|
|
HOUSTON TEXAS TECH |
|
| 68.5 | 49 Final 63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
169 | HOUSTON | +5 | Over 63 | 170 | TEXAS TECH | +7 | Under 75 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 45.0 | 24.0 | 564.0 | (8) | 1.0 | 22.5 | 12.0 | 485.0 | (5.3) | 1.5 | Road Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 45.0 | 17.0 | 577.0 | (9.5) | 2.0 | 27.0 | 24.0 | 439.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 45.0 | 24.0 | 564.0 | (8) | 1.0 | 22.5 | 12.0 | 485.0 | (5.3) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 45.0 | 24.0 | 564.0 | (8) | 1.0 | 22.5 | 12.0 | 485.0 | (5.3) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 45.0 | 24.0 | 25.5 | 22:21 | 38-277 | (7.3) | 18-32 | 56.9% | 287 | (8.8) | 70-564 | (8) | (12.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 37.6 | 19.3 | 23.4 | 27:33 | 36-213 | (5.9) | 19-32 | 59.0% | 263 | (8.3) | 68-476 | (7) | (12.7) | Offense Road Games | 45.0 | 17.0 | 23.0 | 20:03 | 36-257 | (7.1) | 18-25 | 72.0% | 320 | (12.8) | 61-577 | (9.5) | (12.8) | Defense (All Games) | 22.5 | 12.0 | 26.5 | 37:39 | 46-148 | (3.2) | 26-45 | 57.1% | 336 | (7.4) | 92-485 | (5.3) | (21.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.8 | 11.3 | 24.1 | 33:27 | 43-170 | (3.9) | 21-37 | 55.1% | 258 | (6.9) | 81-428 | (5.3) | (17.3) | Defense Road Games | 27.0 | 24.0 | 22.0 | 39:57 | 43-147 | (3.4) | 24-41 | 58.5% | 292 | (7.1) | 84-439 | (5.2) | (16.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | -1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 52.0 | 29.5 | 584.5 | (6.5) | 0.5 | 23.5 | 15.0 | 364.0 | (5.4) | 2.5 | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 77.0 | 42.0 | 683.0 | (7.9) | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 182.0 | (2.5) | 4.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | -1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 52.0 | 29.5 | 584.5 | (6.5) | 0.5 | 23.5 | 15.0 | 364.0 | (5.4) | 2.5 | Turf Games | 1-0 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 77.0 | 42.0 | 683.0 | (7.9) | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 182.0 | (2.5) | 4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 52.0 | 29.5 | 31.5 | 33:32 | 45-214 | (4.8) | 31-45 | 69.2% | 370 | (8.1) | 90-584 | (6.5) | (11.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 55.5 | 34.8 | 31 | 34:52 | 46-233 | (5) | 31-44 | 70.7% | 387 | (8.9) | 90-620 | (6.9) | (11.2) | Offense Home Games | 77.0 | 42.0 | 32.0 | 30:40 | 51-264 | (5.2) | 30-35 | 85.7% | 419 | (12) | 86-683 | (7.9) | (8.9) | Defense (All Games) | 23.5 | 15.0 | 17.5 | 26:27 | 35-156 | (4.5) | 16-32 | 50.0% | 208 | (6.5) | 67-364 | (5.4) | (15.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.8 | 16.2 | 18.5 | 26:43 | 36-145 | (4) | 16-33 | 50.4% | 244 | (7.4) | 69-389 | (5.7) | (12.7) | Defense Home Games | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 29:20 | 42-102 | (2.4) | 10-32 | 31.2% | 80 | (2.5) | 74-182 | (2.5) | (182000000) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: HOUSTON 22.5, TEXAS TECH 19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ RICE | 45-27 | W | -25 | L | 56 | O | 36-257 | 18-25-320 | 2 | 43-147 | 24-41-292 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | ARIZONA | 45-18 | W | -3.5 | W | 71 | U | 40-297 | 19-40-254 | 0 | 50-150 | 28-50-381 | 2 | 9/15/2018 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/4/2018 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | *OLE MISS | 27-47 | L | 2.5 | L | 72 | O | 39-164 | 33-56-322 | 0 | 28-210 | 22-32-336 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | LAMAR | 77-0 | W | -49 | W | 74 | O | 51-264 | 30-35-419 | 1 | 42-102 | 10-32-80 | 4 | 9/15/2018 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/11/2018 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| HOUSTON: With Outland Trophy-winning DT Ed Oliver in the fold, the Cougars will have the best defensive line in the conference. Oliver is capable of dominating a game single-handedly, and he'll likely hear his name called within the first five picks of next year's NFL draft. Houston also happens to have a ton of transfers coming in to help bolster a talented secondary. Offensively, the Cougars had their worst scoring season in 12 years last year. But Major Applewhite is an offensive-minded coach, and it's hard to imagine him not figuring it out with all their talent. Houston will have a shot to win the AAC. | | TEXAS TECH: Lubbock has frozen over: There's currently more faith in the Red Raiders' defense than there is in their offense. The D took huge strides from 2016 to 2017, and now almost everyone is back from last year. On offense, Kliff Kingsbury needs to break in a new quarterback, a new running back and new wideouts. The line is strong, though, forming a solid foundation for a unit that has consistently been among the nation's best throughout this century. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 9:58:35 PM EST. |
|
|