| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA NEW YORK |
|
| 156.5 | 75 Final 80 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | ATLANTA | +350 | 604 | NEW YORK | -500 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (57-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.4%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (53-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (42-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (61-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse. (60-31 since 1997.) (65.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (162-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +61 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (44-13 since 1997.) (77.2%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite against opponent off a home loss. (26-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +21.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (39-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (84-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +17 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (46-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.4%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (61-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (84-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +28.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (66-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +5.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (63-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (49-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +14.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (110-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (110-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (110-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (51-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (46-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (33-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (107-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +20.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (67-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +21.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (222-176 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +43.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (68-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +14.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (207-155 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.2%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (65-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +27.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest. (94-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home loss. (49-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (41-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (69-46 since 1997.) (60%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more. (28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (36-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more. (49-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG). (80-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 70 | | 25-65 | 38.9% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-20 | 77.6% | 39 | 9 | 16 | NEW YORK | 80 | | 29-64 | 44.8% | 4-11 | 31.6% | 19-25 | 76.8% | 47 | 11 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 751 times, while ATLANTA won 233 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 65-87 against the money line (-33.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 71.2 |
|
ATLANTA is 8-15 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 81.5 | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.2, OPPONENT 76.4 | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 82.1 | ATLANTA is 13-12 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 78.2 | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-16.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 81.8 | ATLANTA is 22-31 against the money line (-27.1 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 82.1 | ATLANTA is 14-17 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-14.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | ATLANTA is 3-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 89.5 | ATLANTA is 56-64 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.4 | ATLANTA is 21-37 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 82.9 | ATLANTA is 1-4 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.5, OPPONENT 74.5 | NEW YORK is 13-2 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 69.3 | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.3, OPPONENT 70.0 | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 70.0 | NEW YORK is 7-0 against the money line (+11.3 Units) when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 68.0 | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 69.4 | NEW YORK is 73-55 against the money line (+24.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.3, OPPONENT 70.6 | NEW YORK is 8-3 against the money line (+5.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 70.0 | NEW YORK is 20-13 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 71.7 | NEW YORK is 9-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 67.7 | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.7, OPPONENT 71.0 | NEW YORK is 13-1 against the money line (+14.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 82.1, OPPONENT 72.0 | NEW YORK is 11-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was NEW YORK 73.3, OPPONENT 65.6 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 14-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 24-26 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-12.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 29-36 against the money line (-18.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-18 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 19-23 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 25-27 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-17 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-23 against the money line (-27.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 21-28 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-6.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-22 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 18-11 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-6 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.9, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 14-8 against the money line (+7.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 21-11 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 17-5 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 10-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 20-11 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 15-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 8-4 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 3-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 65.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 9-18 against the money line (-13.4 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 69.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-21 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 68.8, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 12-16 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-20 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-20 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-26 against the money line (-21.1 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 25-27 against the money line (-23.0 Units) on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-12 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-19 against the money line (-16.3 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-16 against the money line (-16.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 23-32 against the money line (-23.1 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-24 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-23 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-18 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-24 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 39-45 against the money line (-24.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-18 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 20-23 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-25 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 17-20 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-21 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-15 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-18 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-14 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 23-27 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-16 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 20-8 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in all games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 11-6 against the money line (+6.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 67-33 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in home games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 66.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 191-168 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.3, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 13-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 12-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 14-5 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.9, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 16-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 57-39 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 39-20 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 27-11 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.4, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 175-139 against the money line (+38.2 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 12-17 | -11.9 | 16-13 | 17-12 | 78.2 | 38.4 | 41.4% | 43.4 | 81.3 | 40.1 | 44.1% | 41.1 | Road Games | 5-10 | -2.4 | 8-7 | 11-4 | 79.9 | 39.7 | 42.7% | 39.8 | 86.5 | 42.6 | 46.7% | 40.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 85.2 | 43.0 | 44.8% | 41.6 | 81.8 | 39.0 | 45.1% | 39.6 | Division Games | 8-10 | -9.8 | 10-8 | 11-7 | 79.2 | 38.4 | 42.5% | 43.2 | 81.7 | 40.2 | 44.2% | 39.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.2 | 38.4 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 17-22 | 78.5% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.2 | 38.1 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.9 | 39.7 | 29-67 | 42.7% | 6-16 | 36.2% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.3 | 40.1 | 28-64 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 20-25 | 81.9% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.3 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.5 | 42.6 | 30-64 | 46.7% | 5-14 | 35.2% | 22-26 | 84.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 20-8 | +11.8 | 21-6 | 13-15 | 75.3 | 38.8 | 43.4% | 44.5 | 70.0 | 36.9 | 38.6% | 39.7 | Home Games | 10-3 | +3.8 | 10-3 | 6-7 | 75.5 | 36.9 | 43.8% | 43.8 | 69.2 | 36.7 | 37.7% | 40.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 78.2 | 41.6 | 49.5% | 42.0 | 65.2 | 36.0 | 38.6% | 37.2 | Division Games | 11-6 | +6.2 | 13-4 | 8-9 | 76.1 | 40.1 | 43.9% | 42.8 | 72.7 | 38.4 | 39.5% | 40.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.3 | 38.8 | 28-64 | 43.4% | 4-12 | 31.0% | 16-21 | 76.8% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.5 | 38.4 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.5 | 36.9 | 28-64 | 43.8% | 4-13 | 31.4% | 15-19 | 77.4% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.0 | 36.9 | 25-64 | 38.6% | 6-16 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76 | 38.3 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.2 | 36.7 | 24-64 | 37.7% | 6-16 | 37.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.3, NEW YORK 70.3 |
| | |
|
|
7/29/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-102 | L | +145 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 7/31/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-86 | L | | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 19 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | PHOENIX | 68-71 | L | +200 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 40 | 12 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 47 | 14 | 8/7/2015 | @ INDIANA | 77-106 | L | +300 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 41 | 26 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 8/9/2015 | @ TULSA | 98-90 | W | +220 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 12 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 41 | 9 | 8/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 82-84 | L | +280 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 41 | 6 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 48 | 14 | 8/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 90-77 | W | -165 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 47 | 12 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 33 | 14 | 8/21/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 67-78 | L | +350 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 13 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 16 | 8/23/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 102-92 | W | -140 | 40-67 | 59.7% | 34 | 15 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 8/25/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 71-57 | W | -330 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 49 | 9 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 12 | 8/28/2015 | @ INDIANA | 90-84 | W | +250 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 39 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 35 | 18 | 8/29/2015 | CHICAGO | 96-98 | L | -105 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 45 | 6 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 10 | 9/1/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/29/2015 | @ INDIANA | 72-84 | L | -140 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 33 | 21 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 38 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | SEATTLE | 78-62 | W | -450 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 43 | 10 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 40 | 17 | 8/7/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 77-63 | W | +170 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 52 | 14 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 43 | 13 | 8/11/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-63 | W | -300 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 42 | 14 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 17 | 8/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 90-78 | W | -210 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 33 | 7 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 17 | 8/15/2015 | TULSA | 76-81 | L | -360 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 33 | 12 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 14 | 8/19/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 73-45 | W | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 50 | 15 | 17-63 | 27.0% | 41 | 19 | 8/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 78-67 | W | -500 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 16 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 13 | 8/23/2015 | @ INDIANA | 79-80 | L | +120 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 38 | 10 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 37 | 14 | 8/28/2015 | MINNESOTA | 81-68 | W | -165 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 14 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 8 | 8/29/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 80-66 | W | -300 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 35 | 15 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 29 | 18 | 9/1/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 21-13 (+16.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 8-4 (+11.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 11-5 (+6.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 5-1 (+7.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 67 | 155 | Under | 36 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 41 | 10 | 13 | | NEW YORK | 78 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 43 | 13 | 16 | 7/12/2015 | NEW YORK | 76 | -3.5 | Over | 32 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 23-34 | 67.6% | 45 | 14 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 84 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 26-36 | 72.2% | 40 | 9 | 15 | 6/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 73 | 149 | SU ATS | 40 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 44 | 11 | 21 | | ATLANTA | 64 | -5 | Under | 28 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 45 | 13 | 18 | 6/5/2015 | ATLANTA | 73 | -6.5 | Over | 38 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 43 | 12 | 19 | | NEW YORK | 82 | 150 | SU ATS | 51 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 40 | 4 | 15 | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | 83 | 157 | SU ATS | 34 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 44 | 10 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 76 | -8 | Over | 35 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 32 | 5 | 15 | 7/16/2014 | ATLANTA | 75 | -5.5 | Under | 40 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 37 | 8 | 14 | | NEW YORK | 77 | 154.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 53 | 15 | 18 | 6/22/2014 | ATLANTA | 78 | -4.5 | Over | 40 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 19-29 | 65.5% | 56 | 15 | 15 | | NEW YORK | 85 | 153 | SU ATS | 38 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 40 | 2 | 16 | 6/20/2014 | NEW YORK | 64 | 156 | Under | 35 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 43 | 7 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 85 | -9 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 50 | 13 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 19-11 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 158-78 against the money line (+37.8 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 111-55 against the money line (+33.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 85-40 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.0, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 44-24 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.4, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 89-51 against the money line (+20.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 20-12 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 9-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 22-8 against the money line (+18.1 Units) off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 78.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 12-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 79.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 9-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in road games after allowing 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 78.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 56-37 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 23-8 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 44-31 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 34-23 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 28-13 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.2, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 12-28 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 1-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 3-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 65.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 9-18 against the money line (-13.4 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 69.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 7-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) off a road win as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 68.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 8-15 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 68.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 2-5 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 70.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 15-20 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 4-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 73.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 32-33 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 12-20 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 12-20 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 10-18 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 20-23 against the money line (-27.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 5-12 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 17-18 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 5-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 10-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 19-24 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 22-23 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-18 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 4-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 5-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-18 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 20-23 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-15 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 19-18 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 6-12 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-14 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 15-16 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 24-26 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 9-17 against the money line (-12.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 9-18 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 19-23 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 25-27 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 7-17 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 16-22 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 13-18 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 19-22 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 13-5 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 78-47 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 33-13 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 44-26 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 75.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 85 times, while the road underdog won straight up 15 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 08/03/2015 - Cierra Burdick expected to miss 4-6 weeks ( Foot ) | [G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension ) | |
[F] 06/15/2015 - Rebecca Allen out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 8:55:05 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|