|
|
VIRGINIA VIRGINIA TECH |
|
|
| 74 Final 58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
517 | VIRGINIA | -220 | 518 | VIRGINIA TECH | +180 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-5 | +4.1 | 9-5 | 1-2 | 62.1 | 29.1 | 45.1% | 33.6 | 50.6 | 22.6 | 36.4% | 29.4 | Road Games | 1-4 | -0.5 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 55.2 | 23.2 | 39.4% | 32.6 | 58.8 | 24.8 | 43.9% | 28.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 57.4 | 26.0 | 45.5% | 31.2 | 48.2 | 22.0 | 39.4% | 25.8 | Conference Games | 2-2 | -1.1 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 53.2 | 24.7 | 41.1% | 31.2 | 50.5 | 23.2 | 40.9% | 27.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 62.1 | 29.1 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 6-14 | 38.9% | 11-15 | 70.8% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.3 | 31.1 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 55.2 | 23.2 | 20-51 | 39.4% | 6-16 | 35.4% | 9-13 | 72.3% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 3 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 50.6 | 22.6 | 18-49 | 36.4% | 5-17 | 28.8% | 10-15 | 67.8% | 29 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 65.9 | 30.6 | 24-56 | 42.2% | 5-16 | 32.0% | 13-20 | 67.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 58.8 | 24.8 | 20-46 | 43.9% | 7-17 | 40.5% | 12-18 | 65.9% | 29 | 5 | 12 | 15 | 4 | 10 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-6 | +4.4 | 6-7 | 2-2 | 75.5 | 33.5 | 43.9% | 38.9 | 74.1 | 35.0 | 41.2% | 38.6 | Home Games | 8-2 | +2.7 | 3-4 | 1-0 | 79.1 | 35.8 | 46.6% | 38.8 | 69.6 | 32.2 | 40.4% | 36.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.2 | 1-4 | 1-0 | 70.6 | 29.4 | 42.4% | 38.4 | 81.4 | 40.6 | 43.7% | 39.4 | Conference Games | 2-2 | +2.2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 70.5 | 29.0 | 43.6% | 38.2 | 77.5 | 36.7 | 43.0% | 37.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.5 | 33.5 | 26-59 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 31.5% | 18-24 | 71.8% | 39 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.5 | 31.1 | 24-57 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 13-19 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.1 | 35.8 | 28-59 | 46.6% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 17-24 | 74.2% | 39 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.1 | 35.0 | 27-65 | 41.2% | 7-24 | 30.1% | 14-21 | 64.9% | 39 | 12 | 14 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 32.3 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 14-21 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.6 | 32.2 | 26-64 | 40.4% | 6-24 | 24.5% | 12-20 | 61.6% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA 74.2, VIRGINIA TECH 70.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2012 | TENNESSEE | 46-38 | W | -4.5 | W | | - | 19-53 | 35.8% | 37 | 8 | 15-52 | 28.8% | 36 | 12 | 12/8/2012 | MISS VALLEY ST | 67-39 | W | | - | | - | 28-56 | 50.0% | 42 | 10 | 11-58 | 19.0% | 39 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | MORGAN ST | 75-57 | W | | - | | - | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 16 | 21-45 | 46.7% | 21 | 17 | 12/22/2012 | *OLD DOMINION | 61-63 | L | -14 | L | 118 | O | 21-53 | 39.6% | 32 | 8 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 39 | 7 | 12/30/2012 | WOFFORD | 74-39 | W | -11 | W | | - | 30-47 | 63.8% | 31 | 12 | 14-42 | 33.3% | 19 | 17 | 1/6/2013 | N CAROLINA | 61-52 | W | -3 | W | 133 | U | 22-49 | 44.9% | 32 | 11 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 35 | 12 | 1/9/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 52-55 | L | -5 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 40 | 17 | 18-44 | 40.9% | 24 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 44-59 | L | 1.5 | L | | - | 17-48 | 35.4% | 23 | 12 | 17-33 | 51.5% | 29 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 56-36 | W | -6 | W | | - | 22-45 | 48.9% | 30 | 16 | 16-43 | 37.2% | 22 | 18 | 1/24/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2013 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/8/2012 | @ W VIRGINIA | 67-68 | L | 7.5 | W | 144.5 | U | 27-65 | 41.5% | 38 | 6 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 49 | 7 | 12/10/2012 | MISS VALLEY ST | 70-49 | W | | - | | - | 23-60 | 38.3% | 51 | 15 | 18-70 | 25.7% | 45 | 14 | 12/15/2012 | GA SOUTHERN | 73-78 | L | -14.5 | L | | - | 27-68 | 39.7% | 38 | 13 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 41 | 17 | 12/22/2012 | *BRADLEY | 66-65 | W | -1 | T | | - | 23-56 | 41.1% | 43 | 24 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 36 | 20 | 12/23/2012 | *COLORADO ST | 52-88 | L | 5.5 | L | 144.5 | U | 19-53 | 35.8% | 32 | 15 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 45 | 6 | 12/29/2012 | *BYU | 71-97 | L | 11 | L | 153 | O | 24-63 | 38.1% | 39 | 15 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 48 | 17 | 1/5/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 71-94 | L | 11.5 | L | | - | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 11 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 41 | 11 | 1/9/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 75-86 | L | -3 | L | | - | 29-56 | 51.8% | 34 | 17 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 33 | 5 | 1/12/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 70-65 | W | 10 | W | | - | 24-58 | 41.4% | 43 | 12 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 32 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | WAKE FOREST | 66-65 | W | -3 | L | | - | 27-60 | 45.0% | 38 | 7 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 8 | 1/24/2013 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2013 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA: Tony Bennett turned the Cavaliers into a dangerous team last year with his painfully defensive style of play, keeping opponents to 54.2 points per game, the second fewest in the nation. The team will sorely miss last year's centerpiece Mike Scott who averaged 18.0 PPG and 8.3 RPG, but they bring back Joe Harris (11.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG), the only other Cavaliers player to average double-figures in scoring last season. Jontel Evans (7.3 PPG, 3.9 APG) will be back running the point, while the team adds a few top recruits in small forwards Justin Anderson and Evan Nolte plus 6-foot-11 center Mike Tobey, who should be an important big body for Bennett to use. | | VIRGINIA TECH: Despite three returning starters, this will be a new-look Hokies squad with Seth Greenberg out and James Johnson in as head coach after the team failed to make the Big Dance yet again, going 4-12 in ACC play. Last year's leading scorer Erick Green (15.6 PPG) is back in the fold after he scored nearly a quarter of the team's points last season (65.1 PPG). Jarell Eddie (9.1 PPG, 4.8 RPG) and Cadarian Raines (5.9 PPG, 3.9 RPG) round out the returning starters. But it will take Johnson more than one year to rebuild this program, with no top recruits joining a squad that struggled to compete last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:03:04 PM EST. |
|
|