| | | |
VA COMMONWEALTH CINCINNATI |
|
| 131.5 | 68 Final 47 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
517 | VA COMMONWEALTH | 127.5 | -1 | 518 | CINCINNATI | -1.5 | 129 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 7-3 | +0.3 | 3-6 | 4-2 | 76.9 | 36.6 | 43.7% | 36.1 | 70.0 | 32.5 | 46.6% | 34.9 | Road Games | 3-2 | -0.5 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 69.6 | 32.8 | 39.9% | 38.0 | 68.8 | 31.2 | 45.1% | 36.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.7 | 1-4 | 2-0 | 72.2 | 30.0 | 41.3% | 33.2 | 69.4 | 32.2 | 50.0% | 35.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.9 | 36.6 | 27-62 | 43.7% | 8-24 | 34.8% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 36 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 62.4 | 28.6 | 22-54 | 40.6% | 6-20 | 32.7% | 12-19 | 67.0% | 32 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.6 | 32.8 | 24-60 | 39.9% | 7-22 | 32.1% | 14-24 | 61.0% | 38 | 14 | 11 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.0 | 32.5 | 23-50 | 46.6% | 8-19 | 39.5% | 16-22 | 71.3% | 35 | 6 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 70.4 | 33.6 | 25-54 | 45.3% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 15-21 | 70.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.8 | 31.2 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 7-18 | 39.1% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 36 | 7 | 14 | 22 | 6 | 17 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-2 | +0.8 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 62.3 | 29.0 | 42.4% | 37.0 | 53.8 | 22.9 | 37.4% | 29.6 | Home Games | 6-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 63.8 | 29.3 | 44.8% | 35.5 | 51.8 | 22.7 | 36.8% | 28.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.2 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 65.4 | 29.0 | 42.8% | 37.4 | 57.4 | 22.6 | 39.3% | 32.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 62.3 | 29.0 | 22-51 | 42.4% | 5-16 | 30.5% | 14-21 | 67.0% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 61.6 | 28.9 | 21-52 | 40.1% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 14-20 | 68.3% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 63.8 | 29.3 | 22-50 | 44.8% | 5-15 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 6 | 13 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 53.8 | 22.9 | 20-52 | 37.4% | 5-17 | 29.8% | 10-15 | 65.4% | 30 | 8 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 65.1 | 31.2 | 23-54 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 13-20 | 67.6% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 51.8 | 22.7 | 20-53 | 36.8% | 4-17 | 26.0% | 8-12 | 64.0% | 28 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: VA COMMONWEALTH 79.1, CINCINNATI 73.4 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | *TENNESSEE | 85-69 | W | -8 | W | 142.5 | O | 25-62 | 40.3% | 49 | 18 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 42 | 19 | 11/18/2014 | TOLEDO | 87-78 | W | -11.5 | L | 153.5 | O | 27-59 | 45.8% | 34 | 13 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 32 | 21 | 11/20/2014 | MD-EAST SHORE | 106-66 | W | | - | | - | 39-70 | 55.7% | 40 | 8 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 30 | 20 | 11/24/2014 | *VILLANOVA | 53-77 | L | 2 | L | 151.5 | U | 22-59 | 37.3% | 32 | 10 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | 11/25/2014 | *OREGON | 77-63 | W | -5 | W | 150.5 | U | 28-56 | 50.0% | 40 | 20 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 31 | 20 | 11/29/2014 | @ OLD DOMINION | 67-73 | L | -6 | L | | - | 23-59 | 39.0% | 35 | 10 | 20-42 | 47.6% | 32 | 12 | 12/2/2014 | @ ILLINOIS ST | 66-62 | W | -5 | L | | - | 22-65 | 33.8% | 34 | 8 | 20-40 | 50.0% | 37 | 24 | 12/6/2014 | VIRGINIA | 57-74 | L | -1.5 | L | 124 | O | 23-60 | 38.3% | 21 | 7 | 28-41 | 68.3% | 35 | 16 | 12/13/2014 | N IOWA | 93-87 | W | -6.5 | L | 132.5 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 37 | 11 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 41 | 16 | 12/16/2014 | BELMONT | 78-51 | W | -14.5 | W | | - | 30-63 | 47.6% | 39 | 7 | 17-46 | 37.0% | 30 | 17 | 12/20/2014 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2014 | E TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/29/2014 | CLEVELAND ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2015 | @ FORDHAM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2015 | DAVIDSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | ST JOSEPHS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/14/2014 | ST FRANCIS-PA | 52-37 | W | | - | | - | 21-46 | 45.7% | 33 | 17 | 12-40 | 30.0% | 27 | 21 | 11/19/2014 | MOREHEAD ST | 69-61 | W | -10 | L | | - | 19-51 | 37.3% | 35 | 10 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 35 | 11 | 11/23/2014 | E ILLINOIS | 54-49 | W | -17 | L | | - | 21-51 | 41.2% | 45 | 19 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 29 | 9 | 11/25/2014 | NC CENTRAL | 59-50 | W | | - | | - | 19-43 | 44.2% | 33 | 11 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 15 | 8 | 11/28/2014 | *MIDDLE TENN ST | 69-51 | W | -8 | W | | - | 25-44 | 56.8% | 34 | 10 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 24 | 8 | 11/29/2014 | *OLE MISS | 54-66 | L | -1.5 | L | | - | 17-56 | 30.4% | 43 | 10 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 31 | 6 | 12/2/2014 | STONY BROOK | 78-52 | W | | - | | - | 29-55 | 52.7% | 32 | 8 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 30 | 14 | 12/13/2014 | @ NEBRASKA | 55-56 | L | 5 | W | 122 | U | 20-63 | 31.7% | 43 | 18 | 16-49 | 32.7% | 42 | 22 | 12/17/2014 | SAN DIEGO ST | 71-62 | W | -2 | W | 106 | O | 25-53 | 47.2% | 35 | 15 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 33 | 18 | 12/20/2014 | VA COMMONWEALTH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/23/2014 | WAGNER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | VA COMMONWEALTH: Shaka Smart has built a strong program at VCU, and this may be the most talented team he has had thus far. Swingman Treveon Graham (15.8 PPG, 7.0 RPG, 2.0 APG) is an explosive athlete who fits the system perfectly. He can cause havoc on the defensive end, and after the forced turnover, he is out and running. SG Melvin Johnson (10.4 PPG, 2.2 RPG, 1.2 APG) and PG Briante Weber (9.4 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 3.9 APG and 3.5 SPG) are two more players who love to defend. Sophomore PF Mo Alie-Cox (3.3 PPG, 3.6 RPG in 14.4 MPG) is still raw offensively, but his tremendous leaping ability makes him a force on the offensive glass and in turning away opponents' shots. VCU has challenged itself in the non-conference season, and will be a team by March that nobody wants to face. | | CINCINNATI: The Bearcats lost a ton of players from last season's team (including Sean Kilpatrick 20.6 PPG and Justin Jackson 11.1 PPG), and there are some question marks on how good this team can be. For Cincinnati to not take a big step back, sophomore PG Troy Caupain (5.3 PPG, 2.3 RPG and 2.2 APG) will have to step up in a big way. While his numbers weren't huge, a big reason was because he logged only 19.1 MPG as a freshman on a senior-laden team. Despite his youth, Caupain is a crafty player who knows how to read the defense. This is his team now, and the Bearcats will need him to become a star quickly. PF Shaquille Thomas (6.8 PPG, 2.8 RPG) and SF Jermaine Sanders (5.7 PPG, 3.1 RPG) are two players who were great complementary pieces on last year's squad, but will be asked to provide much more scoring for the upcoming season. This is a team that could have some struggles early, but by March, could be playing some pretty good basketball. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/18/2024 10:55:01 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|