| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SAN ANTONIO LOS ANGELES |
|
| 149 | 52 Final 60 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
657 | SAN ANTONIO | +450 | 658 | LOS ANGELES | -650 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (258-93 since 1997.) (73.5%, +75.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (246-90 since 1997.) (73.2%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (251-97 since 1997.) (72.1%, +66.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games. (97-26 since 1997.) (78.9%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (123-72 since 1997.) (63.1%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (90-30 since 1997.) (75%, +42.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (95-33 since 1997.) (74.2%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more. (79-44 since 1997.) (64.2%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (102-71 since 1997.) (59%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (65-34 since 1997.) (65.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (65-34 since 1997.) (65.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (65-34 since 1997.) (65.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games. (96-52 since 1997.) (64.9%, +29.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (54-28 since 1997.) (65.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (76-53 since 1997.) (58.9%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (76-53 since 1997.) (58.9%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (76-53 since 1997.) (58.9%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (56-33 since 1997.) (62.9%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a horrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a horrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a horrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season. (38-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (135-68 since 1997.) (66.5%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (35-13 since 1997.) (72.9%, +30.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (59-36 since 1997.) (62.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (45-22 since 1997.) (67.2%, +29.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (30-17 since 1997.) (63.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (36-22 since 1997.) (62.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (46-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO | 68 | | 25-64 | 39.5% | 4-12 | 30.4% | 14-18 | 77.4% | 38 | 8 | 13 | LOS ANGELES | 81 | | 32-65 | 48.9% | 4-14 | 32.0% | 13-15 | 84.0% | 43 | 8 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 834 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 152 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 23-23 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.4 | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 79.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 73.7 | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.6, OPPONENT 73.4 | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.2 | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-7.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 73.0 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 36-84 against the money line (-68.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 77.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-22 against the money line (-20.5 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 85.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 32-59 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 63-91 against the money line (-52.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 10-20 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 79.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 2-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 85.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 6-20 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 81.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-14 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 80.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.9, OPPONENT 77.3 | LOS ANGELES is 14-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 89-31 against the money line (+38.6 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 68.3 | LOS ANGELES is 110-61 against the money line (+32.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 71.1 | LOS ANGELES is 98-45 against the money line (+39.8 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 71.8 | LOS ANGELES is 75-30 against the money line (+30.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 75.7 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 1-3 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-5 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-30 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-18 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-27 against the money line (-24.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-18 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-15 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-4 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-6 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-18 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-25 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-17 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-8.4 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-21 against the money line (-27.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-9 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-6 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-9 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-27 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 87-96 against the money line (-41.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-65 against the money line (-40.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 47-86 against the money line (-36.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 130-153 against the money line (-50.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-29 against the money line (-15.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-147 against the money line (-51.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 154-211 against the money line (-68.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-42 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-28 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 115-144 against the money line (-49.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-16 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-20 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-27 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-14.6 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-12.1 Units) as a home favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 66.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-12.9 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.0, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-4 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 11*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-3 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-16.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-14.0 Units) off a road loss against a division rival this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-15.0 Units) off a road loss this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-22 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 7-20 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in all games this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) as an underdog this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 59-100 against the money line (-51.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 69-116 against the money line (-53.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-149 against the money line (-65.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-23 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 36-65 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 87-132 against the money line (-60.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 41-68 against the money line (-36.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 54-82 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-19 against the money line (-11.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 66.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-138 against the money line (-46.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 63-94 against the money line (-42.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-39 against the money line (-25.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-16 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 61-106 against the money line (-40.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 71-110 against the money line (-42.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-126 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-149 against the money line (-48.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-49 against the money line (-32.6 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-22 | -12.2 | 14-14 | 13-16 | 69.5 | 34.7 | 40.3% | 39.7 | 78.0 | 38.1 | 46.3% | 42.3 | Road Games | 0-14 | -12 | 7-6 | 7-7 | 68.4 | 33.6 | 39.9% | 37.2 | 79.9 | 38.0 | 47.3% | 43.4 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 59.4 | 30.4 | 32.5% | 38.2 | 79.2 | 39.0 | 48.6% | 46.8 | Division Games | 5-13 | -5.3 | 8-9 | 8-10 | 68.8 | 34.8 | 39.6% | 40.3 | 76.6 | 37.6 | 46.0% | 41.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.5 | 34.7 | 26-64 | 40.3% | 4-12 | 30.6% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.2 | 37.8 | 28-65 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.4 | 33.6 | 26-65 | 39.9% | 4-13 | 28.6% | 13-16 | 80.6% | 37 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 38.1 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 12-16 | 75.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 38 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-18 | 80.3% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.9 | 38.0 | 31-67 | 47.3% | 4-13 | 29.8% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-18 | -16.9 | 12-17 | 14-14 | 73.6 | 36.9 | 45.2% | 39.1 | 74.4 | 35.1 | 41.8% | 40.1 | Home Games | 6-8 | -12.5 | 5-9 | 5-9 | 73.7 | 38.2 | 45.3% | 38.8 | 72.8 | 33.1 | 41.4% | 40.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.4 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 76.6 | 38.2 | 47.9% | 37.0 | 72.2 | 33.4 | 39.1% | 44.4 | Division Games | 8-11 | -12.9 | 7-12 | 8-10 | 73.7 | 37.1 | 46.0% | 39.0 | 74.0 | 35.3 | 43.2% | 38.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.6 | 36.9 | 28-63 | 45.2% | 4-14 | 30.2% | 12-15 | 83.0% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.7 | 38.2 | 28-63 | 45.3% | 4-13 | 27.1% | 13-16 | 83.9% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.4 | 35.1 | 27-64 | 41.8% | 4-14 | 32.1% | 16-21 | 77.0% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.2 | 37.8 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.8 | 33.1 | 26-64 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 77.0% | 40 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 70.8, LOS ANGELES 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
7/21/2015 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | +105 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | 7/29/2015 | ATLANTA | 102-85 | W | -165 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | WASHINGTON | 53-88 | L | +100 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 30 | 12 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 47 | 14 | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 78-80 | L | +175 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | 8/4/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 51-82 | L | +145 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 21 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 50 | 17 | 8/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-66 | L | +400 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 9 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 46 | 12 | 8/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 88-81 | W | -200 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 35 | 16 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 32 | 15 | 8/11/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-83 | L | | 30-76 | 39.5% | 44 | 12 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 40 | 14 | 8/16/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 63-72 | L | +120 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 33 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 46 | 16 | 8/19/2015 | NEW YORK | 45-73 | L | +210 | 17-63 | 27.0% | 41 | 19 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 50 | 15 | 8/21/2015 | MINNESOTA | 61-78 | L | +280 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 39 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 43 | 13 | 8/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 59-90 | L | +175 | 19-71 | 26.8% | 45 | 10 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 50 | 10 | 8/28/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-83 | L | +155 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 33 | 11 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 45 | 18 | 8/30/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | W | +155 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | L | -120 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | L | +300 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 88-77 | W | +175 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-78 | W | -210 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | 83-61 | W | +105 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 42 | 7 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 37 | 15 | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | 84-57 | W | -330 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 47 | 14 | 17-65 | 26.2% | 37 | 10 | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-72 | L | +180 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 16 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 9 | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | 77-85 | L | -1050 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 9 | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 76-64 | W | -165 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 41 | 11 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 49 | 9 | 8/18/2015 | INDIANA | 68-79 | L | -175 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 46 | 16 | 8/21/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 78-68 | W | +170 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 8 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 40 | 15 | 8/23/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 90-59 | W | -210 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 50 | 10 | 19-71 | 26.8% | 45 | 10 | 8/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 81-79 | W | +155 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 9 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 44 | 15 | 8/28/2015 | @ TULSA | 66-76 | L | -115 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 31 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 47 | 13 | 8/30/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 46-32 (-5.4 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 5-7 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 27-11 (+3.3 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 4-1 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 90 | -5 | SU ATS | 43 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 50 | 7 | 10 | | SAN ANTONIO | 59 | 147 | Over | 27 | 19-71 | 26.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 45 | 13 | 10 | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | -5 | SU Over | 38 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 39 | 6 | 10 | | SAN ANTONIO | 78 | 152.5 | ATS | 49 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 33 | 5 | 7 | 7/8/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 63 | -4 | Under | 38 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 39 | 9 | 11 | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 45 | 4 | 11 | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 81 | 150.5 | ATS | 40 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 34 | 6 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 86 | -6 | SU Over | 38 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 21-23 | 91.3% | 31 | 8 | 10 | 8/10/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -2.5 | Over | 31 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 35 | 7 | 9 | | SAN ANTONIO | 82 | 155 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 49 | 10 | 8 | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | 159 | SU ATS | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 30 | 6 | 10 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -6.5 | Under | 38 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 47 | 8 | 22 | 6/14/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 74 | -2.5 | Over | 44 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 0-3 | 0.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 35 | 8 | 19 | | SAN ANTONIO | 101 | 155 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 24-24 | 100.0% | 29 | 5 | 11 | 5/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 62 | 154.5 | Under | 38 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 2-2 | 100.0% | 33 | 6 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 38 | 6 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Dan is 15-11 against the money line (+12.2 Units) revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 76.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 52-58 against the money line (+19.5 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-28 against the money line (+19.3 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 11-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 6-8 against the money line (-14.6 Units) as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 6-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 1-4 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 66.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 8-11 against the money line (-12.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 7-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 4-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.0, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 32-26 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 41-46 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 72.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 2-4 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 6-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 70.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 13-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 71.2, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 2-8 against the money line (-16.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 7*) | Brian is 1-5 against the money line (-14.0 Units) off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 2-7 against the money line (-15.0 Units) off a road loss as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 6-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 6-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 5-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 1-3 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 4-6 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-15 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 17-13 against the money line (-31.6 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Dan is 157-192 against the money line (-46.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 48-82 against the money line (-48.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 97-125 against the money line (-26.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 94-121 against the money line (-33.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 57-81 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 77-107 against the money line (-39.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 82-106 against the money line (-43.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 26-46 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 74-93 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 34-50 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 42-56 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 6-22 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 51-78 against the money line (-28.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 78-95 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 56-65 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 39-45 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 25-35 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 81-105 against the money line (-30.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-74 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 22-32 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 45-77 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 76-89 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 80-105 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 10-34 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 12-33 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 5-13 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-61 against the money line (-26.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 73.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 22-49 against the money line (-28.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 38-63 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 79-88 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 114-128 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 48-74 against the money line (-33.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 72-108 against the money line (-53.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 48-70 against the money line (-28.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 80-96 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 84-109 against the money line (-36.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 126-155 against the money line (-47.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 29-46 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 48-70 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 110-112 against the money line (-33.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-83 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 101-117 against the money line (-35.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 6-21 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 33-48 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 20-44 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 34-65 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 42-32 against the money line (+20.6 Units) on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 71.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 70-50 against the money line (+28.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-3 against the money line (+15.3 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 75.3, OPPONENT 65.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 52-39 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 71.4, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 19-8 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 75.9, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 92-73 against the money line (+23.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 135-114 against the money line (+32.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 139-105 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 74.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 62-35 against the money line (+24.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 92-49 against the money line (+43.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 33 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
| | |
[G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[F] 08/29/2015 - Nnemkadi Ogwumike "?" Sunday vs. SA Stars ( Concussion ) | [G] 08/26/2015 - Erin Phillips out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [C] 08/26/2015 - Marianna Tolo out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/30/2024 7:39:05 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|