| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
WASHINGTON |
|
|
159
| 81
Final
83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 617 | CHICAGO | -140 | | 618 | WASHINGTON | +120 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(88-61 since 1997.) (59.1%, +43.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(95-63 since 1997.) (60.1%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(66-51 since 1997.) (56.4%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss.
(82-45 since 1997.) (64.6%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(39-18 since 1997.) (68.4%, +34.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +23 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(27-6 since 1997.) (81.8%, +20.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(45-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(46-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +36.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(47-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(118-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(126-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(127-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(52-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.3%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(57-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.8%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(50-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(50-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(169-121 since 1997.) (58.3%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - playing with 2 days rest, with a losing record.
(59-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(21-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(37-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.2%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(38-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(37-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.1%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(115-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(38-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.6%, +26.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(52-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(121-84 since 1997.) (59%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(68-19 since 1997.) (78.2%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(93-61 since 1997.) (60.4%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(87-55 since 1997.) (61.3%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(34-12 since 1997.) (73.9%, +27.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(57-33 since 1997.) (63.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(145-116 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a road underdog of 6 more.
(24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(111-108 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.7%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(34-14 since 1997.) (70.8%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(29-14 since 1997.) (67.4%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(25-11 since 1997.) (69.4%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(52-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(160-125 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.1%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(37-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(51-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival, in June games.
(32-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(141-134 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing with 2 days rest.
(45-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(29-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(77-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (52%, +52.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(51-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.3%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(66-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +41.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(77-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +49 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(82-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(53-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(55-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(92-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.1%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(79-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (52%, +52.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(84-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +46.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(126-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.5%, +58.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(124-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(168-164 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 76 | | 29-68 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 12-16 | 76.8% | 44 | 9 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 80 | | 29-69 | 42.2% | 9-26 | 34.4% | 12-16 | 77.7% | 44 | 9 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 581 times, while CHICAGO won 397 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 21-20 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | CHICAGO is 18-7 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 80.7 | CHICAGO is 7-3 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 78.9 | CHICAGO is 108-78 against the money line (+43.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 99-88 against the money line (+27.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 17-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 85.7 | WASHINGTON is 30-42 against the money line (-24.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 9-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 78.4 | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 80.1 | WASHINGTON is 69-77 against the money line (-38.8 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 80.8 | WASHINGTON is 4-15 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 83.5 | WASHINGTON is 80-107 against the money line (-51.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 12-19 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.3 | WASHINGTON is 108-157 against the money line (-61.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.7 | WASHINGTON is 10-25 against the money line (-18.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 86.2 | WASHINGTON is 10-19 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 80.7 |
|
CHICAGO is 68-115 against the money line (-71.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.8 | CHICAGO is 6-18 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 83.5 | CHICAGO is 70-113 against the money line (-48.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 122-250 against the money line (-161.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 87.7 | CHICAGO is 40-75 against the money line (-43.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.2 | CHICAGO is 128-175 against the money line (-57.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 80.5 | WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.6, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 32-21 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.4, OPPONENT 81.4 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 18-12 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-16 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-13 against the money line (+15.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-22 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 29-38 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-39 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 102-99 against the money line (-45.0 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-32 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 303-407 against the money line (-128.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 233-279 against the money line (-75.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-25 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-95 against the money line (-39.4 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 139-125 against the money line (-64.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 77-85 against the money line (-52.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 13-11 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-11 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-11 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-13 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-6 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-0 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.8, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 7-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-40 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-15 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-13 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-11 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-9 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-11 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-12 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 38-45 against the money line (+22.0 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-8 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-13 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-10 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-5 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 10-6 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 16-9 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-9 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-6 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 28-19 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-8 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-15 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 23-36 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 41-49 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 221-218 against the money line (-87.3 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 170-163 against the money line (-58.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 79-102 against the money line (-38.5 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 84-118 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 225-305 against the money line (-110.7 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 138-202 against the money line (-74.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 88-138 against the money line (-61.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-30 against the money line (-23.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 3-11 against the money line (-16.5 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 183-257 against the money line (-97.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 57-106 against the money line (-46.3 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 69-111 against the money line (-66.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 90-132 against the money line (-72.7 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 31-58 against the money line (-39.9 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-36 against the money line (-29.2 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-18 against the money line (-18.7 Units) off a win by 15 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 60-94 against the money line (-46.9 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-54 against the money line (-32.8 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-12.7 Units) off an upset win by 15 points or more as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 42-59 against the money line (-26.0 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-6 against the money line (-12.7 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-5 against the money line (-13.0 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-10 against the money line (-14.9 Units) off a road win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 47-55 against the money line (-31.9 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-36 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-31 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-25 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-24 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-27 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 17-27 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-34 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-17 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-31 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 188-311 against the money line (-112.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-68 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 135-206 against the money line (-72.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-25 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 82-117 against the money line (-54.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 3-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 17-22 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in home games after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 30-40 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-23 against the money line (-15.6 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-12 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-7 | -3.6 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 78.5 | 40.2 | 41.6% | 44.3 | 80.0 | 40.4 | 43.0% | 44.1 | | Road Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 80.2 | 36.2 | 40.8% | 51.0 | 76.8 | 38.6 | 41.1% | 46.0 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 75.8 | 38.6 | 40.9% | 44.0 | 80.4 | 43.8 | 43.1% | 42.4 | | Division Games | 2-5 | -4.2 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 78.7 | 40.4 | 42.2% | 42.3 | 81.3 | 41.9 | 44.0% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.5 | 40.2 | 29-70 | 41.6% | 4-15 | 30.2% | 16-20 | 77.0% | 44 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 7-23 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.2 | 36.2 | 31-75 | 40.8% | 4-17 | 22.9% | 15-21 | 69.2% | 51 | 14 | 19 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.0 | 40.4 | 29-68 | 43.0% | 6-19 | 30.2% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.8 | 29-68 | 43.3% | 7-22 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.8 | 38.6 | 29-70 | 41.1% | 6-19 | 30.9% | 13-18 | 74.2% | 46 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 18 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 1-12 | -8.9 | 8-5 | 6-7 | 75.6 | 39.2 | 41.4% | 39.3 | 82.4 | 39.5 | 44.6% | 43.6 | | Home Games | 0-5 | -5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 75.2 | 39.0 | 40.3% | 42.8 | 81.2 | 38.8 | 42.5% | 46.8 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.9 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 77.6 | 40.0 | 42.8% | 41.6 | 80.2 | 37.4 | 42.4% | 43.4 | | Division Games | 1-8 | -4.9 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 76.8 | 39.8 | 42.5% | 40.7 | 81.4 | 38.9 | 43.1% | 43.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.6 | 39.2 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 9-27 | 35.1% | 11-15 | 75.8% | 39 | 8 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 8-23 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.2 | 39.0 | 28-70 | 40.3% | 8-27 | 30.9% | 10-15 | 70.3% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.4 | 39.5 | 29-64 | 44.6% | 8-24 | 33.8% | 17-22 | 78.4% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.7 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 7-22 | 32.3% | 16-19 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.2 | 38.8 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 7-24 | 30.5% | 16-21 | 78.8% | 47 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 10 | 17 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 72, WASHINGTON 72.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | 79-87 | L | +250 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 54 | 12 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 49 | 15 | | 5/18/2024 | @ DALLAS | 83-74 | W | +155 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 50 | 17 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 25 | | 5/23/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 90-81 | W | | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 9 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | | 5/25/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 82-86 | L | +170 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | | 5/28/2024 | SEATTLE | 68-77 | L | +100 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 41 | 21 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 39 | 18 | | 5/30/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 83-73 | W | -200 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 46 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 45 | 18 | | 6/1/2024 | @ INDIANA | 70-71 | L | -115 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 54 | 15 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 11 | | 6/4/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-88 | L | +300 | 24-74 | 32.4% | 49 | 10 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 50 | 10 | | 6/6/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-71 | W | -155 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 24 | | 6/8/2024 | ATLANTA | 80-89 | L | -105 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 13 | | 6/12/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 75-83 | L | +250 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 14 | | 6/14/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/16/2024 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/20/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2024 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | NEW YORK | 80-85 | L | +450 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 43 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 45 | 18 | | 5/17/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-84 | L | +280 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | | 5/19/2024 | SEATTLE | 75-84 | L | +170 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 16 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 52 | 20 | | 5/21/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 68-70 | L | +120 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 18 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 24 | | 5/23/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 80-83 | L | +220 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 42 | 17 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | | 5/25/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 69-101 | L | +300 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 33 | 14 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 40 | 16 | | 5/29/2024 | ATLANTA | 67-73 | L | +120 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 38 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 51 | 17 | | 5/31/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 79-90 | L | +650 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 40 | 14 | | 6/4/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 59-76 | L | +650 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | | 6/6/2024 | CHICAGO | 71-79 | L | +135 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 24 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | INDIANA | 83-85 | L | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 15 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 15 | | 6/9/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 88-93 | L | | 33-67 | 49.3% | 26 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 21 | | 6/11/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 87-68 | W | +210 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 11 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 8 | | 6/14/2024 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2024 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 34-34 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 5-4 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 19-14 (-0.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-2 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/13/2023 | CHICAGO | 76 | 161.5 | Under | 39 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 38 | 12 | 16 | | | WASHINGTON | 83 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 06/22/2023 | WASHINGTON | 80 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 47 | 7 | 13 | | | CHICAGO | 59 | 155 | Under | 30 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 36 | 6 | 18 | 06/18/2023 | CHICAGO | 69 | 155 | Under | 38 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 51 | 8 | 20 | | | WASHINGTON | 77 | -4 | SU ATS | 42 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 31 | 6 | 5 | 06/06/2024 | CHICAGO | 79 | -3 | SU ATS | 35 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 49 | 13 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 71 | 156 | Under | 44 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 48 | 7 | 24 | 05/26/2023 | WASHINGTON | 71 | -5 | SU Under | 40 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 41 | 7 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 69 | 157 | ATS | 34 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 43 | 3 | 21 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 13-24 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-11 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-24 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 2-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 8-16 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 6-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 12-25 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog won the game straight up 15 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 12 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 2 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 10/22/2024 8:30:27 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|