| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
CHICAGO |
|
|
158
| 68
Final
71 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | WASHINGTON | +170 | | 608 | CHICAGO | -200 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(219-87 since 1997.) (71.6%, +63.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(188-69 since 1997.) (73.2%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(121-29 since 1997.) (80.7%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(139-52 since 1997.) (72.8%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(107-51 since 1997.) (67.7%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(91-61 since 1997.) (59.9%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(123-99 since 1997.) (55.4%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(47-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(65-43 since 1997.) (60.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(65-43 since 1997.) (60.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(65-43 since 1997.) (60.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss as a home favorite, in August or September games.
(25-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +22.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(63-41 since 1997.) (60.6%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games.
(28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(43-19 since 1997.) (69.4%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, in August or September games.
(36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 55 points or less.
(44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(22-11 since 1997.) (66.7%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Sunday games.
(36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(29-12 since 1997.) (70.7%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(45-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG).
(71-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(23-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(45-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(273-259 since 1997.) (51.3%, +86.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(245-261 since 1997.) (48.4%, +72.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(111-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(177-170 since 1997.) (51%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(186-124 since 1997.) (60%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season.
(249-238 since 1997.) (51.1%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(145-87 since 1997.) (62.5%, +57.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win.
(121-51 since 1997.) (70.3%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(36-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(70-30 since 1997.) (70%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(45-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good defensive team - shooting pct defense of <=40% on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(47-21 since 1997.) (69.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(47-22 since 1997.) (68.1%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(39-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +19.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(58-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +23.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(73-48 since 1997.) (60.3%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(57-26 since 1997.) (68.7%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(34-17 since 1997.) (66.7%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(30-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +18.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(31-14 since 1997.) (68.9%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win by 10 points or more, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(19-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win by 10 points or more, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%).
(34-10 since 1997.) (77.3%, +23 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(35-13 since 1997.) (72.9%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(81-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +19.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(35-13 since 1997.) (72.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(25-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(32-15 since 1997.) (68.1%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(63-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(24-7 since 1997.) (77.4%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win by 10 points or more, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games.
(24-5 since 1997.) (82.8%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +14.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(112-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(56-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(103-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +13.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(30-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +18 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(23-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +25.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(64-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 77 | | 29-68 | 42.7% | 7-19 | 37.2% | 12-15 | 77.8% | 41 | 9 | 11 | | CHICAGO | 81 | | 32-72 | 44.1% | 4-13 | 29.1% | 14-16 | 85.6% | 47 | 12 | 10 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 601 times, while WASHINGTON won 369 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 8-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 76.0 | WASHINGTON is 14-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 70.0 | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 70.9 | CHICAGO is 74-117 against the money line (-61.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 41-56 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.6 | CHICAGO is 26-44 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 23-52 against the money line (-36.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.0, OPPONENT 74.6 | CHICAGO is 41-65 against the money line (-29.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.5 | CHICAGO is 23-27 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.5 | CHICAGO is 44-44 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 |
|
WASHINGTON is 88-148 against the money line (-52.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 70-103 against the money line (-43.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 50-104 against the money line (-68.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 72.2 | WASHINGTON is 121-192 against the money line (-75.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 21-82 against the money line (-61.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | WASHINGTON is 3-15 against the money line (-14.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 83.5 | WASHINGTON is 62-134 against the money line (-68.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.4 | WASHINGTON is 32-95 against the money line (-72.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 74.8 | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 78.1 | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 74.1 | CHICAGO is 23-8 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 81.8 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-17 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 11-21 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 63-65 against the money line (-35.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-22 against the money line (-16.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 47-44 against the money line (-28.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 111-152 against the money line (-52.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 81-131 against the money line (-48.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-25 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 27-101 against the money line (-45.0 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 52-106 against the money line (-39.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 87-145 against the money line (-66.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 134-201 against the money line (-71.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 116-192 against the money line (-82.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 183-279 against the money line (-96.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-24 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 67-101 against the money line (-43.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-66 against the money line (-37.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 38-104 against the money line (-54.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 60-104 against the money line (-40.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 12-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 5-0 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-11 against the money line (+8.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-13 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 25-18 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-21 against the money line (-21.9 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 83-82 against the money line (-37.9 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 80-78 against the money line (-36.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 87-117 against the money line (-46.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-31 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 4-14 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 12-19 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-42 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-19 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in home games off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-26 against the money line (-17.5 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-51 against the money line (-31.1 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-16 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-29 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 49-89 against the money line (-48.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 25-30 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-21 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-18 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 42-61 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-39 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-41 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-15 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-21 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 58-79 against the money line (-34.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-64 against the money line (-34.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 57-96 against the money line (-45.5 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 72-105 against the money line (-38.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-27 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 3-12 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 239-359 against the money line (-111.4 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-119 against the money line (-44.2 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-39 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in road games on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 154-232 against the money line (-86.3 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-116 against the money line (-50.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 108-178 against the money line (-79.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 54-81 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-51 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 14-64 against the money line (-33.5 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-28 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after allowing 55 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 64.5, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 14-24 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-21 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 112-174 against the money line (-65.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-38 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-35 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-14 against the money line (+12.5 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 11-6 | +1.7 | 8-9 | 7-10 | 74.9 | 39.4 | 42.5% | 41.1 | 70.7 | 36.7 | 39.9% | 42.9 | | Road Games | 5-3 | +1.9 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 71.7 | 39.0 | 42.6% | 41.1 | 69.2 | 37.2 | 38.1% | 44.7 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5.4 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 81.6 | 42.6 | 47.0% | 41.2 | 65.6 | 34.8 | 36.8% | 43.4 | | Division Games | 7-5 | -1 | 5-7 | 4-8 | 71.4 | 37.9 | 40.4% | 42.4 | 70.0 | 36.9 | 40.0% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.9 | 39.4 | 27-64 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.6 | 38.6 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.7 | 39.0 | 26-62 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 36.1% | 13-17 | 76.1% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.7 | 36.7 | 27-68 | 39.9% | 4-14 | 29.6% | 12-15 | 81.7% | 43 | 11 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.2 | 37.2 | 27-70 | 38.1% | 3-12 | 26.9% | 13-16 | 80.2% | 45 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-8 | -0.6 | 8-11 | 13-6 | 85.4 | 42.4 | 45.7% | 43.4 | 81.4 | 39.8 | 43.3% | 42.2 | | Home Games | 7-2 | +3.2 | 4-5 | 8-1 | 90.4 | 44.2 | 47.2% | 44.6 | 81.7 | 39.4 | 44.2% | 39.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.1 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 84.0 | 42.2 | 43.6% | 44.4 | 87.0 | 37.4 | 47.7% | 39.2 | | Division Games | 8-4 | +1.1 | 5-7 | 7-5 | 85.1 | 42.7 | 45.2% | 44.2 | 77.7 | 39.6 | 42.0% | 42.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 42.4 | 32-71 | 45.7% | 4-13 | 30.6% | 17-20 | 85.7% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 38 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.4 | 44.2 | 34-71 | 47.2% | 5-13 | 35.0% | 19-21 | 87.6% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 8 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.4 | 39.8 | 31-71 | 43.3% | 6-15 | 37.3% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.7 | 39.4 | 31-70 | 44.2% | 6-15 | 37.0% | 14-18 | 74.7% | 40 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.4, CHICAGO 70.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 84-80 | W | -650 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | | 6/26/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 69-72 | L | -165 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 86-71 | W | -115 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | 50-73 | L | -165 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 39 | 15 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 37 | 7 | | 7/9/2015 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -175 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 45 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 16 | | 7/15/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 57-85 | L | +180 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 44 | 14 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 54 | 8 | | 7/17/2015 | INDIANA | 68-50 | W | -125 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 9 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 39 | 17 | | 7/19/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 89-82 | W | -270 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 12 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 47 | 15 | | 7/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 76-69 | W | +145 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | | 7/29/2015 | SEATTLE | 87-74 | W | -450 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 5 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 7 | | 7/31/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 88-53 | W | -120 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 47 | 14 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 30 | 12 | | 8/2/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -400 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | | 6/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 83-77 | W | -155 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | | 6/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 71-86 | L | -105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | | 6/30/2015 | NEW YORK | 81-89 | L | -220 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 45 | 12 | | 7/2/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-74 | W | -175 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 36 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 14 | | 7/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | 90-83 | W | +145 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | | 7/12/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 96-76 | W | -360 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 41 | 10 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 30 | 9 | | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 85-57 | W | -220 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 54 | 8 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 44 | 14 | | 7/17/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 66-84 | L | +175 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | | 7/19/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-82 | W | -750 | 40-74 | 54.1% | 43 | 12 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 9 | | 7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 97-92 | W | -500 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | | 7/28/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 87-89 | L | +155 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 77-88 | L | -210 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 21-16 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 7-4 (+1.6 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 12-6 (+1.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 4-1 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 57 | 157.5 | Under | 32 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 44 | 9 | 14 | | | CHICAGO | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 54 | 15 | 8 | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 71 | 154 | Over | 34 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 31 | 4 | 9 | | | WASHINGTON | 86 | -1 | SU ATS | 43 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 40 | 9 | 10 | 8/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 72 | -3 | SU | 31 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 2-6 | 33.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 48 | 7 | 14 | | | WASHINGTON | 69 | 146.5 | Under | 29 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 37 | 7 | 6 | 8/3/2014 | WASHINGTON | 65 | 153 | Under | 31 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 45 | 12 | 19 | | | CHICAGO | 76 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 43 | 8 | 8 | 7/9/2014 | WASHINGTON | 72 | 154.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 41 | 7 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 65 | -3.5 | Under | 37 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 50 | 13 | 15 | 6/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 68 | 148.5 | Under | 34 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 44 | 10 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 79 | -7 | SU ATS | 38 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 45 | 11 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 11-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.4, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 93-66 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 47-26 against the money line (+28.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 25-11 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 20-13 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 10-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 15 or less fouls in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.2, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 114-82 against the money line (+28.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 80-57 against the money line (+21.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 78.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 42-24 against the money line (+25.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 79.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 47-35 against the money line (+21.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 73-43 against the money line (+21.0 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 32-18 against the money line (+17.8 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 15-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after allowing 55 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 72.9, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 11-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 19-9 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.8, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 40-18 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 78.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 42-27 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 25-18 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 9-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 116-100 against the money line (+19.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 74.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 52-32 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.9, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 78-55 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 81-83 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 16-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 24-31 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 28-28 against the money line (-17.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 48-60 against the money line (-33.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 10-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 1-4 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 37-42 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 3-7 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 32-35 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 12-17 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 17-25 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 38-51 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 25-41 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 42-50 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 23-32 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-21 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 29-36 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 1-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 13-20 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 13-21 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 34-42 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 39-43 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 36-43 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 13-22 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 13-36 against the money line (-29.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 27-51 against the money line (-35.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 11-22 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 21-38 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 15-32 against the money line (-23.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 25-46 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 18-34 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 61-69 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 18-35 against the money line (-25.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 27-55 against the money line (-48.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 52-54 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 63-73 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 28-31 against the money line (-22.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 13-25 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 42-58 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 1-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 2-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 11-29 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 21-39 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Mike is 6-13 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 12-22 against the money line (-18.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 78.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 15-24 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 214 times, while the road underdog won straight up 128 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times, while the road underdog won straight up 12 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 06/15/2015 - Tamera Young out indefinitely ( Thumb ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 2:37:55 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|