| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES SAN ANTONIO |
|
| 152.5 | 80 Final 78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | LOS ANGELES | -165 | 606 | SAN ANTONIO | +145 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (120-67 since 1997.) (64.2%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (98-62 since 1997.) (61.2%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games. (47-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (42-32 since 1997.) (56.8%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (52-25 since 1997.) (67.5%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (63-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +19.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (44-21 since 1997.) (67.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (26-14 since 1997.) (65%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (307-110 since 1997.) (73.6%, +87.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (279-264 since 1997.) (51.4%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (264-109 since 1997.) (70.8%, +72.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (111-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (186-60 since 1997.) (75.6%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (173-53 since 1997.) (76.5%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (152-57 since 1997.) (72.7%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (131-36 since 1997.) (78.4%, +54.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (186-72 since 1997.) (72.1%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season. (120-39 since 1997.) (75.5%, +53.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (157-48 since 1997.) (76.6%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (177-68 since 1997.) (72.2%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (127-43 since 1997.) (74.7%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (139-47 since 1997.) (74.7%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win. (104-26 since 1997.) (80%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (150-57 since 1997.) (72.5%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win. (121-51 since 1997.) (70.3%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (132-64 since 1997.) (67.3%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points. (85-37 since 1997.) (69.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (119-45 since 1997.) (72.6%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (112-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (91-61 since 1997.) (59.9%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (94-24 since 1997.) (79.7%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (78-18 since 1997.) (81.2%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (92-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less. (73-28 since 1997.) (72.3%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in August or September games. (56-13 since 1997.) (81.2%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (65-43 since 1997.) (60.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (65-43 since 1997.) (60.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (65-43 since 1997.) (60.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (97-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (54-11 since 1997.) (83.1%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (67-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points, with a losing record. (50-14 since 1997.) (78.1%, +32.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (57-12 since 1997.) (82.6%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (43-7 since 1997.) (86%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (52-23 since 1997.) (69.3%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home loss, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (42-9 since 1997.) (82.4%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (52-22 since 1997.) (70.3%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (140-132 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (55-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (57-34 since 1997.) (62.6%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +20.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (111-91 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points. (28-8 since 1997.) (77.8%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (25-14 since 1997.) (64.1%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (25-4 since 1997.) (86.2%, +20.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (38-20 since 1997.) (65.5%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (46-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (40-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (52-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (112-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 75 | | 30-66 | 44.9% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 10-12 | 83.4% | 41 | 8 | 13 | SAN ANTONIO | 75 | | 27-63 | 43.2% | 4-12 | 30.0% | 17-22 | 78.2% | 40 | 8 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SAN ANTONIO won the game straight up 504 times, while LOS ANGELES won 469 times. Edge against the money line=SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 36-82 against the money line (-66.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 34-67 against the money line (-37.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 19-27 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 62-88 against the money line (-50.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 23-26 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 5-18 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 82.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 6-19 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.9, OPPONENT 80.0 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-19 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.8 | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 82.2 | LOS ANGELES is 0-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 64.1, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 80.2 | LOS ANGELES is 66-69 against the money line (-41.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 3-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 77.7 | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-6.6 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | LOS ANGELES is 9-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 85.5 | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 81.2 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 31-21 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-25 against the money line (+20.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 86-92 against the money line (-38.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 28-59 against the money line (-35.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 46-80 against the money line (-31.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 73-65 against the money line (-41.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 88-131 against the money line (-52.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 153-203 against the money line (-61.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 23-16 against the money line (-23.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-27 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-21 against the money line (-32.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-23 against the money line (-18.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-23 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-23 against the money line (-29.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-29 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-15 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-22 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-10.4 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-21 against the money line (-29.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-22 against the money line (-16.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-6.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-23 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-13 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 67-52 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in road games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 191-254 against the money line (-73.5 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 114-109 against the money line (-49.8 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-84 against the money line (-45.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 58-92 against the money line (-44.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-141 against the money line (-57.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 57-83 against the money line (-35.6 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 46-80 against the money line (-49.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-19 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 63-89 against the money line (-37.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-35 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-38 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-24 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-14 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-18.9 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-23 against the money line (-17.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-18 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-11.7 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-19 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-21 against the money line (-17.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-8 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in home games off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-12 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 4-14 | -10.8 | 6-12 | 10-8 | 71.4 | 35.8 | 43.5% | 39.2 | 76.7 | 35.3 | 43.7% | 39.2 | Road Games | 1-8 | -7.6 | 4-5 | 6-3 | 71.3 | 35.4 | 43.3% | 40.2 | 78.7 | 37.0 | 43.5% | 39.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 71.8 | 34.2 | 45.4% | 37.8 | 71.8 | 36.6 | 39.6% | 40.4 | Division Games | 3-8 | -6 | 3-8 | 5-6 | 70.8 | 36.3 | 44.1% | 38.5 | 77.3 | 35.8 | 46.4% | 36.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.4 | 35.8 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 5-15 | 31.8% | 13-15 | 83.9% | 39 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.3 | 35.4 | 27-63 | 43.3% | 5-15 | 34.3% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.7 | 35.3 | 28-63 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 17-22 | 76.4% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.1 | 37.3 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.7 | 37.0 | 28-64 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 18-24 | 76.9% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-13 | -5.2 | 10-8 | 8-11 | 71.7 | 34.2 | 41.7% | 41.3 | 77.5 | 38.9 | 45.1% | 41.4 | Home Games | 6-4 | +2.8 | 5-5 | 3-7 | 72.7 | 36.2 | 43.0% | 43.7 | 74.0 | 38.3 | 42.5% | 40.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.8 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 76.4 | 37.8 | 46.4% | 40.8 | 77.2 | 41.6 | 44.1% | 39.4 | Division Games | 4-7 | -1.3 | 5-5 | 3-8 | 67.7 | 32.3 | 40.3% | 42.2 | 73.7 | 37.6 | 43.3% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.7 | 34.2 | 26-63 | 41.7% | 4-12 | 29.7% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.7 | 36.2 | 27-62 | 43.0% | 4-11 | 32.2% | 16-21 | 75.7% | 44 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.5 | 38.9 | 31-68 | 45.1% | 4-12 | 34.1% | 12-16 | 74.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 38.5 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.0 | 38.3 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 4-12 | 35.9% | 12-16 | 72.0% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.4, SAN ANTONIO 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
6/23/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-84 | L | +450 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | L | +220 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | L | +145 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-81 | W | -250 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | 98-95 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | 91-94 | L | +145 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 63-70 | L | -175 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | 67-82 | L | +175 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-68 | L | -155 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | 72-76 | L | -140 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | 7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | W | +155 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | L | -120 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | L | +300 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 88-77 | W | +175 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/25/2015 | PHOENIX | 76-71 | W | +120 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | 6/27/2015 | SEATTLE | 73-71 | W | -220 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | 6/30/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 78-85 | L | +400 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | 7/2/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 81-86 | L | +200 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 7/8/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 70-63 | W | +155 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 7/10/2015 | @ INDIANA | 76-83 | L | +250 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 13 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 10 | 7/12/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 49-66 | L | | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | 7/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 68-84 | L | +325 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 38 | 11 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 47 | 12 | 7/17/2015 | TULSA | 65-58 | W | +170 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | 7/19/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 82-93 | L | +500 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 9 | 40-74 | 54.1% | 43 | 12 | 7/21/2015 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | +105 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | 7/29/2015 | ATLANTA | 102-85 | W | -165 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | WASHINGTON | 53-88 | L | +100 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 30 | 12 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 47 | 14 | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
SAN ANTONIO is 32-44 (-3.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 5-5 (+5.1 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 21-17 (+5.3 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 4-1 (+7.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/8/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 63 | -4 | Under | 38 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 39 | 9 | 11 | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 45 | 4 | 11 | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 81 | 150.5 | ATS | 40 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 34 | 6 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 86 | -6 | SU Over | 38 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 21-23 | 91.3% | 31 | 8 | 10 | 8/10/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -2.5 | Over | 31 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 35 | 7 | 9 | | SAN ANTONIO | 82 | 155 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 49 | 10 | 8 | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | 159 | SU ATS | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 30 | 6 | 10 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -6.5 | Under | 38 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 47 | 8 | 22 | 6/14/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 74 | -2.5 | Over | 44 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 0-3 | 0.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 35 | 8 | 19 | | SAN ANTONIO | 101 | 155 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 24-24 | 100.0% | 29 | 5 | 11 | 5/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 62 | 154.5 | Under | 38 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 2-2 | 100.0% | 33 | 6 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 38 | 6 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 39-31 against the money line (+18.6 Units) on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 71.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 73-57 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 72.2, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 109-85 against the money line (+34.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 91-68 against the money line (+24.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 64-55 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 70.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 67-50 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 56-31 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.6, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 30-15 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 77.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 42-21 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 77.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 85-70 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 128-111 against the money line (+27.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 67-29 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 75.0, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 133-102 against the money line (+29.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-34 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 89-48 against the money line (+41.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 156-184 against the money line (-39.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 91-80 against the money line (-33.4 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 81-70 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-74 against the money line (-41.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 77-99 against the money line (-31.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 9-19 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 71.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 5-8 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 48-61 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-58 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 13-14 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 7-10 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in home games after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.4, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 45-40 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 81-99 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 52-69 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 17-31 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 27-35 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 18-26 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 35-28 against the money line (-22.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-43 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 79-82 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 114-122 against the money line (-36.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-67 against the money line (-27.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-101 against the money line (-47.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 47-63 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-41 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 83-101 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 125-147 against the money line (-40.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-63 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 109-107 against the money line (-29.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 19-37 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-58 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brian is 4-14 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 5-22 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in road games off an upset win as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 64.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 2-8 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 7-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 67.6, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 2-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-28 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 71.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 30-19 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 21-10 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 83 times, while the home underdog won straight up 40 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 08/01/2015 - Erin Phillips "?" Sunday vs. SA Stars ( Leg ) | |
[F] 08/01/2015 - Danielle Adams expected to miss Sunday vs. LA Sparks ( Suspension ) | [F] 08/01/2015 - Dearica Hamby "?" Sunday vs. LA Sparks ( Ankle ) | [G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/17/2024 6:08:56 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|