WNBA LOSANGELES Matchup 20150903

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Thursday 9/3/2015

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

WASHINGTON
First Half Results
LOS ANGELES

+3.5

-3.5

53
Final
43

WASHINGTON (16 - 13) at LOS ANGELES (12 - 18)

Thursday, 9/3/2015 10:35 PM

Board		First Half
605	WASHINGTON	70
606	LOS ANGELES	-2.5

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

KEY GAME INFORMATION

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line

There are 4 situations with a total rating of 8 stars.

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(48-18 since 1997.) (72.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less against opponent after scoring 60 points or less in 2 straight games.
(48-18 since 1997.) (72.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*)

- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +20 units. Rating = 1*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 8 situations with a total rating of 20 stars.

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(110-62 since 1997.) (64%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(65-29 since 1997.) (69.1%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(53-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(46-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 4*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(35-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(33-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(43-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(51-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 258 situations with a total rating of 588 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in August or September games.
(311-212 since 1997.) (59.5%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - on Thursday nights.
(138-76 since 1997.) (64.5%, +54.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 3 or more days rest.
(211-135 since 1997.) (61%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 3 or more days rest, on Thursday nights.
(58-24 since 1997.) (70.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game.
(591-376 since 1997.) (61.1%, +177.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(229-137 since 1997.) (62.6%, +78.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(397-263 since 1997.) (60.2%, +107.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(141-91 since 1997.) (60.8%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, on Thursday nights.
(57-23 since 1997.) (71.2%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(323-204 since 1997.) (61.3%, +98.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%).
(113-63 since 1997.) (64.2%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(87-45 since 1997.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%).
(211-123 since 1997.) (63.2%, +75.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(159-95 since 1997.) (62.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(323-198 since 1997.) (62%, +105.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(245-140 since 1997.) (63.6%, +91 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.).
(146-88 since 1997.) (62.4%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(109-62 since 1997.) (63.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games.
(337-227 since 1997.) (59.8%, +87.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, after a division game.
(213-133 since 1997.) (61.6%, +66.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off a home win against a division rival.
(78-33 since 1997.) (70.3%, +41.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off a win against a division rival.
(119-60 since 1997.) (66.5%, +53 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off a home win.
(119-62 since 1997.) (65.7%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(476-322 since 1997.) (59.6%, +121.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(179-86 since 1997.) (67.5%, +84.4 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(109-53 since 1997.) (67.3%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(240-166 since 1997.) (59.1%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(65-31 since 1997.) (67.7%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(291-213 since 1997.) (57.7%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(301-193 since 1997.) (60.9%, +88.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games.
(212-137 since 1997.) (60.7%, +61.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(271-168 since 1997.) (61.7%, +86.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(144-82 since 1997.) (63.7%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(216-126 since 1997.) (63.2%, +77.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record.
(313-212 since 1997.) (59.6%, +79.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record, on Thursday nights.
(50-24 since 1997.) (67.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(213-135 since 1997.) (61.2%, +64.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Thursday nights.
(38-13 since 1997.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(146-90 since 1997.) (61.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(93-50 since 1997.) (65%, +38 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(78-37 since 1997.) (67.8%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(54-19 since 1997.) (74%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(138-85 since 1997.) (61.9%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(103-62 since 1997.) (62.4%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(68-38 since 1997.) (64.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(468-257 since 1997.) (64.6%, +185.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(107-57 since 1997.) (65.2%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after playing a home game.
(415-277 since 1997.) (60%, +110.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(182-116 since 1997.) (61.1%, +54.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(51-22 since 1997.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(421-286 since 1997.) (59.5%, +106.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(74-39 since 1997.) (65.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(201-129 since 1997.) (60.9%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(22-6 since 1997.) (78.6%, +15.4 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(450-295 since 1997.) (60.4%, +125.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, on Thursday nights.
(77-32 since 1997.) (70.6%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(41-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(110-70 since 1997.) (61.1%, +33 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(391-278 since 1997.) (58.4%, +85.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(252-172 since 1997.) (59.4%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(483-338 since 1997.) (58.8%, +111.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(368-244 since 1997.) (60.1%, +99.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(256-172 since 1997.) (59.8%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(139-87 since 1997.) (61.5%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(116-70 since 1997.) (62.4%, +39 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(480-347 since 1997.) (58%, +98.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(115-68 since 1997.) (62.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(62-31 since 1997.) (66.7%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(362-258 since 1997.) (58.4%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(246-173 since 1997.) (58.7%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(126-78 since 1997.) (61.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(822-586 since 1997.) (58.4%, +177.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(210-134 since 1997.) (61%, +62.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(373-266 since 1997.) (58.4%, +80.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(119-72 since 1997.) (62.3%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(145-86 since 1997.) (62.8%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(94-51 since 1997.) (64.8%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(239-153 since 1997.) (61%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(611-448 since 1997.) (57.7%, +118.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(293-203 since 1997.) (59.1%, +69.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(594-415 since 1997.) (58.9%, +137.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(306-212 since 1997.) (59.1%, +72.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(112-67 since 1997.) (62.6%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(118-67 since 1997.) (63.8%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(169-105 since 1997.) (61.7%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(649-456 since 1997.) (58.7%, +147.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(169-100 since 1997.) (62.8%, +59 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(75-40 since 1997.) (65.2%, +31 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, on Thursday nights.
(87-47 since 1997.) (64.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(37-15 since 1997.) (71.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, on Thursday nights.
(121-70 since 1997.) (63.4%, +44 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in August or September games.
(311-212 since 1997.) (59.5%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - on Thursday nights.
(138-76 since 1997.) (64.5%, +54.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(371-232 since 1997.) (61.5%, +115.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive non-conference games.
(168-113 since 1997.) (59.8%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(256-164 since 1997.) (61%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, in August or September games.
(105-62 since 1997.) (62.9%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(133-73 since 1997.) (64.6%, +52.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(91-48 since 1997.) (65.5%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(159-97 since 1997.) (62.1%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season.
(89-39 since 1997.) (69.5%, +46.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(59-24 since 1997.) (71.1%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(351-222 since 1997.) (61.3%, +106.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(239-162 since 1997.) (59.6%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(107-63 since 1997.) (62.9%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-53 since 1997.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(91-53 since 1997.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-53 since 1997.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%).
(198-138 since 1997.) (58.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(91-53 since 1997.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(153-100 since 1997.) (60.5%, +43 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(67-38 since 1997.) (63.8%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%).
(211-123 since 1997.) (63.2%, +75.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(88-43 since 1997.) (67.2%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(159-95 since 1997.) (62.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(323-198 since 1997.) (62%, +105.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(245-140 since 1997.) (63.6%, +91 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.).
(146-88 since 1997.) (62.4%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(109-62 since 1997.) (63.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games.
(337-227 since 1997.) (59.8%, +87.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, after a non-conference game.
(219-134 since 1997.) (62%, +71.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(111-64 since 1997.) (63.4%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(497-313 since 1997.) (61.4%, +152.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(165-100 since 1997.) (62.3%, +55 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(272-144 since 1997.) (65.4%, +113.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(153-81 since 1997.) (65.4%, +63.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(296-204 since 1997.) (59.2%, +71.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(108-63 since 1997.) (63.2%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(264-175 since 1997.) (60.1%, +71.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(60-29 since 1997.) (67.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(53-25 since 1997.) (67.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(185-123 since 1997.) (60.1%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(74-41 since 1997.) (64.3%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season.
(422-255 since 1997.) (62.3%, +141.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season, on Thursday nights.
(73-35 since 1997.) (67.6%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(290-173 since 1997.) (62.6%, +99.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, on Thursday nights.
(53-25 since 1997.) (67.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(168-97 since 1997.) (63.4%, +61.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(116-62 since 1997.) (65.2%, +47.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games, on Thursday nights.
(25-7 since 1997.) (78.1%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(155-92 since 1997.) (62.8%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(115-68 since 1997.) (62.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(424-300 since 1997.) (58.6%, +94 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(328-225 since 1997.) (59.3%, +80.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, on Thursday nights.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season.
(213-139 since 1997.) (60.5%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(454-333 since 1997.) (57.7%, +87.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(181-121 since 1997.) (59.9%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(338-240 since 1997.) (58.5%, +74 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Thursday nights.
(58-30 since 1997.) (65.9%, +25 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after playing a road game.
(416-287 since 1997.) (59.2%, +100.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after playing 2 consecutive road games.
(179-123 since 1997.) (59.3%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(201-116 since 1997.) (63.4%, +73.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season.
(97-53 since 1997.) (64.7%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(68-39 since 1997.) (63.6%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(47-24 since 1997.) (66.2%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(156-88 since 1997.) (63.9%, +59.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season.
(71-38 since 1997.) (65.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(116-61 since 1997.) (65.5%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(121-62 since 1997.) (66.1%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(73-35 since 1997.) (67.6%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in non-conference games.
(52-23 since 1997.) (69.3%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season.
(59-31 since 1997.) (65.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(186-128 since 1997.) (59.2%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(636-470 since 1997.) (57.5%, +119 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(75-42 since 1997.) (64.1%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season.
(128-79 since 1997.) (61.8%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(59-29 since 1997.) (67%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(664-498 since 1997.) (57.1%, +116.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%).
(101-57 since 1997.) (63.9%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(159-106 since 1997.) (60%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(483-338 since 1997.) (58.8%, +111.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(368-244 since 1997.) (60.1%, +99.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(403-292 since 1997.) (58%, +81.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season.
(724-542 since 1997.) (57.2%, +127.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(490-366 since 1997.) (57.2%, +87.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(259-170 since 1997.) (60.4%, +72 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(190-125 since 1997.) (60.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team.
(43-19 since 1997.) (69.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(317-231 since 1997.) (57.8%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(74-42 since 1997.) (63.8%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(62-29 since 1997.) (68.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(58-31 since 1997.) (65.2%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(239-169 since 1997.) (58.6%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(173-113 since 1997.) (60.5%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(39-16 since 1997.) (70.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(227-163 since 1997.) (58.2%, +47.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(181-126 since 1997.) (59%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(173-104 since 1997.) (62.5%, +58.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(105-61 since 1997.) (63.3%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(186-120 since 1997.) (60.8%, +54 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(195-111 since 1997.) (63.7%, +72.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(134-74 since 1997.) (64.4%, +52.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(92-51 since 1997.) (64.3%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(63-28 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(59-24 since 1997.) (71.1%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(43-13 since 1997.) (76.8%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(78-33 since 1997.) (70.3%, +41.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(48-21 since 1997.) (69.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win against a division rival.
(82-38 since 1997.) (68.3%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(134-66 since 1997.) (67%, +61.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(131-63 since 1997.) (67.5%, +61.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(297-161 since 1997.) (64.8%, +119.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(134-68 since 1997.) (66.3%, +59.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(100-47 since 1997.) (68%, +48.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(31-8 since 1997.) (79.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(55-19 since 1997.) (74.3%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win against a division rival.
(83-41 since 1997.) (66.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a home win.
(81-37 since 1997.) (68.6%, +40.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(328-179 since 1997.) (64.7%, +131.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(158-84 since 1997.) (65.3%, +65.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(126-66 since 1997.) (65.6%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(76-37 since 1997.) (67.3%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(62-27 since 1997.) (69.7%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(51-19 since 1997.) (72.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(43-13 since 1997.) (76.8%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(59-25 since 1997.) (70.2%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(90-47 since 1997.) (65.7%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(361-198 since 1997.) (64.6%, +143.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(86-43 since 1997.) (66.7%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(153-86 since 1997.) (64%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(110-62 since 1997.) (64%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(59-25 since 1997.) (70.2%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(95-50 since 1997.) (65.5%, +40 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival.
(176-100 since 1997.) (63.8%, +66 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(68-34 since 1997.) (66.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival, on Thursday nights.
(33-10 since 1997.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival, with a losing record.
(44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival.
(298-190 since 1997.) (61.1%, +89 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, on Thursday nights.
(56-22 since 1997.) (71.8%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, with a losing record.
(75-43 since 1997.) (63.6%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a road loss.
(86-49 since 1997.) (63.7%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win.
(274-168 since 1997.) (62%, +89.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win, on Thursday nights.
(45-14 since 1997.) (76.3%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(74-34 since 1997.) (68.5%, +36.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(69-34 since 1997.) (67%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(113-66 since 1997.) (63.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - poor 3 point shooting team - making <=30% of their attempts.
(128-76 since 1997.) (62.7%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(69-36 since 1997.) (65.7%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(174-119 since 1997.) (59.4%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(347-226 since 1997.) (60.6%, +98.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(89-47 since 1997.) (65.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(409-291 since 1997.) (58.4%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season.
(151-102 since 1997.) (59.7%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
WASHINGTON	70		35		26-64	39.8%	5-17	32.4%	14-17	79.1%	40	9	11
LOS ANGELES	74		37		29-65	44.7%	4-14	29.3%	12-15	84.4%	43	9	12

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON covered the first half line 506 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 494 times.
No Edge.

In 1000 simulated games, 582 games went over first half total, while 380 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 36.6

WASHINGTON is 10-3 against the 1rst half line (+6.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.1, OPPONENT 35.3

WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 36.9

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 83-118 against the 1rst half line (-46.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 37.0

LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.1, OPPONENT 35.6

LOS ANGELES is 48-29 against the 1rst half line (+16.1 Units) in home games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.8, OPPONENT 33.8

LOS ANGELES is 64-43 against the 1rst half line (+16.7 Units) in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 34.4

LOS ANGELES is 15-7 against the 1rst half line (+7.3 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 34.8

LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 37.6

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total

WASHINGTON is 102-71 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.4

WASHINGTON is 75-48 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5

WASHINGTON is 99-69 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 36.3

WASHINGTON is 180-131 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 35.8

WASHINGTON is 134-91 UNDER (+33.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 34.9

WASHINGTON is 105-60 UNDER (+39.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.0

WASHINGTON is 71-48 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.7

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
WASHINGTON
LOS ANGELES	-3

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 12 trends with a total rating of 10 stars.

WASHINGTON is 44-27 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 20-7 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 30-16 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 29-13 against the 1rst half line (+14.7 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 38-22 against the 1rst half line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line

There are 5 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.

LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.3, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 14-7 against the 1rst half line (+6.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.3, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.3, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 3*)

LOS ANGELES is 16-8 against the 1rst half line (+7.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 1 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.

WASHINGTON is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 35 trends with a total rating of 35 stars.

WASHINGTON is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 62-36 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 61-37 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 52-32 UNDER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 80-50 UNDER (+25.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 76-46 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 118-84 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 172-123 UNDER (+36.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 132-91 UNDER (+31.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 31-16 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 51-30 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 29-14 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 190-130 UNDER (+47.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 277-192 UNDER (+65.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 53-31 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 71-45 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 105-74 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 155-112 UNDER (+31.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 122-86 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 15-3 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 3*)

LOS ANGELES is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 16-8 UNDER (+7.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 14-6 UNDER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 11 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.

WASHINGTON is 34-20 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 33-17 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 65-42 against the 1rst half line (+18.8 Units) in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 33-17 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 38-24 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 52-77 against the 1rst half line (-32.7 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line

There are 11 trends with a total rating of 7 stars.

LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 99-66 against the 1rst half line (+26.4 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games in August or September games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.7, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 51-21 against the 1rst half line (+27.9 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 13-6 against the 1rst half line (+6.4 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 14-7 against the 1rst half line (+6.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 137-103 against the 1rst half line (+23.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 102-69 against the 1rst half line (+26.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in home games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 119-89 against the 1rst half line (+21.1 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 1 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.

WASHINGTON is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 41 trends with a total rating of 21 stars.

WASHINGTON is 38-26 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 216-159 UNDER (+41.1 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 123-90 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 110-77 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 72-49 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 108-74 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 42-22 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 133-85 UNDER (+39.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 138-85 UNDER (+44.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 126-83 UNDER (+34.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 110-81 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 146-105 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 164-122 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 176-135 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 99-65 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 195-149 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 120-82 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 11-4 UNDER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 157-119 UNDER (+26.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 2*)

LOS ANGELES is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 139-102 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 76-52 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 116-84 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

LOS ANGELES is 176-139 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 191-145 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 99-70 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 46-27 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)

LOS ANGELES is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

WASHINGTON - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	16-13	+0.8	14-15	10-19	72.9	38.2	41.7%	40.1	70.9	36.3	40.7%	42.7
Road Games	6-8	-0.6	7-7	3-11	70.7	38.2	41.6%	39.3	71.5	37.4	41.0%	43.6
Last 5 Games	1-4	-4.2	2-3	1-4	66.4	36.8	39.0%	37.0	71.6	36.6	44.6%	42.4

WASHINGTON Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	72.9	38.2	27-64	41.7%	6-17	33.8%	14-18	78.8%	40	8	18	18	6	12	5
vs opponents surrendering	76.1	38.4	28-65	42.8%	5-15	33.1%	15-19	79.5%	41	9	16	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	70.7	38.2	26-63	41.6%	6-17	32.4%	12-16	78.0%	39	9	17	18	6	12	5
Stats Against (All Games)	70.9	36.3	27-67	40.7%	4-13	30.9%	12-15	81.9%	43	10	15	19	6	13	4
vs opponents averaging	76.5	38.4	28-66	42.7%	5-14	32.9%	15-19	79.5%	42	9	16	19	7	13	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	71.5	37.4	27-67	41.0%	3-12	29.3%	13-16	82.0%	44	11	16	18	7	12	4

LOS ANGELES - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	12-18	-15.9	12-18	14-15	73.1	36.8	45.0%	39.2	73.7	34.9	41.3%	40.5
Home Games	7-8	-11.5	5-10	5-10	72.8	37.9	44.8%	38.9	71.4	32.7	40.4%	40.8
Last 5 Games	4-1	+4.1	3-2	2-2	75.0	36.2	46.3%	38.4	66.8	32.8	37.3%	45.4

LOS ANGELES Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	73.1	36.8	28-63	45.0%	4-14	29.9%	12-15	83.2%	39	7	18	18	6	12	4
vs opponents surrendering	75.4	38	28-66	42.9%	5-15	32.6%	14-18	79.6%	41	9	16	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	72.8	37.9	28-62	44.8%	4-14	26.7%	13-16	84.3%	39	7	19	17	6	12	4
Stats Against (All Games)	73.7	34.9	27-65	41.3%	4-14	31.7%	16-21	77.1%	40	9	16	17	7	10	3
vs opponents averaging	74.7	37.5	27-65	42.1%	5-14	32.7%	15-19	79.7%	41	9	16	18	7	13	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	71.4	32.7	26-65	40.4%	5-15	32.6%	14-18	77.3%	41	9	15	17	6	11	3

Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.3, LOS ANGELES 70.7

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

WASHINGTON - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/29/2015	SEATTLE	87-74	53-37	-5	W	71	O	33-70	47.1%	42	5	30-73	41.1%	41	7
7/31/2015	@ SAN ANTONIO	88-53	49-27	-1	W	73.5	O	36-63	57.1%	47	14	22-63	34.9%	30	12
8/2/2015	@ CHICAGO	68-71	39-34	3	W	78	U	25-70	35.7%	41	5	27-69	39.1%	50	6
8/5/2015	SAN ANTONIO	66-63	27-38	-6	L	73	U	21-56	37.5%	46	12	26-67	38.8%	35	9
8/7/2015	@ CONNECTICUT	72-86	38-46	-1	L	71	O	25-60	41.7%	34	11	35-65	53.8%	40	9
8/9/2015	CONNECTICUT	84-73	34-22	-3.5	W	71.5	U	25-51	49.0%	40	11	22-64	34.4%	38	8
8/11/2015	INDIANA	62-73	31-32	-2	L	74.5	U	25-57	43.9%	33	14	30-70	42.9%	44	10
8/16/2015	MINNESOTA	77-69	49-40	2	W	72.5	O	27-67	40.3%	42	8	28-73	38.4%	48	8
8/19/2015	@ MINNESOTA	79-61	36-34	5.5	W	72.5	U	29-65	44.6%	43	10	21-61	34.4%	41	14
8/21/2015	@ CHICAGO	85-87	43-45	3	W	75.5	O	37-73	50.7%	34	12	37-79	46.8%	49	15
8/23/2015	CHICAGO	64-66	33-35	-1.5	L	77	U	22-66	33.3%	47	16	24-62	38.7%	46	15
8/28/2015	PHOENIX	71-63	41-37	-2.5	W	70.5	O	25-60	41.7%	35	11	26-65	40.0%	45	19
8/30/2015	@ SEATTLE	59-69	39-30	-2	W	71.5	U	24-66	36.4%	33	16	18-43	41.9%	37	17
9/2/2015	@ PHOENIX	53-73	28-36	2	L	71	U	19-61	31.1%	36	12	31-56	55.4%	35	14
9/3/2015	@ LOS ANGELES
9/6/2015	@ ATLANTA
9/8/2015	INDIANA
9/11/2015	@ NEW YORK
9/13/2015	ATLANTA

LOS ANGELES - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/29/2015	@ MINNESOTA	76-82	35-43	5	L	73	O	31-55	56.4%	32	21	29-61	47.5%	31	12
7/31/2015	@ CHICAGO	88-77	39-39	2.5	W	80.5	U	32-66	48.5%	42	6	28-67	41.8%	37	9
8/2/2015	@ SAN ANTONIO	80-78	38-49	-2.5	L	75	O	35-65	53.8%	39	10	28-64	43.7%	33	7
8/4/2015	MINNESOTA	83-61	39-35	1	W	75	U	37-77	48.1%	42	7	25-62	40.3%	37	15
8/6/2015	TULSA	84-57	41-26	-4	W	75	U	34-63	54.0%	47	14	17-65	26.2%	37	10
8/9/2015	@ MINNESOTA	64-72	32-37	3	L	73.5	U	24-62	38.7%	39	16	26-66	39.4%	43	9
8/11/2015	SEATTLE	77-85	48-35	-7.5	W	73	O	28-64	43.7%	35	13	34-67	50.7%	37	9
8/16/2015	CHICAGO	76-64	38-35	-2	W	80	U	30-62	48.4%	41	11	23-71	32.4%	49	9
8/18/2015	INDIANA	68-79	44-30	-2	W	75	U	26-57	45.6%	34	17	25-68	36.8%	46	16
8/21/2015	@ PHOENIX	78-68	38-30	2.5	W	72	U	32-65	49.2%	34	8	25-57	43.9%	40	15
8/23/2015	@ SAN ANTONIO	90-59	43-27	-2.5	W	72.5	U	37-68	54.4%	50	10	19-71	26.8%	45	10
8/26/2015	@ INDIANA	81-79	39-43	2	L	74.5	O	28-63	44.4%	36	9	30-63	47.6%	44	15
8/28/2015	@ TULSA	66-76	27-37	-0.5	L	75.5	U	27-60	45.0%	31	13	28-66	42.4%	47	13
8/30/2015	SAN ANTONIO	60-52	34-27	-6.5	W	73.5	U	22-59	37.3%	41	14	22-75	29.3%	51	11
9/3/2015	WASHINGTON
9/6/2015	TULSA
9/9/2015	@ ATLANTA
9/11/2015	@ PHOENIX

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

LOS ANGELES is 21-11 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997

17 of 34 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

LOS ANGELES is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at LOS ANGELES since 1997

LOS ANGELES is 11-4 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997

9 of 16 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons.

LOS ANGELES is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
6/23/2015	LOS ANGELES	80	138	ATS	37	34-68	50.0%	6-15	40.0%	6-7	85.7%	43	11	17
	WASHINGTON	84	-11	SU Over	39	27-58	46.6%	6-14	42.9%	24-33	72.7%	32	5	9
7/17/2014	WASHINGTON	79	155	SU ATS	34	29-59	49.2%	4-11	36.4%	17-21	81.0%	40	10	22
	LOS ANGELES	75	-7.5	Under	34	26-57	45.6%	3-9	33.3%	20-21	95.2%	26	5	19
6/1/2014	LOS ANGELES	84	-5	Over	28	32-97	33.0%	4-12	33.3%	16-19	84.2%	50	13	15
	WASHINGTON	92	148.5	SU ATS	33	31-76	40.8%	10-27	37.0%	20-22	90.9%	65	12	29

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 29 trends with a total rating of 24 stars.

Mike is 58-43 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 34-20 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 33-17 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 33-17 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 25-14 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 38-24 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 41-22 against the 1rst half line (+16.8 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 30-19 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 20-7 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 27-16 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 28-17 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 45-32 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line

There are 16 trends with a total rating of 11 stars.

Mike is 27-47 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 34.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 86-115 against the 1rst half line (-40.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.7, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) in home games on Thursday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.9, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 35-19 against the 1rst half line (+14.1 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 28-13 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 38.8, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 57-37 against the 1rst half line (+16.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 43-19 against the 1rst half line (+22.1 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 57-35 against the 1rst half line (+18.5 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 31-15 against the 1rst half line (+14.5 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 38.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 76-52 against the 1rst half line (+18.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 39-21 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 38.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 55-31 against the 1rst half line (+20.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.9, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 44-25 against the 1rst half line (+16.5 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.3, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 10 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.

Mike is 52-30 OVER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games against Western conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.8, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 2nd road game in 2 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 41.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 52-30 OVER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.8, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 27-12 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.9, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 38-19 OVER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 36-18 OVER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 27-12 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 35-19 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 68-38 OVER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.5, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 72 trends with a total rating of 90 stars.

Mike is 58-43 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 27-12 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 38-23 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 34-19 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 29-14 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 31-20 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 45-32 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 125-70 UNDER (+48.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 97-56 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.3, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 52-27 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 124-73 UNDER (+43.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.7, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 62-35 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 91-53 UNDER (+32.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 88-52 UNDER (+30.8 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 37-13 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*)

Brian is 59-27 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 91-46 UNDER (+40.4 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 109-56 UNDER (+47.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 129-80 UNDER (+41.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 111-59 UNDER (+46.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 91-46 UNDER (+40.4 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 31-12 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 75-47 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 83-48 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 56-32 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 73-38 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 34-17 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 49-23 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games being outrebounded by opponent by 5 or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 31.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 109-67 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 81-46 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 18-6 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 55 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 44-23 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 44-22 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 125 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 31.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 128-66 UNDER (+55.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 65-36 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 96-56 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 120-73 UNDER (+39.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 128-66 UNDER (+55.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 60-33 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 122-77 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 39-14 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Brian is 21-2 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.0, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 5*)

Brian is 114-63 UNDER (+44.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 62-37 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 35-18 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 116-73 UNDER (+35.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 54-34 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 69-42 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 104-65 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 85-54 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 151-99 UNDER (+42.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 110-69 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 86-52 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 130-79 UNDER (+43.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Brian is 197-106 UNDER (+80.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Brian is 75-52 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 33.5, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Brian is 76-45 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = -2.5, Closing First Half Line = -2.5

Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 164 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 154 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 19 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 14 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 70.5, Closing First Half Total = 70

Since 1997, 11 games went over the first half total, while 11 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = -2.5, Closing First Half Total = 70

Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 14 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 12 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times.

Since 1997, 13 games went over the first half total, while 13 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

WASHINGTON

[G] 08/28/2015 - Kara Lawson "?" Wednesday vs. Phoenix Mercury ( Back )

LOS ANGELES

[F] 09/02/2015 - Nnemkadi Ogwumike "?" Thursday vs. Wash Mystics ( Concussion )

[G] 08/26/2015 - Erin Phillips out indefinitely ( Knee )

[C] 08/26/2015 - Marianna Tolo out for season ( Knee )

Last Updated: 5/7/2024 3:27:42 PM EST.