| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
SEATTLE |
|
|
153.5
| 61
Final
72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 631 | CONNECTICUT | +100 | | 632 | SEATTLE | -120 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(126-62 since 1997.) (67%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(126-62 since 1997.) (67%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(126-62 since 1997.) (67%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - playing with 3 or more days rest, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(53-14 since 1997.) (79.1%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(47-25 since 1997.) (65.3%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more.
(52-24 since 1997.) (68.4%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(68-29 since 1997.) (70.1%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(41-24 since 1997.) (63.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(41-24 since 1997.) (63.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(41-24 since 1997.) (63.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(24-10 since 1997.) (70.6%, +24.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(65-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(66-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(74-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(43-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.2%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(72-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(50-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.5%, +47.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(73-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +51 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(162-130 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.5%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(58-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.3%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(31-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(31-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(114-91 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(95-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(88-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +57.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(102-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(65-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +24 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, on Sunday games.
(85-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(85-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(80-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, on Sunday games.
(67-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, on Sunday games.
(85-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, on Sunday games.
(60-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(84-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +31.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - on Sunday games.
(98-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 81 | | 30-69 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 75.7% | 42 | 9 | 12 | | SEATTLE | 79 | | 29-68 | 42.2% | 6-21 | 31.2% | 15-19 | 81.4% | 45 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 560 times, while SEATTLE won 418 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 70.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 76.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 71.8 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 76.1 | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 76.9 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.1 | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 78.0 | SEATTLE is 5-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.8, OPPONENT 82.2 | SEATTLE is 40-72 against the money line (-34.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | SEATTLE is 6-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 89.9 | SEATTLE is 15-26 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 82.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 11-17 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 46-64 against the money line (-47.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 86.8 | SEATTLE is 114-69 against the money line (+61.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 74.9 | SEATTLE is 214-171 against the money line (+30.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 73.6 | SEATTLE is 123-63 against the money line (+57.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 73.1 | SEATTLE is 126-100 against the money line (+26.3 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 74.4 | SEATTLE is 219-162 against the money line (+36.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 82.4 | SEATTLE is 90-43 against the money line (+58.7 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 88.4, OPPONENT 80.7 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-14 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 66.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 98-120 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 1-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 35-26 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-15.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-28 against the money line (-22.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-25 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-23 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-18 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in home games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 140-98 against the money line (+33.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 202-150 against the money line (+28.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 164-122 against the money line (+32.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 242-184 against the money line (+41.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 114-119 against the money line (+32.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 112-65 against the money line (+23.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 139-80 against the money line (+27.5 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 78-47 against the money line (+22.4 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 76-45 against the money line (+19.1 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 190-119 against the money line (+38.0 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 190-119 against the money line (+38.0 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-6 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-9 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-11 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-9 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 157-150 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-16 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-16 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-16 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-6 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 32-35 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 2-9 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in home games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-15.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-23 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-12 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-18 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-9 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 309-122 against the money line (+41.8 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 54-36 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 92-47 against the money line (+25.0 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 90-50 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 59-34 against the money line (+22.5 Units) in home games off a road loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 136-110 against the money line (+48.4 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 68-46 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 63-61 against the money line (+23.7 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 196-154 against the money line (+34.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 76-35 against the money line (+22.0 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 219-176 against the money line (+44.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 146-113 against the money line (+32.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 31-20 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 91-40 against the money line (+23.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 189-200 against the money line (+33.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 151-139 against the money line (+49.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 214-178 against the money line (+56.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 109-92 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 225-186 against the money line (+40.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 202-187 against the money line (+34.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 90-84 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-2 | +10 | 7-8 | 7-8 | 80.5 | 39.9 | 44.5% | 42.5 | 71.7 | 36.1 | 42.9% | 38.5 | | Road Games | 5-1 | +4 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 80.8 | 38.8 | 44.0% | 44.2 | 73.8 | 39.5 | 42.2% | 38.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 82.0 | 41.0 | 46.2% | 40.0 | 73.8 | 35.8 | 44.6% | 36.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.5 | 39.9 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 5-16 | 31.3% | 17-22 | 75.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41.5 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 8-23 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.8 | 38.8 | 29-65 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 31.3% | 18-23 | 77.7% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.7 | 36.1 | 26-62 | 42.9% | 6-20 | 28.7% | 13-17 | 77.1% | 38 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 40.6 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 8-23 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.8 | 39.5 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 5-18 | 28.3% | 15-18 | 81.7% | 38 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-6 | +1.5 | 9-6 | 7-8 | 83.1 | 40.5 | 43.0% | 44.9 | 79.7 | 39.4 | 42.1% | 42.1 | | Home Games | 4-1 | +0.7 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 86.2 | 46.4 | 44.8% | 48.2 | 75.2 | 40.2 | 39.3% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.6 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 82.4 | 40.4 | 43.2% | 43.2 | 85.4 | 42.4 | 47.3% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.1 | 40.5 | 31-72 | 43.0% | 6-20 | 30.2% | 15-18 | 80.9% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.7 | 30-69 | 43.1% | 8-24 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.2 | 46.4 | 33-74 | 44.8% | 7-19 | 36.5% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 48 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.7 | 39.4 | 28-67 | 42.1% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 16-19 | 83.0% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 9-25 | 34.9% | 14-17 | 80.0% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.2 | 40.2 | 28-71 | 39.3% | 6-22 | 27.5% | 14-17 | 81.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 15 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 69.5, SEATTLE 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | INDIANA | 92-71 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 25 | | 5/17/2024 | WASHINGTON | 84-77 | W | -360 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | | 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -200 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | 70-47 | W | -360 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 52 | 9 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 59 | 20 | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | 74-72 | W | -400 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 69-50 | W | -140 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 54 | 15 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 41 | 12 | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | 76-59 | W | -1050 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-82 | L | +120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | 89-72 | W | -550 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 48 | 10 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 11 | | 6/12/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 83-75 | W | -330 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 14 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | | 6/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | 85-67 | W | -270 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 7 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 11 | | 6/18/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 79-70 | W | | 34-65 | 52.3% | 31 | 10 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 35 | 22 | | 6/21/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 74-85 | L | +175 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 47 | 12 | | 6/23/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | MINNESOTA | 70-83 | L | -330 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 50 | 17 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 45 | 17 | | 5/17/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 93-102 | L | -115 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 48 | 24 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 52 | 27 | | 5/19/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 84-75 | W | -200 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 52 | 20 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 16 | | 5/20/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 63-74 | L | +650 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 42 | 14 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 47 | 15 | | 5/22/2024 | INDIANA | 85-83 | W | -220 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 47 | 8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 11 | | 5/25/2024 | WASHINGTON | 101-69 | W | -400 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 40 | 16 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 33 | 14 | | 5/28/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 77-68 | W | -120 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 39 | 18 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 41 | 21 | | 5/30/2024 | @ INDIANA | 103-88 | W | -220 | 42-75 | 56.0% | 37 | 7 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 42 | 13 | | 6/4/2024 | PHOENIX | 80-62 | W | -210 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 50 | 14 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 46 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 78-65 | W | +250 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 53 | 12 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 44 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-83 | L | -105 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 45 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 46 | 16 | | 6/11/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 95-79 | W | -750 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 54 | 9 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 11 | | 6/13/2024 | @ DALLAS | 92-84 | W | -250 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 33 | 11 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 36 | 19 | | 6/16/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 78-87 | L | -155 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 44 | 9 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 40 | 15 | | 6/19/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 83-94 | L | +210 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 40 | 15 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 34 | 14 | | 6/23/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2024 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 31-23 (+0.2 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 6-0 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 15-11 (-0.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-0 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/08/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 37 | 11 | 11 | | | SEATTLE | 69 | 161 | Under | 34 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 47 | 13 | 16 | 07/06/2023 | SEATTLE | 73 | 166 | | 24 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 39 | 9 | 20 | | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 57 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 36 | 6 | 17 | 06/20/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | -8.5 | SU Over | 45 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 45 | 8 | 12 | | | SEATTLE | 79 | 160.5 | ATS | 48 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 43 | 7 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
White is 21-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 21-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 21-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games in June games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 15-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 11-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 6-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 15-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 18-10 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 14-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 13-4 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 15-3 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 12-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 16-9 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 15-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 7-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 85.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 13-3 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 18-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 24-14 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 15-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 19-12 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 14-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 21-11 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 21-8 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 11-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 16-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 13-6 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 36-29 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 21-10 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 76.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 14-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 26-12 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 26-14 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 25-15 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 36-23 against the money line (+21.1 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 32-20 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 18-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 30-19 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 36-21 against the money line (+21.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 9-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 33-16 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 29-14 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 32-21 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 16-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 11-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 153-129 against the money line (-54.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 77.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 14-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games on Sunday games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 60-58 against the money line (-37.9 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 76.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 193-210 against the money line (-65.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 75.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 73-71 against the money line (-44.8 Units) in home games in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 74.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-22 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-36 against the money line (-33.0 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 78.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 9-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 29-22 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 31-31 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 78.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 23-26 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 175 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 80.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 9-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 76.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-21 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 10-33 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 30-28 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
White is 6-10 against the money line (-15.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 16-12 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-10 against the money line (-15.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 15-13 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 129-87 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 46-28 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-13 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 28-17 against the money line (+12.4 Units) off a road loss as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 32-18 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 80-48 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 60-37 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 43-24 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 85-49 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 49-32 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 32-16 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 17-7 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 65-33 against the money line (+26.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 35-24 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 10-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 66-36 against the money line (+18.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 46-24 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 29-14 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 93-53 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 78-43 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 67-35 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 70-37 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 97-61 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 70-40 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 52-26 against the money line (+22.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 36-18 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 29-14 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 40-12 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 87-49 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 34-14 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 23-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 59-33 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 28-12 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 54-35 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 65-35 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 49-35 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 59-50 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 63-43 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 100-62 against the money line (+24.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 65-46 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 103-68 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 60-44 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 93-65 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 36-21 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 47-29 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 69-47 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 109-71 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 67-47 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 105-69 against the money line (+18.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-17 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 36-25 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 66-46 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 103-69 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 58-44 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 92-63 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 19-11 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 104 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 89 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 7 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 7/2/2024 9:58:17 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|