Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : First Half Matchup
Sunday 8/30/2015Line$ LineOU LineScore
WASHINGTON
 First Half Results
SEATTLE
-2  

+2  


71.5
 
39
Final
30

WASHINGTON (16 - 11) at SEATTLE (8 - 20)
View Previous GameNo Next Game
Sunday, 8/30/2015 9:05 PM
Board First Half
659WASHINGTON-2
660SEATTLE71.5
KEY GAME INFORMATION
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™
StatFox Super Situations favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 1 situations with a total rating of 2 stars.
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total
There are 243 situations with a total rating of 540 stars.
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in August or September games.
(308-211 since 1997.) (59.3%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game.
(588-376 since 1997.) (61%, +174.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(227-137 since 1997.) (62.4%, +76.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(322-204 since 1997.) (61.2%, +97.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(163-110 since 1997.) (59.7%, +42 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(67-38 since 1997.) (63.8%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(60-38 since 1997.) (61.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(198-127 since 1997.) (60.9%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(60-38 since 1997.) (61.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(60-38 since 1997.) (61.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(39-16 since 1997.) (70.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(81-40 since 1997.) (66.9%, +37 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games.
(335-227 since 1997.) (59.6%, +85.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, after a division game.
(211-133 since 1997.) (61.3%, +64.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, off a home win against a division rival.
(77-33 since 1997.) (70%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, off a win against a division rival.
(118-60 since 1997.) (66.3%, +52 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, off a home win.
(118-62 since 1997.) (65.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(398-263 since 1997.) (60.2%, +108.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG).
(66-31 since 1997.) (68%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(44-18 since 1997.) (71%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs against opponent after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(189-124 since 1997.) (60.4%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(318-196 since 1997.) (61.9%, +102.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(115-58 since 1997.) (66.5%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(83-38 since 1997.) (68.6%, +41.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(55-23 since 1997.) (70.5%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(299-193 since 1997.) (60.8%, +86.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record.
(311-212 since 1997.) (59.5%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(211-135 since 1997.) (61%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(144-90 since 1997.) (61.5%, +45 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(91-50 since 1997.) (64.5%, +36 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(77-37 since 1997.) (67.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(53-19 since 1997.) (73.6%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(466-256 since 1997.) (64.5%, +184.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(171-108 since 1997.) (61.3%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(184-119 since 1997.) (60.7%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(194-111 since 1997.) (63.6%, +71.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(133-74 since 1997.) (64.3%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(91-51 since 1997.) (64.1%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(58-24 since 1997.) (70.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(42-13 since 1997.) (76.4%, +27.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win against a division rival.
(81-38 since 1997.) (68.1%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(133-66 since 1997.) (66.8%, +60.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(130-63 since 1997.) (67.4%, +60.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a home win.
(179-94 since 1997.) (65.6%, +75.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(296-160 since 1997.) (64.9%, +120 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(133-68 since 1997.) (66.2%, +58.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(99-47 since 1997.) (67.8%, +47.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win against a division rival.
(82-41 since 1997.) (66.7%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a home win.
(80-37 since 1997.) (68.4%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a home win.
(108-58 since 1997.) (65.1%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points.
(90-41 since 1997.) (68.7%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a losing record.
(49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(250-137 since 1997.) (64.6%, +99.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(119-64 since 1997.) (65%, +48.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(88-46 since 1997.) (65.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a win against a division rival.
(64-29 since 1997.) (68.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home win.
(72-31 since 1997.) (69.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home win.
(96-52 since 1997.) (64.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(326-178 since 1997.) (64.7%, +130.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(157-84 since 1997.) (65.1%, +64.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(125-66 since 1997.) (65.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(61-27 since 1997.) (69.3%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(50-19 since 1997.) (72.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(42-13 since 1997.) (76.4%, +27.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(89-47 since 1997.) (65.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a home win.
(128-75 since 1997.) (63.1%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(359-197 since 1997.) (64.6%, +142.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(152-86 since 1997.) (63.9%, +57.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(109-62 since 1997.) (63.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(94-50 since 1997.) (65.3%, +39 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home win.
(144-75 since 1997.) (65.8%, +61.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(204-109 since 1997.) (65.2%, +84.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(96-52 since 1997.) (64.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win against a division rival.
(175-100 since 1997.) (63.6%, +65 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(67-34 since 1997.) (66.3%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win against a division rival, with a losing record.
(43-19 since 1997.) (69.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent off a home win.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a win against a division rival.
(297-190 since 1997.) (61%, +88 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a win against a division rival, with a losing record.
(74-43 since 1997.) (63.2%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a home win.
(98-54 since 1997.) (64.5%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win.
(273-168 since 1997.) (61.9%, +88.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win, on Sunday games.
(47-16 since 1997.) (74.6%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(68-34 since 1997.) (66.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(344-225 since 1997.) (60.5%, +96.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season.
(149-101 since 1997.) (59.6%, +37.9 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after playing a home game.
(414-277 since 1997.) (59.9%, +109.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after playing 2 consecutive home games.
(167-101 since 1997.) (62.3%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(181-116 since 1997.) (60.9%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(454-301 since 1997.) (60.1%, +122.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a losing record.
(146-94 since 1997.) (60.8%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(71-37 since 1997.) (65.7%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(449-295 since 1997.) (60.3%, +124.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(109-70 since 1997.) (60.9%, +32 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(389-278 since 1997.) (58.3%, +83.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(108-70 since 1997.) (60.7%, +31 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(108-70 since 1997.) (60.7%, +31 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(108-70 since 1997.) (60.7%, +31 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG).
(124-75 since 1997.) (62.3%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(83-41 since 1997.) (66.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG).
(69-32 since 1997.) (68.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(45-18 since 1997.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(535-405 since 1997.) (56.9%, +89.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(195-128 since 1997.) (60.4%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(138-87 since 1997.) (61.3%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(819-585 since 1997.) (58.3%, +175.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(372-266 since 1997.) (58.3%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(118-72 since 1997.) (62.1%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(237-153 since 1997.) (60.8%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(609-447 since 1997.) (57.7%, +117.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(292-203 since 1997.) (59%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(429-301 since 1997.) (58.8%, +97.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(214-147 since 1997.) (59.3%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(591-414 since 1997.) (58.8%, +135.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(305-212 since 1997.) (59%, +71.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(111-67 since 1997.) (62.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(167-105 since 1997.) (61.4%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(646-455 since 1997.) (58.7%, +145.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(356-249 since 1997.) (58.8%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in August or September games.
(308-211 since 1997.) (59.3%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(369-231 since 1997.) (61.5%, +114.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(349-250 since 1997.) (58.3%, +74 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(163-110 since 1997.) (59.7%, +42 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(400-292 since 1997.) (57.8%, +78.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(141-98 since 1997.) (59%, +33.2 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(319-213 since 1997.) (60%, +84.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(140-75 since 1997.) (65.1%, +57.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(217-147 since 1997.) (59.6%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(100-52 since 1997.) (65.8%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(424-305 since 1997.) (58.2%, +88.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(279-188 since 1997.) (59.7%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(115-71 since 1997.) (61.8%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread.
(254-175 since 1997.) (59.2%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(175-116 since 1997.) (60.1%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(77-41 since 1997.) (65.3%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season.
(721-541 since 1997.) (57.1%, +125.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(487-365 since 1997.) (57.2%, +85.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(257-169 since 1997.) (60.3%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(188-124 since 1997.) (60.3%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(99-52 since 1997.) (65.6%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(170-104 since 1997.) (62%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(102-61 since 1997.) (62.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(144-83 since 1997.) (63.4%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(88-50 since 1997.) (63.8%, +33 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(792-581 since 1997.) (57.7%, +152.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(402-271 since 1997.) (59.7%, +103.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(270-172 since 1997.) (61.1%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(163-107 since 1997.) (60.4%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(137-75 since 1997.) (64.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(104-52 since 1997.) (66.7%, +46.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(832-604 since 1997.) (57.9%, +167.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(480-337 since 1997.) (58.8%, +109.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(316-220 since 1997.) (59%, +74 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(147-84 since 1997.) (63.6%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(109-59 since 1997.) (64.9%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(236-161 since 1997.) (59.4%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(100-54 since 1997.) (64.9%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games.
(335-227 since 1997.) (59.6%, +85.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, after a non-conference game.
(217-134 since 1997.) (61.8%, +69.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a home win.
(85-49 since 1997.) (63.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(495-312 since 1997.) (61.3%, +151.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(162-90 since 1997.) (64.3%, +63 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(222-156 since 1997.) (58.7%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(270-144 since 1997.) (65.2%, +111.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(98-48 since 1997.) (67.1%, +45.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(131-74 since 1997.) (63.9%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(262-175 since 1997.) (60%, +69.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(51-25 since 1997.) (67.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(316-195 since 1997.) (61.8%, +101.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(181-100 since 1997.) (64.4%, +71 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(119-62 since 1997.) (65.7%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(73-31 since 1997.) (70.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(120-77 since 1997.) (60.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(238-154 since 1997.) (60.7%, +68.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(165-101 since 1997.) (62%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(108-68 since 1997.) (61.4%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(69-35 since 1997.) (66.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(104-64 since 1997.) (61.9%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season.
(420-254 since 1997.) (62.3%, +140.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(288-172 since 1997.) (62.6%, +98.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(167-97 since 1997.) (63.3%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(115-62 since 1997.) (65%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(153-91 since 1997.) (62.7%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(113-67 since 1997.) (62.8%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win.
(306-183 since 1997.) (62.6%, +104.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, with a winning record on the season.
(183-106 since 1997.) (63.3%, +66.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(119-75 since 1997.) (61.3%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(64-26 since 1997.) (71.1%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(422-299 since 1997.) (58.5%, +93.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(326-225 since 1997.) (59.2%, +78.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season.
(211-139 since 1997.) (60.3%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(451-332 since 1997.) (57.6%, +85.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(335-239 since 1997.) (58.4%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(263-160 since 1997.) (62.2%, +87 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(418-292 since 1997.) (58.9%, +96.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after playing a home game.
(450-298 since 1997.) (60.2%, +122.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after playing 2 consecutive home games.
(222-140 since 1997.) (61.3%, +68 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(118-62 since 1997.) (65.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in non-conference games.
(50-23 since 1997.) (68.5%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season.
(57-31 since 1997.) (64.8%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(99-49 since 1997.) (66.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(60-29 since 1997.) (67.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in non-conference games.
(43-19 since 1997.) (69.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season.
(46-23 since 1997.) (66.7%, +20.7 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(459-272 since 1997.) (62.8%, +159.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(167-115 since 1997.) (59.2%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(179-122 since 1997.) (59.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(235-127 since 1997.) (64.9%, +95.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(154-80 since 1997.) (65.8%, +66 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(89-45 since 1997.) (66.4%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(62-29 since 1997.) (68.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(78-41 since 1997.) (65.5%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(481-285 since 1997.) (62.8%, +167.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(168-97 since 1997.) (63.4%, +61.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(281-158 since 1997.) (64%, +107.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(185-102 since 1997.) (64.5%, +72.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(109-61 since 1997.) (64.1%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(73-40 since 1997.) (64.6%, +29 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(84-46 since 1997.) (64.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(634-469 since 1997.) (57.5%, +118.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(116-70 since 1997.) (62.4%, +39 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(82-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +27 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(106-60 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(71-35 since 1997.) (67%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(242-162 since 1997.) (59.9%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeHalfEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
WASHINGTON73 37 27-6442.9%6-1735.9%12-1678.1%40812
SEATTLE70 35 27-6342.9%5-1532.7%11-1380.8%41813

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.
In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE covered the first half line 490 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 469 times.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, 527 games went over first half total, while 473 games went under first half total.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line
WASHINGTON is 10-3 against the 1rst half line (+6.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.1, OPPONENT 35.3
WASHINGTON is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 35.3
WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.0, OPPONENT 34.9
SEATTLE is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 40.0

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 37.2

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total
WASHINGTON is 102-71 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.4
WASHINGTON is 99-64 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.3
WASHINGTON is 93-61 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 34.7
WASHINGTON is 118-72 UNDER (+38.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 35.0
WASHINGTON is 65-32 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 33.4
WASHINGTON is 195-121 UNDER (+61.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.0
WASHINGTON is 132-91 UNDER (+31.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 34.9
WASHINGTON is 105-60 UNDER (+39.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.0
WASHINGTON is 99-68 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.5
SEATTLE is 91-58 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.7
SEATTLE is 107-49 UNDER (+53.1 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 33.9
SEATTLE is 81-50 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 35.1
SEATTLE is 86-51 UNDER (+29.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 34.4
SEATTLE is 23-12 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 36.6
SEATTLE is 89-60 UNDER (+23.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 35.0
SEATTLE is 70-33 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.8, OPPONENT 34.1
SEATTLE is 189-111 UNDER (+66.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.1

STATFOX POWERLINE™
 Power Rating
 EstimateEdge
WASHINGTON-2 
SEATTLE  
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line
There are 8 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.
WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 2 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.
SEATTLE is 66-45 against the 1rst half line (+16.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 49-30 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 13 trends with a total rating of 15 stars.
WASHINGTON is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.8, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.8, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.2, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.4, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 42.3, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 3*)
SEATTLE is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.7, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 22 trends with a total rating of 10 stars.
WASHINGTON is 31-17 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 61-36 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 51-32 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 79-50 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 130-91 UNDER (+29.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 49-30 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 27-14 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 197-142 UNDER (+40.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 188-130 UNDER (+45.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 275-192 UNDER (+63.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 103-74 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 155-110 UNDER (+34.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 43-25 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 70-45 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 54-35 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 158-122 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 92-65 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 128-93 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 55-33 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 70-48 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line
There are 12 trends with a total rating of 9 stars.
WASHINGTON is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 64-41 against the 1rst half line (+18.9 Units) in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 15-4 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*)
WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 37-23 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 23-9 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 6 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.
WASHINGTON is 53-82 against the 1rst half line (-37.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 22-52 against the 1rst half line (-35.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*)
WASHINGTON is 97-135 against the 1rst half line (-51.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 34-18 against the 1rst half line (+14.2 Units) in home games on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games committing 7+ more turnovers than opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.9, OPPONENT 29.1 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 8 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.
WASHINGTON is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.2, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 3*)
SEATTLE is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 43.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 34 trends with a total rating of 25 stars.
WASHINGTON is 347-251 UNDER (+70.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 121-90 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 169-118 UNDER (+39.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 79-52 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 136-85 UNDER (+42.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 45 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 20-7 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)
WASHINGTON is 120-90 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 103-73 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)
WASHINGTON is 170-117 UNDER (+41.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)
WASHINGTON is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 323-231 UNDER (+68.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 163-119 UNDER (+32.1 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 65-35 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 203-144 UNDER (+44.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 164-122 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 145-107 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 163-95 UNDER (+58.5 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 120-75 UNDER (+37.5 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 111-78 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 62-39 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 104-76 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 83-57 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 126-90 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 85-56 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 33-16 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 162-102 UNDER (+49.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 161-114 UNDER (+35.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS
WASHINGTON - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games16-11+3.514-1310-1774.138.642.2%40.570.936.640.3%43.1
Road Games6-6+2.17-53-973.239.042.8%40.171.638.140.0%44.8
Last 5 Games3-2+3.64-11-475.240.442.3%40.269.238.240.0%45.8
WASHINGTON Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)74.138.627-6442.2%6-1734.9%14-1878.4%41818186115
vs opponents surrendering76.638.728-6543.1%5-1533.4%15-1979.4%41917197134
Team Stats (Road Games)73.239.027-6342.8%6-1834.6%13-1776.9%40818186126
Stats Against (All Games)70.936.627-6840.3%4-1331.5%12-1581.0%431115196124
vs opponents averaging77.138.828-6742.8%5-1533.2%15-1979.3%42916197134
Stats Against (Road Games)71.638.128-7040.0%4-1230.5%12-1580.0%451216187124

SEATTLE - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games8-20-4.114-1415-1271.135.743.8%37.176.940.843.6%41.1
Home Games6-7-0.78-58-575.038.946.6%39.075.339.542.4%38.8
Last 5 Games2-302-32-273.640.445.5%39.676.842.041.8%39.0
SEATTLE Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)71.135.727-6143.8%5-1532.7%12-1580.4%37517186143
vs opponents surrendering75.437.428-6642.6%5-1532.8%15-1979.4%41916197134
Team Stats (Home Games)75.038.928-6046.6%5-1432.4%15-1977.2%39617196153
Stats Against (All Games)76.940.828-6543.6%5-1633.0%15-1978.8%41917187125
vs opponents averaging75.337.728-6542.4%5-1532.6%15-1979.8%41916187134
Stats Against (Home Games)75.339.528-6542.4%5-1531.7%15-1979.4%39915199125
Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70,  SEATTLE 71.6
SCHEDULE AND RESULTS
WASHINGTON - Season Results Against the First Half Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreHalfLineATSTot.O/UShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
7/21/2015@ TULSA76-6938-402T74O25-5644.6%31823-7331.5%6014
7/29/2015SEATTLE87-7453-37-5W71O33-7047.1%42530-7341.1%417
7/31/2015@ SAN ANTONIO88-5349-27-1W73.5O36-6357.1%471422-6334.9%3012
8/2/2015@ CHICAGO68-7139-343W78U25-7035.7%41527-6939.1%506
8/5/2015SAN ANTONIO66-6327-38-6L73U21-5637.5%461226-6738.8%359
8/7/2015@ CONNECTICUT72-8638-46-1L71O25-6041.7%341135-6553.8%409
8/9/2015CONNECTICUT84-7334-22-3.5W71.5U25-5149.0%401122-6434.4%388
8/11/2015INDIANA62-7331-32-2L74.5U25-5743.9%331430-7042.9%4410
8/16/2015MINNESOTA77-6949-402W72.5O27-6740.3%42828-7338.4%488
8/19/2015@ MINNESOTA79-6136-345.5W72.5U29-6544.6%431021-6134.4%4114
8/21/2015@ CHICAGO85-8743-453W75.5O37-7350.7%341237-7946.8%4915
8/23/2015CHICAGO64-6633-35-1.5L77U22-6633.3%471624-6238.7%4615
8/28/2015PHOENIX71-6341-37-2.5W70.5O25-6041.7%351126-6540.0%4519
8/30/2015@ SEATTLE              
9/2/2015@ PHOENIX              
9/3/2015@ LOS ANGELES              
9/6/2015@ ATLANTA              
9/8/2015INDIANA              
9/11/2015@ NEW YORK              
9/13/2015ATLANTA              

SEATTLE - Season Results Against the First Half Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreHalfLineATSTot.O/UShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
7/21/2015NEW YORK77-8145-402.5W71.5O30-6248.4%361435-7248.6%3910
7/29/2015@ WASHINGTON74-8737-535L71O30-7341.1%41733-7047.1%425
7/31/2015@ CONNECTICUT66-6740-383.5W73O24-6139.3%401524-6338.1%4716
8/2/2015@ NEW YORK62-7835-365W72.5U24-6238.7%401731-6845.6%4310
8/8/2015@ SAN ANTONIO81-8834-432.5L73O35-6653.0%321532-6350.8%3516
8/11/2015@ LOS ANGELES85-7735-487.5L73O34-6750.7%37928-6443.7%3513
8/12/2015@ PHOENIX66-8342-528L73.5O28-6642.4%321030-6744.8%4612
8/14/2015CHICAGO84-9441-523L78.5O29-6048.3%361134-7445.9%466
8/16/2015SAN ANTONIO72-6334-35-1.5L75U27-6144.3%461622-5937.3%3315
8/21/2015INDIANA63-7543-372.5W74.5O25-5446.3%391927-6541.5%378
8/28/2015SAN ANTONIO83-6942-34-2W73.5O29-6246.8%451825-6538.5%3311
8/30/2015WASHINGTON              
9/3/2015TULSA              
9/6/2015@ CHICAGO              
9/8/2015@ MINNESOTA              
9/11/2015MINNESOTA              
9/13/2015SAN ANTONIO              
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY
All games in this series since 1997
SEATTLE is 14-13 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997
14 of 27 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
SEATTLE is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons
3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at SEATTLE since 1997
SEATTLE is 7-6 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997
9 of 13 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997
Games played at SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons.
SEATTLE is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons
2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
7/29/2015SEATTLE74143.5 Over3730-7341.1%5-1533.3%9-1181.8%4187
 WASHINGTON87-9SU ATS5333-7047.1%8-1844.4%13-1492.9%4285
6/22/2014WASHINGTON86140.5 ATS4136-6952.2%8-1844.4%6-875.0%35711
 SEATTLE89-3.5SU Over4531-7243.1%12-2450.0%15-1978.9%45128
5/24/2014SEATTLE73145SU ATS2425-5843.1%7-2035.0%16-16100.0%34515
 WASHINGTON65-5.5 Under2624-6536.9%3-1421.4%14-1593.3%41614
COACHING TRENDS
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line
There are 17 trends with a total rating of 14 stars.
Mike is 57-42 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Mike is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Mike is 24-13 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 37-26 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 33-22 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 37-23 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 72-50 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Mike is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Mike is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 27-16 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Mike is 44-31 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 1 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.
Mike is 31-51 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 24 trends with a total rating of 20 stars.
Mike is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 56-36 OVER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 35-18 OVER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.1, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 40-23 OVER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 68-36 OVER (+28.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Mike is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 44-21 OVER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Jenny 36.9, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a home underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Jenny 39.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Jenny is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Jenny 36.3, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Jenny is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.2, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Jenny is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 43.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 38-22 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Jenny 36.9, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Jenny is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Jenny 36.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Jenny is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.2, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Jenny is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Jenny is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 42.3, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Jenny is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Jenny is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.7, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 13 trends with a total rating of 13 stars.
Mike is 56-43 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Mike is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 36-23 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 20-7 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Mike is 30-18 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 31-17 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 27-14 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Mike is 37-24 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™
Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening First Half Line = 3, Closing First Half Line = 2
Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 14 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 10 times.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 5 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 3 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:
Opening First Half Total = 72, Closing First Half Total = 71.5
Since 1997, 88 games went under the first half total, while 42 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under
Over the last 3 seasons, 7 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:
Closing First Half Line = 2, Closing First Half Total = 71.5
Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 6 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 5 times.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 0 times.
Since 1997, 6 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total.
Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total.
KEY PLAYER INJURIES
WASHINGTON
[C] 08/29/2015 - LaToya Sanders probable Sunday vs. Seattle Storm ( Foot )
[G] 08/28/2015 - Tayler Hill "?" Sunday vs. Seattle Storm ( Ankle )
[G] 08/28/2015 - Kara Lawson "?" Sunday vs. Seattle Storm ( Back )
SEATTLE
[F] 08/27/2015 - Abby Bishop out indefinitely ( Hamstring )
[F] 08/21/2015 - Ramu Tokashiki out for season ( Personal )
[G] 07/16/2015 - Monica Wright out indefinitely ( Knee )

Last Updated: 5/5/2024 11:42:13 AM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.