| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
141.5
| 91
Final
93 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | WASHINGTON | +175 | | 606 | LOS ANGELES | -210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(332-123 since 1997.) (73%, +93.4 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(313-127 since 1997.) (71.1%, +85.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(254-105 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(254-105 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(254-105 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(254-105 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(254-105 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(254-105 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(301-116 since 1997.) (72.2%, +76.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(225-74 since 1997.) (75.3%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(225-74 since 1997.) (75.3%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(225-74 since 1997.) (75.3%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(229-78 since 1997.) (74.6%, +74.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(229-78 since 1997.) (74.6%, +74.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(229-78 since 1997.) (74.6%, +74.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(181-66 since 1997.) (73.3%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights.
(96-60 since 1997.) (61.5%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(105-71 since 1997.) (59.7%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(64-16 since 1997.) (80%, +38.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(67-34 since 1997.) (66.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(67-34 since 1997.) (66.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(67-34 since 1997.) (66.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(55-13 since 1997.) (80.9%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(70-52 since 1997.) (57.4%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(79-53 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(79-53 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(79-53 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(38-6 since 1997.) (86.4%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after game - allowing a shooting pct. of 30% or less against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after allowing 55 points or less.
(23-5 since 1997.) (82.1%, +18.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(35-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +16.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(42-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +20 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(135-70 since 1997.) (65.9%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(89-35 since 1997.) (71.8%, +42.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(42-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(53-19 since 1997.) (73.6%, +34 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(43-14 since 1997.) (75.4%, +33.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(70-52 since 1997.) (57.4%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(47-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 70 | | 26-64 | 39.8% | 5-17 | 32.4% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 40 | 9 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | | 29-65 | 44.7% | 4-14 | 29.3% | 12-15 | 84.4% | 43 | 9 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 607 times, while WASHINGTON won 368 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 16-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 70.9 | WASHINGTON is 16-8 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 70.0 | WASHINGTON is 14-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 71.3 | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 79.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.7 | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 73.7 | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 72.3 | LOS ANGELES is 6-14 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | LOS ANGELES is 21-25 against the money line (-23.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 74.2 | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-7.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 73.0 | LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 77.4 |
|
WASHINGTON is 90-152 against the money line (-52.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 78.0 | WASHINGTON is 72-105 against the money line (-43.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 31-92 against the money line (-66.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 77.4 | WASHINGTON is 1-5 against the money line (-7.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 66.7, OPPONENT 70.3 | WASHINGTON is 124-195 against the money line (-73.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 65-137 against the money line (-68.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 75.3 | WASHINGTON is 43-81 against the money line (-43.5 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 72.9 | LOS ANGELES is 89-31 against the money line (+38.6 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 68.3 | LOS ANGELES is 110-61 against the money line (+32.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 71.1 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 20-26 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-16 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-9 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-16 against the money line (-29.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-3 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-30 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-18 against the money line (-14.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-27 against the money line (-23.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-8 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-25 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-25 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-17 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-27 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 120-143 against the money line (-56.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-82 against the money line (-41.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-64 against the money line (-31.9 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-48 against the money line (-31.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 92-151 against the money line (-66.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 139-207 against the money line (-70.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 121-199 against the money line (-83.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 188-286 against the money line (-97.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 27-54 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 70-108 against the money line (-49.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-8 against the money line (-6.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 64-110 against the money line (-41.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-5 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) against Western conference opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-18 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-13.6 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-22.7 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-18 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-6 against the money line (-20.1 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-15 against the money line (-30.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.3, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 8*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-23.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-17 against the money line (-20.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-15 against the money line (-24.8 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-19.4 Units) off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-12.9 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-22 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-21 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-16 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-6.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 19-29 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 12 or less assists since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 244-366 against the money line (-112.4 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 75-126 against the money line (-45.2 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 71-119 against the money line (-53.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 112-183 against the money line (-78.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-48 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 8-20 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 66.8, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 89-135 against the money line (-47.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 92-134 against the money line (-47.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 47-104 against the money line (-56.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 53-109 against the money line (-61.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 41-87 against the money line (-44.9 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 73-123 against the money line (-44.4 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 62-112 against the money line (-40.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-59 against the money line (-40.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 12-28 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-34 against the money line (-26.6 Units) after scoring 55 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 36-74 against the money line (-49.6 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 9-17 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 63.5, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-17 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after scoring 60 points or less in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 63.5, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-234 against the money line (-85.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 114-178 against the money line (-68.2 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 117-200 against the money line (-77.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 59-107 against the money line (-56.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 130-220 against the money line (-70.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 74-132 against the money line (-51.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 16-13 | +0.8 | 14-15 | 10-19 | 72.9 | 38.2 | 41.7% | 40.1 | 70.9 | 36.3 | 40.7% | 42.7 | | Road Games | 6-8 | -0.6 | 7-7 | 3-11 | 70.7 | 38.2 | 41.6% | 39.3 | 71.5 | 37.4 | 41.0% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 66.4 | 36.8 | 39.0% | 37.0 | 71.6 | 36.6 | 44.6% | 42.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.9 | 38.2 | 27-64 | 41.7% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.1 | 38.4 | 28-65 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.7 | 38.2 | 26-63 | 41.6% | 6-17 | 32.4% | 12-16 | 78.0% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.9 | 36.3 | 27-67 | 40.7% | 4-13 | 30.9% | 12-15 | 81.9% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.5 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.5 | 37.4 | 27-67 | 41.0% | 3-12 | 29.3% | 13-16 | 82.0% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 12-18 | -15.9 | 12-18 | 14-15 | 73.1 | 36.8 | 45.0% | 39.2 | 73.7 | 34.9 | 41.3% | 40.5 | | Home Games | 7-8 | -11.5 | 5-10 | 5-10 | 72.8 | 37.9 | 44.8% | 38.9 | 71.4 | 32.7 | 40.4% | 40.8 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.1 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 75.0 | 36.2 | 46.3% | 38.4 | 66.8 | 32.8 | 37.3% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.1 | 36.8 | 28-63 | 45.0% | 4-14 | 29.9% | 12-15 | 83.2% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 38 | 28-66 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.8 | 37.9 | 28-62 | 44.8% | 4-14 | 26.7% | 13-16 | 84.3% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.7 | 34.9 | 27-65 | 41.3% | 4-14 | 31.7% | 16-21 | 77.1% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.7 | 37.5 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.4 | 32.7 | 26-65 | 40.4% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 77.3% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.3, LOS ANGELES 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/29/2015 | SEATTLE | 87-74 | W | -450 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 5 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 7 | | 7/31/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 88-53 | W | -120 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 47 | 14 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 30 | 12 | | 8/2/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 68-71 | L | +180 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 41 | 5 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 50 | 6 | | 8/5/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 66-63 | W | -600 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 46 | 12 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 9 | | 8/7/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-86 | L | -125 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 40 | 9 | | 8/9/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 84-73 | W | -300 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 11 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 8 | | 8/11/2015 | INDIANA | 62-73 | L | -165 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 33 | 14 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 10 | | 8/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 77-69 | W | +155 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 8 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 48 | 8 | | 8/19/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-61 | W | +350 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 10 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 41 | 14 | | 8/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 85-87 | L | +180 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 34 | 12 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 49 | 15 | | 8/23/2015 | CHICAGO | 64-66 | L | -140 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 47 | 16 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 46 | 15 | | 8/28/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-63 | W | -200 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 35 | 11 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 45 | 19 | | 8/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 59-69 | L | -175 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 33 | 16 | 18-43 | 41.9% | 37 | 17 | | 9/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 53-73 | L | +155 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 36 | 12 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 35 | 14 | | 9/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | L | +300 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 88-77 | W | +175 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-78 | W | -210 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | 83-61 | W | +105 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 42 | 7 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 37 | 15 | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | 84-57 | W | -330 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 47 | 14 | 17-65 | 26.2% | 37 | 10 | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-72 | L | +180 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 16 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 9 | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | 77-85 | L | -1050 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 9 | | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 76-64 | W | -165 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 41 | 11 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 49 | 9 | | 8/18/2015 | INDIANA | 68-79 | L | -175 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 46 | 16 | | 8/21/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 78-68 | W | +170 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 8 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 40 | 15 | | 8/23/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 90-59 | W | -210 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 50 | 10 | 19-71 | 26.8% | 45 | 10 | | 8/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 81-79 | W | +155 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 9 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 44 | 15 | | 8/28/2015 | @ TULSA | 66-76 | L | -115 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 31 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 47 | 13 | | 8/30/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 60-52 | W | -750 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 41 | 14 | 22-75 | 29.3% | 51 | 11 | | 9/3/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 22-12 (-6.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-2 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 5-11 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 1-1 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | 138 | ATS | 37 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 43 | 11 | 17 | | | WASHINGTON | 84 | -11 | SU Over | 39 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 24-33 | 72.7% | 32 | 5 | 9 | 7/17/2014 | WASHINGTON | 79 | 155 | SU ATS | 34 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 10 | 22 | | | LOS ANGELES | 75 | -7.5 | Under | 34 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 20-21 | 95.2% | 26 | 5 | 19 | 6/1/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 84 | -5 | Over | 28 | 32-97 | 33.0% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 50 | 13 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 92 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 10-27 | 37.0% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 65 | 12 | 29 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 28-17 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when playing on back-to-back days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 19-15 against the money line (+14.2 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 94-71 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 47-29 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 25-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 12-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when playing their 2nd road game in 2 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 81.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 19-15 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 102-77 against the money line (+29.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 65-37 against the money line (+27.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 106-83 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 62-42 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 57-39 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 12-18 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 7-8 against the money line (-13.6 Units) as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 2-4 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 8-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 3-9 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 6-13 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 9-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 3-6 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 5-14 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in home games after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 70.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 5-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.3, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 3-7 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 33-26 against the money line (-26.4 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 42-46 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 5-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a combined score of 115 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 63.5, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 23-42 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after a combined score of 125 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 66.0, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 7-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 4-9 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 1-5 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 12-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 15-30 against the money line (-29.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 6-9 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Mike is 15-27 against the money line (-18.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 43-46 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 28-19 against the money line (+13.7 Units) on Thursday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.9, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 38-16 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.6, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 58-34 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.2, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 56-31 against the money line (+21.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 79-50 against the money line (+27.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 93-73 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.5, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 136-114 against the money line (+33.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 219 times, while the road underdog won straight up 102 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 22 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/28/2015 - Kara Lawson "?" Wednesday vs. Phoenix Mercury ( Back ) | |
| [F] 09/02/2015 - Nnemkadi Ogwumike "?" Thursday vs. Wash Mystics ( Concussion ) | | [G] 08/26/2015 - Erin Phillips out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 08/26/2015 - Marianna Tolo out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/7/2024 12:14:38 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|