| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
TULSA SEATTLE |
|
| 148 | 85 Final 67 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | TULSA | +120 | 604 | SEATTLE | -140 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights. (96-60 since 1997.) (61.5%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (105-71 since 1997.) (59.7%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (58-18 since 1997.) (76.3%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (79-53 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (79-53 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (79-53 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (49-26 since 1997.) (65.3%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (62-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.3%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (135-70 since 1997.) (65.9%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (94-54 since 1997.) (63.5%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 4 or more consecutive wins. (30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (47-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA | 76 | | 27-67 | 40.0% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 11 | 12 | SEATTLE | 76 | | 28-61 | 45.8% | 5-14 | 34.0% | 15-18 | 82.0% | 40 | 7 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA won the game straight up 511 times, while SEATTLE won 457 times. Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 6-14 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.5, OPPONENT 75.6 |
|
TULSA is 22-47 against the money line (-27.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.1, OPPONENT 82.4 | TULSA is 5-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.6 | TULSA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was TULSA 74.4, OPPONENT 78.1 | TULSA is 6-18 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.8 | TULSA is 6-17 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.4, OPPONENT 81.9 | TULSA is 10-23 against the money line (-14.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.8, OPPONENT 79.8 | SEATTLE is 76-39 against the money line (+33.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 72.3 | SEATTLE is 38-17 against the money line (+16.7 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 69.6 | SEATTLE is 59-28 against the money line (+25.3 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 69.1 | SEATTLE is 56-22 against the money line (+26.8 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 68.0 | SEATTLE is 106-76 against the money line (+27.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 80.4 | SEATTLE is 11-8 against the money line (+14.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 74.5 | SEATTLE is 91-51 against the money line (+28.8 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 68.8 |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 5-15 against the money line (-11.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-39 against the money line (-23.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 13-24 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-27 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was TULSA 73.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 72.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 30-10 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-6 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-11 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 87-64 against the money line (+21.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 125-96 against the money line (+27.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 71-39 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 164-152 against the money line (+22.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 87-77 against the money line (+26.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 124-113 against the money line (+27.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 102-55 against the money line (+27.0 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 143-78 against the money line (+30.1 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 101-81 against the money line (+25.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 152-122 against the money line (+37.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 89-53 against the money line (+22.3 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 59-32 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 7-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was TULSA 75.8, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 10-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was TULSA 79.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 10-2 against the money line (+11.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season. The average score was TULSA 77.4, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 5*) | TULSA is 7-2 against the money line (+5.6 Units) off a home win this season. The average score was TULSA 78.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 11-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was TULSA 76.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 14-3 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was TULSA 78.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 5*) | TULSA is 11-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was TULSA 78.5, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 8-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was TULSA 78.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 7-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 12-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 6*) | TULSA is 9-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was TULSA 80.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 7-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was TULSA 80.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 6-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 70.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 70.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-16 against the money line (-13.1 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 67.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 7-33 against the money line (-22.1 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was TULSA 75.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 194-73 against the money line (+42.0 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 159-51 against the money line (+46.9 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 184-97 against the money line (+43.1 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 81-39 against the money line (+28.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 130-59 against the money line (+43.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-14 against the money line (+15.3 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 118-65 against the money line (+30.4 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 100-90 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 96-48 against the money line (+22.6 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 155-133 against the money line (+26.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 93-39 against the money line (+30.3 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 130-142 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 69.6, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 93-38 against the money line (+33.9 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 96-39 against the money line (+26.4 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 46-13 against the money line (+19.5 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 15-14 | +2.7 | 16-11 | 13-16 | 77.5 | 40.3 | 38.8% | 44.6 | 76.5 | 36.9 | 43.8% | 41.3 | Road Games | 5-9 | -0.4 | 8-5 | 8-6 | 75.6 | 39.8 | 37.9% | 44.2 | 79.5 | 39.4 | 45.2% | 43.9 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +7.5 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 78.2 | 37.2 | 42.1% | 44.6 | 69.4 | 32.4 | 40.3% | 38.2 | Division Games | 8-10 | -0.6 | 10-8 | 5-13 | 75.1 | 38.1 | 37.5% | 45.7 | 74.8 | 34.3 | 43.8% | 41.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.5 | 40.3 | 27-68 | 38.8% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 18-23 | 79.4% | 45 | 12 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.6 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.6 | 39.8 | 27-70 | 37.9% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 16-22 | 76.2% | 44 | 13 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.5 | 36.9 | 28-64 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 37.2 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 14-18 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.5 | 39.4 | 29-64 | 45.2% | 4-13 | 33.7% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-20 | -2.5 | 15-14 | 15-13 | 71.0 | 35.6 | 43.7% | 37.1 | 76.3 | 40.8 | 43.4% | 40.8 | Home Games | 7-7 | +0.9 | 9-5 | 8-6 | 74.6 | 38.3 | 46.4% | 38.9 | 74.1 | 39.4 | 41.9% | 38.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 74.2 | 38.0 | 45.7% | 40.6 | 72.0 | 39.4 | 40.1% | 36.4 | Division Games | 7-11 | +4.1 | 11-7 | 10-7 | 71.7 | 34.4 | 43.7% | 36.6 | 75.5 | 40.2 | 43.5% | 40.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.0 | 35.6 | 27-61 | 43.7% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 37 | 5 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.8 | 37.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.6 | 38.3 | 27-59 | 46.4% | 4-14 | 31.9% | 16-20 | 78.9% | 39 | 6 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.3 | 40.8 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 5-16 | 32.4% | 15-18 | 79.2% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.6 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.1 | 39.4 | 27-65 | 41.9% | 4-14 | 30.5% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 38 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 71.7, SEATTLE 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | 66-78 | L | +105 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | 8/1/2015 | MINNESOTA | 80-86 | L | +180 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 43 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 8/4/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 84-87 | L | +280 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 8 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 13 | 8/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-84 | L | +250 | 17-65 | 26.2% | 37 | 10 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 47 | 14 | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | 90-98 | L | -300 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 41 | 9 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 12 | 8/12/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-80 | L | +155 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 13 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 10 | 8/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 81-76 | W | +280 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 14 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 33 | 12 | 8/18/2015 | PHOENIX | 74-59 | W | +170 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 53 | 17 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 38 | 15 | 8/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 84-76 | W | -220 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 10 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 8/28/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76-66 | W | -105 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 47 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 31 | 13 | 8/30/2015 | INDIANA | 76-70 | W | -125 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 35 | 14 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 15 | 9/3/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/29/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 74-87 | L | +325 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 7 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 5 | 7/31/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 66-67 | L | +220 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 40 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 47 | 16 | 8/2/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 62-78 | L | +325 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 40 | 17 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 43 | 10 | 8/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-88 | L | +170 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 32 | 15 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 35 | 16 | 8/11/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 85-77 | W | +650 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 9 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 8/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 66-83 | L | | 28-66 | 42.4% | 32 | 10 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 12 | 8/14/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-94 | L | +200 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 11 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 46 | 6 | 8/16/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-63 | W | -140 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 46 | 16 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 33 | 15 | 8/21/2015 | INDIANA | 63-75 | L | +175 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 19 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 37 | 8 | 8/28/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 83-69 | W | -175 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 45 | 18 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 33 | 11 | 8/30/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69-59 | W | +155 | 18-43 | 41.9% | 37 | 17 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 33 | 16 | 9/3/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
TULSA is 18-21 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
TULSA is 7-5 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
TULSA is 7-10 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 4-2 (-1.3 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/30/2015 | TULSA | 69 | -2.5 | Under | 40 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 43 | 8 | 10 | | SEATTLE | 74 | 150.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 42 | 3 | 9 | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 89 | 150 | ATS | 42 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 30 | 6 | 9 | | TULSA | 93 | -12 | SU Over | 45 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 26-28 | 92.9% | 43 | 11 | 13 | 6/9/2015 | SEATTLE | 45 | 161 | Under | 15 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 4-24 | 16.7% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 42 | 6 | 18 | | TULSA | 68 | -6 | SU ATS | 40 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-27 | 59.3% | 58 | 13 | 13 | 8/10/2014 | TULSA | 68 | 153 | Under | 42 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 50 | 14 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 74 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 42 | 6 | 13 | 7/29/2014 | SEATTLE | 74 | 152.5 | Over | 36 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 30 | 3 | 14 | | TULSA | 80 | -5 | SU ATS | 35 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 41 | 8 | 14 | 6/15/2014 | SEATTLE | 79 | 145.5 | ATS | 39 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 29 | 5 | 11 | | TULSA | 85 | -6.5 | SU Over | 41 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 14 | 8 | 6/1/2014 | TULSA | 60 | 149 | ATS | 36 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 40 | 7 | 15 | | SEATTLE | 62 | -3.5 | SU Under | 37 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 34 | 9 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 14-8 against the money line (+9.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 78.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 32-14 against the money line (+22.8 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 14-6 against the money line (+12.3 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 23-13 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 80.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 17-8 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 79.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 11-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 78.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 18-8 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 79.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 27-16 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 8-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Jenny is 5-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Jenny 72.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 3-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 7-20 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-23 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-20 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Fred is 4-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 12-22 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-10 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 69.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 70.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 6-27 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 10-26 against the money line (-16.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 16-41 against the money line (-22.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 14-28 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 25-39 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 21-34 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 33-48 against the money line (-34.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 8-11 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-14 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 72.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 6-25 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Jenny is 21-7 against the money line (+11.7 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Jenny 79.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 6 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 1 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 08/27/2015 - Abby Bishop out indefinitely ( Hamstring ) | [F] 08/21/2015 - Ramu Tokashiki out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 07/16/2015 - Monica Wright out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/19/2024 1:04:48 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|