4 against the 1rst half line (+13.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in home games in non-conference games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 29-13 against the 1rst half line (+14.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 26-11 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.3, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 24-8 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 26-11 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 21-8 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 24-11 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 27-13 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 23-9 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 28-11 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.8, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 35 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 31 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 6 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 11 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| | | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/21/2024 9:05:25 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|