WNBA CHICAGO Matchup 20150802

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Sunday 8/2/2015

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

WASHINGTON
First Half Results
CHICAGO

-3

39
Final
34

WASHINGTON (11 - 6) at CHICAGO (11 - 8)

Sunday, 8/2/2015 6:05 PM

Board		First Half
607	WASHINGTON	78.5
608	CHICAGO	-2.5

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

KEY GAME INFORMATION

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 11 situations with a total rating of 19 stars.

- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(60-27 since 1997.) (69%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(39-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +17 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(38-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(34-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +18.6 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(29-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +18 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(231-159 since 1997.) (59.2%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(83-43 since 1997.) (65.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(40-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 5 situations with a total rating of 10 stars.

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(23-5 since 1997.) (82.1%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(125-78 since 1997.) (61.6%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(113-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(86-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(98-56 since 1997.) (63.6%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 69 situations with a total rating of 148 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents.
(980-764 since 1997.) (56.2%, +139.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents.
(980-764 since 1997.) (56.2%, +139.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(291-194 since 1997.) (60%, +77.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a road win by 10 points or more.
(65-32 since 1997.) (67%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(158-91 since 1997.) (63.5%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(622-456 since 1997.) (57.7%, +120.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(144-90 since 1997.) (61.5%, +45 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(125-70 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(70-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(125-70 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(125-70 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%).
(121-73 since 1997.) (62.4%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(47-17 since 1997.) (73.4%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(39-9 since 1997.) (81.2%, +29.1 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(93-44 since 1997.) (67.9%, +44.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(39-9 since 1997.) (81.2%, +29.1 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(39-9 since 1997.) (81.2%, +29.1 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(465-322 since 1997.) (59.1%, +110.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(350-228 since 1997.) (60.6%, +99.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(409-297 since 1997.) (57.9%, +82.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(100-63 since 1997.) (61.3%, +30.7 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(272-183 since 1997.) (59.8%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(144-85 since 1997.) (62.9%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread.
(243-168 since 1997.) (59.1%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(170-111 since 1997.) (60.5%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(349-243 since 1997.) (59%, +81.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(315-220 since 1997.) (58.9%, +73 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season.
(705-524 since 1997.) (57.4%, +128.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(471-348 since 1997.) (57.5%, +88.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(23-4 since 1997.) (85.2%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points against opponent off a home loss.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win by 10 points or more.
(130-77 since 1997.) (62.8%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(50-23 since 1997.) (68.5%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(55-27 since 1997.) (67.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win.
(306-197 since 1997.) (60.8%, +89.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season.
(174-102 since 1997.) (63%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(111-56 since 1997.) (66.5%, +49.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(407-286 since 1997.) (58.7%, +92.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a win by 10 points or more.
(275-195 since 1997.) (58.5%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(771-567 since 1997.) (57.6%, +147.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(192-126 since 1997.) (60.4%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(390-262 since 1997.) (59.8%, +101.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(258-163 since 1997.) (61.3%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(208-143 since 1997.) (59.3%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(146-88 since 1997.) (62.4%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(229-140 since 1997.) (62.1%, +75 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(148-88 since 1997.) (62.7%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(121-75 since 1997.) (61.7%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(194-130 since 1997.) (59.9%, +51 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(118-71 since 1997.) (62.4%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(69-36 since 1997.) (65.7%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(45-17 since 1997.) (72.6%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(814-587 since 1997.) (58.1%, +168.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(467-324 since 1997.) (59%, +110.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(303-207 since 1997.) (59.4%, +75.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(244-167 since 1997.) (59.4%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(167-106 since 1997.) (61.2%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(330-232 since 1997.) (58.7%, +74.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(261-178 since 1997.) (59.5%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(214-143 since 1997.) (59.9%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(304-213 since 1997.) (58.8%, +69.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(144-90 since 1997.) (61.5%, +45 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(125-70 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(125-70 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(125-70 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(465-322 since 1997.) (59.1%, +110.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(350-228 since 1997.) (60.6%, +99.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(131-83 since 1997.) (61.2%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
WASHINGTON	77		39		29-68	42.7%	7-19	37.2%	12-15	77.8%	41	9	11
CHICAGO	81		41		32-72	44.1%	4-13	29.1%	14-16	85.6%	47	12	10

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON covered the first half line 503 times, while CHICAGO covered the first half line 497 times.
No Edge.

In 1000 simulated games, 520 games went over first half total, while 480 games went under first half total.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.7, OPPONENT 34.8

WASHINGTON is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.5, OPPONENT 32.3

WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in road games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 35.2

CHICAGO is 26-46 against the 1rst half line (-24.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.0, OPPONENT 39.2

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 37-66 against the 1rst half line (-35.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 38.6

WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 40.2

WASHINGTON is 80-115 against the 1rst half line (-46.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 37.1

CHICAGO is 90-44 against the 1rst half line (+41.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 38.2

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the OVER against the first half total

CHICAGO is 30-13 OVER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.7

CHICAGO is 22-7 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 39.3

CHICAGO is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 42.1

CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 38.6

CHICAGO is 43-11 OVER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 41.6

CHICAGO is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 40.2

CHICAGO is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 39.4

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total

WASHINGTON is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 34.9

WASHINGTON is 98-63 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.3

WASHINGTON is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 35.2

WASHINGTON is 116-71 UNDER (+37.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 34.9

WASHINGTON is 175-130 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.8

WASHINGTON is 130-89 UNDER (+32.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 34.9

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
WASHINGTON
CHICAGO	-0.5

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 12 trends with a total rating of 12 stars.

WASHINGTON is 17-5 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 17-5 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 33.8, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 14-27 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 2 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

WASHINGTON is 36-59 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 25-45 against the 1rst half line (-24.5 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 12 trends with a total rating of 12 stars.

WASHINGTON is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 27-13 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.2, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 30-17 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 34-18 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 27-14 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 14 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.

WASHINGTON is 153-118 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 73-44 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 111-80 UNDER (+23.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 165-119 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 46-27 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 192-138 UNDER (+40.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 182-126 UNDER (+43.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 269-188 UNDER (+62.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 98-71 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 150-107 UNDER (+32.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 149-108 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 24 trends with a total rating of 16 stars.

WASHINGTON is 23-12 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) in road games vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.4, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 15-27 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 9-25 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 21-35 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 10-26 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 20-34 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 12-28 against the 1rst half line (-18.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 18-32 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 7-19 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 8 trends with a total rating of 11 stars.

WASHINGTON is 50-79 against the 1rst half line (-36.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 41-65 against the 1rst half line (-30.5 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 20-49 against the 1rst half line (-33.9 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 18-41 against the 1rst half line (-27.1 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 32-61 against the 1rst half line (-35.1 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 8-25 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 94-133 against the 1rst half line (-52.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 49 trends with a total rating of 63 stars.

WASHINGTON is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 26-13 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 41-19 OVER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 36-20 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 23-8 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 28-9 OVER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 21-6 OVER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 22-7 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 17-6 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 17-6 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 36-22 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 24-8 OVER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 39-21 OVER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 27-13 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 29-15 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 21-8 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 24-10 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 26 trends with a total rating of 23 stars.

WASHINGTON is 341-247 UNDER (+69.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 213-157 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.4, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 119-88 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 106-77 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 50-25 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 20-5 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game outrebounding opponent by 15 or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 199-144 UNDER (+40.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 127-95 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 145-91 UNDER (+44.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 117-81 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 59-37 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 16-2 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.3, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 4*)

WASHINGTON is 126-86 UNDER (+31.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 74-51 UNDER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 117-87 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 159-121 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 158-106 UNDER (+41.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 3*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

WASHINGTON - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	11-6	+1.7	8-9	7-10	74.9	39.4	42.5%	41.1	70.7	36.7	39.9%	42.9
Road Games	5-3	+1.9	4-4	1-7	71.7	39.0	42.6%	41.1	69.2	37.2	38.1%	44.7
Last 5 Games	5-0	+5.4	5-0	2-3	81.6	42.6	47.0%	41.2	65.6	34.8	36.8%	43.4
Division Games	7-5	-1	5-7	4-8	71.4	37.9	40.4%	42.4	70.0	36.9	40.0%	43.2

WASHINGTON Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	74.9	39.4	27-64	42.5%	6-18	34.6%	14-18	77.8%	41	8	19	17	7	12	5
vs opponents surrendering	76.6	38.6	28-65	42.7%	5-15	33.2%	16-20	79.6%	42	9	16	19	8	14	5
Team Stats (Road Games)	71.7	39.0	26-62	42.6%	6-18	36.1%	13-17	76.1%	41	8	18	18	6	13	5
Stats Against (All Games)	70.7	36.7	27-68	39.9%	4-14	29.6%	12-15	81.7%	43	11	15	19	7	13	4
vs opponents averaging	75.8	38.4	28-66	41.8%	5-15	32.3%	15-20	77.8%	43	10	16	20	8	14	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	69.2	37.2	27-70	38.1%	3-12	26.9%	13-16	80.2%	45	13	15	18	8	12	4

CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	11-8	-0.6	8-11	13-6	85.4	42.4	45.7%	43.4	81.4	39.8	43.3%	42.2
Home Games	7-2	+3.2	4-5	8-1	90.4	44.2	47.2%	44.6	81.7	39.4	44.2%	39.7
Last 5 Games	2-3	-2.1	1-4	4-1	84.0	42.2	43.6%	44.4	87.0	37.4	47.7%	39.2
Division Games	8-4	+1.1	5-7	7-5	85.1	42.7	45.2%	44.2	77.7	39.6	42.0%	42.3

CHICAGO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	85.4	42.4	32-71	45.7%	4-13	30.6%	17-20	85.7%	43	10	15	18	7	12	7
vs opponents surrendering	75.4	38	28-65	42.5%	5-15	32.2%	15-19	79.9%	42	9	16	19	8	14	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	90.4	44.2	34-71	47.2%	5-13	35.0%	19-21	87.6%	45	10	18	18	7	11	8
Stats Against (All Games)	81.4	39.8	31-71	43.3%	6-15	37.3%	15-19	76.7%	42	9	18	19	7	12	5
vs opponents averaging	75.4	37.8	28-66	42.0%	5-15	33.3%	15-19	77.5%	42	9	16	19	8	14	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	81.7	39.4	31-70	44.2%	6-15	37.0%	14-18	74.7%	40	9	20	19	7	12	5

Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.4, CHICAGO 70.3

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

WASHINGTON - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/23/2015	LOS ANGELES	84-80	39-37	-6.5	L	68	O	27-58	46.6%	32	9	34-68	50.0%	43	17
6/26/2015	@ ATLANTA	69-72	36-31	-2	W	72	U	26-57	45.6%	34	17	30-70	42.9%	45	17
6/28/2015	CHICAGO	86-71	43-34	-0.5	W	75.5	O	35-70	50.0%	40	10	31-65	47.7%	31	9
7/2/2015	@ INDIANA	50-73	34-38	-2	L	76.5	U	17-58	29.3%	39	15	29-58	50.0%	37	7
7/9/2015	NEW YORK	76-79	46-50	-2	L	71	O	27-74	36.5%	45	12	28-68	41.2%	49	16
7/15/2015	@ CHICAGO	57-85	32-51	3	L	78	O	23-70	32.9%	44	14	38-83	45.8%	54	8
7/17/2015	INDIANA	68-50	34-29	-1	W	74	U	27-70	38.6%	48	9	18-57	31.6%	39	17
7/19/2015	CONNECTICUT	89-82	39-41	-3.5	L	70.5	O	28-58	48.3%	38	12	32-74	43.2%	47	15
7/21/2015	@ TULSA	76-69	38-40	2	T	74	O	25-56	44.6%	31	8	23-73	31.5%	60	14
7/29/2015	SEATTLE	87-74	53-37	-5	W	71	O	33-70	47.1%	42	5	30-73	41.1%	41	7
7/31/2015	@ SAN ANTONIO	88-53	49-27	-1	W	73.5	O	36-63	57.1%	47	14	22-63	34.9%	30	12
8/2/2015	@ CHICAGO
8/5/2015	SAN ANTONIO
8/7/2015	@ CONNECTICUT
8/9/2015	CONNECTICUT
8/11/2015	INDIANA
8/16/2015	MINNESOTA

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/24/2015	ATLANTA	100-96	40-34	-5	W	79	U	30-72	41.7%	49	15	38-88	43.2%	50	13
6/26/2015	@ INDIANA	83-77	43-52	-1.5	L	81.5	O	32-77	41.6%	43	9	25-57	43.9%	43	18
6/28/2015	@ WASHINGTON	71-86	34-43	0.5	L	75.5	O	31-65	47.7%	31	9	35-70	50.0%	40	10
6/30/2015	NEW YORK	81-89	36-48	-3	L	74.5	O	28-71	39.4%	39	8	30-66	45.5%	45	12
7/2/2015	@ CONNECTICUT	77-74	38-42	-2	L	75.5	O	29-62	46.8%	36	15	30-74	40.5%	43	14
7/10/2015	MINNESOTA	90-83	38-40	2	T	76.5	O	32-63	50.8%	40	10	34-78	43.6%	41	9
7/12/2015	CONNECTICUT	96-76	49-41	-4.5	W	77.5	O	38-67	56.7%	41	10	28-62	45.2%	30	9
7/15/2015	WASHINGTON	85-57	51-32	-3	W	78	O	38-83	45.8%	54	8	23-70	32.9%	44	14
7/17/2015	@ MINNESOTA	66-84	34-34	2.5	W	76.5	U	26-73	35.6%	47	12	33-74	44.6%	46	10
7/19/2015	SAN ANTONIO	93-82	50-35	-6.5	W	76.5	O	40-74	54.1%	43	12	32-67	47.8%	32	9
7/21/2015	ATLANTA	97-92	44-48	-5.5	L	80.5	O	32-65	49.2%	42	15	37-71	52.1%	33	14
7/28/2015	@ PHOENIX	87-89	44-31	2	W	79	U	33-86	38.4%	53	12	32-70	45.7%	43	13
7/31/2015	LOS ANGELES	77-88	39-39	-2.5	L	80.5	U	28-67	41.8%	37	9	32-66	48.5%	42	6
8/2/2015	WASHINGTON
8/4/2015	INDIANA
8/7/2015	NEW YORK
8/9/2015	PHOENIX
8/11/2015	@ NEW YORK
8/14/2015	@ SEATTLE
8/16/2015	@ LOS ANGELES

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

WASHINGTON is 21-16 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997

19 of 37 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

CHICAGO is 6-5 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

8 of 11 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CHICAGO since 1997

WASHINGTON is 12-6 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997

9 of 18 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons.

CHICAGO is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons

4 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
7/15/2015	WASHINGTON	57	157.5	Under	32	23-70	32.9%	2-10	20.0%	9-13	69.2%	44	9	14
	CHICAGO	85	-5.5	SU ATS	51	38-83	45.8%	3-13	23.1%	6-8	75.0%	54	15	8
6/28/2015	CHICAGO	71	154	Over	34	31-65	47.7%	0-8	0.0%	9-10	90.0%	31	4	9
	WASHINGTON	86	-1	SU ATS	43	35-70	50.0%	10-19	52.6%	6-7	85.7%	40	9	10
8/13/2014	CHICAGO	72	-3	SU	31	28-61	45.9%	2-6	33.3%	14-18	77.8%	48	7	14
	WASHINGTON	69	146.5	Under	29	24-69	34.8%	5-19	26.3%	16-19	84.2%	37	7	6
8/3/2014	WASHINGTON	65	153	Under	31	27-70	38.6%	6-16	37.5%	5-6	83.3%	45	12	19
	CHICAGO	76	-4.5	SU ATS	43	30-72	41.7%	4-9	44.4%	12-14	85.7%	43	8	8
7/9/2014	WASHINGTON	72	154.5	SU ATS	41	23-63	36.5%	6-20	30.0%	20-23	87.0%	41	7	12
	CHICAGO	65	-3.5	Under	37	21-67	31.3%	1-11	9.1%	22-24	91.7%	50	13	15
6/13/2014	CHICAGO	68	148.5	Under	34	26-68	38.2%	4-12	33.3%	12-19	63.2%	44	10	13
	WASHINGTON	79	-7	SU ATS	38	33-70	47.1%	3-15	20.0%	10-13	76.9%	45	11	14

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 62 trends with a total rating of 55 stars.

Mike is 51-38 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 30-19 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 23-12 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 32-21 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.4, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 17-4 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 41.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 37-21 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 17-5 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 26-15 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 40-27 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 72-92 against the 1rst half line (-29.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 39-54 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 23-43 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 29-50 against the 1rst half line (-26.0 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 28-50 against the 1rst half line (-27.0 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 22-43 against the 1rst half line (-25.3 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 46-62 against the 1rst half line (-22.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 21-35 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 47-60 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 25-41 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 37-52 against the 1rst half line (-20.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 40-54 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 20-36 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 35-50 against the 1rst half line (-20.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 22-40 against the 1rst half line (-22.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 15-28 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 37-50 against the 1rst half line (-18.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 16-29 against the 1rst half line (-15.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 32-47 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 20-31 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 32-48 against the 1rst half line (-20.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 57-72 against the 1rst half line (-22.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 34-46 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 25-43 against the 1rst half line (-22.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 43-62 against the 1rst half line (-25.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 34-51 against the 1rst half line (-22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 58-77 against the 1rst half line (-26.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.

Mike is 32-51 against the 1rst half line (-24.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 4-17 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 10-24 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 36 trends with a total rating of 28 stars.

Mike is 54-34 OVER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 60-40 OVER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.3, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 39-21 OVER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 67-34 OVER (+29.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.3, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 23-10 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 41.2, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 43-24 OVER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.3, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 92-72 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 33-22 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 61-46 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 51-39 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 49-37 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 49-32 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 52-36 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 41-23 OVER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 32-19 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 27-12 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 40-26 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 31-20 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 21-7 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 52-33 OVER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 40-22 OVER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 30-14 OVER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 51-38 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 31-20 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 48-27 OVER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 52-38 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 30-16 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 45-33 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 71-58 OVER (+7.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 62-44 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 78-58 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 57-43 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 16 trends with a total rating of 15 stars.

Mike is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 41-19 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 33-19 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 4*)

Mike is 33-17 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 27-16 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 67-44 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 46-25 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 38-21 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 32-20 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = -2, Closing First Half Line = -2.5

Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 173 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 164 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 16 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 14 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 78.5, Closing First Half Total = 78.5

Since 1997, 10 games went over the first half total, while 6 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 4 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = -2.5, Closing First Half Total = 78.5

Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 8 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times.
Edge against the first half line=WASHINGTON

Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times.

Since 1997, 6 games went under the first half total, while 4 games went over the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

WASHINGTON

No significant injuries.

CHICAGO

[F] 06/15/2015 - Tamera Young out indefinitely ( Thumb )

Last Updated: 5/3/2024 3:16:38 AM EST.