| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
TULSA
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
149
| 95
Final
98 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | TULSA | +170 | | 654 | LOS ANGELES | -200 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days.
(297-107 since 1997.) (73.5%, +81 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record.
(237-100 since 1997.) (70.3%, +69.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days.
(184-63 since 1997.) (74.5%, +67.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(167-51 since 1997.) (76.6%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(174-105 since 1997.) (62.4%, +60 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(171-60 since 1997.) (74%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record.
(158-65 since 1997.) (70.9%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(98-25 since 1997.) (79.7%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(89-29 since 1997.) (75.4%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(134-92 since 1997.) (59.3%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, playing on back-to-back days.
(98-38 since 1997.) (72.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(84-57 since 1997.) (59.6%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(59-15 since 1997.) (79.7%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less.
(69-28 since 1997.) (71.1%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(39-33 since 1997.) (54.2%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(71-34 since 1997.) (67.6%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(37-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +28 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(24-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +22 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less.
(39-8 since 1997.) (83%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(54-30 since 1997.) (64.3%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(50-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(37-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(35-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(73-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(275-289 since 1997.) (48.8%, +90.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(241-255 since 1997.) (48.6%, +75.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(158-134 since 1997.) (54.1%, +63.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(65-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(175-109 since 1997.) (61.6%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(75-39 since 1997.) (65.8%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(132-101 since 1997.) (56.7%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(128-84 since 1997.) (60.4%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(138-124 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.7%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(41-31 since 1997.) (56.9%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(59-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +19.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(38-26 since 1997.) (59.4%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record, in July games.
(44-13 since 1997.) (77.2%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(79-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(72-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Friday nights.
(22-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(38-19 since 1997.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(36-15 since 1997.) (70.6%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(21-6 since 1997.) (77.8%, +15.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(37-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(35-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | 80 | | 28-68 | 41.7% | 7-19 | 37.0% | 16-21 | 79.1% | 43 | 10 | 10 | | LOS ANGELES | 73 | | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-17 | 29.7% | 12-14 | 85.3% | 42 | 7 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA won the game straight up 670 times, while LOS ANGELES won 300 times.
Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 15-8 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 89.1, OPPONENT 85.5 | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 81.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.7 | LOS ANGELES is 56-55 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 75.9 | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 78.3 | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 81.5 | LOS ANGELES is 19-14 against the money line (-24.1 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 74.2 | LOS ANGELES is 29-52 against the money line (-46.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 4-18 against the money line (-22.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 87.7 | LOS ANGELES is 2-15 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.2, OPPONENT 79.3 | LOS ANGELES is 7-15 against the money line (-16.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 85.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 79.2 |
|
TULSA is 18-37 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 79.8, OPPONENT 83.4 | TULSA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.0 | TULSA is 3-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 82.3 | TULSA is 8-20 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 76.3, OPPONENT 81.0 | TULSA is 20-58 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 84.7 | LOS ANGELES is 108-59 against the money line (+31.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 70.9 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-27.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-21 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-17 against the money line (-15.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-22 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-21 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-18 against the money line (-31.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
TULSA is 10-33 against the money line (-20.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 77.3, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 64-49 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 78.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 78.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-27 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 34-22 against the money line (-35.1 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-12 against the money line (-25.7 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-22 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when playing on back-to-back days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-23 against the money line (-26.4 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-26 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-27.2 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-20.5 Units) off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-12.2 Units) off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-9.9 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-21 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
TULSA is 9-30 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 76.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-42 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 74.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-23 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-3 | +7.1 | 7-3 | 4-7 | 78.6 | 42.0 | 39.5% | 45.0 | 74.1 | 36.3 | 43.4% | 39.5 | | Road Games | 3-3 | +2.1 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 74.0 | 37.5 | 36.8% | 44.8 | 77.5 | 38.2 | 46.2% | 41.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.1 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 39.4 | 37.4% | 41.4 | 77.8 | 40.0 | 49.3% | 38.2 | | Division Games | 5-3 | +3.6 | 5-3 | 2-6 | 75.9 | 39.4 | 38.8% | 47.9 | 72.2 | 34.9 | 42.5% | 39.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.6 | 42.0 | 28-71 | 39.5% | 7-19 | 36.9% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 45 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.4 | 37.4 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 5-16 | 32.2% | 14-17 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.0 | 37.5 | 27-75 | 36.8% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 76.8% | 45 | 15 | 15 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.1 | 36.3 | 28-64 | 43.4% | 4-15 | 29.4% | 14-17 | 83.2% | 39 | 7 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 73.7 | 35.9 | 27-64 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 31.1% | 14-18 | 81.1% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.5 | 38.2 | 29-64 | 46.2% | 4-14 | 29.8% | 14-18 | 80.4% | 41 | 6 | 18 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 1-7 | -6.2 | 2-6 | 6-2 | 68.4 | 34.9 | 42.0% | 39.0 | 76.6 | 32.2 | 46.0% | 38.6 | | Home Games | 1-3 | -2.2 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 65.0 | 35.0 | 42.7% | 36.5 | 71.0 | 29.2 | 47.5% | 35.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 76.0 | 37.0 | 44.8% | 38.8 | 80.0 | 35.2 | 45.0% | 39.0 | | Division Games | 1-3 | -2.2 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 63.2 | 33.0 | 40.5% | 37.2 | 73.5 | 30.5 | 49.8% | 37.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.4 | 34.9 | 26-62 | 42.0% | 5-16 | 31.0% | 11-13 | 84.5% | 39 | 7 | 16 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 73.1 | 37.5 | 27-65 | 41.2% | 5-16 | 32.1% | 14-18 | 81.4% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 65.0 | 35.0 | 25-60 | 42.7% | 4-16 | 27.0% | 10-12 | 79.6% | 36 | 6 | 15 | 17 | 4 | 12 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 32.2 | 28-62 | 46.0% | 5-15 | 31.9% | 15-21 | 71.2% | 39 | 6 | 18 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 73.5 | 35.9 | 27-65 | 42.5% | 5-16 | 31.6% | 14-17 | 79.0% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.0 | 29.2 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 4-14 | 27.3% | 11-16 | 71.4% | 36 | 5 | 18 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 1 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 70.6, LOS ANGELES 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/5/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 75-83 | L | +400 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 38 | 6 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 53 | 16 | | 6/6/2015 | CHICAGO | 101-93 | W | -125 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 33 | 15 | | 6/9/2015 | SEATTLE | 68-45 | W | -250 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 58 | 13 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 42 | 18 | | 6/14/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 73-62 | W | +155 | 30-84 | 35.7% | 64 | 12 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 41 | 10 | | 6/16/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-61 | W | -250 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 50 | 12 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 36 | 11 | | 6/19/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-82 | W | +145 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 37 | 9 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 38 | 12 | | 6/21/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-78 | W | +250 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | | 6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | W | -450 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | W | -850 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | L | -140 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | L | +250 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/6/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-86 | L | +155 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 40 | 8 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 45 | 6 | | 6/14/2015 | SEATTLE | 54-60 | L | -125 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 39 | 12 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 38 | 12 | | 6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 52-67 | L | +500 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 31 | 8 | | 6/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 68-76 | L | +155 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | | 6/23/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-84 | L | +450 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | | 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | L | +220 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | L | +145 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-81 | W | -250 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| TULSA is 19-25 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 3-5 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 13-5 (-3.4 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 1-2 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/5/2014 | TULSA | 96 | 161.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 3-19 | 15.8% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 49 | 16 | 10 | | | LOS ANGELES | 90 | -6.5 | Over | 44 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 26-27 | 96.3% | 25 | 3 | 14 | 6/28/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 92 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 46 | 8 | 11 | | | TULSA | 89 | -1 | Over | 32 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 47 | 11 | 16 | 6/19/2014 | TULSA | 77 | 157 | Over | 36 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 13-23 | 56.5% | 45 | 13 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 1-5 | 20.0% | 18-26 | 69.2% | 44 | 14 | 14 | 6/13/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 67 | -4 | Under | 39 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 0-1 | 0.0% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 47 | 10 | 13 | | | TULSA | 69 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 42 | 13 | 6 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 5-23 against the money line (-18.2 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 75.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 7-18 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 72.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 73.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 13-22 against the money line (-16.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 79.2, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 77.3, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 75.2, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 4-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 73.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 11-17 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 79.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-9 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 72.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Fred is 21-32 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 75.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 21-37 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 77.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 71.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 72.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 5-23 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 73.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 7-20 against the money line (-13.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 14-35 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 73.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 21-30 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 76.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 27-40 against the money line (-30.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 78.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 71.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 87-45 against the money line (+27.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.6, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 15-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 88-63 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.9, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.2, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 23-12 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.6, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 27-14 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 62-52 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 70.1, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 37-32 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 69.3, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 34-14 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.7, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 33-20 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 69.8, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 18-6 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games after having lost 4 of their last 5 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 71.7, OPPONENT 66.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 10-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.4, OPPONENT 66.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 19-7 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 66-46 against the money line (+29.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 30-19 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.0, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 14-7 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.2, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 29-13 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 41-15 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 77.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 31-8 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 80.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-7 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.7, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 19-4 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in home games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 78.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 11-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 77.1, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 54-32 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.7, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 77-47 against the money line (+29.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 94-68 against the money line (+26.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 125-105 against the money line (+30.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 13-4 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 130-98 against the money line (+31.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.8, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 72-37 against the money line (+25.5 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 82-73 against the money line (+24.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 25 times, while the road underdog won straight up 10 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 06/16/2015 - Alana Beard out indefinitely ( Foot ) | | [F] 06/04/2015 - Candace Parker out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 4:37:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|