| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT DALLAS |
|
| 174 | 82 Final 96 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
615 | CONNECTICUT | -210 | 616 | DALLAS | +175 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (72-43 since 1997.) (62.6%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (73-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team. (86-61 since 1997.) (58.5%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Sunday games. (88-42 since 1997.) (67.7%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (125-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +51.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (66-48 since 1997.) (57.9%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team. (58-39 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (86-53 since 1997.) (61.9%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Sunday games. (55-23 since 1997.) (70.5%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (56-23 since 1997.) (70.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (99-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (45-25 since 1997.) (64.3%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (36-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.3%, +17.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (64-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (45-24 since 1997.) (65.2%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (28-8 since 1997.) (77.8%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games. (34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (51-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (72-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (82-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +8.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (72-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +26.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (153-110 since 1997.) (58.2%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (111-76 since 1997.) (59.4%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (57-10 since 1997.) (85.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (46-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (98-60 since 1997.) (62%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season. (90-50 since 1997.) (64.3%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (81-47 since 1997.) (63.3%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season. (81-55 since 1997.) (59.6%, +26.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season. (39-26 since 1997.) (60%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (51-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (30-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.1%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record. (21-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +11.6 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 89 | | 35-74 | 47.2% | 7-17 | 38.7% | 13-18 | 71.3% | 47 | 14 | 13 | DALLAS | 82 | | 27-66 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 30.3% | 22-26 | 83.0% | 41 | 11 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 698 times, while DALLAS won 281 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 32-35 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 80.9 | CONNECTICUT is 73-33 against the money line (+42.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+15.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | CONNECTICUT is 6-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 81.1 | CONNECTICUT is 72-40 against the money line (+27.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 74.6 | CONNECTICUT is 14-9 against the money line (+16.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 79.6 | CONNECTICUT is 114-99 against the money line (+27.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 74.1 | CONNECTICUT is 39-30 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in road games when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 60-36 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 95.7, OPPONENT 80.8 | DALLAS is 13-27 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 89.0 | DALLAS is 3-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 90.8 | DALLAS is 12-31 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 90.1 | DALLAS is 6-28 against the money line (-26.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 93.0 | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 90.2 | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 90.2 | DALLAS is 15-26 against the money line (-14.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 89.3 | DALLAS is 8-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 88.2 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 43-72 against the money line (-38.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 77.0 | CONNECTICUT is 55-67 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 27-44 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 55-145 against the money line (-121.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 86.6 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-8 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+16.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-12 against the money line (+20.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+15.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-7 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-0 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-8 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-16 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 94.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-7 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-12 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 7-15 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 12-27 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-17 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 10-23 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-16 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 13-24 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-21 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 9-25 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 91.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-0 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in June games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 95.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-9 against the money line (+15.5 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-9 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-22 against the money line (+20.1 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-9 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-0 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 95.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+12.1 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset wins as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset wins as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-16 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-12 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-9 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-16 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-14 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 98.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 44-27 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-36 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-9 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-32 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 65-66 against the money line (+25.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-7 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-24 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 98.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 5 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-4 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 18-31 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 5-19 against the money line (-20.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 94.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-20 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-19 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-17 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-19 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 4-12 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 14-23 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-19 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after 5 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-5 | +3.3 | 9-2 | 6-5 | 86.3 | 41.0 | 44.3% | 46.0 | 80.6 | 37.9 | 43.4% | 41.1 | Road Games | 4-3 | +4.4 | 7-0 | 4-3 | 86.7 | 42.0 | 44.7% | 47.3 | 82.4 | 37.1 | 44.4% | 39.9 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +8.2 | 5-0 | 5-0 | 95.4 | 44.0 | 49.4% | 43.4 | 81.2 | 35.6 | 46.2% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.3 | 41.0 | 32-73 | 44.3% | 7-17 | 42.8% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.5 | 40 | 29-67 | 42.8% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.7 | 42.0 | 33-75 | 44.7% | 8-17 | 45.8% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 47 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.6 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 18-23 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 5-17 | 31.8% | 16-21 | 78.3% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.4 | 37.1 | 29-65 | 44.4% | 7-17 | 39.5% | 18-23 | 79.7% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-8 | +3.8 | 8-7 | 9-6 | 84.3 | 40.4 | 41.7% | 41.9 | 86.2 | 44.0 | 47.1% | 41.2 | Home Games | 3-4 | +0.2 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 87.0 | 42.7 | 42.5% | 40.9 | 87.6 | 45.7 | 46.8% | 42.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 85.8 | 39.4 | 40.9% | 41.8 | 85.8 | 42.8 | 49.1% | 40.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.3 | 40.4 | 28-68 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 30.8% | 22-27 | 82.7% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.8 | 40.1 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 80.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.0 | 42.7 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 5-18 | 29.5% | 24-28 | 85.1% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 86.2 | 44.0 | 31-67 | 47.1% | 5-16 | 32.1% | 18-22 | 82.5% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 41.2 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 17-21 | 81.3% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 87.6 | 45.7 | 32-68 | 46.8% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 18-21 | 85.8% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.6, DALLAS 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
5/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | 79-81 | L | +210 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 39 | 18 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 29 | 9 | 5/23/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-80 | L | +550 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 43 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 42 | 20 | 5/26/2017 | MINNESOTA | 68-82 | L | +200 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 34 | 12 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 15 | 5/28/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 97-79 | W | +120 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 69 | 7 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 11 | 5/31/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 76-78 | L | +250 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 49 | 10 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 48 | 9 | 6/3/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-77 | W | -210 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 47 | 10 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 43 | 13 | 6/10/2017 | ATLANTA | 104-71 | W | -165 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 45 | 8 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 39 | 20 | 6/14/2017 | NEW YORK | 96-76 | W | -125 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 41 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 41 | 11 | 6/17/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 98-93 | W | +350 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 46 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 30 | 13 | 6/23/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 94-89 | W | +170 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 39 | 14 | 6/25/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/20/2017 | MINNESOTA | 87-89 | L | +350 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 33 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 45 | 18 | 5/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 94-82 | W | -115 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 14 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 41 | 18 | 5/27/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 65-107 | L | +210 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 46 | 15 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 50 | 9 | 5/30/2017 | INDIANA | 89-62 | W | -210 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 48 | 12 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 35 | 17 | 6/2/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 89-93 | L | +145 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 10 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 51 | 16 | 6/3/2017 | @ INDIANA | 85-91 | L | +155 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 40 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 41 | 6 | 6/6/2017 | WASHINGTON | 89-101 | L | +145 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 47 | 12 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 44 | 7 | 6/9/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 96-90 | W | +220 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 44 | 14 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 34 | 15 | 6/11/2017 | MINNESOTA | 74-91 | L | +375 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 31 | 11 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 47 | 13 | 6/13/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 87-97 | L | +500 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 38 | 14 | 35-61 | 57.4% | 35 | 10 | 6/16/2017 | NEW YORK | 93-102 | L | -105 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 41 | 11 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 50 | 13 | 6/18/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 87-83 | W | +280 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 7 | 6/21/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 81-78 | W | -300 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 12 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 39 | 12 | 6/23/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-69 | W | -155 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 39 | 10 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 42 | 19 | 6/25/2017 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
DALLAS is 31-28 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-1 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
DALLAS is 17-13 (-5.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-1 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/16/2016 | DALLAS | 74 | 173 | Over | 41 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-27 | 29.6% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 31 | 8 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 107 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 54 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 50 | 11 | 14 | 7/20/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 11 | 12 | | DALLAS | 78 | -7 | Under | 33 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 38 | 8 | 9 | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 174 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 41 | 12 | 15 | | DALLAS | 83 | -9 | Under | 38 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 39 | 11 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 12-9 against the money line (+15.5 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-9 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-16 against the money line (+14.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-9 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 5-0 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 95.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 5-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-16 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-13 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-10 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 12-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-12 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-9 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-16 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-14 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 13-12 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-11 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 12-9 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-8 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 8-2 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 7*) | Miller is 10-8 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 4-0 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 13-8 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 11-5 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 6-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 11-8 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-14 against the money line (+19.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 11-6 against the money line (+16.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 17-12 against the money line (+20.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 9-3 against the money line (+15.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 10-7 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 8-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 5-0 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 11-8 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-16 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-16 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-7 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 16-12 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 25-29 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-31 against the money line (-20.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 24-44 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after a division game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 12-24 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 4-19 against the money line (-20.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 6*) | Williams is 20-41 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 16-36 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 14-32 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 4-11 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-31 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-28 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 34-49 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 80.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 19-30 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 33-50 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 16-26 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-19 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 5-12 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-14 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 14-30 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 20-36 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-29 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 11-22 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 73.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 14-24 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-30 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 12-32 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 32-59 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-48 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 34-58 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 39-57 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-25 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 32-54 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-38 against the money line (-22.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 26-54 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-41 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 23-47 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Williams is 23-19 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 33-25 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 53-35 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 31-20 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 26 times, while the home underdog won straight up 13 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 06/25/2017 - Morgan Tuck is downgraded to doubtful Sunday vs. Dallas Wings ( Knee ) | [F] 06/23/2017 - Lynetta Kizer "?" Sunday vs. Dallas Wings ( Back ) | [F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 9:32:49 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|