| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA DALLAS |
|
| 164 | 88 Final 94 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | MINNESOTA | -450 | 602 | DALLAS | +325 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights. (21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights. (39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games. (62-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in June games. (31-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games. (64-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (42.4%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games. (57-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.3%, +31.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (298-233 since 1997.) (56.1%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (230-181 since 1997.) (56%, +65.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (236-186 since 1997.) (55.9%, +61.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (161-142 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +53.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (159-44 since 1997.) (78.3%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (150-55 since 1997.) (73.2%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (53-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (128-93 since 1997.) (57.9%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (58-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (51-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (51-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (106-53 since 1997.) (66.7%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off 2 or more consecutive road losses, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (83-27 since 1997.) (75.5%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (37-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +37 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (40-2 since 1997.) (95.2%, +35.9 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (40-2 since 1997.) (95.2%, +35.9 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good defensive team - shooting pct defense of <=40% on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (56-30 since 1997.) (65.1%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots. (93-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots. (96-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots. (95-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.2%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (29-1 since 1997.) (96.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (29-1 since 1997.) (96.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights. (46-23 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots. (56-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (96-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (25-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +11.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots. (106-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.6%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (91-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.5%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (77-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.9%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents. (44-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (36-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots. (36-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (53-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (74-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (43-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (82-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (73-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.3%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents. (35-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents. (30-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (88-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +55.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off an upset win as an underdog. (23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +20.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (34-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents. (67-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games. (55-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (71-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after playing 4 consecutive road games. (34-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 83 | | 31-69 | 45.1% | 10-25 | 38.5% | 11-14 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 15 | DALLAS | 79 | | 30-71 | 42.7% | 6-20 | 30.6% | 13-16 | 80.1% | 46 | 13 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 601 times, while DALLAS won 371 times. Edge against the money line=DALLAS |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.9, OPPONENT 76.2 | MINNESOTA is 5-0 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 8-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 80.1 | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | MINNESOTA is 10-5 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 81.1 | MINNESOTA is 10-5 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 82.3 | MINNESOTA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 71.4 | MINNESOTA is 7-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 90.3, OPPONENT 81.2 | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+13.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.5, OPPONENT 76.8 | MINNESOTA is 10-0 against the money line (+15.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 90.5, OPPONENT 75.9 | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 88.1 | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.1 | DALLAS is 28-58 against the money line (-35.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 1-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was DALLAS 77.2, OPPONENT 86.4 | DALLAS is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 87.9 | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 89.2 | DALLAS is 16-18 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 84.5 | DALLAS is 5-8 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 88.7 | DALLAS is 22-29 against the money line (-22.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 87.1 |
|
MINNESOTA is 63-75 against the money line (-39.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.7 | MINNESOTA is 127-246 against the money line (-231.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 86.4 | MINNESOTA is 172-161 against the money line (-74.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.0 | MINNESOTA is 54-97 against the money line (-86.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.5, OPPONENT 76.3 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 25-21 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 40-67 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-27 against the money line (-17.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 55-77 against the money line (-43.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 56-83 against the money line (-45.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 29-32 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 0-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-20 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 61-91 against the money line (-51.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 0-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 53-81 against the money line (-47.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-25 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 61-89 against the money line (-49.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 0-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.7, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 5-19 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 6*) | DALLAS is 63-90 against the money line (-48.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 60-91 against the money line (-50.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 0-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 53-83 against the money line (-47.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 19-26 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 72.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-25 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 75.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 12-22 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 36-25 against the money line (-33.3 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 86-109 against the money line (-38.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 72-102 against the money line (-41.1 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 34-46 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 77-120 against the money line (-60.2 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 55-68 against the money line (-34.2 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-29 against the money line (-26.0 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 57-46 against the money line (-32.6 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 35-21 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 77-104 against the money line (-40.4 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 13-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in all games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 14-10 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-10 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-10 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in June games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 13-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-11 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 8-0 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-11 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+5.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+5.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-16 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 20-10 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 10-7 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-14 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-12 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 119-67 against the money line (+28.9 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-15 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 13-10 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 72-42 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 18-13 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 79-27 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after a game where they committed 10+ less turnovers than opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 10-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-4 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 13-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 0-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in June games this season. The average score was DALLAS 77.3, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 87.4, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 31-46 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-22 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 0-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was DALLAS 77.0, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-19 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was DALLAS 76.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 13-31 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-18 against the money line (-16.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-10.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 7-13 against the money line (-13.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 77.4, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 0-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 79-112 against the money line (-47.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 67-90 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 49-79 against the money line (-47.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 48-74 against the money line (-36.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 32-53 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-36 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-14 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 77-105 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 23-25 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-19 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-14 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in home games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 78.7, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 64-98 against the money line (-46.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-75 against the money line (-40.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 76.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-16 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 13-17 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 23-40 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 0-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was DALLAS 77.0, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-23 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after 5 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-12 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 6 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 7 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 14-20 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-40 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-19 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 79.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 10-17 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 93.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-3 | +12.2 | 12-4 | 7-9 | 84.5 | 42.3 | 45.3% | 41.3 | 73.8 | 38.0 | 39.2% | 45.2 | Road Games | 4-2 | +4.2 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 87.2 | 45.0 | 47.7% | 40.5 | 76.8 | 40.0 | 39.6% | 45.3 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5.1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 82.4 | 42.8 | 45.0% | 39.4 | 71.0 | 37.2 | 39.2% | 46.2 | Division Games | 10-2 | +8.6 | 8-4 | 5-7 | 85.5 | 42.7 | 45.4% | 40.5 | 74.7 | 37.8 | 39.2% | 46.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 42.3 | 31-68 | 45.3% | 10-25 | 39.8% | 13-16 | 80.0% | 41 | 7 | 24 | 17 | 10 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.3 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 8-24 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 80.0% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.2 | 45.0 | 32-68 | 47.7% | 10-26 | 39.9% | 12-16 | 72.9% | 40 | 6 | 25 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 38.0 | 27-70 | 39.2% | 6-22 | 27.1% | 13-16 | 78.6% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.1 | 29-69 | 42.7% | 7-23 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 80.4% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.8 | 40.0 | 28-70 | 39.6% | 6-21 | 27.6% | 15-18 | 82.9% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-13 | -10.2 | 6-10 | 10-6 | 79.7 | 40.2 | 43.2% | 43.8 | 87.1 | 41.4 | 45.0% | 41.6 | Home Games | 1-5 | -4.8 | 1-5 | 4-2 | 80.5 | 38.2 | 42.0% | 43.7 | 88.5 | 41.0 | 45.0% | 44.8 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 74.0 | 36.4 | 40.5% | 40.6 | 89.4 | 45.0 | 46.7% | 40.4 | Division Games | 2-6 | -2.8 | 3-5 | 7-1 | 84.0 | 42.0 | 45.1% | 45.4 | 89.6 | 40.9 | 45.5% | 38.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.7 | 40.2 | 30-70 | 43.2% | 5-19 | 29.6% | 14-17 | 83.4% | 44 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.1 | 40.1 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 8-23 | 33.0% | 15-18 | 79.3% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.5 | 38.2 | 30-71 | 42.0% | 5-18 | 27.3% | 16-18 | 86.4% | 44 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 17 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.1 | 41.4 | 32-71 | 45.0% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 10 | 22 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 40.1 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 88.5 | 41.0 | 33-73 | 45.0% | 7-23 | 29.2% | 16-20 | 77.9% | 45 | 11 | 22 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 71.3, DALLAS 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
5/23/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-83 | L | +200 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 5/25/2024 | NEW YORK | 84-67 | W | +210 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 42 | 16 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 37 | 16 | 5/26/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 92-79 | W | +155 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 38 | 10 | 5/29/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 66-80 | L | +155 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 40 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 14 | 5/31/2024 | PHOENIX | 95-71 | W | -270 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 40 | 6 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 16 | 6/2/2024 | DALLAS | 87-76 | W | -270 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 47 | 25 | 6/5/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 86-62 | W | -300 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 14 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 51 | 16 | 6/7/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 80-81 | L | -200 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 44 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 47 | 14 | 6/9/2024 | SEATTLE | 83-64 | W | -115 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 46 | 16 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 45 | 13 | 6/11/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 100-86 | W | +210 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 30 | 9 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 46 | 13 | 6/14/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 81-76 | W | -950 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 31 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 21 | 6/17/2024 | DALLAS | 90-78 | W | | 30-67 | 44.8% | 34 | 7 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 44 | 16 | 6/19/2024 | ATLANTA | 68-55 | W | -500 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 51 | 9 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 53 | 13 | 6/22/2024 | PHOENIX | 73-60 | W | -220 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 51 | 15 | 23-74 | 31.1% | 46 | 13 | 6/25/2024 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2024 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/18/2024 | CHICAGO | 74-83 | L | -175 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 25 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 50 | 17 | 5/21/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 78-83 | L | +210 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 14 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 12 | 5/25/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 107-92 | W | +155 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 47 | 18 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 19 | 5/26/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-83 | W | +145 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 54 | 6 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 46 | 8 | 5/31/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-74 | L | +300 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | 6/2/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-87 | L | +210 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 47 | 25 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 15 | 6/5/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 81-95 | L | +325 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 13 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 12 | 6/7/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-81 | L | -175 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 42 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | 6/9/2024 | PHOENIX | 90-97 | L | -105 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 21 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 46 | 20 | 6/13/2024 | SEATTLE | 84-92 | L | +200 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 36 | 19 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 33 | 11 | 6/15/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 67-85 | L | +210 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 7 | 6/17/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-90 | L | | 35-73 | 47.9% | 44 | 16 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 34 | 7 | 6/20/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 72-83 | L | +200 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 40 | 15 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 13 | 6/22/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 69-97 | L | -155 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 39 | 21 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 43 | 13 | 6/23/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 84-92 | L | -105 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 14 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 33 | 12 | 6/27/2024 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2024 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2024 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
MINNESOTA is 45-17 (+27.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 4-3 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 21-11 (+13.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 1-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/24/2023 | MINNESOTA | 90 | 166 | SU ATS | 50 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 39 | 10 | 14 | | DALLAS | 81 | -5.5 | Over | 48 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 44 | 11 | 18 | 08/22/2023 | DALLAS | 86 | -6 | Over | 36 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 50 | 17 | 20 | | MINNESOTA | 91 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 37 | 8 | 14 | 07/12/2023 | DALLAS | 107 | -2 | SU ATS | 50 | 41-79 | 51.9% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 56 | 12 | 7 | | MINNESOTA | 67 | 168 | Over | 34 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 31 | 10 | 15 | 06/17/2024 | DALLAS | 78 | 161 | ATS | 39 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 1-3 | 33.3% | 44 | 10 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 90 | -15 | SU Over | 43 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 23-24 | 95.8% | 34 | 8 | 7 | 06/02/2024 | DALLAS | 76 | 162.5 | Over | 38 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 47 | 8 | 25 | | MINNESOTA | 87 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 31 | 10 | 15 | 05/30/2023 | MINNESOTA | 89 | -15 | Over | 46 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 41 | 7 | 15 | | DALLAS | 94 | 163 | SU ATS | 52 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 41 | 12 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 322-187 against the money line (+28.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 124-88 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 179-99 against the money line (+19.3 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 196-102 against the money line (+55.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 132-70 against the money line (+28.2 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 162-81 against the money line (+47.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 179-112 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 128-68 against the money line (+38.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 236-123 against the money line (+42.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 145-88 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 244-132 against the money line (+45.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 192-99 against the money line (+46.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 82-21 against the money line (+42.9 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 106-49 against the money line (+31.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 196-105 against the money line (+49.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 117-61 against the money line (+31.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 62-24 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 85-67 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 174-99 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 213-109 against the money line (+31.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 148-68 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 75-23 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 21-11 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 154-58 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 96-30 against the money line (+19.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 32-11 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 197-118 against the money line (+23.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 145-94 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 217-134 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 166-124 against the money line (+3.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 251-154 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 215-133 against the money line (+9.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 125-78 against the money line (+17.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 183-110 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 258-154 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 124-78 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 180-104 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 258-146 against the money line (+33.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 128-63 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 193-91 against the money line (+42.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 240-151 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 198-128 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 26-33 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in all games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 13-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in home games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 4-16 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Trammell is 11-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 87.4, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 16-22 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 9-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 5-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 3-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 6-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 13-19 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 15-20 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 9-18 against the money line (-16.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 9-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 7-11 against the money line (-10.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 2-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 7-13 against the money line (-13.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 19-28 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 18-24 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 14-24 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 11-23 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Trammell is 21-27 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 7-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 15-22 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 8-14 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 8-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 9-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 23-25 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 20-26 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 16-21 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 9-16 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 13-17 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 6-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 8-16 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 10-20 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 13-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 20-28 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 19-29 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 16-25 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 5-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 88.7, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 5-19 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 6*) | Trammell is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 20-29 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 19-26 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 12-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 88.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 12-22 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
Reeve is 26-20 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in road games after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 39-27 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in road games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-40 against the money line (-25.6 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 60-62 against the money line (-29.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 90-85 against the money line (-28.1 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 46-42 against the money line (-23.3 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 70-70 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 9-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 93.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 24 times, while the home underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 9/7/2024 11:32:51 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|