| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON INDIANA |
|
| 156 | 50 Final 73 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | WASHINGTON | -165 | 602 | INDIANA | +145 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (359-221 since 1997.) (61.9%, +85.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (105-51 since 1997.) (67.3%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (79-48 since 1997.) (62.2%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog. (28-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog. (26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a win against a division rival. (39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +15.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more. (41-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset win as a road underdog. (22-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG). (66-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (275-286 since 1997.) (49%, +93.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (271-252 since 1997.) (51.8%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (258-103 since 1997.) (71.5%, +77 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (241-254 since 1997.) (48.7%, +76.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (255-103 since 1997.) (71.2%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (109-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (239-90 since 1997.) (72.6%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (244-100 since 1997.) (70.9%, +72.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (175-164 since 1997.) (51.6%, +69 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season. (247-229 since 1997.) (51.9%, +67.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in May, June, or July games. (129-41 since 1997.) (75.9%, +63.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (133-46 since 1997.) (74.3%, +62 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (187-70 since 1997.) (72.8%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (147-134 since 1997.) (52.3%, +59.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (176-63 since 1997.) (73.6%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (133-43 since 1997.) (75.6%, +58.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (126-31 since 1997.) (80.3%, +57.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (182-67 since 1997.) (73.1%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (64-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.3%, +43.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (153-43 since 1997.) (78.1%, +56.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (149-53 since 1997.) (73.8%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (138-43 since 1997.) (76.2%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (175-108 since 1997.) (61.8%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (128-51 since 1997.) (71.5%, +52.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (159-60 since 1997.) (72.6%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games. (129-52 since 1997.) (71.3%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (90-23 since 1997.) (79.6%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (123-41 since 1997.) (75%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (54-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (33-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (80-21 since 1997.) (79.2%, +48.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (84-21 since 1997.) (80%, +47.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (70-14 since 1997.) (83.3%, +46.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (93-21 since 1997.) (81.6%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (104-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record. (29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games. (106-43 since 1997.) (71.1%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - with a losing record, in July games. (86-22 since 1997.) (79.6%, +43.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (71-14 since 1997.) (83.5%, +42.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in May, June, or July games. (77-17 since 1997.) (81.9%, +41.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (68-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (151-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +72.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (83-26 since 1997.) (76.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (74-18 since 1997.) (80.4%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (73-19 since 1997.) (79.3%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (95-35 since 1997.) (73.1%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in July games. (67-19 since 1997.) (77.9%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (69-16 since 1997.) (81.2%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (93-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +48.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games. (70-17 since 1997.) (80.5%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (128-83 since 1997.) (60.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (41-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (49-6 since 1997.) (89.1%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a combined score of 155 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (54-12 since 1997.) (81.8%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (46-7 since 1997.) (86.8%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (57-22 since 1997.) (72.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (89-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (59-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +20.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (49-29 since 1997.) (62.8%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (78-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +26.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (43-11 since 1997.) (79.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (107-85 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (49-16 since 1997.) (75.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (53-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 15 points or more. (70-47 since 1997.) (59.8%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record. (51-16 since 1997.) (76.1%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (45-13 since 1997.) (77.6%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (36-9 since 1997.) (80%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games. (30-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +19.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game) against a poor rebounding team (-3 to -6 reb/game). (29-15 since 1997.) (65.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a win against a division rival, in July games. (33-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (56-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (62-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.3%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (62-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.8%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season. (121-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 80 | | 30-67 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 37.5% | 13-17 | 77.6% | 43 | 10 | 12 | INDIANA | 75 | | 27-66 | 40.9% | 6-17 | 36.4% | 15-20 | 74.4% | 43 | 11 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 645 times, while INDIANA won 329 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 8-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 76.0 | WASHINGTON is 12-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 71.2 | WASHINGTON is 12-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 75.8 | INDIANA is 10-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | INDIANA is 43-80 against the money line (-52.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | INDIANA is 45-55 against the money line (-28.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 72.2 | INDIANA is 23-33 against the money line (-15.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.0, OPPONENT 74.2 | INDIANA is 21-46 against the money line (-52.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 79.9 | INDIANA is 2-17 against the money line (-15.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.6, OPPONENT 86.9 | INDIANA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 87.2 |
|
WASHINGTON is 86-146 against the money line (-51.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 78.2 | WASHINGTON is 3-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 76.0 | WASHINGTON is 31-75 against the money line (-42.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 73.7 | WASHINGTON is 119-190 against the money line (-74.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 42-87 against the money line (-57.1 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 130-186 against the money line (-58.9 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.4 | WASHINGTON is 63-102 against the money line (-40.9 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.8 | INDIANA is 81-46 against the money line (+20.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 70.7 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 4-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 117-141 against the money line (-56.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-63 against the money line (-30.2 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 115-191 against the money line (-64.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 178-276 against the money line (-97.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-21 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-6 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 16-8 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 96-73 against the money line (+24.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.7, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 19-12 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 0-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) as a home underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 0-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 20-24 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 10-18 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 33-36 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.6, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 14-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 97-103 against the money line (-43.4 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 3-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 5-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-11 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 144-147 against the money line (-56.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 39-56 against the money line (-32.6 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 3-11 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 234-356 against the money line (-112.5 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-111 against the money line (-47.6 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 164-237 against the money line (-68.3 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 152-229 against the money line (-83.9 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 88-150 against the money line (-69.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 109-182 against the money line (-74.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 86-130 against the money line (-44.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 36-57 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 66-82 against the money line (-32.9 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 53-103 against the money line (-54.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 24-51 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-22 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 0-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 62.2, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 100-131 against the money line (-46.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 19-14 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 18-11 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 96-63 against the money line (+31.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 52-35 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 75.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 112-87 against the money line (+24.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 20-9 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 132-111 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-3 | +0.7 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 75.9 | 38.3 | 43.3% | 40.6 | 70.8 | 34.6 | 39.7% | 41.3 | Road Games | 3-1 | +2.1 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 75.7 | 39.7 | 44.3% | 42.0 | 68.5 | 35.5 | 35.9% | 44.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.3 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 81.6 | 39.6 | 47.5% | 37.8 | 76.8 | 36.8 | 43.4% | 38.4 | Division Games | 5-2 | +1.3 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 73.9 | 38.6 | 42.9% | 42.1 | 67.3 | 33.4 | 38.0% | 41.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.9 | 38.3 | 28-64 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 14-17 | 77.7% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 37.6 | 27-65 | 41.6% | 6-16 | 34.5% | 16-21 | 79.9% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.7 | 39.7 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 8-21 | 37.6% | 13-17 | 76.8% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.8 | 34.6 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 4-14 | 29.0% | 13-15 | 85.0% | 41 | 11 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.5 | 35.5 | 25-71 | 35.9% | 3-13 | 26.4% | 14-16 | 84.8% | 44 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 4-6 | -0.2 | 3-7 | 7-3 | 78.3 | 41.0 | 41.5% | 41.1 | 82.7 | 41.7 | 45.0% | 44.3 | Home Games | 1-4 | -3 | 0-5 | 3-2 | 74.0 | 37.0 | 39.0% | 41.0 | 84.0 | 43.2 | 44.5% | 47.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.9 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 82.8 | 48.0 | 44.7% | 40.8 | 79.2 | 39.8 | 44.9% | 39.8 | Division Games | 3-5 | -0.2 | 3-5 | 6-2 | 79.6 | 42.5 | 41.2% | 40.6 | 84.4 | 42.6 | 47.0% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.3 | 41.0 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 7-17 | 39.3% | 18-24 | 74.9% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.3 | 37.8 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.0 | 37.0 | 26-67 | 39.0% | 5-16 | 29.6% | 17-23 | 73.0% | 41 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 8 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 41.7 | 30-67 | 45.0% | 5-15 | 36.5% | 17-22 | 78.4% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 9 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.7 | 38.2 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 4-14 | 31.3% | 16-20 | 81.2% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.0 | 43.2 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 7-16 | 40.2% | 18-22 | 82.4% | 47 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.1, INDIANA 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
6/5/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 73-68 | W | -250 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 48 | 9 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 46 | 8 | 6/6/2015 | NEW YORK | 67-62 | W | -300 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 45 | 17 | 6/12/2015 | ATLANTA | 61-64 | L | -270 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 42 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 16 | 6/14/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 74-59 | W | +170 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 12 | 22-71 | 31.0% | 50 | 19 | 6/19/2015 | TULSA | 82-86 | L | -165 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 38 | 12 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 37 | 9 | 6/20/2015 | @ INDIANA | 87-75 | W | -115 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 45 | 17 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 36 | 13 | 6/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 84-80 | W | -650 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 6/26/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 69-72 | L | -165 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 86-71 | W | -115 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/5/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 72-95 | L | +220 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 40 | 20 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 56 | 11 | 6/6/2015 | MINNESOTA | 69-78 | L | +280 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 40 | 12 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 49 | 14 | 6/9/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 79-86 | L | +135 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 41 | 15 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 12 | 6/12/2015 | PHOENIX | 77-74 | W | -175 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 46 | 15 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 46 | 12 | 6/14/2015 | CHICAGO | 72-98 | L | +135 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 40 | 10 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 53 | 15 | 6/16/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 90-79 | W | +175 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 45 | 18 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 17 | 6/19/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 80-63 | W | +145 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 9 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 40 | 16 | 6/20/2015 | WASHINGTON | 75-87 | L | -105 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 36 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 45 | 17 | 6/26/2015 | CHICAGO | 77-83 | L | +135 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 6/30/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-84 | W | +170 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 7/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 41-20 (+14.8 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 6-5 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 21-10 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 4-2 (+4.3 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/20/2015 | WASHINGTON | 87 | -1 | SU ATS | 44 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 45 | 10 | 17 | | INDIANA | 75 | 148 | Over | 42 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 36 | 12 | 13 | 8/23/2014 | INDIANA | 81 | 143 | SU ATS | 30 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 44 | 11 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -3 | Over | 27 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 44 | 8 | 13 | 8/21/2014 | WASHINGTON | 73 | 140.5 | | 36 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 40 | 6 | 16 | | INDIANA | 78 | -5 | SU Over | 30 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 45 | 12 | 10 | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74 | 143 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 44 | 8 | 10 | | INDIANA | 61 | -5 | Under | 29 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 38 | 13 | 10 | 7/2/2014 | INDIANA | 80 | 144 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 38 | 7 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 77 | -4 | Over | 29 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 6/6/2014 | INDIANA | 64 | 141.5 | SU ATS | 26 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 38 | 10 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 61 | -4.5 | Under | 35 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 51 | 15 | 17 | 5/23/2014 | WASHINGTON | 79 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 9 | 12 | | INDIANA | 63 | -4 | Under | 30 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 39 | 9 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 11-2 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 78.5, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Mike is 166-115 against the money line (+26.6 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 7-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a game where opponent was called for 10 or less fouls in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 79.1, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 29-22 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games off a home win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 74.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 18-12 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 61-40 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Mike is 11-21 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 25 times, while the home underdog won straight up 14 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 07/02/2015 - Kia Vaughn is downgraded to doubtful Thursday vs. Indiana Fever ( Concussion ) | [G] 06/29/2015 - Bria Hartley "?" Thursday vs. Indiana Fever ( Foot ) | |
[G] 06/30/2015 - Jeanette Pohlen "?" Thursday vs. Wash Mystics ( Calf ) | [F] 06/30/2015 - Erlana Larkins "?" Thursday vs. Wash Mystics ( Knee ) | [G] 06/30/2015 - Shavonte Zellous "?" Thursday vs. Wash Mystics ( Back ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 6/15/2024 7:57:42 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|