| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
SAN ANTONIO
First Half Results
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
73.5
| 27
Final
34 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 657 | SAN ANTONIO | 72.5 | | 658 | LOS ANGELES | -6.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(86-43 since 1997.) (66.7%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(63-30 since 1997.) (67.7%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more.
(38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(70-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games, with a losing record.
(111-65 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games.
(69-33 since 1997.) (67.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games, with a losing record.
(56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(63-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +36.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(63-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a losing record.
(63-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(41-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record.
(142-90 since 1997.) (61.2%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 3 or more consecutive losses.
(83-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a losing record.
(70-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 3 or more consecutive losses.
(93-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in August or September games.
(308-211 since 1997.) (59.3%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents.
(562-384 since 1997.) (59.4%, +139.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(376-243 since 1997.) (60.7%, +108.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(133-79 since 1997.) (62.7%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(198-113 since 1997.) (63.7%, +73.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss against a division rival.
(140-79 since 1997.) (63.9%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(97-54 since 1997.) (64.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(88-47 since 1997.) (65.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(70-33 since 1997.) (68%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(59-26 since 1997.) (69.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss.
(179-117 since 1997.) (60.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game.
(588-376 since 1997.) (61%, +174.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(257-153 since 1997.) (62.7%, +88.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(182-102 since 1997.) (64.1%, +69.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(219-130 since 1997.) (62.8%, +76 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, in August or September games.
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(72-37 since 1997.) (66.1%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(105-63 since 1997.) (62.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(163-110 since 1997.) (59.7%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(242-162 since 1997.) (59.9%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(113-64 since 1997.) (63.8%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(99-50 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(67-38 since 1997.) (63.8%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(60-38 since 1997.) (61.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(198-127 since 1997.) (60.9%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(99-50 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(99-50 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(60-38 since 1997.) (61.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(60-38 since 1997.) (61.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(321-197 since 1997.) (62%, +104.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(243-139 since 1997.) (63.6%, +90.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(89-49 since 1997.) (64.5%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(474-322 since 1997.) (59.5%, +119.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(318-196 since 1997.) (61.9%, +102.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(115-58 since 1997.) (66.5%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(83-38 since 1997.) (68.6%, +41.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(55-23 since 1997.) (70.5%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(299-193 since 1997.) (60.8%, +86.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(80-38 since 1997.) (67.8%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games.
(211-137 since 1997.) (60.6%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(227-156 since 1997.) (59.3%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(67-31 since 1997.) (68.4%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(270-168 since 1997.) (61.6%, +85.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(83-39 since 1997.) (68%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more.
(60-25 since 1997.) (70.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record.
(311-212 since 1997.) (59.5%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(211-135 since 1997.) (61%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(144-90 since 1997.) (61.5%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(91-50 since 1997.) (64.5%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival.
(291-186 since 1997.) (61%, +86.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(120-65 since 1997.) (64.9%, +48.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(77-37 since 1997.) (67.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(97-54 since 1997.) (64.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival.
(205-119 since 1997.) (63.3%, +74.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(85-45 since 1997.) (65.4%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(54-25 since 1997.) (68.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, with a losing record.
(96-55 since 1997.) (63.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(68-31 since 1997.) (68.7%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(141-88 since 1997.) (61.6%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(62-29 since 1997.) (68.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss.
(276-180 since 1997.) (60.5%, +78 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss, in August or September games.
(109-62 since 1997.) (63.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss, with a losing record.
(128-80 since 1997.) (61.5%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(88-47 since 1997.) (65.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(365-242 since 1997.) (60.1%, +98.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 10 points or more.
(205-139 since 1997.) (59.6%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(344-225 since 1997.) (60.5%, +96.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(88-46 since 1997.) (65.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(407-290 since 1997.) (58.4%, +88 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season.
(149-101 since 1997.) (59.6%, +37.9 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after playing a road game.
(441-303 since 1997.) (59.3%, +107.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(419-285 since 1997.) (59.5%, +105.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(424-291 since 1997.) (59.3%, +103.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in August or September games.
(157-101 since 1997.) (60.9%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(137-87 since 1997.) (61.2%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents.
(998-783 since 1997.) (56%, +136.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(151-98 since 1997.) (60.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-78 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(132-78 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-78 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(158-104 since 1997.) (60.3%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(138-81 since 1997.) (63%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(108-70 since 1997.) (60.7%, +31 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(138-81 since 1997.) (63%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(138-81 since 1997.) (63%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(108-70 since 1997.) (60.7%, +31 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(108-70 since 1997.) (60.7%, +31 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(479-337 since 1997.) (58.7%, +108.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(364-243 since 1997.) (60%, +96.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(96-53 since 1997.) (64.4%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(535-405 since 1997.) (56.9%, +89.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(195-128 since 1997.) (60.4%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(138-87 since 1997.) (61.3%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(477-346 since 1997.) (58%, +96.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(62-33 since 1997.) (65.3%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(238-171 since 1997.) (58.2%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in August or September games.
(308-211 since 1997.) (59.3%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents.
(562-384 since 1997.) (59.4%, +139.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(395-273 since 1997.) (59.1%, +94.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(266-176 since 1997.) (60.2%, +72.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games.
(172-110 since 1997.) (61%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game.
(512-359 since 1997.) (58.8%, +117.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(337-222 since 1997.) (60.3%, +92.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(218-138 since 1997.) (61.2%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(349-250 since 1997.) (58.3%, +74 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(349-221 since 1997.) (61.2%, +105.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(105-63 since 1997.) (62.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(163-110 since 1997.) (59.7%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(236-161 since 1997.) (59.4%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(105-62 since 1997.) (62.9%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(321-197 since 1997.) (62%, +104.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(243-139 since 1997.) (63.6%, +90.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(386-277 since 1997.) (58.2%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(73-40 since 1997.) (64.6%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(298-215 since 1997.) (58.1%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(134-81 since 1997.) (62.3%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(336-243 since 1997.) (58%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(451-332 since 1997.) (57.6%, +85.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, cold shooting team - 4 straight games making <=40% of their shots.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(179-120 since 1997.) (59.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(335-239 since 1997.) (58.4%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season.
(143-92 since 1997.) (60.9%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing a road game.
(414-286 since 1997.) (59.1%, +99.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record.
(30-10 since 1997.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(29-9 since 1997.) (76.3%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(118-62 since 1997.) (65.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(56-24 since 1997.) (70%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(99-49 since 1997.) (66.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(60-29 since 1997.) (67.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(49-20 since 1997.) (71%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(94-54 since 1997.) (63.5%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents.
(998-783 since 1997.) (56%, +136.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - cold shooting team - 4 straight games making <=40% of their shots.
(42-19 since 1997.) (68.9%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(661-497 since 1997.) (57.1%, +114.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(151-98 since 1997.) (60.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-78 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(82-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +27 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(132-78 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-78 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(479-337 since 1997.) (58.7%, +108.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(364-243 since 1997.) (60%, +96.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, cold shooting team - 4 straight games making <=40% of their shots.
(36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(225-163 since 1997.) (58%, +45.7 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(146-98 since 1997.) (59.8%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(179-126 since 1997.) (58.7%, +40.4 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(115-74 since 1997.) (60.8%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(170-104 since 1997.) (62%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(102-61 since 1997.) (62.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(107-62 since 1997.) (63.3%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(78-40 since 1997.) (66.1%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(66-32 since 1997.) (67.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(144-83 since 1997.) (63.4%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(88-50 since 1997.) (63.8%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SAN ANTONIO | 68 | | 35 | | 25-64 | 39.5% | 4-12 | 30.4% | 14-18 | 77.4% | 38 | 8 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 81 | | 41 | | 32-65 | 48.9% | 4-14 | 32.0% | 13-15 | 84.0% | 43 | 8 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, SAN ANTONIO covered the first half line 541 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 459 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 592 games went over first half total, while 408 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 39-72 against the 1rst half line (-40.2 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 40.4 | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.1, OPPONENT 35.6 | LOS ANGELES is 23-7 against the 1rst half line (+15.3 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 35.8 | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 37.6 | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in home games when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 37.0 | LOS ANGELES is 30-17 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 37.3 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 41.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 40.9 | LOS ANGELES is 106-46 OVER (+55.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.1, OPPONENT 35.9 | LOS ANGELES is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 38.5 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.4, OPPONENT 38.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 33-15 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.3, OPPONENT 36.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 30.9, OPPONENT 34.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 40-21 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 47-24 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 36.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 67-42 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 37.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 100-71 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 84-57 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 39-16 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.3, OPPONENT 37.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 49-29 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.6, OPPONENT 35.8 | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.2, OPPONENT 33.1 | LOS ANGELES is 122-82 UNDER (+31.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 35.0 | LOS ANGELES is 80-41 UNDER (+34.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 33.1 | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 33.8 |
|
| | |
|
| SAN ANTONIO | | | | LOS ANGELES | -8 |  |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.3, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-8 against the 1rst half line (+6.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 31-16 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 44-23 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-61 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 135-94 UNDER (+31.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 55-33 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-23 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-8 UNDER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 62-33 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 77-51 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 UNDER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-140 against the 1rst half line (-51.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.0, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 3 straight losses by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 29.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 29.1, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 18-35 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 98-66 against the 1rst half line (+25.4 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 136-103 against the 1rst half line (+22.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses by 10 points or more to division rivals over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 257-191 UNDER (+46.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 158-111 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 33-16 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 66-40 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 33-16 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 31-16 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 39-25 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-9 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 79-45 UNDER (+29.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 126-95 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 60-37 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 38-24 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 33-19 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 49-29 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a road loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 126-91 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-59 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-40 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 53-27 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 136-101 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-50 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 42-25 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 93-66 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 79-51 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-12 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 97-68 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-44 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 27-11 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 82-58 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 51-29 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 65-44 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 246-198 UNDER (+28.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 134-98 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 122-91 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-57 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 138-102 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-18 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 181-133 UNDER (+34.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 190-145 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 45-27 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-22 | -12.2 | 14-14 | 13-16 | 69.5 | 34.7 | 40.3% | 39.7 | 78.0 | 38.1 | 46.3% | 42.3 | | Road Games | 0-14 | -12 | 7-6 | 7-7 | 68.4 | 33.6 | 39.9% | 37.2 | 79.9 | 38.0 | 47.3% | 43.4 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 59.4 | 30.4 | 32.5% | 38.2 | 79.2 | 39.0 | 48.6% | 46.8 | | Division Games | 5-13 | -5.3 | 8-9 | 8-10 | 68.8 | 34.8 | 39.6% | 40.3 | 76.6 | 37.6 | 46.0% | 41.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 69.5 | 34.7 | 26-64 | 40.3% | 4-12 | 30.6% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.2 | 37.8 | 28-65 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.4 | 33.6 | 26-65 | 39.9% | 4-13 | 28.6% | 13-16 | 80.6% | 37 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 38.1 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 12-16 | 75.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 38 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-18 | 80.3% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.9 | 38.0 | 31-67 | 47.3% | 4-13 | 29.8% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-18 | -16.9 | 12-17 | 14-14 | 73.6 | 36.9 | 45.2% | 39.1 | 74.4 | 35.1 | 41.8% | 40.1 | | Home Games | 6-8 | -12.5 | 5-9 | 5-9 | 73.7 | 38.2 | 45.3% | 38.8 | 72.8 | 33.1 | 41.4% | 40.1 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.4 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 76.6 | 38.2 | 47.9% | 37.0 | 72.2 | 33.4 | 39.1% | 44.4 | | Division Games | 8-11 | -12.9 | 7-12 | 8-10 | 73.7 | 37.1 | 46.0% | 39.0 | 74.0 | 35.3 | 43.2% | 38.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.6 | 36.9 | 28-63 | 45.2% | 4-14 | 30.2% | 12-15 | 83.0% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.7 | 38.2 | 28-63 | 45.3% | 4-13 | 27.1% | 13-16 | 83.9% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.4 | 35.1 | 27-64 | 41.8% | 4-14 | 32.1% | 16-21 | 77.0% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.2 | 37.8 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.8 | 33.1 | 26-64 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 77.0% | 40 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 70.8, LOS ANGELES 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/21/2015 | INDIANA | 80-62 | 48-32 | 1 | W | 74.5 | O | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | | 7/29/2015 | ATLANTA | 102-85 | 47-42 | -2 | W | 74.5 | O | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | | 7/31/2015 | WASHINGTON | 53-88 | 27-49 | 1 | L | 73.5 | O | 22-63 | 34.9% | 30 | 12 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 47 | 14 | | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 78-80 | 49-38 | 2.5 | W | 75 | O | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | | 8/4/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 51-82 | 30-37 | 2 | L | 74 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 21 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 50 | 17 | | 8/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-66 | 38-27 | 6 | W | 73 | U | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 9 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 46 | 12 | | 8/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 88-81 | 43-34 | -2.5 | W | 73 | O | 32-63 | 50.8% | 35 | 16 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 32 | 15 | | 8/11/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-83 | 46-35 | 8 | W | 73.5 | O | 30-76 | 39.5% | 44 | 12 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 40 | 14 | | 8/16/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 63-72 | 35-34 | 1.5 | W | 75 | U | 22-59 | 37.3% | 33 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 46 | 16 | | 8/19/2015 | NEW YORK | 45-73 | 18-39 | 3.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 17-63 | 27.0% | 41 | 19 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 50 | 15 | | 8/21/2015 | MINNESOTA | 61-78 | 38-37 | 4.5 | W | 74 | O | 24-71 | 33.8% | 39 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 43 | 13 | | 8/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 59-90 | 27-43 | 2.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 19-71 | 26.8% | 45 | 10 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 50 | 10 | | 8/28/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-83 | 34-42 | 2 | L | 73.5 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 33 | 11 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 45 | 18 | | 8/30/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | 38-35 | 2 | W | 74 | U | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | 24-31 | -1 | L | 72.5 | U | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | 35-43 | 5 | L | 73 | O | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 88-77 | 39-39 | 2.5 | W | 80.5 | U | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-78 | 38-49 | -2.5 | L | 75 | O | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | 83-61 | 39-35 | 1 | W | 75 | U | 37-77 | 48.1% | 42 | 7 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 37 | 15 | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | 84-57 | 41-26 | -4 | W | 75 | U | 34-63 | 54.0% | 47 | 14 | 17-65 | 26.2% | 37 | 10 | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-72 | 32-37 | 3 | L | 73.5 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 16 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 9 | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | 77-85 | 48-35 | -7.5 | W | 73 | O | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 9 | | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 76-64 | 38-35 | -2 | W | 80 | U | 30-62 | 48.4% | 41 | 11 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 49 | 9 | | 8/18/2015 | INDIANA | 68-79 | 44-30 | -2 | W | 75 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 46 | 16 | | 8/21/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 78-68 | 38-30 | 2.5 | W | 72 | U | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 8 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 40 | 15 | | 8/23/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 90-59 | 43-27 | -2.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 37-68 | 54.4% | 50 | 10 | 19-71 | 26.8% | 45 | 10 | | 8/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 81-79 | 39-43 | 2 | L | 74.5 | O | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 9 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 44 | 15 | | 8/28/2015 | @ TULSA | 66-76 | 27-37 | -0.5 | L | 75.5 | U | 27-60 | 45.0% | 31 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 47 | 13 | | 8/30/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SAN ANTONIO is 40-34 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 41 of 76 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 7-4 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 12 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 20-17 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO since 1997 | | 20 of 38 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 90 | -5 | SU ATS | 43 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 50 | 7 | 10 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 59 | 147 | Over | 27 | 19-71 | 26.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 45 | 13 | 10 | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | -5 | SU Over | 38 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 39 | 6 | 10 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 78 | 152.5 | ATS | 49 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 33 | 5 | 7 | 7/8/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 63 | -4 | Under | 38 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 39 | 9 | 11 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 45 | 4 | 11 | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 81 | 150.5 | ATS | 40 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 34 | 6 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 86 | -6 | SU Over | 38 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 21-23 | 91.3% | 31 | 8 | 10 | 8/10/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -2.5 | Over | 31 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 35 | 7 | 9 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 82 | 155 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 49 | 10 | 8 | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | 159 | SU ATS | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 30 | 6 | 10 | | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -6.5 | Under | 38 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 47 | 8 | 22 | 6/14/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 74 | -2.5 | Over | 44 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 0-3 | 0.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 35 | 8 | 19 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 101 | 155 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 24-24 | 100.0% | 29 | 5 | 11 | 5/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 62 | 154.5 | Under | 38 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 2-2 | 100.0% | 33 | 6 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 38 | 6 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Dan is 111-92 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 77-64 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 94-80 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 63-48 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 54-36 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 50-38 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 29-18 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 63-47 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 37-22 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 51-39 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 100-85 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 43-27 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 42-26 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 67-53 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 26-15 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Dan is 87-101 against the 1rst half line (-24.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 75-90 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 47-28 against the 1rst half line (+16.2 Units) in home games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 28-13 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) in home games on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.4, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 34-19 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 38.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 38-21 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 43-25 against the 1rst half line (+15.5 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.3, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Dan is 196-151 UNDER (+29.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 114-86 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 85-54 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 46-30 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 104-68 UNDER (+29.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 91-61 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 59-34 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 193-140 UNDER (+39.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 186-139 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 68-38 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 90-59 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 102-85 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 54-35 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 45-27 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 54-33 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 62-39 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 97-74 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 49-35 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 54-42 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 51-36 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 40-24 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 58-25 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 28-8 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Dan is 115-75 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 87-54 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 36-23 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 58-35 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 46-27 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 32.6, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 73-54 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 65-45 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-22 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 64-42 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 35-23 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 101-72 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 75-46 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 54-30 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 40-21 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 103-85 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 32-21 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 72-57 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 33-21 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 54-39 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 109-86 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 72-50 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 51-30 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 36-21 UNDER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 81-54 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 99-68 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 93-79 UNDER (+6.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 26-15 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 106-80 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 58-41 UNDER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-38 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 80-59 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 35-21 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 24-10 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 33-15 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-17 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-33 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 131-115 UNDER (+4.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 70-53 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 103-79 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 68-52 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 106-72 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 53-41 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 154-129 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 66-53 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 45-29 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 121-104 UNDER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 45-29 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 62-43 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 48-33 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 31-16 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 124-70 UNDER (+47.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 96-56 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.4, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 123-73 UNDER (+42.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.7, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 61-35 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 90-53 UNDER (+31.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 87-52 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 49-28 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 161-92 UNDER (+59.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 75-31 UNDER (+40.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.9, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 41-21 UNDER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 94-46 UNDER (+43.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 82-48 UNDER (+29.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 53-19 UNDER (+32.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 55-32 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 57-26 UNDER (+28.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 72-38 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 23-6 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 81-34 UNDER (+43.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.3, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 49-23 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.1, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 39-18 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 43-14 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 17-3 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 76-35 UNDER (+37.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 36-16 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 81-39 UNDER (+38.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 96-48 UNDER (+43.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 53-26 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 127-66 UNDER (+54.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 31-10 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 124-58 UNDER (+60.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 60-29 UNDER (+28.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 127-66 UNDER (+54.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 124-55 UNDER (+63.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 38-14 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 20-2 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.0, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 115-57 UNDER (+52.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 66-38 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 150-99 UNDER (+41.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 109-69 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 85-52 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 129-79 UNDER (+42.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 196-106 UNDER (+79.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 65-38 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 99-69 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 150-93 UNDER (+47.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 85-58 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 36.4, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 62-26 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 51-31 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 75-45 UNDER (+25.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 19 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 15 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 45 games went under the first half total, while 36 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 10 games went under the first half total, while 7 games went over the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 10 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times.
Edge against the first half line=SAN ANTONIO | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 8 games went under the first half total, while 6 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 0 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| [F] 08/29/2015 - Nnemkadi Ogwumike "?" Sunday vs. SA Stars ( Concussion ) | | [G] 08/26/2015 - Erin Phillips out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 08/26/2015 - Marianna Tolo out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/30/2024 4:02:53 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|