| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT INDIANA |
|
| 152 | 51 Final 81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | CONNECTICUT | +375 | 602 | INDIANA | -550 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games. (55-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (24-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (45-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (43-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +18 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (30-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (222-176 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +43.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (207-155 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.2%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (65-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +27.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (30-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (40-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (54-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (243-198 since 1997.) (55.1%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (179-130 since 1997.) (57.9%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (130-89 since 1997.) (59.4%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (76-47 since 1997.) (61.8%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +25.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (45-22 since 1997.) (67.2%, +27.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 3 straight losses by 6 points or less. (33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 3 straight losses by 6 points or less. (19-8 since 1997.) (70.4%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 75 | | 29-66 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 32.0% | 11-15 | 72.7% | 40 | 10 | 15 | INDIANA | 82 | | 29-65 | 44.8% | 6-15 | 39.3% | 18-23 | 81.0% | 43 | 11 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 705 times, while CONNECTICUT won 273 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 139-101 against the money line (+27.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 | CONNECTICUT is 109-88 against the money line (+26.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 73.2 | CONNECTICUT is 66-44 against the money line (+20.7 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 72.1 | INDIANA is 103-124 against the money line (-65.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 76.2 | INDIANA is 3-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 77.4 | INDIANA is 46-69 against the money line (-37.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 74.4 | INDIANA is 7-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 81.3, OPPONENT 83.7 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 29-49 against the money line (-44.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.2, OPPONENT 79.9 | CONNECTICUT is 8-25 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 40-61 against the money line (-36.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 23-37 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 1-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 87.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-34 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.2, OPPONENT 75.9 | INDIANA is 69-35 against the money line (+34.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 73.4 | INDIANA is 105-66 against the money line (+38.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 70.3 | INDIANA is 78-52 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 70.9 | INDIANA is 84-38 against the money line (+48.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.9, OPPONENT 68.9 | INDIANA is 19-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | INDIANA is 85-49 against the money line (+22.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 70.9 | INDIANA is 10-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.9 | INDIANA is 11-4 against the money line (+6.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 84.8, OPPONENT 78.4 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 69-40 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 24-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-8 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 19-19 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 112-90 against the money line (+22.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 79-58 against the money line (+23.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-40 against the money line (+19.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 82-67 against the money line (+20.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 76-49 against the money line (+18.5 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-21 against the money line (+18.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 7-14 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 0-5 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in home games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 69.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 4-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 42-57 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-18 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-31 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-12 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in all games this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 46-30 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.4, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 95-68 against the money line (+24.5 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 101-67 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-9 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 34-17 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 117-91 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 10-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-8 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-7 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 12-6 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 12-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was INDIANA 80.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 15-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-17 | +5.2 | 15-15 | 18-12 | 75.9 | 37.2 | 42.5% | 40.4 | 76.8 | 38.8 | 44.0% | 41.9 | Road Games | 6-8 | +7.6 | 6-8 | 9-5 | 74.1 | 34.4 | 40.2% | 40.8 | 77.1 | 35.2 | 42.1% | 45.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 73.4 | 35.8 | 42.7% | 36.6 | 80.4 | 42.8 | 48.1% | 41.4 | Division Games | 5-14 | -2.6 | 7-12 | 10-9 | 74.2 | 37.5 | 42.6% | 38.2 | 79.2 | 40.4 | 44.8% | 42.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.9 | 37.2 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 34.6% | 12-16 | 73.8% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.1 | 34.4 | 27-68 | 40.2% | 6-20 | 32.5% | 13-18 | 73.7% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 22 | 9 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 38.8 | 28-64 | 44.0% | 5-13 | 34.8% | 16-19 | 82.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.3 | 38.6 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.1 | 35.2 | 27-63 | 42.1% | 5-14 | 34.9% | 19-23 | 81.3% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-12 | +6 | 13-15 | 17-12 | 78.2 | 40.2 | 42.5% | 40.6 | 76.8 | 40.3 | 44.6% | 40.6 | Home Games | 9-6 | +0.5 | 5-9 | 12-3 | 80.9 | 41.6 | 44.5% | 39.9 | 77.3 | 40.7 | 43.1% | 41.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -4 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 77.6 | 42.4 | 44.1% | 39.6 | 77.8 | 40.8 | 45.4% | 37.4 | Division Games | 10-8 | +2.7 | 9-9 | 12-6 | 79.3 | 40.9 | 42.1% | 40.7 | 79.0 | 40.8 | 45.7% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.2 | 40.2 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 6-15 | 37.0% | 17-22 | 79.5% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.3 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.9 | 41.6 | 28-64 | 44.5% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 19-24 | 79.0% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 40.3 | 28-63 | 44.6% | 4-15 | 30.9% | 16-21 | 78.0% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.3 | 40.7 | 27-63 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 31.9% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 42 | 9 | 14 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.1, INDIANA 70.1 |
| | |
|
|
7/28/2015 | INDIANA | 73-75 | L | -115 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | 67-66 | W | -300 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 47 | 16 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 40 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | 70-83 | L | +200 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 13 | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-51 | W | -165 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 50 | 17 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 21 | 8/7/2015 | WASHINGTON | 86-72 | W | +105 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 40 | 9 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | 8/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-84 | L | +220 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 8 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 11 | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | 80-74 | W | -175 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 10 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 13 | 8/14/2015 | NEW YORK | 78-90 | L | +175 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 17 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 33 | 7 | 8/16/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 77-90 | L | +145 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 33 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 47 | 12 | 8/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 76-84 | L | +180 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 10 | 8/23/2015 | ATLANTA | 92-102 | L | +120 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 40-67 | 59.7% | 34 | 15 | 8/25/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 57-71 | L | +250 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 12 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 49 | 9 | 8/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 80-81 | L | +250 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 33 | 8 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 42 | 16 | 8/29/2015 | NEW YORK | 66-80 | L | +220 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 29 | 18 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 35 | 15 | 8/30/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 72-68 | W | +325 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 46 | 15 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 47 | 9 | 9/1/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/28/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-73 | W | -105 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 7/29/2015 | NEW YORK | 84-72 | W | +120 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 38 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 33 | 21 | 8/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 83-70 | W | -250 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 13 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 82-106 | L | +180 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 42 | 13 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 42 | 14 | 8/7/2015 | ATLANTA | 106-77 | W | -400 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 41 | 26 | 8/11/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-62 | W | +145 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 10 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 33 | 14 | 8/16/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 75-63 | W | +180 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 42 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 10 | 8/18/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 79-68 | W | +155 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 46 | 16 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 8/21/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 75-63 | W | -210 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 37 | 8 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 19 | 8/23/2015 | NEW YORK | 80-79 | W | -140 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 37 | 14 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 38 | 10 | 8/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 79-81 | L | -175 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 44 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 9 | 8/28/2015 | ATLANTA | 84-90 | L | -330 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 35 | 18 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 39 | 14 | 8/30/2015 | @ TULSA | 70-76 | L | +105 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 15 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 35 | 14 | 9/1/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 38-30 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 7-5 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 15-19 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 5-1 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 151 | Over | 41 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 17-27 | 63.0% | 33 | 3 | 12 | | INDIANA | 83 | -6 | SU ATS | 32 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 28-30 | 93.3% | 43 | 14 | 13 | 7/28/2015 | INDIANA | 75 | 153 | SU ATS | 42 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 2-16 | 12.5% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 52 | 13 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 73 | -1 | Under | 34 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 37 | 7 | 18 | 6/30/2015 | INDIANA | 92 | 152 | SU ATS | 49 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 36 | 8 | 19 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -4.5 | Over | 44 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 31 | 5 | 10 | 7/10/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 68 | 149.5 | ATS | 30 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 36 | 8 | 12 | | INDIANA | 72 | -5.5 | SU Under | 21 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 32 | 9 | 14 | 6/17/2014 | INDIANA | 67 | 147.5 | Over | 29 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 37 | 12 | 21 | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 29-34 | 85.3% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 6/7/2014 | INDIANA | 71 | 143.5 | Over | 35 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 30 | 5 | 25 | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -4 | SU ATS | 45 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 24-32 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 12 | 5/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | 139.5 | Over | 25 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 15-26 | 57.7% | 51 | 21 | 19 | | INDIANA | 79 | -5 | SU ATS | 30 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 31-40 | 77.5% | 44 | 11 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 13-25 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 9-32 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Anne is 12-31 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 16-35 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 1-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 18-45 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 12-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 80.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Stephanie is 8-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 10-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Stephanie is 8-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 13-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 16-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 56 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 08/24/2015 - Alex Bentley out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | [F] 08/15/2015 - Alyssa Thomas out indefinitely ( Shoulder ) | [C] 08/13/2015 - Elizabeth Williams out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) | |
[G] 08/31/2015 - Briann January "?" Tuesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 3:34:06 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|