| | | |
WASHINGTON ST UCLA |
|
| 148 | 67 Final 72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
835 | WASHINGTON ST | 148 | 149.5 | 836 | UCLA | -15 | -14 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 12-15 | +7 | 12-14 | 14-7 | 70.7 | 32.7 | 43.2% | 33.9 | 76.3 | 36.5 | 46.5% | 35.6 | Road Games | 5-10 | +5.2 | 6-8 | 6-4 | 64.4 | 29.0 | 40.6% | 34.7 | 75.9 | 36.8 | 45.8% | 36.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 71.8 | 30.8 | 45.1% | 32.6 | 81.0 | 40.6 | 48.6% | 36.8 | Conference Games | 6-9 | +8.9 | 7-7 | 9-6 | 69.8 | 32.1 | 43.1% | 33.0 | 78.3 | 37.8 | 47.6% | 35.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.7 | 32.7 | 24-55 | 43.2% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 16-23 | 71.0% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.4 | 30.2 | 23-54 | 41.7% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.4 | 29.0 | 22-54 | 40.6% | 6-19 | 31.2% | 15-22 | 67.6% | 35 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 3 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.3 | 36.5 | 28-60 | 46.5% | 7-18 | 37.4% | 14-20 | 68.6% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.9 | 36.8 | 28-61 | 45.8% | 7-18 | 37.7% | 13-19 | 69.8% | 36 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-12 | +2 | 15-14 | 10-18 | 71.0 | 32.5 | 43.3% | 38.9 | 67.7 | 31.8 | 41.3% | 34.2 | Home Games | 14-1 | +8.8 | 11-4 | 8-6 | 81.0 | 38.1 | 48.5% | 40.2 | 66.2 | 30.5 | 40.4% | 31.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 69.6 | 36.2 | 49.2% | 34.2 | 62.6 | 30.8 | 39.0% | 29.2 | Conference Games | 9-7 | +4.1 | 11-5 | 4-12 | 67.2 | 30.7 | 43.4% | 36.5 | 65.2 | 30.8 | 41.9% | 32.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.0 | 32.5 | 25-58 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 39 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 30.1 | 22-55 | 40.9% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.0 | 38.1 | 28-58 | 48.5% | 7-17 | 42.0% | 17-25 | 68.7% | 40 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.7 | 31.8 | 23-57 | 41.3% | 8-22 | 34.9% | 13-19 | 70.2% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 32.5 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 14-21 | 69.6% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.2 | 30.5 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 8-24 | 35.5% | 11-17 | 68.7% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON ST 75, UCLA 77.3 |
| | |
|
|
1/10/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-77 | W | 11.5 | W | 137 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 31 | 9 | 1/15/2015 | OREGON | 108-99 | W | 3 | W | 147 | O | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 12 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 36 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | OREGON ST | 47-62 | L | -2.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 14-48 | 29.2% | 22 | 10 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 37 | 10 | 1/21/2015 | @ UTAH | 64-86 | L | 18.5 | L | 136 | O | 21-46 | 45.7% | 35 | 17 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 30 | 4 | 1/24/2015 | @ COLORADO | 58-90 | L | 8.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 11 | 1/29/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 67-76 | L | -2.5 | L | 140 | O | 19-57 | 33.3% | 32 | 7 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 40 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | STANFORD | 89-88 | W | 9 | W | 153 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 32 | 3 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 32 | 4 | 2/5/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 50-55 | L | 7.5 | W | 125 | U | 19-51 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 34 | 5 | 2/8/2015 | @ OREGON | 72-95 | L | 10.5 | L | 156.5 | O | 25-67 | 37.3% | 37 | 12 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 39 | 6 | 2/13/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 74-71 | W | 4.5 | W | 149.5 | U | 28-54 | 51.9% | 28 | 9 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 2/15/2015 | ARIZONA | 59-86 | L | 16 | L | 147 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 23 | 14 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 44 | 11 | 2/22/2015 | WASHINGTON | 84-87 | L | -2.5 | L | 153 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 31 | 12 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 27 | 3 | 2/25/2015 | @ USC | 70-66 | W | 3 | W | 151 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 44 | 16 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 33 | 8 | 3/1/2015 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/11/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 73-54 | W | -6.5 | W | 135 | U | 29-65 | 44.6% | 40 | 6 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 34 | 16 | 1/14/2015 | @ USC | 83-66 | W | -5 | W | 143.5 | O | 35-62 | 56.5% | 41 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 55-66 | L | -1.5 | L | 124 | U | 19-62 | 30.6% | 35 | 12 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 32 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | @ OREGON | 64-82 | L | 2.5 | L | 147 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 7 | 33-53 | 62.3% | 31 | 10 | 1/29/2015 | UTAH | 69-59 | W | 5.5 | W | 132 | U | 24-52 | 46.2% | 29 | 6 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 27 | 14 | 1/31/2015 | COLORADO | 72-59 | W | -6.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 36 | 11 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 15 | 2/5/2015 | @ STANFORD | 69-67 | W | 7 | W | 144 | U | 24-64 | 37.5% | 40 | 9 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 41 | 11 | 2/7/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 62-64 | L | -4 | L | 137.5 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 44 | 12 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 5 | 2/11/2015 | OREGON ST | 75-59 | W | -9 | W | 119 | O | 22-46 | 47.8% | 41 | 14 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 23 | 7 | 2/14/2015 | OREGON | 72-63 | W | -6.5 | W | 145 | U | 24-48 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 24 | 6 | 2/18/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 66-68 | L | 3 | W | 138.5 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 27 | 8 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 39 | 15 | 2/21/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 47-57 | L | 14 | W | 141 | U | 16-42 | 38.1% | 23 | 12 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 40 | 10 | 2/25/2015 | WASHINGTON | 88-66 | W | -11 | W | 141 | O | 37-59 | 62.7% | 42 | 16 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 20 | 10 | 3/1/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2015 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | WASHINGTON ST: The Cougars have a new coach in Ernie Kent, as the program is looking for anything to get things going back on the right track. If there is one positive, Washington State has one of the best players in the conference in SG DaVonte Lacy (19.4 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 39% threes). He is a complete scorer who can get to the rim, but can also catch fire from the outside as well. He was really the only scoring threat last season, and was able to put up those big numbers with defenses focusing on him. The other key WSU player is swingman Que Johnson (9.5 PPG, 2.4 RPG, 35% threes) who quietly had a solid season in the Pac-12 as a freshman. The weak spot on the team will be at the point, where Kent brought in three freshmen (Jackie Davis, Trevor Dunbar and Ny Redding) to compete with sophomore PG Ike Iroegbu (5.5 PPG, 1.5 APG in 18.1 MPG). Washington State also has to find some scoring from the frontcourt if it is going to be able to compete with the top teams in the conference. Forwards Dexter Kernich-Drew (6.3 PPG, 36% threes) and Junior Longrus (3.3 PPG, 3.5 RPG) need to make huge strides for the Cougars this season. | | UCLA: If you are talking about pure talent, the Bruins deserve to be higher on the list. However, this is as young of a team as there is in the conference, who will look to replace five key players that helped UCLA reach the Sweet 16 last season. The top incoming freshman is 6-foot-9 PF Kevin Looney, who is relentless on the glass. He should work well with C Tony Parker (6.9 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 0.6 BPG), who has to become a more imposing presence down low. He is skilled and agile for his size, but he has to be more aggressive in his junior campaign. SG Norman Powell (11.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 53% FG) leads a thin backcourt. Powell came off the bench last season, but will likely be the team's leading scorer, especially early as the freshmen class adjusts to college basketball. He must become a better shooter (29% from threes), as opposing defense are going to pack it in a bit and make the Bruins beat them from deep, but Powell played very well in the 2014 postseason with 14.0 PPG. He will be joined by PG Bryce Alford (8.0 PPG, 2.8 APG, 39% threes) who is the son of head coach Steve Alford, and has similarities to his father in his intelligence and long-range shooting. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/19/2024 12:15:05 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|