| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
154
| 77
Final
74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | CHICAGO | -155 | | 604 | CONNECTICUT | +135 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(244-100 since 1997.) (70.9%, +73.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(49-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(107-60 since 1997.) (64.1%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(90-46 since 1997.) (66.2%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(90-46 since 1997.) (66.2%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(67-27 since 1997.) (71.3%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(57-22 since 1997.) (72.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a home loss.
(55-20 since 1997.) (73.3%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(56-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(78-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +26.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(35-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(42-12 since 1997.) (77.8%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(35-9 since 1997.) (79.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(100-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(63-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(271-250 since 1997.) (52%, +84.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(274-108 since 1997.) (71.7%, +83.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(300-121 since 1997.) (71.3%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(255-103 since 1997.) (71.2%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(239-90 since 1997.) (72.6%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(244-100 since 1997.) (70.9%, +72.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(157-133 since 1997.) (54.1%, +63.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(133-46 since 1997.) (74.3%, +62 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(187-70 since 1997.) (72.8%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(160-53 since 1997.) (75.1%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(166-51 since 1997.) (76.5%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(171-103 since 1997.) (62.4%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(145-52 since 1997.) (73.6%, +58.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(64-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.3%, +43.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(41-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (82%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(113-34 since 1997.) (76.9%, +54.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(72-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(61-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +44.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(87-20 since 1997.) (81.3%, +52.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(159-60 since 1997.) (72.6%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a loss against a division rival.
(125-40 since 1997.) (75.8%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(78-61 since 1997.) (56.1%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(123-41 since 1997.) (75%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(33-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(123-49 since 1997.) (71.5%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(90-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +47.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(97-25 since 1997.) (79.5%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(117-42 since 1997.) (73.6%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(113-38 since 1997.) (74.8%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(130-70 since 1997.) (65%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(104-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(133-92 since 1997.) (59.1%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(41-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +41.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a combined score of 155 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(60-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(83-26 since 1997.) (76.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(82-37 since 1997.) (68.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights.
(90-57 since 1997.) (61.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(82-35 since 1997.) (70.1%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(66-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +48.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(95-35 since 1997.) (73.1%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(93-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +48.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-12 since 1997.) (83.1%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(79-48 since 1997.) (62.2%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a combined score of 155 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-12 since 1997.) (81.8%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(89-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(137-124 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.5%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(48-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(78-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +26.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-27 since 1997.) (65.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(53-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(43-11 since 1997.) (79.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(36-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(107-85 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more.
(64-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.2%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(23-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.2%, +21 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(61-35 since 1997.) (63.5%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(30-18 since 1997.) (62.5%, +26.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +37.1 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(54-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(45-13 since 1997.) (77.6%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(40-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(52-29 since 1997.) (64.2%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(45-23 since 1997.) (66.2%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(36-9 since 1997.) (80%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +16 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(40-23 since 1997.) (63.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(30-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(25-13 since 1997.) (65.8%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(49-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(25-14 since 1997.) (64.1%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(34-8 since 1997.) (81%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(26-8 since 1997.) (76.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(41-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(40-20 since 1997.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(33-8 since 1997.) (80.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +29.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(51-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(22-6 since 1997.) (78.6%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +23.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(108-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.4%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(42-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +22 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(20-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +16.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +14.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(35-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(26-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(71-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 76 | | 29-68 | 42.6% | 3-12 | 27.9% | 15-17 | 85.4% | 44 | 11 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | | 32-72 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 35.9% | 13-17 | 75.4% | 44 | 11 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 670 times, while CHICAGO won 306 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 10-26 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.3, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.7, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
CHICAGO is 70-114 against the money line (-61.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 41-55 against the money line (-25.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.5 | CHICAGO is 14-33 against the money line (-22.2 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 26-44 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 41-63 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.3 | CHICAGO is 7-21 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 87.8 | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 91.3 | CHICAGO is 20-25 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.9 | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 72.5 | CONNECTICUT is 49-20 against the money line (+30.8 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 71.2 | CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 66.8 | CONNECTICUT is 136-96 against the money line (+27.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.8 | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+14.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 79.9 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 27-13 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 6-16 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-14 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 104-145 against the money line (-49.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 76-96 against the money line (-35.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 105-149 against the money line (-55.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-22 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 76-129 against the money line (-51.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-92 against the money line (-40.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 8-0 against the money line (+8.0 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-14 against the money line (+8.5 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-27 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-22 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-29 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-17 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-40 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-18 against the money line (-14.4 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-33 against the money line (-26.8 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 18-30 against the money line (-17.5 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-26 against the money line (-18.5 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-51 against the money line (-32.1 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-27 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-20 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-20 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-15 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-44 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 38-59 against the money line (-32.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-38 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-23 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 39-55 against the money line (-26.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-40 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-25 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 54-77 against the money line (-37.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-62 against the money line (-35.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 53-94 against the money line (-47.5 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 62-92 against the money line (-37.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 70-104 against the money line (-37.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-20 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 68.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) as an underdog this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 64.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-27 against the money line (+18.0 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-3 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-8 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 61-35 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 5-5 | -2.9 | 4-6 | 7-3 | 85.4 | 41.8 | 45.2% | 43.1 | 82.1 | 41.4 | 42.2% | 44.8 | | Road Games | 3-4 | -2.7 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 82.6 | 41.6 | 46.5% | 41.0 | 80.6 | 42.0 | 42.0% | 44.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.3 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 86.0 | 39.4 | 45.2% | 40.6 | 87.0 | 43.4 | 44.3% | 45.4 | | Division Games | 4-4 | -2.9 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 83.2 | 41.4 | 43.1% | 44.6 | 79.1 | 39.0 | 41.8% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 41.8 | 32-70 | 45.2% | 4-12 | 29.0% | 18-21 | 85.4% | 43 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.8 | 38.6 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 16-19 | 80.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.6 | 41.6 | 32-69 | 46.5% | 3-12 | 28.2% | 15-18 | 82.8% | 41 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.1 | 41.4 | 30-71 | 42.2% | 6-17 | 38.3% | 16-21 | 74.6% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.9 | 27-67 | 41.0% | 6-16 | 34.4% | 16-20 | 76.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 42.0 | 29-70 | 42.0% | 6-16 | 38.5% | 16-21 | 75.2% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 7-2 | +10.2 | 7-2 | 5-4 | 77.9 | 36.1 | 42.0% | 42.0 | 71.6 | 38.0 | 40.8% | 44.0 | | Home Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 76.2 | 37.6 | 42.3% | 41.4 | 74.0 | 39.8 | 42.1% | 41.8 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 81.8 | 34.0 | 42.1% | 43.6 | 74.4 | 36.4 | 43.6% | 41.4 | | Division Games | 3-2 | +5.2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 75.2 | 39.8 | 43.4% | 38.2 | 72.8 | 41.8 | 40.6% | 45.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.9 | 36.1 | 29-70 | 42.0% | 5-16 | 33.1% | 14-18 | 74.8% | 42 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 12 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.9 | 36.8 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 77.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.2 | 37.6 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 76.4% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.6 | 38.0 | 26-64 | 40.8% | 4-14 | 30.9% | 15-18 | 84.0% | 44 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 18 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 73.4 | 36.2 | 27-66 | 41.4% | 5-16 | 32.2% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.0 | 39.8 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-13 | 34.8% | 15-18 | 85.2% | 42 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 69.2, CONNECTICUT 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/5/2015 | INDIANA | 95-72 | W | -300 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 56 | 11 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 40 | 20 | | 6/6/2015 | @ TULSA | 93-101 | L | +105 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 33 | 15 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | | 6/11/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 65-67 | L | -200 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 45 | 11 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 10 | | 6/14/2015 | @ INDIANA | 98-72 | W | -155 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 53 | 15 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 40 | 10 | | 6/19/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 73-74 | L | -165 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 18 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 51 | 17 | | 6/20/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 95-87 | W | -210 | 42-76 | 55.3% | 41 | 12 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 49 | 14 | | 6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -400 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | | 6/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 83-77 | W | -155 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | | 6/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 71-86 | L | -105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | | 6/30/2015 | NEW YORK | 81-89 | L | -220 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 45 | 12 | | 7/2/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/5/2015 | WASHINGTON | 68-73 | L | +200 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 46 | 8 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 48 | 9 | | 6/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 75-70 | W | +550 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 34 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 60 | 25 | | 6/11/2015 | CHICAGO | 67-65 | W | +170 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 10 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 45 | 11 | | 6/14/2015 | ATLANTA | 82-64 | W | +105 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 31 | 23 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 24 | | 6/16/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 79-58 | W | +120 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 12 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 36 | 22 | | 6/19/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 90-78 | W | +180 | 38-92 | 41.3% | 58 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 54 | 21 | | 6/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-68 | W | -175 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | | 6/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80-76 | W | -300 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | | 6/30/2015 | INDIANA | 84-92 | L | -200 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | | 7/2/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 16-19 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 7-2 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 6-10 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 3-2 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/11/2015 | CHICAGO | 65 | -4.5 | Under | 38 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 0-6 | 0.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 45 | 10 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 67 | 156 | SU ATS | 39 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 49 | 9 | 10 | 8/5/2014 | CHICAGO | 82 | -4 | SU ATS | 36 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 28-30 | 93.3% | 46 | 6 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 66 | 154.5 | Under | 41 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 2-16 | 12.5% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 40 | 13 | 8 | 6/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 69 | 162 | Under | 45 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 33 | 8 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 79 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 55 | 21 | 14 | 5/30/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 82 | 146 | Over | 41 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 48 | 16 | 10 | | | CHICAGO | 101 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 39-74 | 52.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 18-27 | 66.7% | 48 | 14 | 9 | 5/21/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 68 | 147.5 | Under | 26 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 35 | 10 | 11 | | | CHICAGO | 78 | -5 | SU ATS | 45 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 43 | 5 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Pokey is 11-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 37-53 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 73.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 17-31 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 71.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 14-14 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in home games after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 71.8, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 16-22 against the money line (-17.1 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 72.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 24-36 against the money line (-24.6 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 73.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 7-11 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 74.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 12-27 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 9-22 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 74.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 50-65 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 74.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 10-23 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 74.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 90-104 against the money line (-48.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 72.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 39-59 against the money line (-41.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 73.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 17-34 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 72.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 72-81 against the money line (-37.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 72.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 12-22 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Pokey is 75-80 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 12-23 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 33-40 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 29-34 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 14-23 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 35-44 against the money line (-19.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 21-23 against the money line (-14.6 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 12-18 against the money line (-11.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 33-49 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 21-39 against the money line (-29.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 37-48 against the money line (-26.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 20-30 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 9-19 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 25-34 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-20 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 9-16 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 23-31 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 30-38 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 11-19 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 30-40 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 35-42 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 34-42 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 4-7 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 26-49 against the money line (-34.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 18-38 against the money line (-41.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 6*) | Pokey is 22-45 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 55-67 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 46-51 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 57-70 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 3-9 against the money line (-8.5 Units) versus good pressure defensive teams - forcing >=17 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 37-56 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 20-47 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 1-7 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 16-36 against the money line (-27.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the home underdog won straight up 12 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 2 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 06/30/2015 - Allie Quigley out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | | [F] 06/15/2015 - Tamera Young out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [C] 06/04/2015 - Sylvia Fowles out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 07/01/2015 - Kelsey Bone is downgraded to expected to miss Thursday vs. Chicago Sky ( Suspension ) | | [G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 10:16:01 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|