| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
150.5
| 89
Final
70 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 617 | MINNESOTA | -950 | | 618 | SAN ANTONIO | +600 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(50-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games.
(46-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(25-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(62-38 since 1997.) (62%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(60-34 since 1997.) (63.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(95-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +21.4 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(218-73 since 1997.) (74.9%, +77 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(376-164 since 1997.) (69.6%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(193-47 since 1997.) (80.4%, +70.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(191-67 since 1997.) (74%, +66.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(119-31 since 1997.) (79.3%, +59.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(104-31 since 1997.) (77%, +56.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 55 points or less.
(142-49 since 1997.) (74.3%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(93-18 since 1997.) (83.8%, +54 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(97-23 since 1997.) (80.8%, +52.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(111-31 since 1997.) (78.2%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(176-65 since 1997.) (73%, +49.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(122-87 since 1997.) (58.4%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(102-64 since 1997.) (61.4%, +46.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less.
(83-30 since 1997.) (73.5%, +45.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(102-76 since 1997.) (57.3%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(180-109 since 1997.) (62.3%, +38.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(96-70 since 1997.) (57.8%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(141-55 since 1997.) (71.9%, +35.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(85-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(81-51 since 1997.) (61.4%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(110-67 since 1997.) (62.1%, +30.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(104-45 since 1997.) (69.8%, +30.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(51-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(102-47 since 1997.) (68.5%, +29.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(44-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.6%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(40-6 since 1997.) (87%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(26-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +19.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(41-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +32.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(88-29 since 1997.) (75.2%, +26.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(70-45 since 1997.) (60.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(69-35 since 1997.) (66.3%, +24.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(37-14 since 1997.) (72.5%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(24-4 since 1997.) (85.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(55-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(29-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.9%, +21 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(38-21 since 1997.) (64.4%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 35% or lower, allowing 50% or higher.
(28-6 since 1997.) (82.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(28-11 since 1997.) (71.8%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(47-19 since 1997.) (71.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(70-43 since 1997.) (61.9%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(37-23 since 1997.) (61.7%, +17.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +17.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +13.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(42-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(35-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +10.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(33-10 since 1997.) (76.7%, +14.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(37-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +15.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 85 | | 33-68 | 47.9% | 6-16 | 36.7% | 13-16 | 81.0% | 43 | 12 | 14 | | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 33.7% | 11-14 | 77.1% | 39 | 11 | 16 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 805 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 180 times.
Edge against the money line=SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 14-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 75.9 | MINNESOTA is 13-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.7, OPPONENT 74.9 | MINNESOTA is 105-45 against the money line (+36.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 72.8 | MINNESOTA is 211-67 against the money line (+102.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 78.5 | MINNESOTA is 158-33 against the money line (+113.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.6, OPPONENT 79.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 62-71 against the money line (-36.5 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 80.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-27 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 82.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 38-77 against the money line (-35.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 79.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 49-83 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.4, OPPONENT 76.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 26-36 against the money line (-27.9 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 79.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-45 against the money line (-30.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 85.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 2-32 against the money line (-28.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 88.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 102-142 against the money line (-53.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.8, OPPONENT 79.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 41-83 against the money line (-41.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 78.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 21-29 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in home games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 82.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 90-151 against the money line (-60.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.7, OPPONENT 75.9 |
|
MINNESOTA is 74-94 against the money line (-46.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 74.0 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 81-126 against the money line (-52.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 114-170 against the money line (-68.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 94-140 against the money line (-55.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-23 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-21 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-27 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-38 against the money line (-26.4 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 141-188 against the money line (-61.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 100-168 against the money line (-61.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 166-243 against the money line (-74.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 77-76 against the money line (-42.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 27-58 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 38-82 against the money line (-34.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-23 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-40 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 128-182 against the money line (-58.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 21-20 against the money line (-36.6 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 10-10 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 151-114 against the money line (-55.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-7 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 31-20 against the money line (-26.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-12 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 52-27 against the money line (-31.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-14 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-4 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 7*) | MINNESOTA is 2-5 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 9*) | MINNESOTA is 22-11 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-13 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-5 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 6*) | MINNESOTA is 7-5 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 1-3 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 40-22 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-13 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 3-5 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 26-12 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-7 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 2-4 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 8*) | MINNESOTA is 4-4 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 21-18 against the money line (-35.0 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 36-26 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-12 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 52-26 against the money line (-30.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-3 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 81-71 against the money line (-41.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 82.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 14-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more shots than opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 82-39 against the money line (+30.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-10 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ less fouls than opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-9 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 207-307 against the money line (-92.4 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 125-136 against the money line (-57.4 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 102-111 against the money line (-53.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 44-67 against the money line (-29.6 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-36 against the money line (-24.1 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 121-194 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 73-125 against the money line (-53.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 100-178 against the money line (-78.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-39 against the money line (-23.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 89-142 against the money line (-51.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-31 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-40 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 64-103 against the money line (-41.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-30 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 81-140 against the money line (-48.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-32 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-27 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 55 points or less since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-49 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 51-67 against the money line (-32.6 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 27-50 against the money line (-32.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 100-145 against the money line (-48.3 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-60 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 3-4 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in August or September games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 66.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-11 against the money line (-26.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 204-196 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 182-162 against the money line (-82.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-15 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-0 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games in August or September games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 85.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | SAN ANTONIO is 48-34 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 23-6 | -5.7 | 15-14 | 14-14 | 85.2 | 45.0 | 46.9% | 43.1 | 74.1 | 36.5 | 42.3% | 38.2 | | Road Games | 10-4 | -5.5 | 9-5 | 7-6 | 84.3 | 45.6 | 46.0% | 43.4 | 76.6 | 37.4 | 43.7% | 37.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -6.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 80.4 | 43.4 | 44.6% | 44.8 | 64.6 | 31.4 | 40.7% | 34.2 | | Division Games | 12-2 | +2.8 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 87.0 | 44.8 | 47.9% | 43.9 | 74.0 | 36.4 | 42.6% | 35.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.2 | 45.0 | 32-68 | 46.9% | 6-16 | 36.4% | 15-19 | 80.4% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.3 | 45.6 | 32-69 | 46.0% | 6-17 | 35.8% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 43 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.1 | 36.5 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 6-17 | 32.0% | 12-16 | 79.6% | 38 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.6 | 37.4 | 29-65 | 43.7% | 5-17 | 31.6% | 14-17 | 82.0% | 37 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 7-24 | -4.8 | 17-14 | 16-15 | 74.7 | 37.0 | 43.0% | 42.2 | 81.5 | 39.9 | 45.0% | 40.1 | | Home Games | 6-10 | +1.4 | 7-9 | 10-6 | 78.3 | 39.0 | 44.0% | 42.6 | 81.6 | 39.7 | 45.8% | 39.3 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 75.6 | 39.6 | 44.4% | 42.6 | 79.2 | 40.8 | 47.7% | 37.2 | | Division Games | 1-14 | -8.6 | 7-8 | 7-8 | 72.5 | 35.1 | 41.4% | 42.7 | 82.2 | 41.0 | 45.2% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.7 | 37.0 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.9% | 13-17 | 76.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.3 | 39.0 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 5-14 | 37.3% | 14-17 | 78.7% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.5 | 39.9 | 30-66 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 40 | 9 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.6 | 39.7 | 31-67 | 45.8% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 39 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70.7, SAN ANTONIO 72 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/16/2017 | PHOENIX | 81-66 | W | | 26-62 | 41.9% | 38 | 11 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 42 | 15 | | 7/19/2017 | DALLAS | 100-74 | W | | 38-67 | 56.7% | 52 | 17 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 36 | 13 | | 7/25/2017 | NEW YORK | 76-75 | W | -750 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 10 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 11 | | 7/28/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 90-80 | W | -330 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 14 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 35 | 17 | | 7/30/2017 | SEATTLE | 93-82 | W | -850 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 45 | 10 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 33 | 11 | | 8/3/2017 | ATLANTA | 69-54 | W | -750 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 42 | 17 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 46 | 22 | | 8/6/2017 | @ INDIANA | 82-84 | L | -1050 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 19 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 38 | 19 | | 8/8/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 81-72 | W | -330 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 45 | 12 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | | 8/11/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 64-70 | L | -220 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 41 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | | 8/16/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 61-62 | L | -300 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 49 | 11 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 38 | 12 | | 8/18/2017 | INDIANA | 111-52 | W | | 42-71 | 59.2% | 50 | 12 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 27 | 19 | | 8/20/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 61-70 | L | -200 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 12 | | 8/22/2017 | PHOENIX | 105-69 | W | -330 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 40 | 13 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 28 | 20 | | 8/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/16/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-89 | L | | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 14 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | | 7/18/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 75-88 | L | +350 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 16 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 51 | 10 | | 7/20/2017 | INDIANA | 85-61 | W | +175 | 33-55 | 60.0% | 39 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 30 | 16 | | 7/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | 76-85 | L | +220 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 47 | 10 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | | 7/28/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 73-85 | L | +450 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 33 | 12 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 33 | 8 | | 7/30/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 64-81 | L | +325 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 51 | 18 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 40 | 13 | | 8/1/2017 | NEW YORK | 93-81 | W | +350 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 13 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 37 | 14 | | 8/4/2017 | WASHINGTON | 76-74 | W | +170 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 42 | 10 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 43 | 11 | | 8/5/2017 | SEATTLE | 87-80 | W | +250 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 56 | 22 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 44 | 17 | | 8/10/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 74-94 | L | +220 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 38 | 17 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 36 | 12 | | 8/12/2017 | ATLANTA | 84-68 | W | +135 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 39 | 11 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 38 | 14 | | 8/18/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 78-79 | L | +375 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 42 | 16 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 32 | 7 | | 8/22/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 55-75 | L | +650 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 38 | 18 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 14 | | 8/25/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 46-22 (+23.9 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 3-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 18-17 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 3-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/25/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 78 | 155.5 | ATS | 31 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 42 | 11 | 8 | | | MINNESOTA | 87 | -18.5 | SU Over | 36 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 44 | 13 | 15 | 5/28/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 66 | 159.5 | ATS | 35 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 38 | 5 | 22 | | | MINNESOTA | 80 | -15 | SU Under | 40 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 40 | 13 | 8 | 9/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | 81 | -13 | SU Over | 41 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 28-37 | 75.7% | 51 | 9 | 8 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 76 | 154.5 | ATS | 39 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 47 | 8 | 10 | 7/12/2016 | MINNESOTA | 81 | -14 | SU ATS | 36 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 49 | 18 | 7 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 57 | 155 | Under | 27 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 7/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 68 | 155.5 | Over | 28 | 25-75 | 33.3% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 42 | 9 | 11 | | | MINNESOTA | 91 | -17.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 21-24 | 87.5% | 46 | 7 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 195-86 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 122-50 against the money line (+40.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 68-13 against the money line (+41.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 94-33 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 59-16 against the money line (+27.7 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 51-11 against the money line (+21.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 87-28 against the money line (+22.5 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 25-6 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 146-60 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 115-45 against the money line (+24.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-12 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 65-17 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 110-40 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 65-22 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 162-61 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 120-39 against the money line (+23.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 107-33 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 99-36 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 102-40 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 140-57 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 35-25 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Reeve is 33-33 against the money line (-28.0 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 44-42 against the money line (-31.5 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 25-25 against the money line (-24.6 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 34-31 against the money line (-26.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 19-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 39-36 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 19-14 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 4-0 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 85.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Johnson is 5-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 82.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 1 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/24/2017 - Rebekkah Brunson is upgraded to "?" Friday vs. SA Stars ( Ankle ) | | [G] 08/24/2017 - Seimone Augustus injured last game, probable Friday vs. SA Stars ( Ribs ) | | [G] 08/03/2017 - Lindsay Whalen out indefinitely ( Hand ) | |
| [G] 08/22/2017 - Moriah Jefferson out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [F] 08/13/2017 - Erika de Souza has been waived ( Leg ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/29/2024 3:12:16 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|