|
|
CLEMSON FLORIDA ST |
|
|
| 57 Final 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
519 | CLEMSON | +170 | 520 | FLORIDA ST | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-7 | -0.3 | 9-4 | 2-7 | 63.9 | 29.2 | 44.2% | 33.8 | 56.1 | 26.6 | 39.2% | 33.3 | Road Games | 4-4 | +2 | 6-1 | 1-5 | 57.6 | 26.0 | 40.1% | 32.7 | 57.7 | 25.9 | 42.5% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 0-3 | 57.4 | 23.2 | 39.9% | 33.2 | 58.6 | 27.6 | 39.8% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 0-3 | 57.4 | 23.2 | 39.9% | 33.2 | 58.6 | 27.6 | 39.8% | 35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.9 | 29.2 | 23-53 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 12-18 | 65.5% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 13-18 | 69.1% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 57.6 | 26.0 | 21-53 | 40.1% | 4-14 | 30.4% | 11-16 | 67.7% | 33 | 10 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.1 | 26.6 | 20-52 | 39.2% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 10-15 | 65.5% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 44.4% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 14-20 | 68.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 57.7 | 25.9 | 21-49 | 42.5% | 5-14 | 34.8% | 11-18 | 60.1% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-7 | -7.8 | 8-7 | 6-2 | 70.8 | 32.4 | 44.9% | 33.6 | 67.2 | 32.3 | 41.2% | 34.9 | Home Games | 4-5 | -12.6 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 70.9 | 31.6 | 43.3% | 32.9 | 67.2 | 31.1 | 42.6% | 33.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 63.2 | 29.4 | 43.6% | 30.6 | 67.8 | 32.4 | 41.1% | 38.4 | Conference Games | 2-2 | +0.9 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 61.0 | 27.7 | 42.2% | 28.2 | 65.2 | 31.7 | 42.9% | 37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.8 | 32.4 | 24-54 | 44.9% | 7-19 | 37.5% | 15-22 | 70.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.4 | 29.6 | 22-56 | 40.3% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 13-19 | 67.8% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.9 | 31.6 | 23-54 | 43.3% | 7-18 | 37.7% | 17-23 | 73.8% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.2 | 32.3 | 23-57 | 41.2% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 68.3% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 32.1 | 25-55 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 68.2% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.2 | 31.1 | 23-55 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 13-19 | 72.5% | 33 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CLEMSON 72.5, FLORIDA ST 74.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/8/2012 | ARIZONA | 54-66 | L | 5.5 | L | 128 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 33 | 14 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 44 | 11 | 12/15/2012 | FLORIDA A&M | 80-57 | W | | - | | - | 30-57 | 52.6% | 49 | 17 | 21-66 | 31.8% | 32 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | @ COASTAL CAROLINA | 46-69 | L | | - | | - | 17-53 | 32.1% | 32 | 18 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 14 | 12/23/2012 | S CAROLINA ST | 77-41 | W | | - | | - | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 9 | 18-58 | 31.0% | 35 | 18 | 1/1/2013 | THE CITADEL | 92-51 | W | -22 | W | | - | 35-57 | 61.4% | 26 | 8 | 20-40 | 50.0% | 22 | 25 | 1/5/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 66-71 | L | -3 | L | | - | 21-54 | 38.9% | 37 | 13 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 33 | 14 | 1/8/2013 | @ DUKE | 40-68 | L | 15.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 15-53 | 28.3% | 31 | 13 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 42 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | VIRGINIA | 59-44 | W | -1.5 | W | | - | 17-33 | 51.5% | 29 | 15 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 23 | 12 | 1/15/2013 | WAKE FOREST | 60-44 | W | -7 | W | 127.5 | U | 22-49 | 44.9% | 36 | 11 | 15-61 | 24.6% | 42 | 11 | 1/20/2013 | @ NC STATE | 62-66 | L | 8.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 6 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 1/24/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2012 | FLORIDA | 47-72 | L | 6 | L | 137 | U | 16-46 | 34.8% | 26 | 22 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 34 | 15 | 12/9/2012 | MAINE | 91-59 | W | -18 | W | 142 | O | 32-73 | 43.8% | 42 | 7 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 43 | 19 | 12/17/2012 | LA-MONROE | 63-48 | W | -25 | L | | - | 19-47 | 40.4% | 37 | 19 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 25 | 23 | 12/22/2012 | *CHARLOTTE | 79-76 | W | 1 | W | 134 | O | 22-49 | 44.9% | 29 | 14 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 17 | 12/29/2012 | *TULSA | 81-63 | W | -11 | W | 135.5 | O | 29-63 | 46.0% | 43 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 32 | 17 | 1/2/2013 | @ AUBURN | 72-78 | L | -4 | L | 136 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 20 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 71-66 | W | 3 | W | | - | 25-53 | 47.2% | 33 | 14 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 37 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 65-62 | W | 6.5 | W | | - | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 42 | 18 | 1/12/2013 | N CAROLINA | 72-77 | L | -3 | L | 152.5 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 19 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 41 | 14 | 1/19/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 36-56 | L | 6 | L | | - | 16-43 | 37.2% | 22 | 18 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 30 | 16 | 1/24/2013 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CLEMSON: Head coach Brad Brownell kept the Tigers at .500 in the ACC last season, but may struggle to do so again without departed two leading scorers, Andre Young and Tanner Smith. This is senior center Devin Booker's (10.5 PPG, 7.0 RPG) team now, while he should be should receive solid help in the frontcourt by senior forward Milton Jennings (9.7 PPG, 5.6 RPG). | | FLORIDA ST: After a strong ACC showing last year (12-4 record), the Seminoles were bounced in the Round of 32 in the Big Dance. Although Leonard Hamilton's squad returns just one starter, it is the most important one'senior guard Michael Snaer (14.0 PPG, 3.8 RPG), who made 40% of his shots from deep. Ian Miller (10.3 PPG) joins him in the backcourt, where they will also receive help from freshman Montay Brandon, who at 6-foot-7 should be ready to contribute from day one. The question is if the return of Terrance Shannon, who played just seven games last season due to a shoulder injury, to the frontcourt can make up for the loss of bigs Bernard James and Xavier Gibson, who did all the dirty work for Hamilton last year. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 11:56:19 PM EST. |
|
|