| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO WASHINGTON |
|
| 163 | 86 Final 78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | CHICAGO | -175 | 604 | WASHINGTON | +155 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (90-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (144-101 since 1997.) (58.8%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (107-70 since 1997.) (60.5%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (72-21 since 1997.) (77.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more. (77-38 since 1997.) (67%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road win. (56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (31-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +17.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ less free throws than opponent. (21-10 since 1997.) (67.7%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs against opponent after 6 or more consecutive overs. (24-4 since 1997.) (85.7%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (43-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (59-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (72-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (280-272 since 1997.) (50.7%, +83.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (273-112 since 1997.) (70.9%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (274-114 since 1997.) (70.6%, +76.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (256-100 since 1997.) (71.9%, +75.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (267-244 since 1997.) (52.3%, +72.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (147-36 since 1997.) (80.3%, +67.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (183-177 since 1997.) (50.8%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (165-56 since 1997.) (74.7%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (136-44 since 1997.) (75.6%, +58.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (164-65 since 1997.) (71.6%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (158-57 since 1997.) (73.5%, +56.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (142-41 since 1997.) (77.6%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (98-24 since 1997.) (80.3%, +55.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (146-47 since 1997.) (75.6%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (138-48 since 1997.) (74.2%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season. (132-47 since 1997.) (73.7%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (91-23 since 1997.) (79.8%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (77-16 since 1997.) (82.8%, +49.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (68-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (90-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (59-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (136-74 since 1997.) (64.8%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (104-62 since 1997.) (62.7%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +36 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (87-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (68-12 since 1997.) (85%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (83-26 since 1997.) (76.1%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (77-21 since 1997.) (78.6%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (82-51 since 1997.) (61.7%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (56-8 since 1997.) (87.5%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (63-13 since 1997.) (82.9%, +37.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (82-21 since 1997.) (79.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (97-59 since 1997.) (62.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (67-48 since 1997.) (58.3%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (53-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (48-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (47-14 since 1997.) (77%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential) against a terrible team (<=-7 PPG differential), after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (23-2 since 1997.) (92%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (44-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (31-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +25 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (53-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +35.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (59-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games. (21-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (27-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 77 | | 30-71 | 42.8% | 4-11 | 33.7% | 13-16 | 80.3% | 46 | 12 | 12 | WASHINGTON | 78 | | 28-66 | 42.6% | 6-17 | 35.0% | 16-20 | 77.7% | 42 | 9 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 519 times, while CHICAGO won 456 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 94-157 against the money line (-51.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | WASHINGTON is 73-110 against the money line (-48.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 73.4 | WASHINGTON is 8-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 76.4 | WASHINGTON is 27-38 against the money line (-24.6 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 70.7 | WASHINGTON is 68-104 against the money line (-41.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 127-200 against the money line (-75.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 46-92 against the money line (-59.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in home games in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 77.6 | WASHINGTON is 34-101 against the money line (-77.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 74.9 | WASHINGTON is 48-58 against the money line (-27.6 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 81.4 |
|
CHICAGO is 10-20 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 82.3 | CHICAGO is 43-59 against the money line (-28.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.8 | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 82.8 | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 82.0 | CHICAGO is 29-55 against the money line (-34.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 74.6 | CHICAGO is 22-53 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | CHICAGO is 23-43 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 72.6, OPPONENT 79.9 | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 87.6 | CHICAGO is 51-82 against the money line (-52.3 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 29-44 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.2 | WASHINGTON is 57-53 against the money line (+21.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 72.4 | WASHINGTON is 14-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 71.6 | WASHINGTON is 8-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 70.9 | WASHINGTON is 12-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.2, OPPONENT 75.4 | WASHINGTON is 16-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 121-147 against the money line (-59.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 141-210 against the money line (-69.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 191-291 against the money line (-99.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 63-81 against the money line (-32.0 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 70-74 against the money line (-41.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-22 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 64-111 against the money line (-67.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 34-43 against the money line (-32.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 47-58 against the money line (-32.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 57-71 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 91-137 against the money line (-49.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 48-95 against the money line (-36.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 249-375 against the money line (-114.8 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 148-164 against the money line (-67.9 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 171-244 against the money line (-68.1 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-46 against the money line (-29.2 Units) on Wednesday since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 49-83 against the money line (-34.1 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 159-242 against the money line (-91.1 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 111-174 against the money line (-60.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 115-191 against the money line (-76.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 52-89 against the money line (-37.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-51 against the money line (-30.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 60-114 against the money line (-43.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 74-125 against the money line (-45.4 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-50 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 91-164 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-55 against the money line (-30.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 102-183 against the money line (-75.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-31 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 12-33 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 59-116 against the money line (-50.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-36 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 63-116 against the money line (-43.2 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-61 against the money line (-40.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 32-37 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 54-56 against the money line (-29.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-28 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 19-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-241 against the money line (-89.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 79-153 against the money line (-60.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 116-183 against the money line (-71.5 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 120-204 against the money line (-77.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-225 against the money line (-70.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 154-197 against the money line (-58.2 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games on Wednesday since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 71.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 71.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 97-122 against the money line (-45.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-33 against the money line (-20.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 71.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-9 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-13 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-43 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-19 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 74-123 against the money line (-63.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 53-93 against the money line (-51.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 23-29 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 48-77 against the money line (-36.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-47 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-11 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 45-66 against the money line (-37.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-43 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-25 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 47-63 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-45 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-22 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 13-17 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-16 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-16 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-23 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 66-87 against the money line (-38.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 31-42 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-24 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 22-15 | -1.5 | 16-20 | 22-15 | 82.9 | 42.4 | 44.8% | 43.9 | 79.5 | 39.8 | 42.9% | 42.1 | Road Games | 8-10 | -3.2 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 79.6 | 41.8 | 43.7% | 42.9 | 80.6 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 44.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 83.0 | 44.6 | 46.4% | 41.2 | 83.6 | 44.0 | 44.7% | 42.2 | Division Games | 15-10 | -2.8 | 9-15 | 13-12 | 81.9 | 42.2 | 44.8% | 43.8 | 78.7 | 39.8 | 42.3% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.9 | 42.4 | 32-71 | 44.8% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 82.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.6 | 41.8 | 30-70 | 43.7% | 4-12 | 31.2% | 15-18 | 81.0% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.5 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-20 | 76.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.7 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 77.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-18 | -0.7 | 19-18 | 15-22 | 73.8 | 38.5 | 42.0% | 40.3 | 72.2 | 36.6 | 40.8% | 42.6 | Home Games | 11-7 | -0.6 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 74.4 | 37.9 | 41.6% | 41.1 | 71.4 | 35.2 | 40.7% | 41.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 76.2 | 38.2 | 42.0% | 41.4 | 75.2 | 36.6 | 40.8% | 44.0 | Division Games | 11-14 | -6.8 | 12-13 | 11-14 | 72.6 | 37.5 | 41.3% | 41.5 | 72.7 | 36.6 | 40.5% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.8 | 38.5 | 27-64 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.5 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.4 | 37.9 | 26-63 | 41.6% | 6-17 | 36.0% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.2 | 36.6 | 27-66 | 40.8% | 4-13 | 31.7% | 14-17 | 81.9% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.4 | 35.2 | 27-67 | 40.7% | 4-14 | 32.5% | 12-15 | 81.5% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 70.7, WASHINGTON 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-70 | W | -550 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 55 | 16 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 43 | 17 | 5/18/2016 | MINNESOTA | 80-97 | L | +145 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | 5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | L | -200 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | L | +135 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-79 | L | -330 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 50 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 11 | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | W | -120 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/14/2016 | NEW YORK | 76-87 | L | +120 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 40 | 7 | 5/18/2016 | DALLAS | 77-87 | L | -155 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 15 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 12 | 5/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 67-97 | L | +250 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 5/21/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 84-76 | W | +200 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 48 | 20 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 53 | 16 | 5/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 84-82 | W | +170 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | 5/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 77-93 | L | +280 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 6 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 41 | 9 | 6/1/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/14/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 24-16 (+5.9 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 6-3 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 10-10 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 2-2 (+0.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/23/2015 | CHICAGO | 66 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 46 | 10 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | -2.5 | Under | 33 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 47 | 10 | 16 | 8/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 85 | 154 | ATS | 43 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 34 | 4 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 87 | -5.5 | SU Over | 45 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 49 | 15 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 68 | 158 | ATS | 39 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 41 | 10 | 5 | | CHICAGO | 71 | -5.5 | SU Under | 34 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 50 | 9 | 6 | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 57 | 157.5 | Under | 32 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 44 | 9 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 54 | 15 | 8 | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 71 | 154 | Over | 34 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 31 | 4 | 9 | | WASHINGTON | 86 | -1 | SU ATS | 43 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 40 | 9 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Chatman is 19-12 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 43-47 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 73.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 2-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 94-94 against the money line (-27.5 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 20-23 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 52-52 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-36 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 58-65 against the money line (-33.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 4-14 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 70.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 11-14 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-49 against the money line (-29.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 45-57 against the money line (-32.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 29-45 against the money line (-31.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 49-57 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 28-35 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 14-22 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 33-43 against the money line (-30.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 11-21 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 18-32 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 12-23 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 7-18 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-34 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-53 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 13-23 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 6-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-43 against the money line (-32.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 11-18 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 10-22 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 39-49 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-25 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 19-26 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 8-15 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 9-20 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-38 against the money line (-26.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-55 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 34-50 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 71-76 against the money line (-27.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 19-27 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 36-34 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 66-68 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 30-35 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 52-64 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-50 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 173-122 against the money line (+26.8 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 48-31 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 22-16 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 16-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 79.8, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 61-41 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 75.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 58-21 against the money line (+28.7 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 17-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games off a road loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.1, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-11 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 27-9 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 40-19 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 105-84 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 12-7 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 8-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 31-21 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 109-88 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 26 times, while the home underdog won straight up 20 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 06/01/2016 - Natasha Cloud is upgraded to probable Wednesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Intestinal ) | [G] 06/01/2016 - Tierra Ruffin-Pratt injured last game, "?" Wednesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Ankle ) | [F] 05/26/2016 - LaToya Sanders expected to miss Wednesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/6/2024 10:46:54 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|