| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
WASHINGTON |
|
|
163.5
| 84
Final
92 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 629 | DALLAS | -105 | | 630 | WASHINGTON | -115 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(192-65 since 1997.) (74.7%, +69.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(192-65 since 1997.) (74.7%, +69.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(148-46 since 1997.) (76.3%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(148-46 since 1997.) (76.3%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(148-46 since 1997.) (76.3%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(148-46 since 1997.) (76.3%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(148-46 since 1997.) (76.3%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(148-46 since 1997.) (76.3%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(120-35 since 1997.) (77.4%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(120-35 since 1997.) (77.4%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(120-35 since 1997.) (77.4%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(120-35 since 1997.) (77.4%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(120-35 since 1997.) (77.4%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(120-35 since 1997.) (77.4%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite.
(61-44 since 1997.) (58.1%, +40 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game, in non-conference games.
(42-23 since 1997.) (64.6%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd road game in 5 days.
(56-23 since 1997.) (70.9%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(94-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(89-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.2%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(75-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(80-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more.
(38-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.4%, +30 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more.
(36-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.8%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(53-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.5%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(58-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(51-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(51-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(169-125 since 1997.) (57.5%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, on Sunday games.
(93-69 since 1997.) (57.4%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points.
(93-105 over the last 5 seasons.) (47%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(37-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +38 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(22-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +35 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a road favorite.
(46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread.
(21-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset win by 10 points or more as a home underdog.
(33-8 since 1997.) (80.5%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a road favorite against opponent off an upset win by 10 points or more as a home underdog.
(28-4 since 1997.) (87.5%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a road favorite.
(36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(65-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset win as an underdog.
(25-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(66-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(53-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(50-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.5%, +47.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(73-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(58-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.3%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, on Sunday games.
(31-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a upset loss as a favorite against opponent off a home win by 10 points or more.
(21-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +14.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(77-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(88-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +57.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in June games.
(65-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +25.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, on Sunday games.
(85-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, on Sunday games.
(48-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.1%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(85-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(80-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, on Sunday games.
(56-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, on Sunday games.
(85-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(84-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +31.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - on Sunday games.
(98-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(168-172 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.4%, +38.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 80 | | 31-69 | 44.7% | 5-19 | 29.3% | 13-17 | 79.6% | 45 | 11 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 84 | | 31-70 | 44.0% | 9-27 | 35.2% | 13-16 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 589 times, while DALLAS won 382 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 16-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 84.6 | DALLAS is 19-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 79.7 | DALLAS is 19-12 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 90.5, OPPONENT 86.3 | WASHINGTON is 32-43 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 78.9 | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 84.8 | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 80.6 | WASHINGTON is 70-77 against the money line (-37.5 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | WASHINGTON is 4-15 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 83.5 | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | WASHINGTON is 6-29 against the money line (-27.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 88.1 | WASHINGTON is 11-26 against the money line (-18.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 86.1 | WASHINGTON is 21-26 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 79.4 |
|
DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 87.8 | DALLAS is 28-58 against the money line (-35.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was DALLAS 76.4, OPPONENT 85.8 | DALLAS is 10-18 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 85.8 | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-8.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 87.6 | DALLAS is 8-25 against the money line (-35.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 92.7 | DALLAS is 16-18 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 84.5 | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 87.4 | DALLAS is 22-28 against the money line (-21.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 87.0 | WASHINGTON is 34-22 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.5, OPPONENT 81.3 | WASHINGTON is 26-14 against the money line (+15.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.8, OPPONENT 83.1 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 27-23 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 101-108 against the money line (-50.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-39 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-68 against the money line (-35.3 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 104-99 against the money line (-42.3 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 77-120 against the money line (-46.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 153-219 against the money line (-78.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 231-302 against the money line (-96.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 198-284 against the money line (-98.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 305-408 against the money line (-126.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 148-194 against the money line (-66.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 16-13 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.8, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 39-32 against the money line (-33.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 40-66 against the money line (-29.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-17 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 55-76 against the money line (-42.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 56-82 against the money line (-44.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 20-27 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 61-90 against the money line (-50.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-28 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 53-80 against the money line (-46.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-24 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 61-88 against the money line (-48.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 29-34 against the money line (-44.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 9-9 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 63-89 against the money line (-47.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 58-73 against the money line (-40.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-25 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 31-21 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 87.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 60-90 against the money line (-49.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 53-82 against the money line (-46.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 19-25 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 10-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-6 against the money line (+13.8 Units) revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 25-36 against the money line (-26.5 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-50 against the money line (-21.9 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 42-60 against the money line (-36.1 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 97-95 against the money line (-52.8 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 223-218 against the money line (-84.6 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-117 against the money line (-44.8 Units) on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 148-209 against the money line (-69.5 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-16 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 97-157 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-40 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 148-209 against the money line (-69.5 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-22 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 71-111 against the money line (-63.4 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 92-133 against the money line (-71.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 36-62 against the money line (-56.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 45-81 against the money line (-63.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 21-36 against the money line (-27.9 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-18 against the money line (-17.4 Units) off a win by 15 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games off a blowout win by 20 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 61-95 against the money line (-46.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) off an upset win by 10 points or more as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 15-34 against the money line (-23.5 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 48-55 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 33-37 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-32 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 22-25 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-38 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 19-28 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-28 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 57-67 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-35 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-32 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-20 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 110-190 against the money line (-67.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-69 against the money line (-33.3 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 48-101 against the money line (-42.9 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-30 against the money line (-27.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 3-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 4-15 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 3-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-6.3 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was DALLAS 74.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 31-45 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 90.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 9-18 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 5-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-6.3 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 74.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was DALLAS 75.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 17-26 against the money line (-25.7 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-17 against the money line (-15.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-11 against the money line (-19.6 Units) off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-20.6 Units) off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 10*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.2, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 18-23 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-22 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.1, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 79-111 against the money line (-46.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-78 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 40-64 against the money line (-36.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 48-73 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 32-52 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-13 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 58-86 against the money line (-43.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 78.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 64-97 against the money line (-45.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-74 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-6.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 75.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-19 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 5-7 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 90.2, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-9 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-15 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 23-39 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-22 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 5 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 21-39 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 15-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 7-16 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 3-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 4-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) off a home win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 4-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 5-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 7-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Trammell is 26-32 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in all games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 4-15 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Trammell is 6-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 14-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 11-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 2-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 90.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 5-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 3-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 6-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 14-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 15-19 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 6-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 9-17 against the money line (-15.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 9-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 2-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 7-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 4-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 19-27 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 18-23 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 14-23 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 11-22 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Trammell is 21-26 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 15-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 8-13 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 3-8 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 20-25 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 13-19 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Trammell is 5-7 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 90.2, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 6-9 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 8-15 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 10-19 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 16-13 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.8, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 13-17 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-27 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 19-28 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 16-24 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 9-9 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 19-25 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 19-25 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 10-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 55 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 46 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/30/2024 12:11:37 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|