Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : First Half Matchup
Friday 7/3/2015Line$ LineOU LineScore
TULSA
 First Half Results
LOS ANGELES
+3  

-3  


73.5
 		42
Final
42

Go to Top
TULSA (8 - 3) at LOS ANGELES (1 - 7)
View Previous GameNo Next Game
Friday, 7/3/2015 10:35 PM
Go to Top
Board First Half
653TULSA73
654LOS ANGELES-2.5
KEY GAME INFORMATIONGo to Top
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™Go to Top
StatFox Super Situations favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line
There are 5 situations with a total rating of 13 stars.
- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(40-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(38-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(100-58 since 1997.) (63.3%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, extremely tired team - when playing their 3rd game in 4 days.
(40-14 since 1997.) (74.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(113-63 since 1997.) (64.2%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring TULSA to cover the first half line
There are 9 situations with a total rating of 19 stars.
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more.
(38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(112-63 since 1997.) (64%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(80-39 since 1997.) (67.2%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after a blowout loss by 15 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(66-33 since 1997.) (66.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after a blowout loss by 15 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(63-29 since 1997.) (68.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(40-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total
There are 177 situations with a total rating of 423 stars.
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in July games.
(276-162 since 1997.) (63%, +97.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - in May, June, or July games.
(578-383 since 1997.) (60.1%, +156.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents.
(552-368 since 1997.) (60%, +147.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(368-237 since 1997.) (60.8%, +107.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game.
(573-362 since 1997.) (61.3%, +174.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(251-150 since 1997.) (62.6%, +86 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(178-100 since 1997.) (64%, +68 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(122-74 since 1997.) (62.2%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(115-67 since 1997.) (63.2%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(314-191 since 1997.) (62.2%, +103.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%).
(208-127 since 1997.) (62.1%, +68.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(392-253 since 1997.) (60.8%, +113.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after one or more consecutive overs against opponent after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(186-118 since 1997.) (61.2%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(282-200 since 1997.) (58.5%, +62 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(280-189 since 1997.) (59.7%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a losing record.
(153-97 since 1997.) (61.2%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(79-34 since 1997.) (69.9%, +41.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(46-16 since 1997.) (74.2%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(35-12 since 1997.) (74.5%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record.
(306-200 since 1997.) (60.5%, +86 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record, in July games.
(113-62 since 1997.) (64.6%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record, in May, June, or July games.
(180-118 since 1997.) (60.4%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival.
(171-95 since 1997.) (64.3%, +66.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(105-61 since 1997.) (63.3%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win against a division rival, with a losing record.
(41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival.
(292-184 since 1997.) (61.3%, +89.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(188-114 since 1997.) (62.3%, +62.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, with a losing record.
(72-40 since 1997.) (64.3%, +28 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a road loss.
(83-46 since 1997.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win.
(267-159 since 1997.) (62.7%, +92.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win, in May, June, or July games.
(171-101 since 1997.) (62.9%, +59.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(66-29 since 1997.) (69.5%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(357-232 since 1997.) (60.6%, +101.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a win by 6 points or less.
(150-89 since 1997.) (62.8%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(315-215 since 1997.) (59.4%, +78.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(236-149 since 1997.) (61.3%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(133-78 since 1997.) (63%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(322-213 since 1997.) (60.2%, +87.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(181-115 since 1997.) (61.1%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(166-108 since 1997.) (60.6%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(326-207 since 1997.) (61.2%, +98.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(189-114 since 1997.) (62.4%, +63.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(71-33 since 1997.) (68.3%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(127-77 since 1997.) (62.3%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season.
(135-86 since 1997.) (61.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season, in July games.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(55-24 since 1997.) (69.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(89-45 since 1997.) (66.4%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after playing a home game.
(406-261 since 1997.) (60.9%, +118.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(407-272 since 1997.) (59.9%, +107.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(192-125 since 1997.) (60.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(442-283 since 1997.) (61%, +130.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(146-90 since 1997.) (61.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(291-175 since 1997.) (62.4%, +98.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(107-65 since 1997.) (62.2%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in July games.
(450-320 since 1997.) (58.4%, +98 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents.
(968-751 since 1997.) (56.3%, +141.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(128-78 since 1997.) (62.1%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(97-56 since 1997.) (63.4%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(175-114 since 1997.) (60.6%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - in July games.
(276-162 since 1997.) (63%, +97.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - in May, June, or July games.
(578-383 since 1997.) (60.1%, +156.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(552-368 since 1997.) (60%, +147.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(388-262 since 1997.) (59.7%, +99.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(262-170 since 1997.) (60.6%, +75 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games.
(169-108 since 1997.) (61%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after a division game.
(501-345 since 1997.) (59.2%, +121.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(331-214 since 1997.) (60.7%, +95.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(214-135 since 1997.) (61.3%, +65.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(249-158 since 1997.) (61.2%, +75.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(129-69 since 1997.) (65.2%, +53.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(155-94 since 1997.) (62.2%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season.
(87-37 since 1997.) (70.2%, +46.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%).
(122-75 since 1997.) (61.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(482-298 since 1997.) (61.8%, +154.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(160-84 since 1997.) (65.6%, +67.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(217-145 since 1997.) (59.9%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(263-133 since 1997.) (66.4%, +116.7 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(97-43 since 1997.) (69.3%, +49.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(128-66 since 1997.) (66%, +55.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(256-167 since 1997.) (60.5%, +72.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(181-114 since 1997.) (61.4%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(73-34 since 1997.) (68.2%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(262-163 since 1997.) (61.6%, +82.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(138-79 since 1997.) (63.6%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(230-146 since 1997.) (61.2%, +69.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(179-115 since 1997.) (60.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(55-23 since 1997.) (70.5%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(95-56 since 1997.) (62.9%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(32-8 since 1997.) (80%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after playing a road game.
(403-270 since 1997.) (59.9%, +106 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after playing 2 consecutive road games.
(173-113 since 1997.) (60.5%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(182-120 since 1997.) (60.3%, +50 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(450-320 since 1997.) (58.4%, +98 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(968-751 since 1997.) (56.3%, +141.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season.
(125-76 since 1997.) (62.2%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(57-27 since 1997.) (67.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(52-23 since 1997.) (69.3%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(389-274 since 1997.) (58.7%, +87.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(138-88 since 1997.) (61.1%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, tired team - playing their 3rd road game in 5 days.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(94-53 since 1997.) (63.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(341-234 since 1997.) (59.3%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, tired team - playing their 3rd road game in 5 days.
(34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(307-212 since 1997.) (59.2%, +73.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(137-78 since 1997.) (63.7%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(79-40 since 1997.) (66.4%, +35 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(263-176 since 1997.) (59.9%, +69.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(250-166 since 1997.) (60.1%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(115-58 since 1997.) (66.5%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(60-26 since 1997.) (69.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season.
(695-507 since 1997.) (57.8%, +137.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(221-121 since 1997.) (64.6%, +87.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(389-258 since 1997.) (60.1%, +105.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(110-63 since 1997.) (63.6%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(154-81 since 1997.) (65.5%, +64.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(270-186 since 1997.) (59.2%, +65.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(54-26 since 1997.) (67.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season.
(225-133 since 1997.) (62.8%, +78.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(90-50 since 1997.) (64.3%, +35 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(120-69 since 1997.) (63.5%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(53-15 since 1997.) (77.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(200-109 since 1997.) (64.7%, +80.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(181-99 since 1997.) (64.6%, +72.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(77-33 since 1997.) (70%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(98-55 since 1997.) (64.1%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(45-13 since 1997.) (77.6%, +30.7 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(149-81 since 1997.) (64.8%, +59.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(144-76 since 1997.) (65.5%, +60.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(64-22 since 1997.) (74.4%, +39.8 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(35-8 since 1997.) (81.4%, +26.2 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games.
(88-41 since 1997.) (68.2%, +42.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, with a winning record on the season.
(87-41 since 1997.) (68%, +41.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season.
(412-237 since 1997.) (63.5%, +151.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(145-56 since 1997.) (72.1%, +83.4 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(236-120 since 1997.) (66.3%, +104 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(165-90 since 1997.) (64.7%, +66 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in July games.
(62-22 since 1997.) (73.8%, +37.8 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in May, June, or July games.
(99-50 since 1997.) (66.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(188-114 since 1997.) (62.3%, +62.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(114-55 since 1997.) (67.5%, +53.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(85-37 since 1997.) (69.7%, +44.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record, in July games.
(35-10 since 1997.) (77.8%, +24 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record, in May, June, or July games.
(56-20 since 1997.) (73.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(292-204 since 1997.) (58.9%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(133-77 since 1997.) (63.3%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(326-229 since 1997.) (58.7%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(415-289 since 1997.) (58.9%, +97.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(232-157 since 1997.) (59.6%, +59.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(138-89 since 1997.) (60.8%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(318-214 since 1997.) (59.8%, +82.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(181-120 since 1997.) (60.1%, +49 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(435-311 since 1997.) (58.3%, +92.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(248-174 since 1997.) (58.8%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(319-214 since 1997.) (59.8%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(188-122 since 1997.) (60.6%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season.
(140-88 since 1997.) (61.4%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(101-56 since 1997.) (64.3%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(300-210 since 1997.) (58.8%, +69 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, in July games.
(117-66 since 1997.) (63.9%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(183-124 since 1997.) (59.6%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(70-37 since 1997.) (65.4%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(40-14 since 1997.) (74.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(260-152 since 1997.) (63.1%, +92.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(102-34 since 1997.) (75%, +64.6 units. Rating = 5*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(162-85 since 1997.) (65.6%, +68.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(108-56 since 1997.) (65.9%, +46.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(49-20 since 1997.) (71%, +27 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(79-43 since 1997.) (64.8%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(408-276 since 1997.) (59.6%, +104.4 units. Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™Go to Top
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeHalfEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
TULSA80 4028-6841.7%7-1937.0%16-2179.1%431010
LOS ANGELES73 36 28-6543.1%5-1729.7%12-1485.3%42713

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.
In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 735 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 265 times.
Edge against first half line=TULSA
In 1000 simulated games, 612 games went over first half total, while 358 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over
Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring TULSA to cover the first half line
TULSA is 18-5 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.2, OPPONENT 40.4
TULSA is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 39.0
TULSA is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.2, OPPONENT 35.2
LOS ANGELES is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 42.5

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line
TULSA is 36-57 against the 1rst half line (-26.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 42.6
LOS ANGELES is 102-75 against the 1rst half line (+19.5 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 33.7

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the OVER against the first half total
TULSA is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 42.9
TULSA is 26-10 OVER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.7, OPPONENT 41.5
TULSA is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.9, OPPONENT 42.2
LOS ANGELES is 53-29 OVER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 38.6
LOS ANGELES is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 42.5
LOS ANGELES is 186-96 OVER (+80.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.2, OPPONENT 38.8

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total
LOS ANGELES is 97-59 UNDER (+32.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.3

View Expanded Details
STATFOX POWERLINE™Go to Top
 Power Rating
 EstimateEdge
TULSA 
LOS ANGELES0 
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line
There are 3 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.
TULSA is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 23-10 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 1 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.
LOS ANGELES is 161-125 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring TULSA to cover the first half line
There are 1 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.
LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line
There are 13 trends with a total rating of 19 stars.
TULSA is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 3*)
TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.1, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*)
TULSA is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.0, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 97-64 against the 1rst half line (+26.6 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 9-0 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 4*)
LOS ANGELES is 31-11 against the 1rst half line (+18.9 Units) in home games off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 98-68 against the 1rst half line (+23.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 6 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.
TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.2, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*)
TULSA is 8-0 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 4 days since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 40.6, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 16-3 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 47.5 - (Rating = 3*)
TULSA is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 44.9 - (Rating = 2*)
TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*)
TULSA is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 11 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
LOS ANGELES is 350-296 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 233-189 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 226-179 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 177-129 UNDER (+35.1 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 114-73 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 134-100 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 233-187 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 183-141 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 95-68 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

View Expanded Details
ADVANCED TEAM STATSGo to Top
TULSA - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games8-3+7.17-34-778.642.039.5%45.074.136.343.4%39.5
Road Games3-3+2.14-22-474.037.536.8%44.877.538.246.2%41.5
Last 5 Games3-2+2.11-32-374.839.437.4%41.477.840.049.3%38.2
Division Games5-3+3.65-32-675.939.438.8%47.972.234.942.5%39.9
TULSA Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)78.642.028-7139.5%7-1936.9%15-1979.4%451316196124
vs opponents surrendering74.437.428-6741.5%5-1632.2%14-1779.2%42916198124
Team Stats (Road Games)74.037.527-7536.8%6-1933.3%13-1676.8%451515195103
Stats Against (All Games)74.136.328-6443.4%4-1529.4%14-1783.2%39716216146
vs opponents averaging73.735.927-6442.9%5-1531.1%14-1881.1%40816187135
Stats Against (Road Games)77.538.229-6446.2%4-1429.8%14-1880.4%41618195136
LOS ANGELES - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games1-7-6.22-66-268.434.942.0%39.076.632.246.0%38.6
Home Games1-3-2.20-42-265.035.042.7%36.571.029.247.5%35.7
Last 5 Games1-4-32-35-076.037.044.8%38.880.035.245.0%39.0
Division Games1-3-2.20-42-263.233.040.5%37.273.530.549.8%37.0
LOS ANGELES Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)68.434.926-6242.0%5-1631.0%11-1384.5%39716184132
vs opponents surrendering73.137.527-6541.2%5-1632.1%14-1881.4%42915187144
Team Stats (Home Games)65.035.025-6042.7%4-1627.0%10-1279.6%36615174121
Stats Against (All Games)76.632.228-6246.0%5-1531.9%15-2171.2%39618176102
vs opponents averaging73.535.927-6542.5%5-1631.6%14-1779.0%41816187134
Stats Against (Home Games)71.029.228-5947.5%4-1427.3%11-1671.4%36518166101
Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 70.6,  LOS ANGELES 69.6
View Expanded Details
SCHEDULE AND RESULTSGo to Top
TULSA - Season Results Against the First Half Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreHalfLineATSTot.O/UShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
6/5/2015@ MINNESOTA75-8344-456W80.5O28-7935.4%38631-6944.9%5316
6/6/2015CHICAGO101-9362-43-1W82.5O34-7048.6%411534-6651.5%3315
6/9/2015SEATTLE68-4540-15-3W79.5U23-6336.5%581315-6323.8%4218
6/14/2015@ SAN ANTONIO73-6234-312W78U30-8435.7%641222-6036.7%4110
6/16/2015SAN ANTONIO88-6145-29-3W74.5U36-7150.7%501222-6931.9%3611
6/19/2015@ WASHINGTON86-8240-362W72O31-7541.3%37930-6943.5%3812
6/21/2015@ MINNESOTA86-7838-384W78U33-7444.6%441130-6050.0%3216
6/26/2015NEW YORK71-6245-41-5L74.5O21-6233.9%341322-5242.3%4426
6/28/2015SEATTLE93-8945-42-7L74O29-6544.6%431335-6950.7%309
6/30/2015@ SEATTLE69-7440-32-1.5W74U23-6535.4%431029-6246.8%429
7/2/2015@ PHOENIX55-8629-474L73.5O20-7128.2%431335-6355.6%4313
7/3/2015@ LOS ANGELES              
7/7/2015@ ATLANTA              
7/11/2015LOS ANGELES              
7/15/2015@ INDIANA              
7/17/2015@ SAN ANTONIO              
7/19/2015MINNESOTA              

LOS ANGELES - Season Results Against the First Half Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreHalfLineATSTot.O/UShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
6/6/2015@ SEATTLE61-8632-352L72U23-6734.3%40833-6451.6%456
6/14/2015SEATTLE54-6034-24-1W71U22-5738.6%391221-5438.9%3812
6/16/2015MINNESOTA52-6728-236.5W71.5U24-6139.3%391130-5752.6%318
6/21/2015CONNECTICUT68-7640-302W67O25-5942.4%371628-6543.1%408
6/23/2015@ WASHINGTON80-8437-396.5W68O34-6850.0%431727-5846.6%329
6/26/2015@ CONNECTICUT76-8032-263.5W70U29-6643.9%441926-7534.7%5012
6/28/2015@ NEW YORK70-7938-412L70O22-6036.7%391029-6048.3%399
7/2/2015SAN ANTONIO86-8138-40-3L74O31-6250.0%311033-6055.0%3414
7/3/2015TULSA              
7/5/2015PHOENIX              
7/8/2015@ SAN ANTONIO              
7/11/2015@ TULSA              
7/15/2015@ SEATTLE              
7/16/2015ATLANTA              
View Expanded Details
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORYGo to Top
All games in this series since 1997
TULSA is 29-18 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997
23 of 45 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
TULSA is 6-3 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons
4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at LOS ANGELES since 1997
TULSA is 12-10 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997
11 of 20 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997
Games played at LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons.
TULSA is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons
2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
8/5/2014TULSA96161.5SU ATS5037-7450.0%3-1915.8%19-2673.1%491610
 LOS ANGELES90-6.5 Over4431-6051.7%2-922.2%26-2796.3%25314
6/28/2014LOS ANGELES92159.5SU ATS4736-7647.4%2-540.0%18-2572.0%46811
 TULSA89-1 Over3231-7441.9%5-1631.2%22-2588.0%471116
6/19/2014TULSA77157 Over3630-6943.5%4-1330.8%13-2356.5%451314
 LOS ANGELES87-6.5SU ATS4634-6651.5%1-520.0%18-2669.2%441414
6/13/2014LOS ANGELES67-4 Under3926-6043.3%0-10.0%15-2268.2%471013
 TULSA69156.5SU ATS4326-7335.6%4-1723.5%13-1492.9%42136
View Expanded Details
COACHING TRENDSGo to Top
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring TULSA to cover the first half line
There are 2 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
Brian is 7-20 against the 1rst half line (-15.0 Units) off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 22-42 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) after a win by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to cover the first half line
There are 14 trends with a total rating of 14 stars.
Fred is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in July games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Fred is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.1, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.0, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Fred is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Fred is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 55-36 against the 1rst half line (+15.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 74-49 against the 1rst half line (+20.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 50-30 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.6, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 3 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
Fred is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.2, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Fred is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 44.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Fred is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 59 trends with a total rating of 71 stars.
Brian is 237-132 UNDER (+91.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 115-67 UNDER (+41.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.8, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 91-54 UNDER (+31.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 48-26 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 116-70 UNDER (+39.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 60-33 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 83-50 UNDER (+28.0 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 69-35 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 157-83 UNDER (+65.7 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing on back-to-back days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.3, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 151-87 UNDER (+55.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 144-83 UNDER (+52.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 118-77 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 32-16 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 34-14 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 100-54 UNDER (+40.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 44-24 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 112-45 UNDER (+62.5 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 4*)
Brian is 43-15 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 68-45 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 75-36 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 44-24 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 56-32 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 27-12 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.2, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 76-36 UNDER (+36.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 88-45 UNDER (+38.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 32-15 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.7, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 53-23 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 33.3, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.7, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 68-44 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 46-28 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 86-52 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 57-32 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 64-30 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 119-62 UNDER (+50.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 91-53 UNDER (+32.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 112-70 UNDER (+35.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 120-62 UNDER (+51.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 56-31 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 115-73 UNDER (+34.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 105-60 UNDER (+39.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 107-69 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 98-61 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 33-14 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 136-94 UNDER (+32.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 95-63 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 119-74 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 181-100 UNDER (+71.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 89-61 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 37-21 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 48-25 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 138-89 UNDER (+40.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 63-36 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 131-84 UNDER (+38.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 90-61 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 62-39 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX LINE TRACKER™Go to Top
Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening First Half Line = -1, Closing First Half Line = -2.5
Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 19 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 16 times.
Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 5 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times.
Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:
Opening First Half Total = 73.5, Closing First Half Total = 73
Since 1997, 33 games went under the first half total, while 15 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under
Over the last 3 seasons, 9 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total.
Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:
Closing First Half Line = -2.5, Closing First Half Total = 73
Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 9 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 9 times.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times.
Since 1997, 10 games went over the first half total, while 8 games went under the first half total.
Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went under the first half total, while 2 games went over the first half total.
KEY PLAYER INJURIESGo to Top
TULSA
No significant injuries.
LOS ANGELES
[G] 06/16/2015 - Alana Beard out indefinitely ( Foot )
[F] 06/04/2015 - Candace Parker out indefinitely ( Personal )

Last Updated: 5/1/2024 7:21:56 PM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.