| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE
MINNESOTA |
|
|
148.5
| 57
Final
82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 651 | SEATTLE | +600 | | 652 | MINNESOTA | -950 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG).
(264-94 since 1997.) (73.7%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG).
(246-98 since 1997.) (71.5%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(174-105 since 1997.) (62.4%, +60 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(88-31 since 1997.) (73.9%, +42.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(74-14 since 1997.) (84.1%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(84-57 since 1997.) (59.6%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(121-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(65-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win against a division rival, in July games.
(33-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home win against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest.
(52-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest.
(84-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SEATTLE | 66 | | 26-63 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 9-11 | 79.3% | 36 | 6 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 78 | | 29-63 | 46.6% | 3-10 | 32.4% | 16-19 | 85.2% | 44 | 8 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 819 times, while SEATTLE won 169 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 63-62 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 71.6 | SEATTLE is 16-13 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 71.6 | MINNESOTA is 57-73 against the money line (-39.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 88-93 against the money line (-39.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 73.9 |
|
SEATTLE is 27-72 against the money line (-69.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.4, OPPONENT 76.3 | SEATTLE is 4-12 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | SEATTLE is 36-75 against the money line (-48.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.8, OPPONENT 71.8 | SEATTLE is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.9, OPPONENT 75.1 | SEATTLE is 14-48 against the money line (-40.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.8, OPPONENT 79.7 | SEATTLE is 1-16 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 84.2 | SEATTLE is 7-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they grab 32 to 36 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.8, OPPONENT 76.3 | SEATTLE is 45-80 against the money line (-50.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.9, OPPONENT 73.0 | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | MINNESOTA is 81-39 against the money line (+50.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 71.7 | MINNESOTA is 87-61 against the money line (+21.3 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 75.1 | MINNESOTA is 20-0 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 73.1 | MINNESOTA is 15-4 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.7 | MINNESOTA is 24-1 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 71.0 | MINNESOTA is 22-6 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.7, OPPONENT 81.2 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 158-141 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 119-105 against the money line (+23.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-10 against the money line (+13.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 122-105 against the money line (-47.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 80-91 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 61-47 against the money line (-35.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 55-60 against the money line (-29.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 27-4 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 31-10 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 39-12 against the money line (+17.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 37-13 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 49-17 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 45-16 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 55-44 against the money line (+15.9 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 151-127 against the money line (+21.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 48-41 against the money line (+16.3 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 13-10 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 31-30 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-1 against the money line (+12.3 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 125-132 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 182-190 against the money line (-70.1 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 43-59 against the money line (-30.2 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 173-178 against the money line (-59.7 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 44-40 against the money line (-34.8 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 15-29 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-16 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.0, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 4-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 6-17 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-33 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in road games off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 65.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 66.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-26 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 14-20 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 61-19 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 59-11 against the money line (+27.0 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 32-3 against the money line (+22.9 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 32-3 against the money line (+22.9 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 32-3 against the money line (+22.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 41-14 against the money line (+15.4 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 28-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-6 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 39-12 against the money line (+21.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 29-6 against the money line (+19.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 21-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-11 against the money line (+25.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 17-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-7 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-7 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 23-2 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-0 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 32-10 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 53-16 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-1 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 41-9 against the money line (+26.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 18-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 28-8 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 23-1 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-7 | -4.1 | 6-4 | 6-4 | 69.8 | 33.4 | 42.8% | 37.5 | 75.1 | 39.5 | 41.8% | 42.8 | | Road Games | 1-4 | -3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 67.0 | 30.0 | 39.5% | 34.6 | 76.4 | 39.2 | 43.7% | 46.0 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 75.8 | 40.2 | 46.9% | 37.0 | 79.0 | 41.8 | 42.3% | 41.4 | | Division Games | 3-6 | -2.8 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 71.1 | 33.8 | 43.1% | 37.7 | 74.7 | 39.3 | 41.6% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 69.8 | 33.4 | 26-61 | 42.8% | 5-17 | 32.4% | 12-15 | 78.5% | 37 | 5 | 16 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 73.7 | 35.3 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 30.4% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.0 | 30.0 | 25-63 | 39.5% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 12-13 | 87.9% | 35 | 5 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 39.5 | 27-64 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 43 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.9 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 41.8% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 14-17 | 81.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.4 | 39.2 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 6-20 | 30.7% | 15-20 | 73.7% | 46 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 7-2 | +0.1 | 5-4 | 3-6 | 76.3 | 37.8 | 46.2% | 41.3 | 69.0 | 35.6 | 39.5% | 37.6 | | Home Games | 3-1 | -0.3 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 81.5 | 39.7 | 47.5% | 42.5 | 71.7 | 33.5 | 38.1% | 38.2 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.7 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 73.2 | 36.4 | 48.8% | 36.0 | 65.2 | 34.4 | 39.9% | 38.4 | | Division Games | 6-2 | -0.9 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 76.1 | 38.0 | 47.1% | 40.4 | 69.0 | 36.6 | 39.1% | 37.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.3 | 37.8 | 29-63 | 46.2% | 3-11 | 31.6% | 15-18 | 84.9% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 36.5 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 30.7% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.5 | 39.7 | 31-65 | 47.5% | 5-12 | 42.6% | 15-18 | 84.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.0 | 35.6 | 26-66 | 39.5% | 6-18 | 30.5% | 12-14 | 80.8% | 38 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 73.8 | 36.8 | 27-65 | 41.2% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.7 | 33.5 | 26-68 | 38.1% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 14-15 | 88.7% | 38 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 71.2, MINNESOTA 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/6/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 86-61 | W | -175 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 45 | 6 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 40 | 8 | | 6/9/2015 | @ TULSA | 45-68 | L | +200 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 42 | 18 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 58 | 13 | | 6/11/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-94 | L | +650 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 29 | 9 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 45 | 10 | | 6/14/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 60-54 | W | +105 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 38 | 12 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 39 | 12 | | 6/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 58-79 | L | -140 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 36 | 22 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 12 | | 6/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 72-84 | L | +120 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 43 | 15 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 36 | 8 | | 6/25/2015 | MINNESOTA | 73-76 | L | +400 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | | 6/27/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-73 | L | +180 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | | 6/28/2015 | @ TULSA | 89-93 | L | +550 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | | 6/30/2015 | TULSA | 74-69 | W | +120 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | | 7/3/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/5/2015 | TULSA | 83-75 | W | -600 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 53 | 16 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 38 | 6 | | 6/6/2015 | @ INDIANA | 78-69 | W | -360 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 49 | 14 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 40 | 12 | | 6/11/2015 | SEATTLE | 94-70 | W | -1050 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 45 | 10 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 29 | 9 | | 6/14/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 66-81 | L | -360 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 45 | 16 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 39 | 10 | | 6/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 67-52 | W | -750 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 31 | 8 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | | 6/19/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-59 | W | -330 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 37 | 15 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 31 | 15 | | 6/21/2015 | TULSA | 78-86 | L | -330 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | | 6/25/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 76-73 | W | -600 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | | 6/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-56 | W | -270 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | | 7/3/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 30-32 (+4.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 9-2 (+3.8 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 22-9 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 5-0 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/25/2015 | MINNESOTA | 76 | -10.5 | SU Over | 42 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 8 | 14 | | | SEATTLE | 73 | 145.5 | ATS | 51 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 36 | 6 | 17 | 6/11/2015 | SEATTLE | 70 | 148 | Over | 29 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 29 | 3 | 9 | | | MINNESOTA | 94 | -13 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 45 | 10 | 10 | 7/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 60 | 148.5 | Under | 28 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 32 | 6 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 77 | -8 | SU ATS | 34 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 51 | 12 | 16 | 6/29/2014 | SEATTLE | 69 | 147.5 | ATS | 32 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 29 | 3 | 15 | | | MINNESOTA | 74 | -9 | SU Under | 42 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 48 | 11 | 18 | 6/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 71 | -6.5 | Over | 26 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 40 | 9 | 6 | | | SEATTLE | 81 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 40 | 8 | 13 | 6/6/2014 | MINNESOTA | 62 | -6 | Under | 40 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 1-13 | 7.7% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 36 | 7 | 11 | | | SEATTLE | 65 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 36 | 8 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Jenny is 2-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Jenny 72.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 129-59 against the money line (+29.8 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 107-33 against the money line (+21.1 Units) as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 66-15 against the money line (+25.2 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 70-18 against the money line (+28.0 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 70-18 against the money line (+28.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 84-39 against the money line (+21.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 59-26 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 44-15 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 78-36 against the money line (+19.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 61-15 against the money line (+35.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Cheryl is 48-11 against the money line (+29.5 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Cheryl is 38-7 against the money line (+27.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Cheryl is 67-33 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 34-16 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 45-20 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 52-19 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 48-15 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 42-11 against the money line (+19.3 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 32-4 against the money line (+21.1 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 33-11 against the money line (+12.8 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 57-19 against the money line (+22.4 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 28-3 against the money line (+19.3 Units) in home games after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 78-34 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 66-28 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 102-37 against the money line (+34.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 82-28 against the money line (+22.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 70-20 against the money line (+29.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 61-14 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 48-14 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 63-25 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 66-29 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 93-36 against the money line (+27.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 69-25 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 59-21 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 75-39 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 74-37 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 102-48 against the money line (+24.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 32-11 against the money line (+15.2 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 92-45 against the money line (+23.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 33 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 06/04/2015 - Anna Cruz out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/30/2024 5:12:20 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|