| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO CONNECTICUT |
|
| 174.5 | 96 Final 83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
613 | CHICAGO | +350 | 614 | CONNECTICUT | -500 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (56-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.5%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (72-14 since 1997.) (83.7%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (56-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +38.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (45-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.2%, +34.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (45-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.9%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (52-15 since 1997.) (77.6%, +34.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (48-7 since 1997.) (87.3%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (35-9 since 1997.) (79.5%, +34 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (35-9 since 1997.) (79.5%, +34 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (35-9 since 1997.) (79.5%, +34 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (61-22 since 1997.) (73.5%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (99-28 since 1997.) (78%, +33.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (46-6 since 1997.) (88.5%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (47-28 since 1997.) (62.7%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record. (37-5 since 1997.) (88.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (33-4 since 1997.) (89.2%, +29.3 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (56-19 since 1997.) (74.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (46-13 since 1997.) (78%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (47-18 since 1997.) (72.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (60-30 since 1997.) (66.7%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (29-2 since 1997.) (93.5%, +26.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (52-30 since 1997.) (63.4%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points. (24-8 since 1997.) (75%, +25.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (41-12 since 1997.) (77.4%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (47-25 since 1997.) (65.3%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (46-15 since 1997.) (75.4%, +23.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (40-17 since 1997.) (70.2%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (36-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (36-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.7%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an embarrassing upset loss by 20 points or more as a favorite. (20-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game. (34-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (26-8 since 1997.) (76.5%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (23-6 since 1997.) (79.3%, +16.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off an embarrassing upset loss by 20 points or more as a favorite. (20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more. (31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more. (35-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (123-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more. (35-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.4%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (70-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a non-conference game against opponent after 3 consecutive non-conference games. (28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after playing 3 consecutive home games. (42-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (42-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 79 | | 32-69 | 46.4% | 7-17 | 40.5% | 8-11 | 77.7% | 40 | 8 | 16 | CONNECTICUT | 93 | | 35-75 | 46.6% | 7-19 | 37.4% | 16-21 | 74.2% | 47 | 14 | 10 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 851 times, while CHICAGO won 135 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 7-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 62-39 against the money line (+22.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 78.8 | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.4, OPPONENT 84.9 | CHICAGO is 40-32 against the money line (+15.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 78.5 | CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 83.5 | CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 81.9 | CONNECTICUT is 4-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | CONNECTICUT is 56-68 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 28-45 against the money line (-27.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 62-150 against the money line (-122.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 86.6 |
|
CHICAGO is 24-54 against the money line (-40.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 11-33 against the money line (-24.2 Units) when they attempt 11 or less free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when they attempt 10+ less free throws than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 87.0 | CHICAGO is 27-51 against the money line (-34.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 17-35 against the money line (-20.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 90.6 | CHICAGO is 3-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 93.3 | CHICAGO is 70-104 against the money line (-51.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.2 | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 88.0 | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 92.6 | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 86.4 | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.2 | CONNECTICUT is 76-33 against the money line (+45.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.8 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when they attempt 10+ more free throws than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 80.2 | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 82.7 | CONNECTICUT is 18-5 against the money line (+15.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 81.0 | CONNECTICUT is 18-0 against the money line (+21.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.8, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 79.7 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 7-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-17 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-12 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.2, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-9 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-17 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-11 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-11 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 57-89 against the money line (-34.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 82-133 against the money line (-60.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-60 against the money line (-33.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 66-102 against the money line (-55.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 57-93 against the money line (-40.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 79-131 against the money line (-65.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-17 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 55-80 against the money line (-32.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-1 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 10*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+19.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+5.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-12 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-4 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 7-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) as a road underdog this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-9 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 16-10 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in home games vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 9-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 117-147 against the money line (-51.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-35 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 15 or less fouls since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 34-60 against the money line (-31.5 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-17 against the money line (-15.4 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 71.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 99-149 against the money line (-59.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 76-117 against the money line (-52.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-57 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-17 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 46-69 against the money line (-34.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-42 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 76-98 against the money line (-39.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 53-78 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 78-118 against the money line (-48.4 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-53 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals this season. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 92.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 91-126 against the money line (-43.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers this season. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-10 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-37 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-27 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-25 against the money line (+17.3 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) off a home win this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-18 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after scoring 90 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-30 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-38 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-22 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 11-18 | -0.4 | 14-15 | 16-12 | 81.8 | 39.7 | 45.8% | 42.7 | 86.1 | 43.2 | 43.1% | 45.1 | Road Games | 7-7 | +9 | 10-4 | 5-8 | 80.4 | 37.1 | 45.4% | 43.1 | 82.0 | 40.5 | 41.3% | 46.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 87.6 | 43.2 | 48.4% | 38.6 | 89.6 | 43.4 | 45.4% | 46.0 | Division Games | 5-9 | -1.8 | 5-9 | 6-8 | 77.6 | 38.2 | 43.2% | 43.4 | 84.3 | 42.1 | 42.6% | 47.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.8 | 39.7 | 32-70 | 45.8% | 6-17 | 37.3% | 11-14 | 77.6% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.3 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.4 | 37.1 | 32-70 | 45.4% | 5-15 | 35.6% | 12-15 | 78.6% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 86.1 | 43.2 | 32-74 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 17-21 | 78.1% | 45 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.0 | 40.5 | 30-73 | 41.3% | 4-16 | 27.3% | 17-23 | 75.9% | 46 | 10 | 19 | 15 | 9 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 20-10 | +7.3 | 19-11 | 15-14 | 87.3 | 42.6 | 45.7% | 45.4 | 81.2 | 40.2 | 43.4% | 41.5 | Home Games | 12-4 | +3.2 | 8-8 | 7-8 | 88.4 | 42.5 | 45.6% | 46.7 | 80.2 | 41.4 | 43.1% | 41.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.3 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 89.8 | 47.6 | 45.7% | 49.8 | 79.6 | 42.8 | 38.3% | 47.4 | Division Games | 9-5 | +0.8 | 11-3 | 8-6 | 88.2 | 43.5 | 44.4% | 45.6 | 80.7 | 38.4 | 42.4% | 43.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.3 | 42.6 | 33-72 | 45.7% | 7-18 | 36.9% | 15-20 | 74.2% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.5 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.4 | 42.5 | 33-72 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 47 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 40.2 | 30-68 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.2 | 41.4 | 30-70 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 78.4% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.4, CONNECTICUT 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
7/16/2017 | @ DALLAS | 106-112 | L | +175 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 55 | 21 | 35-97 | 36.1% | 64 | 12 | 7/18/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 94-83 | W | +200 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 36 | 9 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 37 | 18 | 7/20/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-80 | W | +550 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 35 | 11 | 7/25/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-93 | L | +220 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 18 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 52 | 11 | 7/28/2017 | PHOENIX | 80-86 | L | -210 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 40 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 44 | 12 | 7/30/2017 | NEW YORK | 82-86 | L | +145 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 39 | 14 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 46 | 16 | 8/4/2017 | @ INDIANA | 81-70 | W | +100 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 43 | 15 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 37 | 14 | 8/5/2017 | ATLANTA | 91-86 | W | +105 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 31 | 6 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 57 | 12 | 8/10/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 94-74 | W | -300 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 36 | 12 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 38 | 17 | 8/18/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 106-115 | L | +220 | 41-82 | 50.0% | 49 | 21 | 45-99 | 45.5% | 49 | 6 | 8/20/2017 | SEATTLE | 66-103 | L | -125 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 34 | 16 | 41-78 | 52.6% | 49 | 10 | 8/25/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/16/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 89-75 | W | | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 14 | 7/19/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 80-96 | L | -125 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 93-72 | W | -300 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 52 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 18 | 7/30/2017 | INDIANA | 89-73 | W | | 32-72 | 44.4% | 49 | 11 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | 8/4/2017 | PHOENIX | 93-92 | W | -360 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 35 | 11 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 16 | 8/8/2017 | SEATTLE | 84-71 | W | -220 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 50 | 10 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 45 | 12 | 8/12/2017 | DALLAS | 96-88 | W | -500 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 55 | 15 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 38 | 11 | 8/15/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 96-75 | W | -210 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 43 | 11 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 56 | 12 | 8/18/2017 | NEW YORK | 70-82 | L | -270 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 48 | 8 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 59 | 12 | 8/20/2017 | PHOENIX | 94-66 | W | -210 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 53 | 12 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 39 | 12 | 8/23/2017 | DALLAS | 93-87 | W | -750 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 50 | 16 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 45 | 13 | 8/25/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 24-20 (-0.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 6-4 (+5.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 8-12 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-2 (+1.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 72 | 174.5 | Under | 32 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 36 | 5 | 18 | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -7 | SU ATS | 38 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 52 | 13 | 11 | 5/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 97 | 162 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 28-39 | 71.8% | 69 | 15 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 79 | -2.5 | Over | 37 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-31 | 61.3% | 48 | 8 | 11 | 9/11/2016 | CHICAGO | 96 | 172 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 24-31 | 77.4% | 46 | 10 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -3.5 | Over | 47 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 47 | 16 | 12 | 7/22/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 167 | SU ATS | 38 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 39 | 8 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 89 | -5 | Over | 38 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 37 | 6 | 15 | 5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 165 | Under | 25 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | | CHICAGO | 93 | -10 | SU ATS | 45 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 0-6 | 0.0% | 31-37 | 83.8% | 55 | 15 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Stocks is 7-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 6-2 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Stocks is 6-2 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 6-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Stocks is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 92.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-8 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-29 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 11-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-18 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 29-24 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-21 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-19 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 24-18 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-23 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-17 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-17 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 27-15 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 25-22 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-13 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-8 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 10-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-4 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 21-9 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 15-1 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 10*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-9 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 14-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-11 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-6 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 16-9 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 10-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 20-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 28-19 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 21-10 against the money line (+19.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 29-17 against the money line (+24.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 10-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-6 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 16-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 26-14 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 7-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-13 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-12 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 30-21 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 19-10 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 27-19 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 28-21 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-21 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-7 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 114 times, while the road underdog won straight up 23 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 05/28/2017 - Jamierra Faulkner out for season ( ACL ) | [C] 05/21/2017 - Alaina Coates out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | |
[F] 08/23/2017 - Lynetta Kizer "?" Friday vs Chicago Sky ( Back ) | [F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 8:16:26 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|