| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
NEW YORK |
|
|
158
| 66
Final
74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 615 | WASHINGTON | +175 | | 616 | NEW YORK | -210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(198-74 since 1997.) (72.8%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(182-59 since 1997.) (75.5%, +60.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(207-150 since 1997.) (58%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(174-61 since 1997.) (74%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(162-108 since 1997.) (60%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(49-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(131-44 since 1997.) (74.9%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(62-30 since 1997.) (67.4%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(34-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +19.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win by 10 points or more, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%).
(32-6 since 1997.) (84.2%, +21.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 125 points or less.
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +13.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(160-119 since 1997.) (57.3%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(50-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(97-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +53 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games.
(46-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(51-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 6 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(38-25 since 1997.) (60.3%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(41-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +32.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 55 points or less.
(49-26 since 1997.) (65.3%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(20-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +14.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 76 | | 27-70 | 38.3% | 7-22 | 31.3% | 16-19 | 83.4% | 43 | 11 | 10 | | NEW YORK | 82 | | 30-71 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 51 | 14 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 670 times, while WASHINGTON won 311 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 70-95 against the money line (-39.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.7, OPPONENT 72.0 | NEW YORK is 1-5 against the money line (-6.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 87.0 |
|
WASHINGTON is 114-177 against the money line (-56.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 | WASHINGTON is 38-103 against the money line (-66.9 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 66.9, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 72-114 against the money line (-47.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | WASHINGTON is 2-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 82.5 | WASHINGTON is 9-19 against the money line (-15.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 82.6 | WASHINGTON is 29-88 against the money line (-56.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 12-29 against the money line (-21.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 87.7 | WASHINGTON is 16-27 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 83.6 | WASHINGTON is 40-108 against the money line (-76.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 75.2 | WASHINGTON is 16-26 against the money line (-14.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 85.8 | WASHINGTON is 4-13 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 81.5 | NEW YORK is 46-26 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 77.9 | NEW YORK is 17-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | NEW YORK is 15-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.2, OPPONENT 73.1 | NEW YORK is 15-8 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | NEW YORK is 86-61 against the money line (+30.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 71.7 | NEW YORK is 10-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.7, OPPONENT 75.2 | NEW YORK is 12-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.9, OPPONENT 74.9 | NEW YORK is 9-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.8, OPPONENT 82.9 | NEW YORK is 125-109 against the money line (+30.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 81.5 | NEW YORK is 77-23 against the money line (+61.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 73.6 | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.6, OPPONENT 77.6 | NEW YORK is 31-15 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 77.7 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 32-113 against the money line (-45.1 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 80-150 against the money line (-68.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 129-208 against the money line (-63.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-17 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-17 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 70-111 against the money line (-42.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-17 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 135-220 against the money line (-95.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 211-313 against the money line (-104.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-20 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 78-132 against the money line (-50.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 55-96 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-6 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 53-33 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 13-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 50-30 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 126-105 against the money line (+25.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 34-19 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 33-21 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 13-7 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 56-34 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 90-58 against the money line (+30.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 9-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 12-7 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-6 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-1 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 6*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-0 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.2, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 35-35 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.4, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 276-404 against the money line (-120.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-140 against the money line (-52.1 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 166-243 against the money line (-99.1 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-194 against the money line (-62.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 17-51 against the money line (-33.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-32 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 44-77 against the money line (-36.6 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 66-119 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 65-128 against the money line (-44.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 79-95 against the money line (-41.3 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 34-58 against the money line (-32.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-64 against the money line (-28.1 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 123-203 against the money line (-70.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-132 against the money line (-47.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-24 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-28 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 129-199 against the money line (-78.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-218 against the money line (-72.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 121-153 against the money line (-54.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-14 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 65-40 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-6 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 15-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 13-5 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+5.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 63-36 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 47-25 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 196-155 against the money line (+33.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+5.7 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 18-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 17-12 | +0.3 | 13-15 | 15-14 | 82.0 | 43.6 | 41.6% | 43.4 | 80.0 | 39.7 | 43.3% | 42.6 | | Road Games | 7-8 | -2 | 6-9 | 7-8 | 80.5 | 44.5 | 41.2% | 42.0 | 79.9 | 39.9 | 42.5% | 44.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 82.6 | 40.6 | 43.3% | 41.4 | 85.2 | 40.8 | 50.3% | 37.6 | | Division Games | 12-2 | +10 | 9-4 | 5-9 | 82.9 | 44.1 | 41.0% | 47.1 | 74.9 | 36.6 | 40.2% | 43.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.0 | 43.6 | 28-68 | 41.6% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 18-22 | 84.6% | 43 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.5 | 44.5 | 28-69 | 41.2% | 7-21 | 31.8% | 17-19 | 87.0% | 42 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.0 | 39.7 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 36.0% | 14-18 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.9 | 39.9 | 30-70 | 42.5% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 15-19 | 80.9% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 18-12 | +1.6 | 16-14 | 14-15 | 79.4 | 40.7 | 42.6% | 47.5 | 77.5 | 40.0 | 40.8% | 40.2 | | Home Games | 10-4 | +4.7 | 8-6 | 6-7 | 81.6 | 40.8 | 43.4% | 47.9 | 76.1 | 37.8 | 40.0% | 39.9 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +7.2 | 5-0 | 1-4 | 77.8 | 40.6 | 43.8% | 46.8 | 65.4 | 34.2 | 35.8% | 40.6 | | Division Games | 9-5 | +1.3 | 7-7 | 6-8 | 78.9 | 39.9 | 42.2% | 49.6 | 75.1 | 38.4 | 39.8% | 38.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.4 | 40.7 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 15-20 | 77.4% | 47 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.6 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.6 | 40.8 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 18-22 | 80.1% | 48 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.5 | 40.0 | 28-68 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 80.6% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.1 | 37.8 | 27-69 | 40.0% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.1, NEW YORK 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/16/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 55-85 | L | +210 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | | 7/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -165 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 53 | 12 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-76 | W | -300 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 47 | 10 | | 7/30/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 77-70 | W | -125 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 58 | 12 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 38 | 6 | | 8/4/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-76 | L | -200 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 43 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 42 | 10 | | 8/6/2017 | PHOENIX | 85-80 | W | -155 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 36 | 9 | | 8/12/2017 | INDIANA | 100-80 | W | -400 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 39 | 11 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 33 | 10 | | 8/16/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 62-95 | L | +200 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 30 | 20 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 38 | 13 | | 8/18/2017 | PHOENIX | 79-89 | L | +155 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 43 | 12 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 40 | 12 | | 8/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | 87-82 | W | -250 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 40 | 6 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 41 | 15 | | 8/25/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/16/2017 | WASHINGTON | 85-55 | W | -270 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | | 7/19/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 96-80 | W | +105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | | 7/25/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 75-76 | L | +500 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 11 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 10 | | 7/28/2017 | @ INDIANA | 85-84 | W | -250 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 50 | 15 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 24 | 10 | | 7/30/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -165 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 46 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 39 | 14 | | 8/1/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-93 | L | -500 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 37 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 13 | | 8/4/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 74-87 | L | +325 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 13 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 44 | 6 | | 8/8/2017 | INDIANA | 81-76 | W | -450 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 49 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 13 | | 8/11/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 83-77 | W | +120 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 11 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 48 | 10 | | 8/13/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 83-69 | W | +120 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 11 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 32 | 10 | | 8/18/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-70 | W | +210 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 59 | 12 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 48 | 8 | | 8/20/2017 | MINNESOTA | 70-61 | W | +170 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 12 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | | 8/23/2017 | @ INDIANA | 71-50 | W | -500 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 44 | 16 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 31 | 16 | | 8/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 51-33 (+8.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 6-6 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 30-12 (+4.9 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 4-2 (+4.9 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/16/2017 | WASHINGTON | 55 | 151 | Under | 29 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 6-27 | 22.2% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 40 | 7 | 11 | | | NEW YORK | 85 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 55 | 10 | 11 | 6/29/2017 | NEW YORK | 54 | 169.5 | Under | 27 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 52 | 9 | 19 | | | WASHINGTON | 67 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 4-25 | 16.0% | 21-23 | 91.3% | 42 | 4 | 6 | 9/13/2016 | WASHINGTON | 75 | 165 | SU ATS | 43 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 10-27 | 37.0% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 42 | 7 | 11 | | | NEW YORK | 62 | -4.5 | Under | 31 | 22-67 | 32.8% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 48 | 10 | 11 | 7/20/2016 | NEW YORK | 88 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 43 | 11 | 10 | | | WASHINGTON | 81 | 154 | Over | 37 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 11-22 | 50.0% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 39 | 8 | 13 | 5/14/2016 | NEW YORK | 87 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 40 | 5 | 7 | | | WASHINGTON | 76 | 140 | Over | 45 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 47 | 11 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 17-16 against the money line (+12.8 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 46-43 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 67-46 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 130-108 against the money line (+20.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 50-38 against the money line (+20.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 79.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 37-25 against the money line (+16.1 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 43-39 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 32-26 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 32-26 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 8-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 10-3 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 5-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 12-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 73-44 against the money line (+33.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 9-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 131-122 against the money line (+21.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 25-26 against the money line (-31.8 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 6-14 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after allowing 55 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 71.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 5-7 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games after 5 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 4-8 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 6 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 11-18 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Thibault is 22-38 against the money line (-16.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 28-33 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 35-49 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-20 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-57 against the money line (-18.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-49 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 35-49 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 91-81 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 58-42 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 31-16 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 26-11 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 111-69 against the money line (+25.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 78-44 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 57-29 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 77.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 117-97 against the money line (+29.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 74-59 against the money line (+28.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 58-48 against the money line (+16.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 23-17 against the money line (+11.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 35-23 against the money line (+20.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 52-43 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 56-33 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 49-39 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 71-61 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 52-28 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 72-43 against the money line (+19.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 42-35 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 113 times, while the road underdog won straight up 67 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 23 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/24/2017 - Elena Delle Donne is upgraded to probable Friday vs. NY Liberty ( Thumb ) | | [G] 08/24/2017 - Natasha Cloud injured last game, doubtful Friday vs. NY Liberty ( Hip ) | | [G] 07/16/2017 - Tayler Hill out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 05/19/2017 - Brittany Boyd out for season ( Achilles ) | | [G] 05/13/2017 - Shoni Schimmel out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 05/13/2017 - Tanisha Wright out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/26/2024 9:49:28 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|