| | | |
ARIZONA ST COLORADO |
|
| 130 | 81 Final 87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
833 | ARIZONA ST | 130 | 129.5 | 834 | COLORADO | -1.5 | -2.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 15-13 | -9.5 | 11-15 | 12-13 | 69.1 | 32.1 | 44.6% | 34.6 | 65.7 | 30.9 | 44.5% | 30.7 | Road Games | 2-10 | -8 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 64.7 | 30.2 | 42.8% | 31.3 | 70.7 | 33.6 | 48.7% | 30.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 64.4 | 26.4 | 40.4% | 38.2 | 70.0 | 31.8 | 48.0% | 29.2 | Conference Games | 7-8 | -0.9 | 5-9 | 6-9 | 65.4 | 29.1 | 42.7% | 33.0 | 67.9 | 32.1 | 47.5% | 30.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.1 | 32.1 | 24-53 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 15-22 | 66.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.5 | 30 | 22-54 | 41.2% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 69.0% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.7 | 30.2 | 23-53 | 42.8% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 12-19 | 65.6% | 31 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.7 | 30.9 | 24-53 | 44.5% | 5-15 | 35.5% | 13-18 | 69.3% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.1 | 31.8 | 24-54 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 14-20 | 69.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.7 | 33.6 | 25-51 | 48.7% | 5-14 | 37.5% | 16-22 | 74.6% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-15 | -9.6 | 11-14 | 10-14 | 66.2 | 30.4 | 42.2% | 36.9 | 65.9 | 30.9 | 41.4% | 33.2 | Home Games | 10-5 | -1.4 | 8-6 | 6-8 | 70.0 | 34.1 | 44.6% | 38.1 | 62.5 | 29.7 | 39.3% | 32.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 59.4 | 23.0 | 35.5% | 39.8 | 70.6 | 32.2 | 43.3% | 35.0 | Conference Games | 5-10 | -6.2 | 6-8 | 7-8 | 64.5 | 27.6 | 40.1% | 36.7 | 69.9 | 30.7 | 43.1% | 35.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.2 | 30.4 | 23-53 | 42.2% | 5-16 | 34.8% | 16-22 | 70.5% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.9 | 30.5 | 23-55 | 42.1% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.0 | 34.1 | 24-54 | 44.6% | 6-14 | 40.3% | 16-22 | 72.1% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.9 | 30.9 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 13-18 | 70.2% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.6 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 15-21 | 68.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 62.5 | 29.7 | 22-57 | 39.3% | 7-22 | 32.2% | 11-16 | 68.8% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ARIZONA ST 77.2, COLORADO 77.4 |
| | |
|
|
1/10/2015 | @ OREGON | 56-59 | L | 5.5 | W | 137 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 32 | 15 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 26 | 15 | 1/15/2015 | UTAH | 59-76 | L | 5 | L | 126 | O | 22-56 | 39.3% | 28 | 13 | 22-41 | 53.7% | 32 | 12 | 1/17/2015 | COLORADO | 78-72 | W | -6 | T | 124.5 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 28 | 14 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 13 | 1/22/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 79-44 | W | 2 | W | 126.5 | U | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 11 | 15-45 | 33.3% | 29 | 19 | 1/24/2015 | @ STANFORD | 70-89 | L | 6.5 | L | 136.5 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 9 | 31-53 | 58.5% | 36 | 8 | 1/28/2015 | OREGON ST | 73-55 | W | -7 | W | 117 | O | 23-49 | 46.9% | 35 | 14 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 22 | 14 | 1/30/2015 | OREGON | 67-68 | L | -6.5 | L | 144 | U | 26-61 | 42.6% | 39 | 14 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 12 | 2/7/2015 | ARIZONA | 81-78 | W | 8 | W | 132.5 | O | 26-52 | 50.0% | 34 | 14 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 37 | 12 | 2/13/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 71-74 | L | -4.5 | L | 149.5 | U | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 28 | 9 | 2/15/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 78-68 | W | -2.5 | W | 142 | O | 28-57 | 49.1% | 44 | 11 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 26 | 7 | 2/18/2015 | UCLA | 68-66 | W | -3 | L | 138.5 | U | 23-50 | 46.0% | 39 | 15 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 27 | 8 | 2/22/2015 | USC | 64-59 | W | -12 | L | 143 | U | 19-58 | 32.8% | 39 | 11 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 15 | 2/26/2015 | @ UTAH | 41-83 | L | 12.5 | L | 129 | U | 14-50 | 28.0% | 28 | 14 | 31-49 | 63.3% | 32 | 9 | 3/1/2015 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/15/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 54-68 | L | 16.5 | W | 125 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 26 | 10 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 41 | 8 | 1/17/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 72-78 | L | 6 | T | 124.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 13 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 28 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | WASHINGTON | 50-52 | L | -1 | L | 129 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 90-58 | W | -8.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 11 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 1/29/2015 | @ USC | 98-94 | W | -3 | W | 133 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 20 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 41 | 17 | 1/31/2015 | @ UCLA | 59-72 | L | 6.5 | L | 133.5 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 36 | 11 | 2/7/2015 | UTAH | 51-79 | L | 6 | L | 123.5 | O | 14-47 | 29.8% | 28 | 9 | 26-45 | 57.8% | 36 | 10 | 2/12/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 61-68 | L | -7 | L | 130.5 | U | 22-60 | 36.7% | 43 | 12 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 10 | 2/15/2015 | STANFORD | 64-58 | W | 1.5 | W | 136.5 | U | 21-64 | 32.8% | 48 | 8 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 39 | 11 | 2/18/2015 | @ OREGON | 60-73 | L | 4.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 45 | 16 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 37 | 9 | 2/21/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 58-72 | L | 2.5 | L | 112 | O | 18-52 | 34.6% | 38 | 22 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 27 | 16 | 2/26/2015 | ARIZONA | 54-82 | L | 9.5 | L | 131.5 | O | 20-52 | 38.5% | 25 | 12 | 27-51 | 52.9% | 38 | 11 | 3/1/2015 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | ARIZONA ST: Like a lot of teams in the Pac-12, the Sun Devils are having to adjust to life without some top players from last season. Arizona State four of its best players, and will look to SF Shaquielle McKissic (9.0 PPG, 5.4 RPG, 2.6 APG) to become the leader of the team. He did a great job last season providing scoring and toughness as a role player, but will have to make the adjustment to being the main guy on the team. PF Jonathan Gilling (7.7 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 2.7 APG) is another role player that will be asked to become more of a leader on the team. For the Sun Devils to make a push to the upper half of the conference, they will have to get big contributions from JUCO swingman Roosevelt Scott, while freshman PG Tra Holder will likely man the point for this team. | | COLORADO: Tad Boyle has done a terrific job of taking the Buffaloes' program to another level in the Pac-12. The team lost Spence Dinwiddie to the NBA, but still brings back a lot of talent from a team that made the NCAA Tournament. C Josh Scott (14.1 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 1.1 BPG) is a highly-skilled post player who can score over both shoulders. He is not an elite athlete, but he knows how to play the game of basketball. Scott is also a solid passer from the block, kicking it out to teammates like PG Askia Booker (13.3 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 3.3 APG) and SG Xavier Johnson (12.0 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 36% threes). Booker is at his best when scoring off the bounce, while Johnson is better at finding the open spot on the perimeter. The Buffaloes are a deep and experienced team, but they will have to shoot better from behind the three-point arc (32% threes). |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/18/2024 10:00:26 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|