| | | |
OREGON STANFORD |
|
| 147 | 73 Final 70 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
831 | OREGON | 145.5 | 146 | 832 | STANFORD | -6 | -6 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 21-8 | +9 | 14-14 | 13-14 | 76.5 | 38.0 | 46.3% | 37.4 | 70.5 | 33.0 | 41.5% | 34.9 | Road Games | 4-6 | +0.6 | 4-6 | 5-4 | 72.6 | 35.8 | 45.0% | 33.3 | 78.3 | 37.2 | 48.3% | 35.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.8 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 73.0 | 37.0 | 46.8% | 33.8 | 66.8 | 30.8 | 42.6% | 34.2 | Conference Games | 11-5 | +8.3 | 8-8 | 8-8 | 74.2 | 38.2 | 47.0% | 32.9 | 72.2 | 33.1 | 44.9% | 34.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.5 | 38.0 | 28-61 | 46.3% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 13-17 | 75.4% | 37 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.9 | 31.6 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 13-20 | 69.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.6 | 35.8 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 7-19 | 35.9% | 11-15 | 75.3% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.5 | 33.0 | 25-60 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 32.1 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.3 | 37.2 | 28-57 | 48.3% | 7-18 | 40.3% | 16-22 | 70.2% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 16 | 4 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 18-9 | -3.7 | 13-13 | 14-13 | 73.6 | 34.3 | 43.9% | 37.6 | 66.0 | 31.1 | 41.8% | 32.6 | Home Games | 13-2 | +2 | 8-6 | 6-9 | 73.2 | 33.9 | 44.2% | 39.0 | 59.5 | 28.5 | 39.9% | 29.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 66.8 | 29.2 | 38.9% | 42.0 | 62.0 | 30.8 | 39.4% | 33.4 | Conference Games | 9-6 | -4.9 | 6-8 | 7-8 | 74.1 | 33.8 | 43.6% | 37.3 | 69.2 | 32.6 | 42.3% | 34.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.6 | 34.3 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-18 | 39.7% | 16-22 | 71.9% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.7 | 31 | 23-55 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.2 | 33.9 | 24-55 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 37.1% | 19-26 | 71.8% | 39 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.0 | 31.1 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 35.6% | 14-21 | 67.1% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 4 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.5 | 28.5 | 21-54 | 39.9% | 6-18 | 36.0% | 10-17 | 62.9% | 29 | 7 | 11 | 22 | 4 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OREGON 76.1, STANFORD 77.1 |
| | |
|
|
1/10/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 59-56 | W | -5.5 | L | 137 | U | 23-46 | 50.0% | 26 | 15 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 32 | 15 | 1/15/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 99-108 | L | -3 | L | 147 | O | 38-77 | 49.4% | 36 | 9 | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 12 | 1/18/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 77-85 | L | 5.5 | L | 142.5 | O | 30-72 | 41.7% | 34 | 6 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 11 | 1/22/2015 | USC | 75-67 | W | -10 | L | 149.5 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 45 | 15 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 37 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | UCLA | 82-64 | W | -2.5 | W | 147 | U | 33-53 | 62.3% | 31 | 10 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 7 | 1/28/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 56-90 | L | 15 | L | 146.5 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 20 | 16 | 35-59 | 59.3% | 34 | 10 | 1/30/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 68-67 | W | 6.5 | W | 144 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 12 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 39 | 14 | 2/4/2015 | WASHINGTON | 78-74 | W | -6 | L | 150.5 | O | 31-58 | 53.4% | 30 | 11 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 24 | 9 | 2/8/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 95-72 | W | -10.5 | W | 156.5 | O | 35-64 | 54.7% | 39 | 6 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 37 | 12 | 2/11/2015 | @ USC | 80-75 | W | -3.5 | W | 148 | O | 34-59 | 57.6% | 34 | 14 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 29 | 11 | 2/14/2015 | @ UCLA | 63-72 | L | 6.5 | L | 145 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 24 | 6 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 2/18/2015 | COLORADO | 73-60 | W | -4.5 | W | 137.5 | U | 24-58 | 41.4% | 37 | 9 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 45 | 16 | 2/22/2015 | UTAH | 69-58 | W | 4.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 35 | 11 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 31 | 14 | 2/25/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 80-69 | W | 2 | W | 143.5 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 39 | 8 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 28 | 5 | 3/1/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2015 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/11/2015 | @ USC | 78-76 | W | -6 | L | 132 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 30 | 14 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 32 | 14 | 1/14/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-59 | W | -2 | W | 133 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 8 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 72-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 24-59 | 40.7% | 48 | 13 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 24 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | ARIZONA | 82-89 | L | 3.5 | L | 130 | O | 25-50 | 50.0% | 29 | 14 | 30-54 | 55.6% | 25 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 89-70 | W | -6.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 31-53 | 58.5% | 36 | 8 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 9 | 1/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 84-74 | W | -2 | W | 140.5 | O | 28-53 | 52.8% | 31 | 9 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 30 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 88-89 | L | -9 | L | 153 | O | 26-59 | 44.1% | 32 | 4 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 32 | 3 | 2/5/2015 | UCLA | 67-69 | L | -7 | L | 144 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 41 | 11 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 40 | 9 | 2/8/2015 | USC | 70-62 | W | -14.5 | L | 148.5 | U | 22-60 | 36.7% | 50 | 17 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 35 | 16 | 2/12/2015 | @ UTAH | 59-75 | L | 10.5 | L | 135 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 33 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 32 | 8 | 2/15/2015 | @ COLORADO | 58-64 | L | -1.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 19-57 | 33.3% | 39 | 11 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 48 | 8 | 2/21/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 72-61 | W | -9 | W | 138 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 42 | 9 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 30 | 8 | 2/26/2015 | OREGON ST | 75-48 | W | -9 | W | 120 | O | 24-56 | 42.9% | 46 | 11 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 22 | 14 | 3/1/2015 | OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | OREGON: No team had a worse offseason than Oregon, as the Ducks found themselves in the news for the wrong reasons. They had five players graduate from last season's team, with another four being kicked off because of a campus scandal. Luckily for head coach Dana Altman, there is one guy on the team that should have Oregon fans optimistic, SG Joseph Young (18.9 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 48% FG). Young is a very efficient offensive player, as he can score from anywhere on the court. For a guy who has the ball in his hands as much as Young does, to turn the ball over only one time per game is impressive. Two guys, SF Elgin Cook (6.7 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 58% FG) and F Jalil Abdul-Bassit (1.9 PPG, 39% threes) that the Ducks were expecting to contribute much more this season, may not be able to play after being involved in a shoplifting incident. Oregon will also ask a lot out of 6-foot-10 C Michael Chandler who transferred from little-known Northwest Florida State, but he had originally committed to Louisville before deciding to be a JUCO player. | | STANFORD: The Cardinal made a surprising run to the Sweet 16 last season, defeating one of the country's most talented teams in Kansas. Leading the way for Stanford will be SG Chasson Randle (18.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 2.1 APG), a talented guard who was terrific in the NCAA Tournament last year. He is an improving shooter, making him a difficult matchup for the opposition. His attacking style is complemented perfectly on the perimeter by swingman Anthony Brown (12.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 45% threes), who shoot the basketball at a high percentage from anywhere on the court (48% FG, 79% FT). At 6-foot-6, he can get a shot off whenever he wants on the perimeter, while doing a solid job of moving without the ball. C Stefan Nastic (7.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 58% FG) did not put up huge numbers as a reserve last season, but now as the starting center, he could double both his points and rebounds. Joining him in the frontcourt is PF Reid Travis, a McDonald's All-American from Minnesota. He is a very physical player with a high motor, and should complement the skill set of Nastic nicely. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/19/2024 1:17:34 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|