| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
WASHINGTON |
|
|
157
| 95
Final
75 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | LOS ANGELES | -360 | | 602 | WASHINGTON | +280 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season.
(43-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(123-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(161-124 since 1997.) (56.5%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(79-49 since 1997.) (61.7%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(87-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(215-150 since 1997.) (58.9%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(48-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(48-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(48-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(23-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(45-28 since 1997.) (61.6%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(42-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(129-93 since 1997.) (58.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(70-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(70-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(70-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(51-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(21-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(48-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +10.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(317-223 since 1997.) (58.7%, +80.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(309-305 since 1997.) (50.3%, +74.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(318-120 since 1997.) (72.6%, +72.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(295-123 since 1997.) (70.6%, +69.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(181-127 since 1997.) (58.8%, +65.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(294-126 since 1997.) (70%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(144-40 since 1997.) (78.3%, +63.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(105-24 since 1997.) (81.4%, +62.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(276-112 since 1997.) (71.1%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(144-36 since 1997.) (80%, +62 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(291-274 since 1997.) (51.5%, +57.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(83-16 since 1997.) (83.8%, +55.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(97-24 since 1997.) (80.2%, +55.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(191-69 since 1997.) (73.5%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(202-204 since 1997.) (49.8%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(184-63 since 1997.) (74.5%, +51.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(96-24 since 1997.) (80%, +50.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(95-19 since 1997.) (83.3%, +49.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(154-54 since 1997.) (74%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(154-48 since 1997.) (76.2%, +47.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(150-60 since 1997.) (71.4%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(109-35 since 1997.) (75.7%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(238-99 since 1997.) (70.6%, +46.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(179-68 since 1997.) (72.5%, +45.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(156-59 since 1997.) (72.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(76-18 since 1997.) (80.9%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(61-8 since 1997.) (88.4%, +43.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(162-58 since 1997.) (73.6%, +43.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(67-12 since 1997.) (84.8%, +43.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(178-167 since 1997.) (51.6%, +43.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(112-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(86-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +29 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(87-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +32.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(76-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(99-29 since 1997.) (77.3%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(76-18 since 1997.) (80.9%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(68-13 since 1997.) (84%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(193-66 since 1997.) (74.5%, +38.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(56-10 since 1997.) (84.8%, +38.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(100-34 since 1997.) (74.6%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(82-21 since 1997.) (79.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(60-36 since 1997.) (62.5%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(73-23 since 1997.) (76%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(52-7 since 1997.) (88.1%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(84-26 since 1997.) (76.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(64-32 since 1997.) (66.7%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(125-55 since 1997.) (69.4%, +32.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(87-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(46-7 since 1997.) (86.8%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(43-34 since 1997.) (55.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(44-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(70-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(54-12 since 1997.) (81.8%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(91-27 since 1997.) (77.1%, +30.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(59-14 since 1997.) (80.8%, +29.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(44-16 since 1997.) (73.3%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(36-6 since 1997.) (85.7%, +26.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(70-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(70-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(70-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(90-35 since 1997.) (72%, +26.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(47-26 since 1997.) (64.4%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(37-9 since 1997.) (80.4%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(62-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 15 or more of their last 20 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(42-20 since 1997.) (67.7%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(98-37 since 1997.) (72.6%, +23.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(33-16 since 1997.) (67.3%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(80-49 since 1997.) (62%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(25-4 since 1997.) (86.2%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +17.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(36-12 since 1997.) (75%, +17.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games, on Friday nights.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(68-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(42-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(76-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +10.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(49-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 85 | | 33-67 | 49.4% | 6-16 | 39.3% | 13-16 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | | 28-66 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 34.7% | 16-20 | 81.7% | 41 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 681 times, while WASHINGTON won 289 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 14-1 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.2, OPPONENT 77.5 | LOS ANGELES is 81-50 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 91.6, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 20-1 against the money line (+20.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.3, OPPONENT 77.8 | WASHINGTON is 99-164 against the money line (-51.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 80.1 | WASHINGTON is 1-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 86.8 | WASHINGTON is 28-39 against the money line (-25.0 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 72.5 | WASHINGTON is 6-12 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 77.6 | WASHINGTON is 68-107 against the money line (-44.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 130-205 against the money line (-76.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 2-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 86.0 | WASHINGTON is 1-11 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 91.3 | WASHINGTON is 69-111 against the money line (-44.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | WASHINGTON is 48-62 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 82.9 | WASHINGTON is 6-19 against the money line (-18.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 78.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 79.9 | LOS ANGELES is 33-55 against the money line (-45.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 11-13 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 85.4 | LOS ANGELES is 102-103 against the money line (-57.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 163-146 against the money line (-76.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 | WASHINGTON is 8-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.2, OPPONENT 81.6 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 35-14 against the money line (+16.7 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-32 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 78-145 against the money line (-65.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 124-200 against the money line (-61.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 35-43 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 83-132 against the money line (-45.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 60-103 against the money line (-41.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 94-158 against the money line (-71.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 143-217 against the money line (-75.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 124-209 against the money line (-92.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 195-299 against the money line (-103.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 27-56 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-33 against the money line (-19.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-16 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 27-71 against the money line (-34.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 44-110 against the money line (-45.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 67-121 against the money line (-50.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 45-85 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 61-66 against the money line (-51.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 94-98 against the money line (-67.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 100-93 against the money line (-44.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 144-132 against the money line (-57.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 122-111 against the money line (-47.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-17 against the money line (-19.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-23 against the money line (-23.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 38-39 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 88-70 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 113-92 against the money line (-48.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 165-136 against the money line (-67.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 159-168 against the money line (-59.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-15 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-20 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-6 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 56-46 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in road games in July games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-12 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 256-385 against the money line (-115.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 152-168 against the money line (-66.3 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 75-120 against the money line (-54.7 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 101-116 against the money line (-55.9 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 157-233 against the money line (-90.2 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 116-182 against the money line (-62.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 120-199 against the money line (-79.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 92-142 against the money line (-50.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 51-106 against the money line (-50.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 61-116 against the money line (-42.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-71 against the money line (-42.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 83-146 against the money line (-60.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 95-171 against the money line (-69.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 63-114 against the money line (-50.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 29-59 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 107-191 against the money line (-75.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 55-102 against the money line (-48.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-34 against the money line (-24.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-21 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 63-121 against the money line (-48.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-29 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 140-247 against the money line (-90.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 35-82 against the money line (-39.7 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 122-209 against the money line (-75.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 61-111 against the money line (-55.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-232 against the money line (-72.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 77-140 against the money line (-53.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-90 against the money line (-43.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-29 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games after 4 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-29 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after 6 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-46 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-32 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 130-114 against the money line (-49.9 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-25 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-11 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-17.1 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-31 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-22 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-15 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-12 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 66.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-5 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 20-3 | +10.6 | 12-11 | 13-10 | 85.5 | 41.6 | 49.4% | 38.4 | 75.8 | 37.5 | 43.2% | 40.6 | | Road Games | 9-2 | +3.2 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 85.6 | 41.8 | 48.3% | 40.9 | 76.6 | 38.1 | 42.9% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -3.6 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 84.8 | 42.4 | 49.4% | 41.2 | 84.8 | 44.8 | 45.7% | 35.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.5 | 41.6 | 32-65 | 49.4% | 6-16 | 39.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 7 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.5 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-16 | 33.9% | 17-22 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.6 | 41.8 | 32-66 | 48.3% | 7-16 | 39.8% | 15-18 | 81.8% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.8 | 37.5 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 30.0% | 13-18 | 76.9% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.5 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 79.4% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.6 | 38.1 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 30.8% | 13-19 | 72.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-14 | -1.3 | 11-11 | 16-7 | 79.8 | 40.4 | 41.7% | 42.3 | 82.7 | 41.3 | 44.1% | 42.7 | | Home Games | 4-7 | -1.9 | 5-6 | 7-4 | 79.6 | 41.4 | 43.3% | 40.8 | 79.6 | 40.7 | 44.7% | 39.9 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -7.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 71.6 | 36.0 | 37.6% | 41.0 | 83.2 | 43.0 | 45.0% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.8 | 40.4 | 28-66 | 41.7% | 7-18 | 36.8% | 18-22 | 81.4% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.2 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-16 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.6 | 41.4 | 28-65 | 43.3% | 7-18 | 37.9% | 16-21 | 79.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 17-21 | 80.0% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.6 | 40.7 | 29-65 | 44.7% | 5-15 | 35.8% | 16-20 | 81.4% | 40 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, WASHINGTON 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 98-85 | W | -360 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | | 6/17/2016 | PHOENIX | 77-71 | W | -550 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 15 | | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-72 | L | -155 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | | 6/24/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-76 | W | +180 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 14 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 38 | 18 | | 6/26/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 80-73 | W | | 30-69 | 43.5% | 42 | 11 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 42 | 15 | | 6/28/2016 | DALLAS | 89-84 | W | -600 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 34 | 12 | | 6/30/2016 | ATLANTA | 84-75 | W | -750 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 36 | 13 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 50 | 15 | | 7/3/2016 | NEW YORK | 77-67 | W | -330 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 33 | 14 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 46 | 15 | | 7/6/2016 | INDIANA | 94-88 | W | -750 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 32 | 13 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 31 | 12 | | 7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | 93-82 | W | -550 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 38 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 32 | 13 | | 7/13/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 77-67 | W | -210 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 44 | 12 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 32 | 5 | | 7/15/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 98-92 | W | -450 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 47 | 14 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 43 | 13 | | 7/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 74-91 | L | -450 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 42 | 12 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 9 | | 7/19/2016 | @ INDIANA | 82-92 | L | -210 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 35 | 19 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 25 | 9 | | 7/22/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/14/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 109-106 | W | -155 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | | 6/18/2016 | ATLANTA | 95-65 | W | -175 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 40 | 12 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 38 | 21 | | 6/22/2016 | INDIANA | 76-62 | W | -200 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 37 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 18 | | 6/24/2016 | PHOENIX | 79-91 | L | -140 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 11 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 40 | 9 | | 6/26/2016 | MINNESOTA | 87-63 | W | +300 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 44 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 14 | | 6/29/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 84-67 | W | -500 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 7 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 39 | 11 | | 7/1/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 84-86 | L | +155 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 46 | 12 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 51 | 8 | | 7/6/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-77 | L | -300 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 44 | 8 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 46 | 5 | | 7/10/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-93 | L | +375 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 32 | 13 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 38 | 12 | | 7/13/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 74-78 | L | +175 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 44 | 14 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 47 | 14 | | 7/15/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 51-80 | L | -115 | 20-69 | 29.0% | 46 | 13 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 8 | | 7/20/2016 | NEW YORK | 81-88 | L | +145 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 39 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 10 | | 7/22/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 12-25 (-3.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-3 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 12-7 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 2-1 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | 82 | 156.5 | Over | 42 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 32 | 9 | 13 | | | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -10 | SU ATS | 44 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 38 | 9 | 12 | 5/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 97 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 36 | 2 | 11 | | | WASHINGTON | 67 | 157.5 | Over | 31 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 9/3/2015 | WASHINGTON | 91 | 141.5 | ATS | 53 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 27 | 6 | 6 | | | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -6.5 | SU Over | 43 | 27-50 | 54.0% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 35-40 | 87.5% | 38 | 8 | 13 | 6/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | 138 | ATS | 37 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 43 | 11 | 17 | | | WASHINGTON | 84 | -11 | SU Over | 39 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 24-33 | 72.7% | 32 | 5 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 87-62 against the money line (+27.6 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 42-26 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-12 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 67-58 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.5, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 7-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 68.5, OPPONENT 64.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 79-55 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 37-26 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.7, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 39-18 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 72-45 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 26-12 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-12 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 109-96 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 61-31 against the money line (+26.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 87-50 against the money line (+35.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 105-74 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 103-79 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 152-121 against the money line (+37.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 154-109 against the money line (+30.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 70-38 against the money line (+25.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 103-52 against the money line (+47.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 102-82 against the money line (+31.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 6-14 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 2-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-24 against the money line (-25.4 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-40 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 24-37 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 6-7 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-10 against the money line (-17.1 Units) off a road loss as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Agler is 3-7 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 1-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 69.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 1-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 2-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 67.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 3-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 8-15 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 3-9 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 6*) | Agler is 3-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 4-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 3-14 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 19-32 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 39-49 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 180-132 against the money line (+26.3 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 62-43 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-6 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.1, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 8-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 123-98 against the money line (+26.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 86-68 against the money line (+19.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 45-34 against the money line (+17.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 79.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 13-4 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 8-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 50-33 against the money line (+22.0 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-17 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-8 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 109-90 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-8 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 34-29 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 67-41 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 112-95 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 22-15 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 126-112 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 74.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 18-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 32 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 07/22/2016 - Kahleah Copper injured last game, "?" Friday vs. LA Sparks ( Undisclosed ) | | [G] 07/21/2016 - Tayler Hill "?" Friday vs. LA Sparks ( Foot ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 6:59:57 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|