| | | |
SMU MICHIGAN |
|
| 128.5 | 62 Final 51 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
519 | SMU | 127 | 128.5 | 520 | MICHIGAN | -3 | -2.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 7-3 | -1.9 | 2-5 | 4-2 | 71.4 | 32.8 | 48.8% | 37.4 | 62.8 | 27.7 | 38.4% | 30.1 | Road Games | 0-2 | -2.2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 62.0 | 30.0 | 42.9% | 40.0 | 73.0 | 37.5 | 40.7% | 34.5 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 69.6 | 31.4 | 49.4% | 37.2 | 56.4 | 22.8 | 36.6% | 27.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.4 | 32.8 | 25-51 | 48.8% | 5-13 | 36.6% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 37 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.9 | 30.7 | 24-55 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 13-19 | 67.7% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.0 | 30.0 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 36.7% | 8-13 | 65.4% | 40 | 12 | 13 | 22 | 2 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.8 | 27.7 | 21-55 | 38.4% | 8-25 | 33.5% | 12-19 | 63.6% | 30 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 73.1 | 34.1 | 26-56 | 46.3% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 14-20 | 70.7% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.0 | 37.5 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 11-28 | 38.6% | 14-22 | 62.2% | 34 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 6 | 8 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-4 | 0 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 68.9 | 33.8 | 43.5% | 31.4 | 63.0 | 26.7 | 45.4% | 32.0 | Home Games | 5-2 | +1 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 73.0 | 37.1 | 44.7% | 32.6 | 61.0 | 25.3 | 44.5% | 29.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | 0 | 0-4 | 3-1 | 64.8 | 32.0 | 41.2% | 29.0 | 64.8 | 26.6 | 48.2% | 32.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.9 | 33.8 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 9-22 | 38.6% | 12-16 | 75.8% | 31 | 7 | 13 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.8 | 32.5 | 23-56 | 41.3% | 7-19 | 35.9% | 15-21 | 70.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.0 | 37.1 | 25-56 | 44.7% | 10-23 | 41.7% | 13-17 | 77.1% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.0 | 26.7 | 24-52 | 45.4% | 7-19 | 38.4% | 8-12 | 71.4% | 32 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.5 | 32.5 | 25-57 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.0 | 25.3 | 23-51 | 44.5% | 8-19 | 41.8% | 8-10 | 80.9% | 29 | 6 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SMU 74.3, MICHIGAN 74 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | LAMAR | 93-54 | W | | - | | - | 33-54 | 61.1% | 38 | 10 | 16-51 | 31.4% | 35 | 16 | 11/17/2014 | @ GONZAGA | 56-72 | L | 9 | L | 141 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 40 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 42 | 10 | 11/20/2014 | @ INDIANA | 68-74 | L | -1 | L | 133.5 | O | 29-51 | 56.9% | 40 | 19 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 27 | 7 | 11/22/2014 | E WASHINGTON | 77-68 | W | -15 | L | | - | 28-57 | 49.1% | 36 | 10 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 32 | 11 | 11/25/2014 | ARKANSAS | 72-78 | L | -4 | L | 145 | O | 22-48 | 45.8% | 34 | 19 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 30 | 13 | 11/26/2014 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 72-59 | W | | - | | - | 28-54 | 51.9% | 31 | 15 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 28 | 19 | 11/30/2014 | MONMOUTH | 63-51 | W | -14.5 | L | | - | 23-51 | 45.1% | 33 | 10 | 18-45 | 40.0% | 28 | 16 | 12/5/2014 | WYOMING | 66-53 | W | -4 | W | 118.5 | O | 23-41 | 56.1% | 35 | 15 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 16 | 11 | 12/8/2014 | UC-SANTA BARBARA | 80-73 | W | -7 | T | 125.5 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 44 | 10 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 36 | 7 | 12/17/2014 | IL-CHICAGO | 67-46 | W | -19 | W | 132 | U | 22-41 | 53.7% | 43 | 20 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 27 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/29/2014 | MIDWESTERN TX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2015 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2015 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/15/2014 | HILLSDALE | 92-68 | W | | - | | - | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 6 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 28 | 14 | 11/17/2014 | BUCKNELL | 77-53 | W | -18.5 | W | 130.5 | U | 29-63 | 46.0% | 37 | 6 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 29 | 17 | 11/20/2014 | DETROIT | 71-62 | W | -17.5 | L | 146 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 37 | 11 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 25 | 11 | 11/24/2014 | *OREGON | 70-63 | W | -4 | W | | - | 21-46 | 45.7% | 29 | 8 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 14 | 11/25/2014 | *VILLANOVA | 55-60 | L | 5 | T | 132.5 | U | 23-56 | 41.1% | 31 | 11 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 35 | 13 | 11/29/2014 | NICHOLLS ST | 91-62 | W | | - | | - | 32-58 | 55.2% | 36 | 13 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 24 | 14 | 12/2/2014 | SYRACUSE | 68-65 | W | -4 | L | 126.5 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 31 | 7 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 36 | 19 | 12/6/2014 | NEW JERSEY TECH | 70-72 | L | -24 | L | 134.5 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 25 | 8 | 27-46 | 58.7% | 26 | 13 | 12/9/2014 | E MICHIGAN | 42-45 | L | -14.5 | L | 128 | U | 14-43 | 32.6% | 27 | 13 | 15-46 | 32.6% | 36 | 17 | 12/13/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 53-80 | L | 10.5 | L | 128 | O | 19-54 | 35.2% | 26 | 12 | 32-55 | 58.2% | 40 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2014 | COPPIN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | SMU: Expectations were high heading into the season as head coach Larry Brown thought he would have Emmanuel Mudiay leading the show, but Mudiay went overseas to play professionally. Despite the loss, the Mustangs are still a loaded team. PG Nic Moore (13.6 PPG, 4.9 APG, 1.5 SPG) is one of the more underrated point guards in the country. He is great on both ends of the court, and he can also knock down the long-range shot (44% threes). PF Markus Kennedy (12.4 PPG, 7.1 RPG, 1.6 APG) is the perfect big man for this team, as SMU is looking to push the pace and cause havoc on defense, but he will miss the first semester due to academic difficulties. The player to look out for is SG Keith Frazier (5.4 PPG, 40% threes). He had some struggles as a freshman, but he has the potential to be a 15-point scorer this season. If he reaches that level of scoring acumen, then the Mustangs will be a very difficult opponent in the NCAA Tournament. | | MICHIGAN: No team in the Big Ten lost as many key players as the Wolverines did. These subtractions will force SG Caris LeVert (12.9 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 2.9 APG) to pick up the slack as the go-to scorer. LeVert is an excellent shooter, knocking down 41% threes last season, and he has the ability to get his shot off at any time. While he is a big threat to hit from deep, he can also put the ball on the floor and get to the rim. LeVert will have to score the ball more this season to give the Wolverines a chance to win, and he is capable of becoming an all-conference performer. PG Derrick Walton Jr. (7.9 PPG, 3.0 RPG, 2.9 APG) had his ups and downs as a freshman, but showed that he has a chance to be a star. In a game against rival Michigan State, Walton had 19 points and six rebounds in an upset road victory. The Wolverines could have one of the best backcourts in the country, as sophomore SG Zak Irvin (6.7 PPG, 43% threes) could play a role similar to what LeVert did last season. Michigan will have to get some scoring from the interior if it is going to emerge as a Big Ten contender. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 12:46:56 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|