| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS ATLANTA |
|
| 164 | 88 Final 93 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | DALLAS | +105 | 604 | ATLANTA | -125 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (317-223 since 1997.) (58.7%, +80.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (198-67 since 1997.) (74.7%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (202-72 since 1997.) (73.7%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (79-32 since 1997.) (71.2%, +48.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (238-99 since 1997.) (70.6%, +46.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (95-25 since 1997.) (79.2%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (68-13 since 1997.) (84%, +41.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (59-10 since 1997.) (85.5%, +41.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (50-7 since 1997.) (87.7%, +41 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (161-124 since 1997.) (56.5%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (193-66 since 1997.) (74.5%, +38.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (49-15 since 1997.) (76.6%, +36.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (44-5 since 1997.) (89.8%, +36 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (45-6 since 1997.) (88.2%, +33.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (43-5 since 1997.) (89.6%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more. (82-41 since 1997.) (66.7%, +27.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +27 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +27 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +27 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in July games. (37-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (28-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +5.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (48-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +10.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games. (31-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +3.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in May, June, or July games. (55-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (291-274 since 1997.) (51.5%, +57.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (143-81 since 1997.) (63.8%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (178-167 since 1997.) (51.6%, +43.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (101-64 since 1997.) (61.2%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (68-27 since 1997.) (71.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (215-150 since 1997.) (58.9%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (65-46 since 1997.) (58.6%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games. (36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games. (35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 straight games being outrebounded by opponent by 5 or more. (38-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 80 | | 27-69 | 39.4% | 7-22 | 32.3% | 19-23 | 80.8% | 43 | 15 | 13 | ATLANTA | 86 | | 30-70 | 43.3% | 4-13 | 26.0% | 21-28 | 76.5% | 50 | 17 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 620 times, while DALLAS won 356 times. Edge against the money line=ATLANTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 7-3 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.7, OPPONENT 86.1 | ATLANTA is 21-26 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 81.1 | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 83.2 | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 9-25 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 89.0 | ATLANTA is 62-72 against the money line (-34.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.5 | ATLANTA is 98-114 against the money line (-53.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 84.7, OPPONENT 85.1 |
|
DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 88.3 | DALLAS is 6-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 89.6 | DALLAS is 3-13 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 92.9 | DALLAS is 9-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 88.0 | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 87.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | ATLANTA is 51-15 against the money line (+38.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 71.8 | ATLANTA is 12-5 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 75.6 | ATLANTA is 6-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 80.9 | ATLANTA is 15-6 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 33-15 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 88.1, OPPONENT 83.5 | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 90.4, OPPONENT 85.7 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 25-24 against the money line (-29.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 79-91 against the money line (-40.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 33-38 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 28-47 against the money line (-32.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-20 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 39-59 against the money line (-33.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-19 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 72-79 against the money line (-43.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 31-36 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-14 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 70-86 against the money line (-43.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 29-35 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 38-54 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 54-74 against the money line (-33.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-5 against the money line (-8.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 77.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-6 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 47-47 against the money line (-25.3 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 31-22 against the money line (-28.9 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 76-43 against the money line (-40.8 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 92-68 against the money line (-42.0 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 92-68 against the money line (-42.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 81-63 against the money line (-44.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-23 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-19 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-30 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-19 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-35 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) off a road loss over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in home games off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 28-34 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 21-31 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-28 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 108-117 against the money line (-44.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 76-94 against the money line (-49.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 27-43 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 66-87 against the money line (-34.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-17 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 69-80 against the money line (-42.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 66-92 against the money line (-59.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in all games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in July games this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 7*) | DALLAS is 2-8 against the money line (-7.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 90.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in non-conference games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 7*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-7.0 Units) off a home loss this season. The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 6-14 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 6-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-12 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 91.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 4-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-5 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 9-15 | -11.7 | 10-14 | 16-8 | 84.5 | 41.4 | 40.3% | 44.5 | 87.9 | 44.7 | 47.3% | 43.2 | Road Games | 4-7 | -0.3 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 82.4 | 40.4 | 38.4% | 44.6 | 86.9 | 44.6 | 46.0% | 46.5 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -7 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 79.6 | 37.8 | 37.2% | 42.8 | 91.8 | 50.2 | 47.4% | 51.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 41.4 | 29-71 | 40.3% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 20-25 | 80.6% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.2 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 6-16 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.4 | 40.4 | 28-72 | 38.4% | 9-26 | 33.0% | 19-23 | 82.7% | 45 | 12 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.9 | 44.7 | 32-69 | 47.3% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 18-23 | 79.6% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 40.7 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.9 | 44.6 | 32-71 | 46.0% | 5-14 | 35.2% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 47 | 9 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-12 | +0.8 | 12-12 | 11-12 | 80.7 | 39.0 | 41.2% | 45.7 | 83.4 | 40.1 | 43.6% | 45.9 | Home Games | 7-4 | +2.7 | 6-5 | 8-3 | 86.5 | 43.0 | 41.7% | 45.7 | 86.4 | 41.2 | 43.3% | 48.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 71.4 | 35.4 | 38.9% | 42.8 | 76.8 | 36.2 | 44.9% | 42.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.7 | 39.0 | 28-69 | 41.2% | 3-13 | 26.7% | 20-27 | 75.9% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.5 | 43.0 | 30-73 | 41.7% | 3-13 | 26.0% | 22-28 | 78.8% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.4 | 40.1 | 31-70 | 43.6% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 18-23 | 78.1% | 46 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-16 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 86.4 | 41.2 | 31-72 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 18-23 | 80.8% | 48 | 10 | 21 | 23 | 5 | 13 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.1, ATLANTA 71 |
| | |
|
|
6/14/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 88-91 | L | +280 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 42 | 12 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 45 | 12 | 6/16/2016 | SEATTLE | 88-79 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | 6/18/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 117-111 | W | +280 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 65 | 17 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 55 | 20 | 6/21/2016 | PHOENIX | 100-90 | W | +135 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 39 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 36 | 13 | 6/23/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-90 | W | -600 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 49 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | 6/25/2016 | INDIANA | 87-92 | L | -250 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 12 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | 6/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-89 | L | +400 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 34 | 12 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | 6/30/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 83-78 | W | -110 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 44 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 35 | 13 | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 83-86 | L | -450 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 12 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 41 | 15 | 7/5/2016 | PHOENIX | 77-74 | W | -105 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 59 | 13 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 31 | 11 | 7/8/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 90-95 | L | +120 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 58 | 17 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 46 | 10 | 7/9/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 56-93 | L | +500 | 17-69 | 24.6% | 36 | 10 | 40-76 | 52.6% | 64 | 8 | 7/15/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 77-84 | L | +200 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 10 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 49 | 9 | 7/17/2016 | MINNESOTA | 97-98 | L | +325 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 41 | 13 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 54 | 17 | 7/20/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 78-89 | L | -300 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 38 | 9 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 46 | 12 | 7/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/12/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-87 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | 6/17/2016 | CHICAGO | 101-97 | W | +175 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 50 | 9 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 11 | 6/18/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 65-95 | L | +155 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 38 | 21 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 40 | 12 | 6/22/2016 | NEW YORK | 79-90 | L | +120 | 28-84 | 33.3% | 46 | 11 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 61 | 18 | 6/25/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 69-73 | L | -210 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 41 | 13 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 49 | 10 | 6/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-84 | L | +180 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 45 | 12 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 33 | 12 | 6/30/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-84 | L | +500 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 50 | 15 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 36 | 13 | 7/3/2016 | PHOENIX | 87-95 | L | +105 | 34-79 | 43.0% | 44 | 8 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 8 | 7/5/2016 | SEATTLE | 77-64 | W | -250 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 42 | 11 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 37 | 16 | 7/8/2016 | DALLAS | 95-90 | W | -140 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 46 | 10 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 58 | 17 | 7/10/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 67-63 | W | -155 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 51 | 16 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 36 | 12 | 7/13/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 62-86 | L | +180 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 45 | 11 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 58 | 13 | 7/15/2016 | @ INDIANA | 72-78 | L | +155 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 33 | 17 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 37 | 17 | 7/17/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 91-74 | W | +325 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 9 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 42 | 12 | 7/20/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 65-83 | L | +650 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 38 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 39 | 12 | 7/22/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 13-8 (-3.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 5-1 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
DALLAS is 5-6 (+5.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 2-1 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/8/2016 | DALLAS | 90 | 172 | Over | 39 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 58 | 17 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 95 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 46 | 9 | 10 | 5/27/2016 | ATLANTA | 102 | 164 | SU ATS | 48 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 36-49 | 73.5% | 44 | 12 | 12 | | DALLAS | 93 | -4.5 | Over | 49 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 30-39 | 76.9% | 48 | 17 | 19 | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | 98 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 24-30 | 80.0% | 44 | 9 | 12 | | TULSA | 90 | -7 | Over | 42 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 30-38 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 9 | 7/7/2015 | TULSA | 85 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 29-36 | 80.6% | 48 | 8 | 18 | | ATLANTA | 75 | -5 | Over | 41 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 54 | 19 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Cooper is 47-47 against the money line (-25.3 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 31-22 against the money line (-28.9 Units) as a favorite as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 36-32 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 14-19 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 10-19 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 11-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) off a road loss as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 28-34 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 21-31 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 17-28 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 17-28 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 21-24 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 25-24 against the money line (-29.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 20-26 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 33-38 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 6-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 15-22 against the money line (-13.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 11-20 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 21-30 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 8-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 16-19 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 19-24 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 31-36 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 18-22 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 6-10 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 29-35 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Williams is 7-22 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in July games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Williams is 29-42 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 1-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games on Friday as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 14-22 against the money line (-15.5 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-32 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 13-27 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 11-24 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 14-22 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 1-6 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 77.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-23 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 9-17 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 4-13 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 5-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 2-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 8-20 against the money line (-18.0 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 3-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 2-19 against the money line (-19.4 Units) off a home loss as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.1, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 6*) | Williams is 7-20 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 21-40 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-33 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 15-29 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 12-26 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 27-44 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-34 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-29 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 12-25 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 11-21 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 19-35 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-24 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 8-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 9-24 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 5-12 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 1-14 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 7*) | Williams is 12-30 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 22-34 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 26-39 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-28 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 12-21 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-30 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-34 against the money line (-29.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Williams is 15-37 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 10-24 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-16 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 4-11 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 16-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-20 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 0-5 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 2-10 against the money line (-16.1 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.3, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 6*) | Williams is 13-28 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 25-45 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 19-34 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 74.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 34-48 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 2-15 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 7*) | Williams is 6-18 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 14-26 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 25-41 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-16 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 14-26 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 13-25 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 22-40 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 13-29 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-22 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 73.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 8-33 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 12-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games against Western conference opponents as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 12-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games in non-conference games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 32-11 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 79.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 34-14 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 77.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 21 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 07/22/2016 - Sancho Lyttle expected to miss 4-6 weeks ( Foot ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 9:52:52 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|