| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
WASHINGTON |
|
|
151.5
| 94
Final
91 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | CONNECTICUT | -600 | | 604 | WASHINGTON | +400 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent ball handling team - committing <=12 turnovers/game, on Thursday nights.
(37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(81-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(46-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(47-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +33.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(48-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(53-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(58-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(51-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(51-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(37-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +37 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(67-52 since 1997.) (56.3%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(53-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(68-30 since 1997.) (69.4%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(46-28 since 1997.) (62.2%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(34-17 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(34-17 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(34-17 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(25-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.3%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(25-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +11.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(28-14 since 1997.) (66.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +15.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(54-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.5%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(62-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(34-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home win.
(32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +17.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(55-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(71-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(92-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(82-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(168-174 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.1%, +36 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 80 | | 30-67 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 14-19 | 74.2% | 43 | 9 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 77 | | 28-66 | 42.8% | 9-25 | 33.8% | 12-15 | 79.9% | 41 | 8 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 580 times, while WASHINGTON won 406 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 70.4 | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 76.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 76.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 110-50 against the money line (+36.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 73.8 | CONNECTICUT is 36-10 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 76.5 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.1 | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 78.0 | WASHINGTON is 32-43 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 78.9 | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 84.8 | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 80.6 | WASHINGTON is 4-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 83.9 | WASHINGTON is 4-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | WASHINGTON is 7-29 against the money line (-26.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 88.0 | WASHINGTON is 13-20 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 81.5 | WASHINGTON is 109-157 against the money line (-59.9 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | WASHINGTON is 12-26 against the money line (-17.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 86.1 | WASHINGTON is 3-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 81.0 | WASHINGTON is 21-26 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 79.4 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 81.5 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 111-64 against the money line (+35.7 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 64-37 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-12 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-16 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-16 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-16 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-16 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 131-116 against the money line (+25.4 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-16 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 70-41 against the money line (+26.6 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-16 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-16 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-39 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 199-284 against the money line (-97.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 306-408 against the money line (-125.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 34-67 against the money line (-29.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-112 against the money line (-43.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 69-165 against the money line (-60.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 95-152 against the money line (-64.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 147-205 against the money line (-68.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in road games in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-2 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-9 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 392-521 against the money line (-146.2 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 224-218 against the money line (-83.6 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-25 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-30 against the money line (-21.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-11.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-9 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-22 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 72-111 against the money line (-62.4 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 93-133 against the money line (-70.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-14 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 37-62 against the money line (-55.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 46-81 against the money line (-62.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 4-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 25-33 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-76 against the money line (-39.0 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-10 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 34-37 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 31-32 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-25 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-28 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 29-38 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 12-22 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 20-28 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 58-67 against the money line (-31.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-35 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-32 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-20 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-30 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-15 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 61-88 against the money line (-41.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-25 against the money line (-27.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-23 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-5 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 4-0 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 89.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 71-61 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-3 | +9 | 7-9 | 7-9 | 79.2 | 39.3 | 44.0% | 42.7 | 71.7 | 35.9 | 42.9% | 38.7 | | Road Games | 5-2 | +3 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 78.0 | 37.7 | 43.0% | 44.4 | 73.6 | 38.7 | 42.2% | 38.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 76.4 | 36.2 | 44.4% | 39.6 | 73.8 | 35.6 | 45.0% | 38.6 | | Division Games | 8-1 | +7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 82.4 | 41.4 | 44.6% | 43.9 | 72.4 | 37.9 | 42.8% | 35.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.2 | 39.3 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 30.4% | 16-22 | 74.7% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 8-23 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.0 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-16 | 29.2% | 17-22 | 75.0% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.7 | 35.9 | 26-62 | 42.9% | 6-20 | 28.5% | 13-17 | 77.7% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.2% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.6 | 38.7 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 5-17 | 27.9% | 15-18 | 82.4% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 4-13 | -6.2 | 11-6 | 10-7 | 78.6 | 40.9 | 42.4% | 39.2 | 81.9 | 40.1 | 44.5% | 43.2 | | Home Games | 3-5 | -1.3 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 81.0 | 42.4 | 42.8% | 41.5 | 80.0 | 39.4 | 42.3% | 44.9 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.8 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 88.0 | 45.0 | 46.1% | 40.0 | 78.0 | 40.0 | 42.4% | 41.6 | | Division Games | 2-9 | -4.6 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 77.7 | 40.7 | 42.5% | 40.5 | 82.0 | 39.3 | 44.0% | 43.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.6 | 40.9 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 10-27 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 78.6% | 39 | 7 | 22 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.3 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.4% | 8-23 | 33.7% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.0 | 42.4 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 9-27 | 34.2% | 13-17 | 77.8% | 41 | 7 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.9 | 40.1 | 29-64 | 44.5% | 8-23 | 33.3% | 17-22 | 77.9% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.0 | 39.4 | 28-67 | 42.3% | 7-23 | 30.6% | 16-21 | 77.6% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 69.7, WASHINGTON 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -200 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | 70-47 | W | -360 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 52 | 9 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 59 | 20 | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | 74-72 | W | -400 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 69-50 | W | -140 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 54 | 15 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 41 | 12 | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | 76-59 | W | -1050 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-82 | L | +120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | 89-72 | W | -550 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 48 | 10 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 11 | | 6/12/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 83-75 | W | -330 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 14 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | | 6/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | 85-67 | W | -270 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 7 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 11 | | 6/18/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 79-70 | W | | 34-65 | 52.3% | 31 | 10 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 35 | 22 | | 6/21/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 74-85 | L | +175 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 47 | 12 | | 6/23/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 61-72 | L | +100 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 46 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 43 | 14 | | 6/27/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/19/2024 | SEATTLE | 75-84 | L | +170 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 16 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 52 | 20 | | 5/21/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 68-70 | L | +120 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 18 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 24 | | 5/23/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 80-83 | L | +220 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 42 | 17 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | | 5/25/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 69-101 | L | +300 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 33 | 14 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 40 | 16 | | 5/29/2024 | ATLANTA | 67-73 | L | +120 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 38 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 51 | 17 | | 5/31/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 79-90 | L | +650 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 40 | 14 | | 6/4/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 59-76 | L | +650 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | | 6/6/2024 | CHICAGO | 71-79 | L | +135 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 24 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | INDIANA | 83-85 | L | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 15 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 15 | | 6/9/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 88-93 | L | | 33-67 | 49.3% | 26 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 21 | | 6/11/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 87-68 | W | +210 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 11 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 8 | | 6/14/2024 | CHICAGO | 83-81 | W | +135 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 18 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 42 | 14 | | 6/19/2024 | @ INDIANA | 81-88 | L | +175 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 11 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 42 | 10 | | 6/22/2024 | DALLAS | 97-69 | W | +135 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 43 | 13 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 39 | 21 | | 6/23/2024 | DALLAS | 92-84 | W | -115 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 33 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 14 | | 6/27/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 63-39 (+16.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 8-1 (+7.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 23-25 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-1 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/22/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 68 | -4 | SU | 36 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 33 | 4 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 64 | 159 | Under | 31 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 47 | 9 | 20 | 07/09/2023 | WASHINGTON | 84 | 161.5 | Over | 41 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 37 | 5 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 13-25 | 52.0% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 35 | 4 | 11 | 06/04/2024 | WASHINGTON | 59 | 152 | Under | 33 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 6-29 | 20.7% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 42 | 13 | 16 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -13 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 16-27 | 59.3% | 45 | 6 | 12 | 05/23/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 42 | 6 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 81 | -5 | Over | 42 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 8-28 | 28.6% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 38 | 12 | 14 | 05/21/2023 | WASHINGTON | 74 | -1 | Under | 38 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 43 | 4 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 159 | SU ATS | 34 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 25-36 | 69.4% | 58 | 8 | 8 | 05/17/2024 | WASHINGTON | 77 | 158 | ATS | 36 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 36 | 4 | 20 | | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -8 | SU Over | 36 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 2-20 | 10.0% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 37 | 8 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
White is 21-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 21-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 21-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in road games in June games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 15-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 13-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 26-13 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 15-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 21-13 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 15-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 23-10 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 19-13 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-9 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 21-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 21-9 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 11-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 11-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 32-20 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 14-4 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 16-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 24-6 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 15-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 21-10 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 26-13 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 26-15 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 36-24 against the money line (+20.1 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 32-21 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 30-20 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 36-22 against the money line (+20.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 33-17 against the money line (+20.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 29-15 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 32-22 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 16-7 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-25 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 8-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-9 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-13 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 8-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 1-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
White is 4-8 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 7*) | White is 4-7 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 15-14 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 13-9 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 17-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 7/2/2024 1:41:13 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|