| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON CHICAGO |
|
| 172.5 | 97 Final 63 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
617 | WASHINGTON | -250 | 618 | CHICAGO | +200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (303-129 since 1997.) (70.1%, +79.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (303-129 since 1997.) (70.1%, +79.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (102-61 since 1997.) (62.6%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (73-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (125-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +51.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (36-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season. (33-27 since 1997.) (55%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (56-23 since 1997.) (70.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (99-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a blowout loss by 15 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (39-8 since 1997.) (83%, +21.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (64-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (82-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +8.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - cold team - having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season. (28-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games. (34-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (264-93 since 1997.) (73.9%, +80.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (53-33 since 1997.) (61.6%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, on Sunday games. (40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (44-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (36-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 85 | | 30-71 | 41.8% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 17-21 | 84.4% | 45 | 13 | 10 | CHICAGO | 80 | | 31-71 | 43.7% | 4-13 | 34.0% | 14-18 | 77.9% | 46 | 13 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 612 times, while CHICAGO won 364 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 17-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 87.5, OPPONENT 81.0 | WASHINGTON is 14-4 against the money line (+16.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 90.9, OPPONENT 80.4 | CHICAGO is 106-148 against the money line (-66.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.1 | CHICAGO is 3-13 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 86.4 | CHICAGO is 49-75 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 27-49 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 80.2 | CHICAGO is 13-26 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 90.1 | CHICAGO is 9-22 against the money line (-17.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 92.8 | CHICAGO is 66-97 against the money line (-52.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.5 | CHICAGO is 2-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 87.9 |
|
WASHINGTON is 106-171 against the money line (-57.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 78.3 | WASHINGTON is 77-119 against the money line (-53.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 72-111 against the money line (-44.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.6 | WASHINGTON is 26-88 against the money line (-59.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 8-24 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 87.7 | WASHINGTON is 18-30 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 80.5 | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 81.8 | WASHINGTON is 11-22 against the money line (-13.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 86.1 | CHICAGO is 68-57 against the money line (+17.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 79.8 | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 124-59 against the money line (+77.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 81.7 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 79-129 against the money line (-64.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 62-96 against the money line (-58.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 75-124 against the money line (-68.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 78-125 against the money line (-56.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-56 against the money line (-42.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 134-174 against the money line (-56.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 38-37 against the money line (-29.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 108-156 against the money line (-51.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 64-114 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 50-72 against the money line (-33.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 16-19 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 201-307 against the money line (-107.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 128-179 against the money line (-56.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 13-8 against the money line (+10.1 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-7 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-21 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 111-139 against the money line (-50.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-19 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 93-141 against the money line (-62.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 71-109 against the money line (-49.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 100-137 against the money line (-51.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 38-45 against the money line (-26.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 61-82 against the money line (-37.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-55 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 86-109 against the money line (-39.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 63-81 against the money line (-35.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 46-61 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-39 against the money line (-29.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 29-34 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-61 against the money line (-34.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-23 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-21 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 9 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 91.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 10-30 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after a game with 8 or less assists since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 266-397 against the money line (-122.3 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 139-103 against the money line (-51.4 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 184-260 against the money line (-71.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-45 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in road games on Sunday games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 123-189 against the money line (-66.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 127-205 against the money line (-82.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-65 against the money line (-32.4 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-53 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-26 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a game where they were called for 10+ more fouls than opponent since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-19 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 100-143 against the money line (-48.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 53-109 against the money line (-54.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 58-115 against the money line (-61.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 77-133 against the money line (-49.9 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 31-57 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 32-63 against the money line (-29.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 115-199 against the money line (-74.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 68-129 against the money line (-50.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 27-63 against the money line (-35.5 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-21 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-15 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 81-125 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 145-253 against the money line (-94.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 108-169 against the money line (-55.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 123-195 against the money line (-79.0 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 128-215 against the money line (-74.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-113 against the money line (-52.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 141-238 against the money line (-71.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 81-141 against the money line (-47.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-5 | -1.6 | 4-7 | 6-6 | 83.0 | 43.5 | 41.8% | 43.9 | 82.1 | 42.4 | 42.6% | 41.7 | Road Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 83.8 | 43.6 | 42.5% | 39.2 | 85.8 | 47.2 | 43.3% | 43.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.6 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 84.2 | 44.4 | 44.0% | 41.2 | 87.4 | 44.8 | 44.3% | 42.8 | Division Games | 5-0 | +5 | 3-1 | 1-4 | 82.8 | 42.6 | 39.9% | 51.4 | 72.8 | 35.6 | 38.3% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.0 | 43.5 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 7-21 | 33.5% | 19-22 | 87.3% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 32.3% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.8 | 43.6 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 8-23 | 35.1% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 39 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.1 | 42.4 | 30-70 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 36.6% | 16-19 | 82.0% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 17-21 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.8 | 47.2 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 20-24 | 86.4% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-9 | -3.9 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 77.4 | 38.1 | 43.2% | 45.5 | 84.4 | 42.8 | 41.9% | 46.5 | Home Games | 0-5 | -5.4 | 0-5 | 4-1 | 79.8 | 42.2 | 42.6% | 42.6 | 92.0 | 44.8 | 45.4% | 46.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.5 | 4-1 | 2-2 | 78.8 | 37.6 | 47.3% | 45.2 | 83.0 | 41.2 | 41.6% | 41.8 | Division Games | 2-5 | -2.1 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 77.7 | 38.7 | 41.5% | 45.7 | 85.4 | 42.0 | 42.6% | 49.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.4 | 38.1 | 30-69 | 43.2% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 13-17 | 74.5% | 45 | 8 | 19 | 22 | 5 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.4 | 39.7 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 32.2% | 17-22 | 80.5% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.8 | 42.2 | 29-69 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 14-19 | 76.6% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 23 | 4 | 13 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.4 | 42.8 | 30-73 | 41.9% | 5-17 | 28.4% | 19-25 | 74.9% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 31.3% | 17-22 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 92.0 | 44.8 | 34-74 | 45.4% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 47 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 9 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.9, CHICAGO 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
5/19/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 89-99 | L | +180 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 29 | 14 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 32 | 11 | 5/21/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 71-81 | L | +105 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 41 | 10 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 39 | 11 | 5/24/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 82-67 | W | -220 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 48 | 7 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 51 | 10 | 5/26/2017 | CHICAGO | 88-79 | W | -360 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 9 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 15 | 5/31/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 78-76 | W | -330 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 48 | 9 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 49 | 10 | 6/4/2017 | ATLANTA | 78-72 | W | -250 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 58 | 14 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 45 | 3 | 6/6/2017 | @ DALLAS | 101-89 | W | -165 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 44 | 7 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 47 | 12 | 6/9/2017 | MINNESOTA | 73-98 | L | +280 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 38 | 15 | 40-76 | 52.6% | 38 | 8 | 6/11/2017 | INDIANA | 88-70 | W | -360 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 52 | 10 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 31 | 8 | 6/18/2017 | DALLAS | 83-87 | L | -360 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 7 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 11 | 6/23/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-93 | L | +375 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 34 | 17 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 49 | 12 | 6/25/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 83-91 | L | +100 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 39 | 12 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 47 | 15 | 5/21/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 75-71 | W | +200 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 54 | 15 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 49 | 11 | 5/24/2017 | WASHINGTON | 67-82 | L | +180 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 51 | 10 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 48 | 7 | 5/26/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-88 | L | +280 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 15 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 9 | 5/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 79-97 | L | -140 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 11 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 69 | 7 | 6/1/2017 | PHOENIX | 91-99 | L | +175 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 35 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 11 | 6/6/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 70-79 | L | +650 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 18 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 44 | 7 | 6/10/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-81 | W | +120 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 41 | 20 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 44 | 12 | 6/16/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 78-86 | L | +350 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 49 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 9 | 6/18/2017 | INDIANA | 79-91 | L | -105 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 40 | 18 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 33 | 4 | 6/23/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 82-78 | W | +135 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 48 | 10 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 6 | 6/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 27-19 (+5.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 7-4 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 16-7 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 5-1 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/26/2017 | CHICAGO | 79 | 161.5 | Over | 38 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 40 | 3 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 88 | -8 | SU ATS | 47 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 8-28 | 28.6% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 51 | 11 | 9 | 5/24/2017 | WASHINGTON | 82 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 48 | 15 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 67 | 164.5 | Under | 41 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 51 | 13 | 10 | 9/7/2016 | CHICAGO | 81 | -3.5 | Over | 39 | 32-84 | 38.1% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 18 | 9 | | WASHINGTON | 118 | 168.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 45-74 | 60.8% | 16-28 | 57.1% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 47 | 7 | 9 | 7/1/2016 | WASHINGTON | 84 | 167 | ATS | 50 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 46 | 8 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 86 | -4 | SU Over | 40 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 51 | 13 | 8 | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | 72 | 162 | Over | 36 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 32 | 7 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 98 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 60 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 45 | 11 | 11 | 6/1/2016 | CHICAGO | 86 | -4 | SU ATS | 45 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 35 | 5 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | 163 | Over | 37 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 42 | 12 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 89-64 against the money line (+19.5 Units) in June games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 186-138 against the money line (+23.7 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 54-37 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 26-23 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 53-47 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 114-96 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 70-43 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 117-101 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 48-41 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 38-30 against the money line (-20.3 Units) as a favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-25 against the money line (-12.9 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 19-28 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 29-45 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 18-34 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-24 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 6-20 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 37-39 against the money line (-17.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 29-45 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 46-52 against the money line (-29.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 74.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 33 times, while the home underdog won straight up 24 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 05/25/2017 - Emma Meesseman out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
[G] 05/28/2017 - Jamierra Faulkner out for season ( ACL ) | [C] 05/21/2017 - Alaina Coates out indefinitely ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/11/2024 6:26:43 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|